Sunday, July 7, 2024

CN — LARRY ROMANOFF: 生物战在行动 — 第14章——埃博拉病毒


生物战在行动 —Biological Warfare in Action 



生物战在行动 — Biological Warfare in Action

第14章——埃博拉病毒 — Chapter 14 – EBOLA

By Larry Romanoff




Health care workers wearing full body suits burn infected items at the ELWA Hospital in Monrovia on Aug. 30, 2014. Images Dominique Faget/AFP/Getty

2014年8月30日,在蒙罗维亚的ELWA医院,身穿全身防护服的医护人员焚烧受感染的物品。图片Dominique Faget/法新社/盖蒂


There was also the outbreak of the Ebola virus simultaneously in several African countries in the middle of 2014 that at the time of writing had already killed around 1,000 people. It was surprising to learn that the variety of Ebola that appeared was “an especially powerful mutated strain that had no apparent natural origin and immediately raised questions in many minds of having been engineered.” This caught my attention because the circumstances seemed so familiar – (a) a sudden, inexplicable outbreak of a new, unusual, and deadly disease, (b) in dispersed but focused locations, (c) with nobody searching for the origin, (d) claims that the virus was primarily race-specific, affecting primarily Africans, and (e) the WHO once again in full attendance.



埃博拉病毒起源 — Ebola Origin


Ebola virus was first discovered in 1976 near the Ebola River in what is now the Democratic Republic of Congo. Since then, the virus has been infecting people from time to time, leading to outbreaks in several African countries. Source



In June of 2003, the Wall Street Journal ran an interesting article (1) titled, “Scientists Search For Human Hand Behind Jungle Virus”, stating that “Some scientists are turning their attention to a question asked all too infrequently once deadly viral outbreaks have been contained: Where did that come from?” The article provided a long list of mostly new diseases resulting from (probably) manufactured retroviruses like Ebola, Hanta, HIV, HTLV-I, HTLV-II, Lassa, Mad Cow Disease, Monkey Pox, Nipah, SARS, and West Nile Virus, as well as other curiosities like Gulf War Illness and Lyme disease, asking, “Where did the pathogens originate?”



Several physicians wrote an article titled, “There is no natural disease called Ebola”, in which they noted that while the main focus was on treatment, an increasing number of people were questioning the disease’s true origin, a decreasing number of investigators being convinced of the official story of Ebola evolving from “infected fruit bats”and much skepticism about how Ebola traveled 6,000 kilometers across Africa – from the site of one US bio-weapons lab to another – without causing infections in the intermediate areas. (2) (3These physicians and virologists insist there is no such natural disease, and believe it is a weaponised virus created in a US military bio-lab. (4) (5One media report, for which I have not yet seen documentation, claims the US Department of Defense was funding Ebola trials on humans in the weeks preceding the outbreaks in Guinea and Sierra Leone. No word on precisely which organisation was physically conducting the trials, but the DOD apparently had a $140 million contract with the Canadian pharma company Tekmira to conduct Ebola research that included infusing humans with the Ebola virus. (6) (7)

几位医生写了一篇题为《没有一种自然疾病叫埃博拉》的文章,他们在文章中指出,虽然主要关注的是治疗,但越来越多的人质疑这种疾病的真实起源,越来越少的调查人员相信埃博拉病毒是从感染的果蝙蝠”进化而来的官方说法,并对埃博拉病毒如何穿越非洲6000公里——从一个美国生物武器实验室到另一个——而不在中间地区造成感染表示怀疑。2) (3这些医生和病毒学家坚持认为不存在这种自然疾病,并认为这是一种在美国军方生物实验室中制造的武器化病毒。没有确切的消息表明是哪个组织在实际进行试验,但国防部显然与加拿大制药公司Tekmira签订了一份价值1.4亿美元的合同,负责进行埃博拉研究,包括为人类注射埃博拉病毒。(6) (7)


