TRANSLATIONS

Will be accepted with gratitude

in all your native languages.

Please send them to: luisavasconcellos2012@gmail.com

Thursday, October 22, 2020

SP -- LARRY ROMANOFF -- El fraudulento "experimento" del arroz dorado de la Universidad de Tufts en China


 

El fraudulento "experimento" del arroz dorado de la Universidad de Tufts en China

 

Por Larry Romanoff – 17 de septiembre de 2020

 



 

El Departamento de Agricultura de los EE.UU. en colaboración con el ejército de los EE.UU. tomaron la Universidad de Tufts como instrumento con el pretexto de realizar unas inocentes investigaciones sobre salud alimentaria, para llevar a cabo un experimento ilegal, deplorable y fraudulento con armas biológicas sobre niños de origen chino sin su consentimiento. Esto es parte de esa historia.

 

Muchos grupos han experimentado con la tecnología de la manipulación genética, insertando ADN foráneo en diferentes  semillas. Hubo un caso en Canadá, en el que un departamento del gobierno descubrió un gen "anticongelante" contenido en la sangre de los peces que viven en las aguas del Ártico y que les permite sobrevivir en aguas de temperaturas inferiores a cero. Los científicos insertaron este gen en varios cultivos de trigo canadienses, lo que permitió que el trigo soportara temperaturas de congelación sin sufrir daños. En otra ocasión, un laboratorio de investigación americano insertó genes de luciérnagas en plantas de tabaco, produciendo un campo de tabaco que brillaba en la oscuridad. Estos ejemplos pueden parecer inofensivos, pero otros lo son mucho menos.

 

El Departamento de Defensa de los EE.UU. ha invertido enormes sumas en investigación dirigida a insertar genes letales en semillas de cultivos modificados genéticamente, incluyendo la viruela, los virus de la gripe aviar y la gripe porcina, la peste, el SIDA y muchos más. Como arma militar, esta ciencia no tiene precio. ¿Por qué involucrarse en una guerra a tiros cuando Monsanto puede venderles arroz, maíz y soja que contienen viruela y el virus H5N1? Una vez que la semilla es cosechada y pasa al suministro de alimentos de la nación podría, en pocas semanas, exterminar al 50% o más de la población sin haber disparado un solo tiro y sin riesgo para el agresor. He visto documentos militares de los EE.UU. que incluso incluían un gráfico de "coste por muerte", demostrando que las semillas son mucho más baratas y efectivas que las bombas en la búsqueda de la dominación militar. En el informe también se señalaba que

 

"Las armas genéticas también pueden ser dispersadas de muchas maneras utilizando insectos o bacterias infectadas por virus o insertadas en semillas modificadas genéticamente, etc. Estas armas son difíciles de detectar e identificar, y un tratamiento o una vacuna puede tardar años en desarrollarse." (1)


Wednesday, October 21, 2020

EN -- LARRY ROMANOFF -- The US Healthcare System -- October 20, 2020


 The US Healthcare System

 

By LARRY ROMANOFF – October 20, 2020




 

Just as with the quality of US education, most of what you are told about the superiority of the American medical system is just false propaganda and brand marketing. The US spends more than twice as much as any other Western nation on a health care system widely considered to be the most dysfunctional in the developed world and where, in spite of the doubled total costs, much of the population has no access to health care. Many studies have demonstrated that the US has an enormous number of preventable deaths each year solely due to the dysfunctional nature of its health care system. The most credible estimate was a study carried out by Harvard Medical School Professors Himmelstein and Woolhandler in 1997, which concluded that about 100,000 people died in the United States each year because of lack of needed care. (1) (2) (3) And statistics confirm that an additional 50,000 Americans die each year while waiting for critical treatment because they have no insurance. (4) But these numbers, large as they are, are trivial compared to those of the patients who die after being admitted to American hospitals. Read on.

