上海的月亮: CN — LARRY ROMANOFF — 查理•柯克的故事 — 为什么阴谋论会兴起 — The Charlie Kirk Story

译者：珍珠

CHINESE ENGLISH

In Chapter Two of my earlier E-book titled “False Flags and Conspiracy Theories” [1], I wrote the following two paragraphs:

在我之前出版的电子书《假旗与阴谋论》[1]的第二章中，我写下了以下两段文字：

“Conspiracy theory” is the name given to public perceptions or beliefs that differ from the official (usually government) story about an event, and where a significant portion of the public believes the government is hiding some or all of the truth. Conspiracy theories generally arise when justified, which means when the official story isn’t supported by the facts and is often riddled with inconsistencies; where the presented facts range from implausible to impossible; when the story repeatedly changes; where the logic is flawed and the pieces just don’t fit together. So, when the facts don’t add up, when the story doesn’t make sense, we believe we are being lied to yet again. And we probably are.

“阴谋论”是指公众对某一事件的看法或信念与官方（通常是政府）的说法不同，且相当一部分公众认为政府隐瞒了部分或全部真相。阴谋论通常在有合理依据时出现，即官方说法得不到事实支持，且往往充满矛盾；所呈现的事实从难以置信到完全不可能；故事情节反复变化；逻辑有缺陷，各部分内容无法自圆其说。因此，当事实无法自圆其说，当故事没有意义时，我们就会认为我们再次被欺骗了。而事实可能确实如此。

The label of ‘conspiracy theory’ originated decades ago as part of a deliberate plan to discredit members of the public who questioned the official version of events, those who made public their suspicions of government criminal activity. The plan was to solicit the assistance of the major media to apply the label of ‘conspiracy theorist’ to these individuals as a way to silence them and discourage rational attention to their claims. The process was both decidedly nasty and effective, since the public media attacks strongly suggested these individuals were mentally unbalanced and delusional, the deprecating public attention often being sufficient to ruin a reputation and destroy a career. Today, the expression is often used as a way to dismiss someone as a fool whose ideas are unworthy of attention but, as Mike Adams wrote, “It’s a tactic frequently used by modern-day thought police in a desperate attempt to demand ‘Don’t go there!’”.

“阴谋论”这一标签起源于几十年前，当时有人精心策划，旨在抹黑那些质疑官方事件版本、公开怀疑政府犯罪活动的公众人士。该计划旨在寻求主流媒体的协助，给这些人贴上“阴谋论者”的标签，以此压制他们的声音，并阻止人们理性地关注他们的主张。这一过程既卑鄙又有效，因为公共媒体的攻击强烈暗示这些人精神失常、妄想，而公众的负面关注往往足以毁掉一个人的声誉和职业生涯。如今，这一说法常被用来贬低某人，称其愚昧无知，思想不值得关注，但正如迈克·亚当斯所写，“这是当今思想警察经常使用的一种策略，他们迫切地想要告诫人们‘不要去那里！’”。

The story of Charlie Kirk’s assassination qualifies on all counts, both as a story where the “official version” makes no sense, and as a prime candidate for yet another (well-deserved) “conspiracy theory”. Let’s perform a brief examination of the story as presented in the media.

查理·柯克斯（Charlie Kirk）遇刺的故事完全符合这些条件，既是一个“官方版本”毫无道理的故事，也是另一个（当之无愧的）“阴谋论”的主要候选故事。让我们对媒体报道的这一故事进行简要分析。

Charlie Kirk was giving a public speech in a Utah college courtyard when a single shot rang out, apparently from a nearby rooftop. Kirk was apparently shot in the neck, and slumped over, dead. There was little to no security at the event. [2][3] According to authorities, a video recording from a 24/7 CCTV camera showed the suspect moving onto the campus, through stairwells, up to a roof and across the roof to the shooting location. After the shot, the person moved to the other side of the building, jumped off the building and fled the campus. Authorities claimed to have recovered from a nearby wooded area a high-powered 30-06 rifle that which they presented as the murder weapon. The rifle was apparently wrapped in a towel. Bullet casings claimed to have been found at the scene of the shooting were engraved with messages.