The “virus” transfers human-to-human by way of contact with an infected person’s bodily fluids. Source



In an article in the UK Guardian, the US Department of Defense was named as a collaborator in a “First in Human Ebola clinical trial” immediately before the Ebola epidemic appeared in West. The article also noted warnings that had been issued by top scientists from both Harvard and Yale Universities that US government funding of such “trials” risked “triggering a worldwide pandemic”. Dr. Broderick said “It is most disturbing that the U.S. government has been operating a viral hemorrhagic fever bioterrorism research laboratory in Sierra Leone. Are there others? Wherever they exist, it is time to terminate them.” And of course, Dr. Broderick is correct in his conclusions. (8) And there are indeed many other such bio-weapons labs around the world, prior US Congressional testimony suggesting these number in the hundreds.

在英国《卫报》的一篇文章中,就在埃博拉疫情在西方出现之前,美国国防部被任命为“人类首次埃博拉临床试验”的合作者。文章还指出,哈佛大学和耶鲁大学的顶尖科学家发出警告,称美国政府资助此类“试验”有“引发全球大流行”的风险。布罗德里克博士说:“最令人不安的是,美国政府一直在塞拉利昂运营一个病毒性出血热生物恐怖主义研究实验室。还有其他实验室吗?无论它们在哪里,都是时候终止它们了。”当然,布罗德里克博士的结论是正确的。8) 世界各地确实还有许多其他此类生物武器实验室,此前美国国会的证词表明,这些实验室的数量有数百个。


世界卫生组织疫苗接种计划 — The WHO Vaccination Programs



I managed to locate some records of the WHO’s vaccination programs for the countries in Africa where this Ebola virus erupted, and was not surprised to learn of the correlation with WHO inoculations since there has been a perfect correlation with other similar incidents to date. (9) (10) (11)Shimatsu noted what he calls “the strange coincidence of the earliest breakout in Guinea with major vaccine campaigns conducted by the WHO and UNICEF. [These involved] a cholera oral vaccine effort by Medicins Sans Frontieres under the WHO, and UNICEF-funded prevention programs against meningitis and polio.

我设法找到了世界卫生组织为埃博拉病毒爆发的非洲国家的疫苗接种计划的一些记录,得知与世界卫生组织疫苗接种的相关性并不感到惊讶,因为迄今为止与其他类似事件有着完美的相关性。(9) (10)(11Shimatsu指出,他所说的“几内亚最早爆发疫情与世界卫生组织和联合国儿童基金会开展的重大疫苗接种活动的奇怪巧合。(这些活动包括)世界卫生组织无国界医生组织的霍乱口服疫苗接种工作,以及联合国儿童卫生组织资助的脑膜炎和脊髓灰质炎预防计划。”。


The reason for suspecting a vaccine campaign rather than an individual carrier is due to the fact that the Ebola contagion did not start at a single geographic center and then spread outward along the roads. Instead, simultaneous outbreaks of multiple cases occurred in widely separated parts of rural Guinea …”. Shimatsu wrote, “How one of the deadliest viral strains in human history could have jumped a distance of 4,000 kilometers undetected from Central to West Africa defies logic.”, and I would certainly have to agree with his assessment.



He notes too that the vaccines were produced by Sanofi Pasteur, a French pharmaceutical controlled by the Rothschilds, and others with funding from the Gates Foundation. For the Gates-funded meningitis vaccine, an earlier UNICEF program with this same vaccine in Chad resulted in dozens of dead children. And in all of this, we seem to have an inclusion of all the usual suspects, namely, the WHO, Doctors without Borders (MSF), UNICEF, Tulane University, the Gates Foundation, USAID, the US-based CDC, Chatham House, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Wellcome Trust, UNAIDS, the US-based NIH, the US military’s Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) from Fort Detrick, and what Shimatsu calls “the rest of the alphabet soup of the hypocritical oafs of pharmaco-witchcraft”USAID has also been implicated in many of these disease outbreaks. He claims that “the herd instinct for self-preservation prevents any honest disclosure” of the facts, and I would have to agree.