 

 

In the United States today, life expectancy is 50th in the world - just above Albania, and infant mortality 46th in the world - worse than Slovenia, in all cases far below all developed nations and far below China as well. Of 17 high-income countries studied by the National Institutes of Health in 2013, the US had the highest prevalence of infant mortality, heart and lung disease, sexually transmitted infections, adolescent pregnancies, injuries, homicides, and disabilities. Together, these issues place the US at the bottom of the list for life expectancy. (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) In 2000, the World Health Organization (WHO) performed an extensive study of health care systems in about 200 nations. (12) (13) In that study, the US health care system was ranked as the highest in cost, 37th in overall performance, and 72nd by overall level of health. Another study by The Commonwealth Fund ranked the United States by far the lowest in quality of health care among all similar countries, and by far the most expensive. The Health Affairs journal performed a study in 2000, where it found that since 1970 all other nations had gained about six more years of life expectancy than did the US. According to the WHO and The Commonwealth Fund, the US spent more on health care per capita, and more on health care as percentage of its GDP, than any other nation in 2011, but ranked last in the quality of health care.

 

 

The root cause is a Right-Wing political conviction that government need not finance social needs which it claims are better looked after by the private sector, but the real reason is more commercial than ideological - the determination of a few wealthy industrialists to access the massive health care revenue stream. Due to extensive lobbying and virtual control by private-interest groups, the US government has largely abandoned medical services to the private sector, leaving corporations to provide society's social needs on a profit-maximisation basis. There are of course huge conflicts of interest when private corporations driven primarily by profit and self-interest are responsible for the delivery of a fundamental social need. The two major manifestations of this capitalist approach are that (a) much of the medical services field in the US, including hospitals and medical offices, are operated as for-profit businesses rather than being part of the social infrastructure of the nation as they are in Canada and Europe, and (b) the involvement of insurance companies as profiteering middlemen. This is one of the factors exacerbating the nation's increasing income disparity. The insertion of private profiteers into public services serves only to drain wealth from the general public and concentrate it into increasingly fewer hands rather than recycling it through the government and overall population.

 

 

EN -- LARRY ROMANOFF -- Nestlé - Murdering With Milk -- October 19, 2020


  

Nestlé - Murdering With Milk

By LARRY ROMANOFF – October 19,2020


 

 Nestlé is one of the four most-boycotted companies in the world, having been subjected to the longest-running worldwide boycott in history, now nearing 50 years. Let's see why. The production and sale of baby milk powder is one of the largest, probably the most profitable, and unquestionably the most criminal, industries in the world today, generating billions in revenue and profits while indirectly causing millions of infant deaths. Nestlé controls 50% or more of that worldwide market. Here is part of the story:

 

 It is not a secret that mothers' breast milk is universally acknowledged as far superior to artificial powdered milk for babies, being naturally sterile and uncontaminated, and containing all the necessary nutrition while, and very importantly, supplying the baby with multiple antibodies that provide immunity against many childhood illnesses and diseases. It is true that almost all mothers are physically able to breastfeed their babies, and a fact that babies that are breastfed become ill much less often than do babies fed with artificial milk powder. Bottle-feeding with artificial milk has been long proven to present increasing dangers where mothers have poor or no access to necessary sterile facilities. UNICEF and many other health groups have stated that about 1.5 million babies die each year from simple ailments like diarrhea, ailments common in babies drinking artificial powdered milk, but that almost never occur with breast-fed babies. The WHO condemned baby milk companies for discouraging breastfeeding, thereby contributing to infant malnutrition and greatly increasing the vulnerability of babies to infections. One UNICEF report stated flatly that "A bottle-fed child is 25 times more likely to die from diarrhea than a breast-fed child where water is unsafe." The WHO and a number of other international organisations claim that "Over 4,000 babies die every day in poor countries because they're not breastfed. That's not conjecture, it's fact." It is also a fact that in most poor nations, infant mortality is at least three times higher with bottle-fed babies than with those who were breast-fed.