查理·柯克（Charlie Kirk）在犹他州一所大学的校园里发表公开演讲时，一声枪响突然响起，显然是从附近的一座屋顶上传来的。柯克颈部中枪，随即倒地身亡。此次活动几乎没有任何安保措施。[2][3]据当局称，24小时闭路电视监控摄像头拍摄的视频显示，嫌疑人进入校园，穿过楼梯间，登上屋顶，并穿过屋顶来到枪击地点。枪击发生后，该人转移到建筑物的另一侧，跳下建筑物逃离校园。当局声称，在附近的一片树林里发现了一支高倍率30-06步枪，他们认为这是凶器。这支步枪显然被一条毛巾包裹着。据称在枪击现场发现的弹壳上刻有信息。

Rather soon after the shooting, the apparent perpetrator went onto the social media platform Discord, and made a full confession, not only admitting to the murder but offering details of the planning, execution and escape.The Washington Post[4] and many other mass media reported this. CBS News[5], The UK Independent [6] and others, offered varying information, the secondary websites offering more detail. PolitiFact (affiliated with the Poynter Institute) offered a typically fraudulent “debunking” of false claims they themselves made, just to help smoke up the room. For those readers who don’t know, both PolitiFact and Poynter are Jewish institutions specialising in misinformation and worse. I covered this in one Chapter of an earlier E-book: Propaganda and the Media – Part 7 — Fact-Checking. If you read this, it will open your eyes.[7]

枪击事件发生后不久，这名明显的肇事者就登上了社交媒体平台Discord，并做出了全面供述，不仅承认了谋杀，还提供了策划、执行和逃跑的细节。《华盛顿邮报》[4]和许多其他大众媒体都对此进行了报道。哥伦比亚广播公司新闻[5]、《英国独立报》[6]等媒体提供了不同的信息，而二级网站则提供了更多细节。PolitiFact（隶属于波因特研究所）对他们自己提出的虚假主张进行了典型的欺诈性“揭穿”，只是为了帮助混淆视听。对于那些不了解情况的读者，PolitiFact和波因特都是专门从事虚假信息甚至更恶劣行为的犹太机构。我在早前的一本电子书《宣传与媒体——第7部分——事实核查》的一个章节中对此进行了介绍。如果你阅读了这本书，它会让你大开眼界 [7]

这些矛盾之处，有许多 — The Inconsistencies. Of these, there are many

屋顶场景 — The Rooftop Scene

The roof from where Tyler Robinson is supposed to have shot Charlie Kirk, positioned at the yellow arrow. Source:

据推测，泰勒·罗宾逊（Tyler Robinson）就是从屋顶上向查理·柯克（Charlie Kirk）开枪的，位置在黄色箭头所指处。来源：

Above is a screenshot of the roof from where the fatal shot was apparently fired. As noted above, according to authorities, a video recording from a 24/7 CCTV camera showed the suspect moving onto the campus, through stairwells, up to a roof and across the roof to the shooting location. After the shot, the person moved to the other side of the building, jumped off the building and fled the campus.

上图是屋顶的截图，致命的一枪似乎就是从这里射出的。如上所述，据当局称，24小时闭路电视监控摄像头拍摄的视频显示，嫌疑人进入校园，穿过楼梯间，来到屋顶，并穿过屋顶到达枪击地点。开枪后，该人转移到建筑物的另一侧，跳下建筑物逃离校园。

But where is that video? The version released showed only an individual moving on the roof of the building after the shooting, hardly evidence of a crime. The entire first portion of this supposed video would have recorded in detail the actual preparation and shooting, but the authorities edited it to begin only with the supposed “escape”. Why would they do that? Because the video doesn’t show what they claim. If such a video did actually exist, it would have been released. There is nothing to show a man taking a shot, nor even clutching a rifle. The only possibility is that the claim was fabricated in entirety.