It’s also worth noting that MSF itself is nowhere near as angelic as it pretends,being financed by what Shimatsu called “a rogue’s gallery of corporate predators” that include Microsoft (Gates again), Goldman Sachs, AIG, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, BlackRock and Bloomberg. MSF’s chief aim, if I want to be cynical, appears to be that of facilitator under the auspices of the WHO and UNICEF to promote (occasionally illegal and often useless) mass vaccination programs that produce huge profits for the big pharma companies. And MSF has been under clouds of suspicion before.(12)



More than one writer has categorised the WHO’s vaccination programs as a “mafia-style protection racket” where poor nations are bullied into spending unaffordable sums of money on often useless vaccines. One such example was Donald Rumsfeld’s prior pharma employer who marketed Tamiflu with enormous success in many countries, to the extent of billions of dollars in cost, with panels of health experts later declaring that Tamiflu had been “largely ineffective” and the money wasted. The UK did the same, spending many hundreds of millions of pounds on useless vaccines for non-existent epidemics. The same happened with the Ukraine, spending half the country’s foreign currency reserves on flu vaccines that proved to be both useless and unnecessary. There are many such stories. (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)



埃博拉作为生物武器 — Ebola as Bioweapon


With this latest move by the Pentagon to help only foreign workers in Liberia, the message from the United States, intended or not, rings loud and clear: African health-care workers and their patients are not our priority. Source



The theory that Ebola is a bioweapon received some media attention when Liberia’s top newspaper, The Liberian Observer, published a report by plant physiologist Dr. Cyril Broderick, who suggested the virus was a genetically modified organism. (19) (20) (21) He quoted Dr. Leonard Horowitz’s book on emerging viruses, in which Horowitz “confirmed the existence of an American military-medical industry that conducts biological weapons tests under the guise of administering vaccinations to control diseases and improve the health of ‘black Africans overseas’.[The] WHO and several other UN agencies have been implicated in selecting and enticing African countries to participate in the testing events, promoting vaccinations, but pursuing various testing programmes.”

当利比里亚顶级报纸《利比里亚观察家报》发表植物生理学家西里尔·布罗德里克博士的一篇报道时,埃博拉病毒是一种生物武器的理论受到了一些媒体的关注,布罗德里克博士认为埃博拉病毒是转基因生物。(19) (20)(21)他引用了Leonard Horowitz博士关于新出现病毒的书,在书中,Horowitz“证实了美国军事医疗行业的存在,该行业以接种疫苗为幌子进行生物武器测试,以控制疾病并改善‘海外非洲黑人’的健康。世界卫生组织和其他几个联合国机构参与了选择和引诱非洲国家参加测试活动,推广疫苗接种,但开展了各种测试计划。”


American law professor Francis A. Boyle claimed the Ebola virus could have originated from American bio-warfare labs in Africa, and revealed that the US had been using West Africa as an offshore bio-weapons lab to circumvent the Convention on Biological Weapons. (22) (23) According to Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, it was Dr. Boyle who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, the US implementing legislation for the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention. And, according to a map produced by the Center of Disease Controlit does appear the virus victims were located in the same places as the American bio-labs. (24) (25) It is worth noting here that Dr. Boyle is not an easy person to dismiss as a flake or a conspiracy theorist, being a prominent American law professor who was responsible for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act and other Biological Weapons conventions. He is well-versed in the subject of bio-warfare and has written at least one book on the US military’s dramatic (and illegal) bio-weapons programs.