Saturday, October 17, 2020

PT -- LARRY ROMANOFF A Traição dos Judeus à Alemanha e a Causa da Segunda Guerra Mundial



A  Traição dos Judeus à Alemanha e a Causa da Segunda Guerra Mundial

LARRY ROMANOFF – October 14, 2020



A verdadeira origem das duas guerras mundiais constitui uma parte crucial da nossa História moderna, cuja verdade foi excluída de todos os Compêndios de História e substituída pela mitologia da culpa da Alemanha. Este artigo é uma pequena tentativa de corrigir parte desse registo. Excerto da introdução ao artigo A Campanha de Agressividade contra a China  (que deve ser lido como complemento deste artigo):

Não deveria ser segredo, embora ainda pareça ser, que nenhuma das duas guerras mundiais foi iniciada (ou desejada) pela Alemanha, mas foi a criação de um grupo de judeus sionistas europeus com a intenção declarada de destruir totalmente a Alemanha. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]No entanto, essa tese não é o propósito deste ensaio e não vou expandi-la, mas o conteúdo deve provar certamente ao leitor comum que a Primeira Guerra Mundial  se encaixa nesta descrição. O objecivo principal deste ensaio é demonstrar não só que a 'História se repete', mas que a História que se repete hoje, é uma preparação em massa da população do mundo ocidental (mas principalmente dos americanos) para a Terceira Guerra Mundial - que acredito, que agora está prestes a acontecer. 


Por um lado, inclui a deslealdade dos judeus sionistas ao trair a Alemanha - que tinha sido uma nação bastante acolhedora para os judeus - e a conspiração para obter a Palestina em troca dessa traição. Por outro lado, poucas pessoas parecem estar cientes de que os judeus declararam abertamente uma guerra mundial contra a Alemanha, muito antes da Segunda Guerra Mundial, cujas consequências económicas foram bastante graves. A intenção declarada, ao organizar um boicote mundial a todos os bens alemães, era destruir a economia da Alemanha e matar à fome um terço da população alemã - como punição por recusar curvar-se ao ultimato judeu para exonerar Hitler (Chanceler da Alemanha) e reintegrar todos os judeus nos seus antigos cargos no governo. Os judeus não podem escapar à acusação de que foram os responsáveis do ressentimento havido dentro da Alemanha, contra o seu próprio povo.


Cabeçalhos dos jornais de Março de 1938: O Chefe de um jornal de destaque do Reino Unido escreve que a influência judaica pode levar a Grã-Bretanha à guerra contra a Alemanha

Thursday, October 15, 2020

PT -- LARRY ROMANOFF -- Um Olhar Mais Aprofundado sobre a Privatização -- October 10, 2020


 

Um Olhar Mais Aprofundado sobre a Privatização

Por LARRY ROMANOFF – October 10, 2020

ENGLISH  PORTUGUÊS

A privatização é geralmente considerada como a venda da infraestrutura física e social básica de propriedade pública de um país, incluindo aeroportos, ferrovias, geração de eletricidade, portos e assim por diante para empresas privadas, e também incluindo a aquisição da assistência médica e dos sistemas educacionais por empresas privadas com fins lucrativos. Mas, no dicionário dos americanos e de seus amigos banqueiros europeus, a privatização tem um significado ampliado, formando apenas um segmento de um plano geral. Vejamos as partes.

 

A privatização começou, e quase sempre foi executada de mãos dadas com o exército colonial, começando com o do Império Britânico e mais tarde com o dos Estados Unidos. Consistia em uma agressão crua contra as nações mais fracas para permitir que alguns banqueiros europeus e suas empresas multinacionais se apropriassem das cobiçadas riquezas e recursos dessas nações. Escrevi alhures que, no início do século XIX, a United Fruit Company possuía a maior parte da Guatemala, incluindo 70% de todas as terras aráveis, instalações de comunicação, a única ferrovia e o único porto de embarque, e controlava a maioria das exportações do país por meio da propriedade da maioria das grandes corporações. Mesmo assim, o presidente dos Estados Unidos, Coolidge, orquestrou a derrubada do governo da Guatemala quando este se recusou a fazer mais concessões. Esse padrão foi seguido em toda a América Central e do Sul, onde nação após nação viram seus governos substituídos por um ditador brutal financiado pelos EUA, sua infraestrutura roubada, seus recursos saqueados e pilhados, enquanto a população era repetidamente aterrorizada e mantida em abjeta pobreza. No Zaire, os banqueiros e industriais europeus cobiçavam tanto o ouro e os diamantes que usaram a CIA para assassinar outro líder e instalar outro ditador passível de suborno ocidental. As guerras bôeres travadas na África do Sul foram organizadas pelos Rothschilds e outros industriais, usando os militares britânicos para exterminar uma população resistente à colonização e, em seguida, reivindicar os campos de ouro e minas de diamante para si. Todo o lamentável episódio do ópio na China envolveu os judeus Rothschilds, Sassoons e Russells, apoiados pelo poder dos militares britânicos para execução, assim como muitas outras coisas envolvendo a Índia. Pelo menos nos últimos 200 anos, o imperialismo militar produziu enormes lucros e crescimento econômico para os Estados Unidos e incontáveis trilhões em riqueza para um punhado de banqueiros europeus, enquanto mantinha incontáveis nações enterradas na pobreza. Isso foi "privatização" na maior escala que o mundo já viu, envolvendo o roubo em atacado da riqueza e dos recursos das nações mais fracas pela força militar. Duas das farsas mais recentes seguindo esse mesmo padrão são a destruição do Iraque e da Líbia, e pelos mesmos motivos - a 'privatização' dos recursos dessas nações, envolvendo a destruição do país e milhões de mortos, e a "pacificação" da população pelo terrorismo.