但是那段视频在哪里呢？发布的版本只显示了一个人在枪击事件后在大楼屋顶上移动，几乎不能作为犯罪证据。这段所谓的视频的整个第一部分本应详细记录实际的准备和枪击过程，但当局却将其编辑为仅从所谓的“逃跑”开始。他们为什么要这样做？因为视频并没有展示他们所声称的内容。如果真的有这样的视频，它早就被公布了。视频中没有任何内容显示一个人开枪，甚至也没有显示他手持步枪。唯一的可能性是，这一说法完全是编造的。

When reading this portion, I couldn’t help thinking of the 9-11 aircraft that supposedly crashed into the Pentagon. According to media reports, there were 85 CCTV cameras in the vicinity, all of which would have captured the supposed crash. But the FBI seized all of them and refused to release them on the basis that “they don’t show anything”.[8] So, an airliner crashes into the Pentagon while being filmed by 85 video cameras, but none of those recordings show anything. Why would you believe a story like that? This one is the same. “We have the video of the shooter taking position and firing the shot, but we won’t release it. We will show only an individual leaving the rooftop”. Why would you believe a story like this?

读到这一部分时，我不禁想到了据称撞入五角大楼的9·11航班。据媒体报道，附近有85个闭路电视摄像头，它们本应捕捉到所谓的坠机事件。但联邦调查局没收了所有摄像头，并以“它们什么都没拍到”为由拒绝公布。[8]所以，一架客机撞入五角大楼时，有85个摄像头在拍摄，但这些录像都没有拍到任何东西。你会相信这样的故事吗？这件事也一样。“我们有枪手就位并开枪的视频，但我们不会公布。我们只会展示一个人离开屋顶的画面。”你会相信这样的故事吗？

But in fact, the videos do show something that the media seem to have ignored:“The strange reactions of people standing behind Kirk are striking: videos show some making gestures and reacting quickly even before the gunshot.”[8a] There is no easy way to explain this reaction if the shooter is on a rooftop 150 meters distant. These “gestures and reactions” would make sense only if the actual shooter were on or near the stage, within easy sight of the others. There have been reports that Kirk was not shot with a rifle but with what was called a “palm pistol”, a derringer or similar small-caliber handgun, easily concealed and effective only at close range. This theory does fit all the known facts.

但事实上，这些视频确实展示了一些媒体似乎忽略了的细节：“站在柯克身后的那些人的奇怪反应令人震惊：视频显示，有些人在枪响之前就做出了手势并迅速做出了反应。”[8a]如果枪手在150米外的屋顶上，这种反应就很难解释。这些“手势和反应”只有在真正的枪手就在舞台上或附近，且其他人很容易看到的情况下，才讲得通。有报道称，柯克不是被步枪击中的，而是被所谓的“掌心枪”、德林加手枪或类似的小口径手枪击中的，这种枪很容易隐藏，且只在近距离有效。这一理论确实符合所有已知事实

To justify more cynicism of the official story is the important fact that the man seen leaving (or running from) the rooftop was not holding a rifle. That could mean only one thing: he had left the rifle on the rooftop before escaping. But then, how was he going to “wrap the rifle in a towel” and hide it in the woods, if he didn’t take it with him on his escape? And he clearly did not have the rifle with him when he left the rooftop, so how did the authorities find it in the woods, and how could they attribute it to him?

有充分理由对官方说法持更为怀疑的态度，因为一个重要的事实是，被看到离开（或逃离）屋顶的那个人手中并没有拿着步枪。这只能说明一件事：他在逃离前把步枪留在了屋顶上。但是，如果他在逃离时没有带走步枪，那么他如何“用毛巾把步枪包起来”并藏在树林里呢？而且，他离开屋顶时显然没有带着步枪，那么当局是如何在树林里找到它的，又是如何确定这把步枪是他的呢？

凶器 — The Murder Weapon

The official narrative is that Charlie Kirk was killed by a shot from a 30-06 rifle, the bullet hitting him in the neck and lodging there without exiting. The explanation was that Kirk’s neck bones were in such magnificent condition that they stopped the bullet. This would have to rank as one of the biggest lies ever told.