美国法学教授Francis A.Boyle声称埃博拉病毒可能起源于美国在非洲的生物战实验室,并透露美国一直在利用西非作为离岸生物武器实验室,以规避《生物武器公约》。(22)(23)根据Paul Craig Roberts博士的说法,是Boyle博士起草了1989年《生物武器反恐怖主义法》,这是美国实施1972年生物武器公约的立法。而且,根据疾病控制中心制作的地图,病毒受害者似乎与美国生物实验室位于同一地点。(24)(25)这里值得注意的是,博伊尔博士是一位著名的美国法学教授,负责起草《生物武器反恐法》和其他《生物武器公约》,他不是一个容易被视为怪人或阴谋论者的人。他精通生物战,至少写过一本关于美军戏剧性(和非法)生物武器计划的书。


One of the issues is that the US bullies smaller nations into rejecting international bio-weapons treaties for the purpose of using those same non-signatory nations as locations for its secret bio-warfare labs. This “offshoring” is just a clever way to violate the Biological Weapons Conventions that the US has signed while at the same time being entirely outside the purview and supervision of Congress (and the media). Often, even the host nations have no clear idea of what transpires in these so-called “health facilities” the US military establishes inside their own countries, this condition often being maintained by large cash disbursements.



There was another disturbing aspect to this entire Ebola enterprise, that being a report in the New York Times that the Zaire Ebola strain was identified or created many years ago (26) (27), and that the WHO ordered it shipped to the UK’s bio-weapons facility at Porton Down, from where it was sent to the US-based CDC who do similar work. (28) (29) Dr. Boyle speculated this virus was then exported to the US military’s bio-labs in West Africa where development was continued. Yoichi Shimatsu noted correctly that “the simultaneous eruptions [of this virus] in widely-separated zones” suggest it was introduced as part of the US military-funded bio-weapons research program.

整个埃博拉企业还有另一个令人不安的方面,那就是《纽约时报》的一篇报道,称扎伊尔埃博拉毒株是多年前发现或创造的(26)(27),世界卫生组下令将其运送到位于Porton Down的英国生物武器设施,然后将其送往美国疾病预防控制中心,后者也在做类似的工作。岛津洋一(Yoichi Shimatsu)正确地指出,“这种病毒在大范围隔离的地区同时爆发”表明,它是作为美国军方资助的生物武器研究计划的一部分引入的。


In the article mentioned above, Broderick claimed the epidemic was the result of work done by the US Department of Defense, among others. Apparently a great many readers praised his article, expressing their own sympathetic concerns for the large number of unexplained ‘coincidences’ of disease outbreak overlaid with US military experimentation on biological pathogens and the seemingly ever-present WHO and its vaccination programs. The US mainstream media attempted to dismiss his comments as relying on information from so-called ‘conspiracy websites’, but he appears to have had many legitimate references on which to base his comments and accusations, published reports he stated were ‘unambiguous’. Dr. Broderick’s main concern was that diseases such as Ebola and others were designed “for culling the world’s black population”, a claim that would be much easier to refute or dismiss out of hand if not for the US military’s proven experiments in designing precisely such race-specific pathogens. To dismiss this without careful thought would seem to be reckless indeed.


On July 24, 2014, in Sierra Leone, Sister Nancy Yoko, a nurse, speaks with colleagues in the office of the Ebola virus disease -EVD- treatment center at Kenema Government Hospital. Staff at the center are devastated by the loss of six nurses and one doctor who contracted EVD while caring for patients. The few nurses who remain are exhausted, overworked and demoralized. “We are known as the ‘Ebola nurses,’” says Ms. Yoko. “No one wants to come close to us. The nurses in the general ward won’t talk to us. Even our families are scared they will catch the virus from us.” Source