Wednesday, October 14, 2020

The Jewish Betrayal of Germany and the Cause of World War II -- October 14, 2020


 

 

The Jewish Betrayal of Germany and the Cause of World War II

 By LARRY ROMANOFF – October 14, 2020

 

The true origins of the two World Wars form a crucial part of our modern history, the truths of which have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology blaming Germany. This article is a minor attempt to set straight part of the record. From the Introduction to the article 'The Anger Campaign Against China' (which should be read as a companion piece to this article):

 

"It shouldn’t be a secret, though it still seems to be, that neither of the two World Wars were started (or desired) by Germany, but were the creation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) The main purpose of this essay is to demonstrate not only that ‘history repeats itself’ but that the history being repeated today is a mass grooming of the Western world’s people (but most especially Americans) in preparation for World War III – which I believe is now imminent."

 

 For one, it involves the treachery of the Zionist Jews in betraying Germany - which had been a rather happy home for the Jews - and scheming to obtain Palestine in trade for that betrayal. For another, few people seem aware that the Jews openly declared a worldwide war on Germany, well before the Second World War, the economic consequences of which were quite severe. The stated intention, by organising a worldwide boycott of all German goods, was to destroy Germany's economy and starve to death one-third of Germany's population - as punishment for refusing to bow to a Jewish ultimatum to fire Hitler (Germany's Chancellor) and to reinstate all Jews to their former government positions. Jews cannot escape the accusation that they themselves were responsible for the resentment within Germany against their own people. 

 

March 1938 Headline: UK Newspaper Boss Writes that Jewish Influence may Drive Britain into War with Germany

The Jewish Declaration of War on Germany -- The Economic Boycott of 1933

 




The Jewish Declaration
Of War On Germany



The Economic Boycott of 1933
Article from The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 41-45.
The Barnes Review, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington D.C. 20003, USA.
By M. Raphael Johnson, Ph.D., assistant editor of TBR;
published here with kind permission from TBR.
This digitalized version © 2002 by The Scriptorium.
1-14-9
 
 
 
 
 
 
Few people know the facts about the singular event that helped spark what ultimately became known as World War II - the international Jewish declaration of war on Germany shortly after Adolf Hitler came to power and well before any official German government sanctions or reprisals against Jews were carried out. The March 24, 1933 issue of The Daily Express of London (shown above) described how Jewish leaders, in combination with powerful international Jewish financial interests, had launched a boycott of Germany for the express purpose of crippling her already precarious economy in the hope of bringing down the new Hitler regime. It was only then that Germany struck back in response. Thus, if truth be told, it was the worldwide Jewish leadership - not the Third Reich - that effectively fired the first shot in the Second World War. Prominent New York attorney Samuel Untermyer (above right) was one of the leading agitators in the war against Germany, describing the Jewish campaign as nothing less than a "holy war."
 
Long before the Hitler government began restricting the rights of the German Jews, the leaders of the worldwide Jewish community formally declared war on the "New Germany" at a time when the U.S. government and even the Jewish leaders in Germany were urging caution in dealing with the new Hitler regime.
 