官方说法是，查理·柯克是被一支30-06步枪射出的子弹击中颈部而死亡，子弹射入颈部后并未退出。解释是，柯克的颈部骨骼状况极佳，以至于挡住了子弹。这无疑是史上最大的谎言之一。

A 30-06 is a very high-powered rifle. Hunters and shooters have unanimously stated that a 30-06 bullet will pass clean through the trunk of a pine tree 14 or 15 inches (35-40 cm.) in diameter. It will drop a large moose or grizzly bear dead in its tracks, and will penetrate steel armor. I can personally testify that a 30-06 bullet will pass easily through several centimeters (much more than half an inch) of solid steel, leaving only a clean hole. To claim that a man’s neck bones stopped such a projectile in its tracks, is too ridiculous to bother refuting. The only way such a thing could occur would be if Kirk had been shot from a great distance, perhaps 2 kilometers, when the bullet had expended all its energy and retained only enough power to penetrate soft flesh. But Kirk was apparently shot from approximately 150 meters. At that distance, a hard-point bullet would have penetrated anything and everything in its path, and a soft-point bullet would have left an exit hole at least the size of a teacup, if not a cereal bowl. In real life, a shot in the neck from close range with a 30-06 would quite possibly have blown the man’s head clean off. It would also have left an enormous spray of blood everywhere. I don’t know what weapon was used to shoot Charlie Kirk, but I can tell you that it wasn’t a 30-06.

30-06是一种火力非常强大的步枪。猎人和射击爱好者一致表示，30-06子弹可以轻松穿透直径14或15英寸（35-40厘米）的松树树干。它能让一头大驼鹿或灰熊当场毙命，甚至能穿透钢铁装甲。我本人可以证明，30-06子弹可以轻松穿透数厘米（远超半英寸）厚的实心钢，只留下一个干净的弹孔。声称人的颈椎骨能阻挡这种弹丸的行进，简直荒谬到不值一驳。这种情况发生的唯一可能，就是柯克被从很远的地方射中，也许是2公里远，此时子弹已经耗尽所有能量，仅剩的威力只够穿透柔软的肉体。但柯克显然是被从大约150米远的地方射中的。在那种距离下，硬质弹头可以穿透一切障碍，而软质弹头留下的弹孔，即使没有麦片碗那么大，至少也有茶杯那么大。在现实生活中，用30-06近距离射中人的颈部，很可能会把人的头整个炸飞。同时还会四处溅起大片血迹。我不知道是什么武器射中了查理·柯克，但我可以告诉你，绝不是30-06。

One physician said, “I’m a surgeon and I have seen what bullets do. The ones from high-powered rifles don’t politely stop because someone drinks their milk. The idea that Charlie’s skeleton magically turned into Captain America’s shield is pure fiction.”

一位医生说道：“我是一名外科医生，我见识过子弹的威力。高倍率步枪射出的子弹可不会因为有人喝了牛奶就乖乖停下来。那种认为查理的骨架能神奇地变成美国队长的盾牌的想法，纯属虚构。”

多重套管 — The Multiple Casings

The official story claims the perpetrator fired one shot, then fled the scene. Well then, what was the origin of the multiple bullets and spent casings found at the scene, with messages either written or engraved? A “casing” is an already-fired cartridge, merely the brass tube into which the projectile and gunpowder are inserted. But we are told that only one shot was fired, so how could all these other “multiple casings” exist? Are we to believe the shooter brought with him already-fired bullets and sprinkled them around the crime scene before escaping? You know that doesn’t make any sense. The only answer that does make sense is that the casing story was fabricated to help lend credibility to the story.