The statements of US bio-weapons labs dotting Africa are not imagination. In the midst of the Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone was privately-owned Tulane University from New Orleans (30) (31) (32), an institution known for conducting bio-weapons research for the US military at USAMRIID. Tulane executives had been boasting of having conducted “the largest and most detailed case [studies] of Ebola patients”, most of whom unfortunately died, and was accused of providing local hospitals with Ebola diagnosis kits that were either useless or fraudulent. (33) (34) In any case, Tulane, the US military, and Doctors without Borders apparently jointly established a hospital at Kenema that provoked local outrage and sent all hospital staff on strike and forcing a government investigation of the nearly 100% death rate. A representative for the group, Dr. Tim Jagatic of Doctors Without Borders, said it was “understandable” that locals believed they would all die if placed in the American hospital: “We created a hospital, and a lot of people [died]. It’s very difficult for them to make a connection that we are here to help”. No kidding. When all the patients die, what is the difference between hospital and no hospital? (35) (36)

美国生物武器实验室散布在非洲的言论并非想象。在塞拉利昂爆发埃博拉疫情期间,新奥尔良私立杜兰大学30)(31)(32是一所以在USAMRIID为美军进行生物武器研究而闻名的机构。杜兰高管一直吹嘘自己对埃博拉患者进行了“最大、最详细的病例[研究]”,其中大多数人不幸死亡,并被指控向当地医院提供无用或欺诈的埃博拉诊断试剂盒。(33)(34)无论如何,杜兰、美国军方和无国界医生组织显然在凯内马联合建立了一家医院,这引起了当地的愤怒,并派遣所有医院工作人员罢工,迫使政府对近100%的死亡率进行调查。该组织的代表、无国界医生组织的Tim Jagatic博士表示,当地人认为如果被安置在美国医院,他们都会死亡,这是“可以理解的”:“我们创建了一家医院,很多人(死亡)。他们很难将我们在这里提供的帮助联系起来”。不开玩笑。当所有的病人都死了,有医院和没有医院有什么区别?(35) (36)


But it wasn’t only the hospital that outraged the locals and caused panic; it was also the fact that the US military was operating a bio-weapons research lab at the same location, with all evidence apparently suggesting a strong connection between that military research lab at Kenema, the Kenema hospital, Tulane’s Ebola research, the Ebola outbreak, and the high death rate. In addition to the closing of the hospital and the ejection of Tulane University, the US military was also forced to shut down its bio-weapons lab in Sierra Leone. The government also ordered the US-based CDC – another bio-weapons-related contractor – to submit all the data from its own labs in Kenema, apparently for a government investigation into this tightly-knit foreign collaboration. Of course the Western media like the Washington Post ignored all of this in their haste to trash anyone who dared contradict the official “Fruit bat – Act of God” theory of origin, dismissing inconvenient truths as “churning out Ebola conspiracy after conspiracy”.



怀疑 — Suspicions




Many nations in Africa, as in South America and Asia, have become increasingly suspicious of US and UN so-called “health” activities within their borders, not forgetting Kissinger’s NSSM paper that said,“The United States economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries.”, and that called for a huge increase in funding for “creating conditions conducive to fertility decline”. They are also aware of the Rumsfeld-Cheney PNAC paper that stated, “Advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes, may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.” (37) (38) (39)

许多非洲国家,如南美和亚洲国家,越来越怀疑美国和联合国在其境内的所谓“健康”活动不要忘记基辛格的NSSM论文,该论文称,“美国经济将需要大量且不断增加的外国矿产,尤其是欠发达国家的矿产。”该论文呼吁大幅增加资金,“创造有利于生育率下降的条件”他们还知道Rumsfeld-Cheney PNAC的论文,论文指出,“可以针对特定基因型的先进形式的生物战,可能会将生物战从恐怖领域转变为政治有用的工具。”(37)(38)(39


To accentuate these, in the aftermath of the Ebola outbreaks, US President Obama announced he would send 3,000 troops to Africa, while Cuba, China and other nations were sending doctors, virologists and medications. The US government and military have been rather cagey about the precise qualifications of the troops being sent to Africa, providing only a nonsensically-vague statement of what appears to be cautionary behavior to protect themselves from infection, the troops receiving vaccinations and “training on medical readiness requirements”. But in fact, the US soldiers being sent to Africa “to fight Ebola” were an elite division of combat troops who have no medical or other training that would be of use to anyone, and Dr. Boyle (as well as many Africans) is convinced they have been sent to establish permanent US military bases on the continent. Africans are naturally asking, “What does Africa need today, troops or doctors?”, with many considering the US effort a “sham” that is simply a prelude to military colonisation of Africa under the pretense of medical security.