The war by the international Jewish leadership on Germany not only sparked definite reprisals by the German government but also set the stage for a little-known economic and political alliance between the Hitler government and the leaders of the Zionist movement who hoped that the tension between the Germans and the Jews would lead to massive emigration to Palestine. In short, the result was a tactical alliance between the Nazis and the founders of the modern-day state of Israel - a fact that many today would prefer be forgotten.

ZIONISM -- THE HIDDEN TIRANNY by Benjamin H. Freedman




ALSO IN  PDF

T A B L E  O F  C O N T E N T S

Introduction


Benjamin Freedman and the ”dynamic silence”
Traces of Freedman: New York Times articles 1946-1965
  1. Seven Masters of Deception
  2. Controlling Policies of Mass Media
  3. President Wilson Blackmailed
  4. Justice Brandeis - The Pay Off
  5. Lloyd George - A Zionist Tool
  6. Edward M. House - Conspirator
  7. Selecting America’s Ally in WWI
  8. Promoting Germans Victory and Stabbing Them in the Back
  9. Worldwide Zionist Boycott against Nazi Germany
10. Franklin D. Roosevelt Manipulated
11. US Secretary of Defense Makes Startling Revelation
12. Conspirators Provoke Pearl Harbor Incident
13. A Pressured Eisenhower and Resolution 117
14. Eisenhower Fulfills the Zionist Demands in Middle East
15. John F. Kennedy Pledges Zionists
16. John F. Kennedy Enlightened on the Palestine Question
17. Neville Chamberlain and Ambassador Kennedy Sr.
18. Lyndon B. Johnson and the so-called Six Day War
19. Controlling the US Vote in the United Nations
20. Rothschilds and the Suez Canal
21. Zionist Supervision Necessary to Control Middle East Situation
22. Rothschild Interests and ”Chosen” Asiatic Jews

Additional:
Other material by Freedman
Related books
Timetable


Introduction

Benjamin Harrison Freedman was born in 1890, and became a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry at the end of World War II, 1945. At least 2.5 million dollars was spent by Mr. Freedman to educate people about what he himself called ”the Talmudic tyranny.” Its stronghold was - and is - the United States of America. Mr. Freedman was ”an insider” at the highest levels of Jewish machinations. Freedman became active in politics at an early age and became acquainted with many important people, as Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph and his son John F. Kennedy. He personally interviewed at length seven presidents of the United States.

Although raised as a Jew, the author became disgusted with the chicanery of the Jews, and Judaism, and became an ardent Christian.

Arnold Forster, a high official of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith or ADL, in his 1988 autobiography Square One, called Benjamin Freedman an affluent, apostate, self-hating Jew.

The magazine Commentary (published by the American Jewish Committee) for February, 1955, referred to him as Jewish anti-Semite Benjamin Freedman. This of course was only a way to ”neutralize” him in the eyes of other Jews who were blindly following their leaders.

”This author has been in a position since 1912 to witness what was going on behind the scenes. This author served on the National Democratic Committee in the 1912 campaign that elected President Wilson to his first term. No doors have been closed to this author since then. This author was ushered into this world in 1890 by Dr. Simon Baruch, the father of Mr. Bernard M. Baruch. Mr. Bernard Baruch was a good friend of this author’s family and would very often consult this author on this situation.”
(Benjamin Freedman, from an extracted paragraph of this pamphlet)



Jewish Responsibility for Both World Wars: A Speech by Benjamin Freedman


 

Jewish Responsibility for Both World Wars: 


A Speech by Benjamin Freedman



(Introduction by Larry Romanoff)

 

By LARRY ROMANOFF – October 14, 2020

 

 

Introduction

 

 

Benjamin Harrison Freedman was born in 1890, and became a successful New York City businessman, at one time being the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. Mr. Freedman is Jewish. However, Mr. Freedman is not only a Jew, but was a highly-placed official in the US government and was present during many of the historical events he describes. He was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected. Mr. Freedman was very much an insider at the highest levels of Jewish machinations, and his descriptions of events do have a ring of truth to them.

 

 

Freedman became active in politics at an early age and was well acquainted with many important people, such as Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermeyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy and his son John F. Kennedy. He knew well all US presidents from Woodrow Wilson on up to President Richard Nixon, and for his articles he personally interviewed seven US presidents at length. 