官方说法称，凶手开了一枪后逃离了现场。那么，现场发现的那些多枚子弹和弹壳，以及上面写有或刻有的信息，又是从何而来呢？“弹壳”是指已经发射过的弹药筒，仅仅是装入弹丸和火药的黄铜管。但我们被告知只开了一枪，那么这些其他的“多枚弹壳”又是如何存在的呢？难道我们要相信凶手带着已经发射过的子弹，在逃离现场前将它们散落在犯罪现场吗？你知道，这根本说不通。唯一合理的解释是，弹壳的故事是编造的，目的是为了增加故事的可信度。

忏悔 — The Confession

Put yourself in this position: You have just shot and killed a well-known politician. Among your first acts after the murder is to go on your social media account, make a public post not only confessing to the murder you have just committed, but listing most of the small details of your planning, execution, and escape. Would you do that? Not likely. Even worse, the alleged perpetrator of this crime detailed in his post how he planned to dispose of the rifle so it could never be found, and thus leave nothing to connect him to the crime. Of course, the only flaw in this plan is that he posted these details on social media so that the entire world would know there was nothing to connect him to the murder he had just committed. Why does this make sense to you?

设身处地地想一想：你刚刚枪杀了一位知名政客。谋杀发生后，你的第一个举动是登上你的社交媒体账户，发布一条公开帖子，不仅承认了你刚刚犯下的谋杀罪，还列出了你策划、执行和逃跑的大部分细节。你会这么做吗？不太可能。更糟糕的是，这起罪行的被指控肇事者在帖子中详细描述了他计划如何处理那杆步枪，使其永远无法被找到，从而留下任何与他犯下的罪行有关的线索。当然，这个计划唯一的缺陷是，他在社交媒体上发布了这些细节，以至于全世界都知道没有任何东西能将他与刚刚犯下的谋杀案联系起来。为什么你觉得这合情合理？

But there was much more. RT produced this list where the alleged shooter:但还有更多信息。RT（俄罗斯电视台）列出了以下与枪手有关的人员：

Confessed to the crime — 承认犯罪

Confirmed his motive for the murder — 确认了他的杀人动机

Confirmed the length of time in planning the murder — 确认了策划谋杀的时间长度

Confirmed the type of weapon — 确认了武器类型

Confirmed the weapon’s current hidden location, and that it was wrapped in a towel — 确认了武器当前的隐藏位置，并得知它被包裹在一条毛巾里

Admitted to engraving slogans on the bullets — 被允许在子弹上刻上标语

As RT also pointed out, much of the phraseology used in these posts resembles professional terminology extremely unlikely to be used by a 22-year-old kid. Terms referring to “the swept area” and “drop point”, lead us almost inevitably to someone fabricating circumstantial evidence to convince the gullible public of their story. And let’s not forget there are many documented instances of individuals or intelligence agencies hacking into someone’s social media account to post whatever they want.

正如RT所指出的，这些帖子中使用的许多措辞类似于专业术语，而这些术语极不可能被一个22岁的孩子使用。提到“扫荡区”和“投放点”的术语，几乎不可避免地让我们想到有人捏造间接证据，以说服轻信的公众相信他们的故事。而且，我们不要忘记，有许多记录在案的案例表明，个人或情报机构会侵入某人的社交媒体账户，发布他们想发布的任何内容。

Some websites that listed details of the “confession”: The Hill[9], LA Times[10], Patriot.com[11], Washington Post[12], CBS News[13], UK Independent[14].