The serum cures and vaccinations are being withheld from Africa and utilised for whites only. Source



It has not escaped their notice that, while military personnel are being “shared” generously, the serum cures and vaccinations are being withheld from Africa and utilised for whites only. And of course, the US has a long and irrefutable history of intentionally infecting countless thousands of people in the US itself and in many other nations, including the famous Guatemala and Tuskegee syphilis experiments that continued for 40 years, the mass sterilisations of US citizens including indigenous natives and much of the population of Puerto Rico. West Africans are terrified of international aid programs for fear of another genocide campaign, and no one can blame them for their suspicions. The distrust of foreigners, and of Americans especially, has become so intense in some African locations that foreign clinics and hospitals have been attacked and burned, and some foreign aid workers and medical staff assaulted. It isn’t difficult to understand why. Dr. Broderick went so far as to claim there is sufficient evidence and clearly “the need to pursue criminal and civil redress for damages”, against the US government, Tulane University, the WHO, and at least one pharma company.



The disease was surprisingly hyped in the media. Though Ebola can certainly be lethal, the death rate (kill rate) was nowhere near the publicised ratios and, while 1,000 or more people did die from it in the first year, in the same year there were more than 200 million cases of malaria worldwide, with nearly 500,000 deaths, 90% of these in Africaand mostly children. Yet this rated no attention whatever in the Western media. If 500,000 deaths aren’t sufficient for even a mention, much less a declaration of apocalypse, why would 1,000 deaths qualify? Is it possible that part of this reason is that malaria is treated with simple low-cost medications like quinine, with no opportunity to sell billions of doses of yet another hugely profitable vaccine? The same has been true with many other “epidemic” infections including ZIKA, where very few died, a relative handful suffered birth defects of questionable origin, but where the human toll was insignificant compared to malaria, and yet the world media were flooding the ether with hype and dire prognostications.



Some of AFRICOM’s known permanent and semi-permanent military bases on the African continent, 2019. Source



If the real concern of the WHO or MSF were saving human lives, where is the malaria effort? If Obama really wanted to save the world when he vowed that “We will not stop, we will not relent until we halt this epidemic once and for all”, why wouldn’t he send thousands of troops to Africa to save 500,000 lives from malaria instead of 1,000 from Ebola? It hardly qualifies as a conspiracy theory when observers suggest the US military’s commitment is more about population control and military dominance to ensure access to natural resources than about saving livesIn this context, the US military “commitment” to eradicating Ebola qualifies more as a deprecating insult and bad joke than a humanitarian gesture. Ignore the claims and the media hype, and examine the results. Ignoring malaria makes a significant contribution to population reduction, no doubt warming the cockles of hearts of our well-known Malthusians, while providing a convenient platform for the US militarisation of Africa. Whether or not these are the intentions, they are the result and, in foreign affairs, it is usually an error of simplistic naïveté to assume that obtained results were not those intended.



Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 32 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).


His full archive can be seen at

他的完整档案可以在 +

He can be contacted at:













































This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.



Copyright © Larry Romanoff, Blue Moon of Shanghai, Moon of Shanghai, 2024

版权所有©Larry Romanoff,上海蓝月亮,上海月亮,2024




TO INTERNET ARCHIVE -- Re: An urgent request

Please remove this file from

Step 1: (a) This is the URL that I want excluded from your website: Sincerely, Luisa Vasconcellos




What part will your country play in World War III?

By Larry Romanoff, May 27, 2021

The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)


L.Romanoff´s interview