 

 

Freedman broke with organised Jewry at the end of World War II, 1945. At least 2.5 million dollars was spent by Mr. Friedman to educate people about what he himself called "The Talmudic Tyranny", the stronghold of which, according to him, was - and is - the United States of America.

 

 

I have not done exhaustive research on all the items covered in this historical speech, but from what I have done, it appears all of Mr. Freedman's claims are independently verifiable. It would seem the entire world needs to readjust its perception of Israel and the Jews, including not only the parts they played in two World Wars but also the pervasiveness of the Jewish lobby today.

 

 

This is the text of a speech made by Benjamin H. Freedman in the Willard Hotel in 1961 on behalf of Conde Mcginley's newspaper, Common Sense. There is another slightly more complete version of Freedman's speech that includes questions and answers, as well as the actual audio of the speech. It can be accessed here:

 

 

 

Mr. Friedman's Speech

 

 

Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.

 

Tuesday, October 13, 2020

SP -- LARRY ROMANOFF -- La Patología de la Competencia Americana -- September 24, 2020


          La Patología de la Competencia Americana

Por LARRY ROMANOFF– 24 de Septiembre, 2020

 


"Que el mercado decida" realiza hoy la misma tarea que "Que el rey, la Iglesia o Dios decida" hizo en el pasado.

Los ricos y los poderosos a menudo consiguen lo que quieren haciendo creer a la gente que un poder o una institución superior lo necesita.

Richard D. Wolff


La teoría de los libros de texto sobre economía nos dice que la competencia proporcionará mayores beneficios sociales, pero es lamentablemente escasa en pruebas que justifiquen tal afirmación. El único lugar donde la competencia podría tener valor social es en el caso de un monopolio, donde la empresa dominante abusa de su posición para cobrar precios inflados y ofrecer un servicio deficiente, razón por la cual se desalienta a los monopolios y por la que los gobiernos tienden a disolverlos; los fragmentos resultantes no tienen el mismo poder para abusar de la población. Pero esto no tiene nada que ver con la "competencia" en ningún sentido significativo de la palabra, sino que se relaciona con la tendencia natural de la codicia de los ejecutivos de las empresas a acercarse al infinito a medida que la regulación se acerca a cero. He perdido la fuente de esta cita, pero su contenido es importante:

"Los monopolios o cuasi-monopolios creados por las fusiones y adquisiciones son eficaces sobre todo para exponer al público a los peores excesos del capitalismo, excesos que no han cambiado mucho en los últimos 100 años. En 1911, hablando ante un Comité del Senado, el juez de la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos, Louis Brandeis, dijo que las corporaciones americanas lograron prosperar sólo por sus sucias tácticas, y por fijar ilegalmente los precios y comprar o destruir a los competidores. Dijo que con un campo de juego equilibrado, "esos monstruos se derrumbarían". 

La interpretación más común del término "competitivo" es que los productos o servicios sean más o menos equivalentes en términos de precio y valor. Esta filosofía de la competencia supone que cierta cantidad de presión o dificultad nos obligará a crecer y quizás a hacerlo mejor. Si tenemos clientes exigentes, podemos esforzarnos por cumplir sus expectativas mejorando nuestro servicio a un nivel que de otra manera no hubiéramos ofrecido. Si tenemos dos mercados de verduras muy cercanos, los clientes frecuentarán el que consideren más atractivo o que ofrezca la mejor calidad o servicio. En esa medida, se mantienen honestos el uno con el otro y la perspectiva de perder clientes puede servir para mejorar el servicio o mantener precios razonables. Sin embargo, en todas las ciudades de todos los países hay muchas tiendas que ofrecen productos similares o idénticos, pero el servicio y los precios tienden a ser medios. China tiene más de 50 millones de empresas. Si eso no es suficiente competencia, no sé qué sería, pero con toda esta llamada competencia, ¿qué tenemos? Altos precios y un pésimo servicio, así que ¿dónde están los beneficios para los consumidores? La respuesta simple es: no hay ninguno, y la teoría económica de los beneficios de la competencia es un mito de los libros de texto. Pero en cierto sentido, esto es algo menor y no es en absoluto lo que los americanos quieren decir cuando hablan de la competencia, que sólo se relaciona con el logro de la dominación del mercado y la destrucción de otros proveedores en el mercado.