一些列出了“认罪”细节的网站包括：The Hill [9]、《洛杉矶时报》[10]、Patriot.com [11]、《华盛顿邮报》[12]、CBS新闻[13]、英国《独立报》[14]。

犯罪现场 — The Crime Scene

As we all know from watching TV, when a crime is suspected, the local police generally cordon off the area with yellow tape that prohibits entry to the area. But in this case – an assassination, no less – nothing of the kind was done. The police and FBI appeared oblivious to the fact that a murder was a crime and that the location needed to be maintained in sterile condition pending a full investigation. Further to this, as RT reported, “Not just was the site not cordoned off, but a man was filmed taking down the camera that had been mounted right behind Kirk … He is subsequently seen placing the camera on a table, looking around furtively, and then removing the SD card.” Tampering with a crime scene is normally a felony, but apparently not in this case. We will never know what happened to the video recording from that camera, but we can legitimately ask why it was removed – as if under earlier instruction. More than this, a few days after the shooting, the entire area was ripped up and reconstructed, preventing any examination of the crime scene. No explanation was given for this.

众所周知，从电视上我们可以看到，当怀疑发生犯罪时，当地警方通常会用黄色警戒带封锁现场，禁止任何人进入。但在这起案件中——竟然是一起暗杀事件——却没有任何此类措施。警方和联邦调查局似乎完全无视谋杀是一种犯罪行为，以及在全面调查之前需要保持现场无污染状态的事实。此外，据今日俄罗斯（RT）报道，“现场不仅没有被封锁，甚至还有一名男子被拍到取下了安装在柯克（Kirk）正后方的摄像头……随后，这名男子被看到将摄像头放在桌子上，鬼鬼祟祟地四处张望，然后取出了SD卡。”篡改犯罪现场通常属于重罪，但显然在这起案件中并非如此。我们永远也无法知道那台摄像机的录像发生了什么，但我们有理由问，为什么它会被取走——仿佛是事先得到了指示。不仅如此，枪击案发生几天后，整个区域被拆除并重建，导致无法对犯罪现场进行任何检查。对此没有任何解释

Pravda suggested: “This clearly suggests that the FBI appears to have botched the investigation and hastily concocted charges under pressure from the White House.” I disagree. Neither the local police nor the FBI are so incompetent as to completely botch a murder investigation. They were doing what they were told to do, the main result being the destruction or loss of most of the actual evidence, and a fabrication of the remainder. There is no way any of this was an accident or caused by incompetence or error.

《真理报》指出：“这显然表明，联邦调查局（FBI）似乎搞砸了调查，并在白宫的压力下仓促炮制了指控。”我不同意这一观点。无论是当地警方还是联邦调查局，都不至于无能到完全搞砸一起谋杀案调查的程度。他们只是在执行被吩咐的任务，主要后果是大部分实际证据被销毁或丢失，而剩余的证据则被捏造。这一切绝非偶然，也绝非无能或失误所致。

奇怪的飞机 — The Strange Airplane

Source 来源

This part appears to fall into the “conspiracy theory” category, but I have not researched this and haven’t the expertise to comment so I will merely record what has been reported. There are afficionados who track aircraft flights (and ownership) as an avocation. Their reports are generally a chronicle of facts, and not usually suspect. In this case, we have something that is definitely suspicious but may or may not be related to Kirk’s assassination. The information comes primarily from FlightRadarand the FAA Aircraft Registry. The stated facts are that, almost immediately after Kirk’s shooting, a private jet aircraft took off from an airport very near the campus where Kirk was shot. This aircraft, a 2013 Bombardier Challenger 300, FAA identification number N888KG, was registered to N888KG LLC, based in Lehi, Utah. It is owned by Derek Maxfield, a Jew and a wealthy donor to the Chabad Lubavitch of Utah. The reports state that this aircraft filed no flight plan, and had its transponder turned off. This is violently illegal, and is something that only the military or intelligence services can do – or by an influential individual with the cooperation and approval of the intelligence services.

这部分内容似乎属于“阴谋论”范畴，但我没有对此进行过研究，也没有相关专业知识来发表评论，因此我将仅记录已报道的内容。有一些爱好者以追踪飞机航班（及所有权）为业余爱好。他们的报告通常都是事实的编年史，通常不会引起怀疑。然而，就本案而言，我们掌握了一些绝对可疑的信息，但这些信息是否与柯克（Kirk）的暗杀事件有关尚不可知。这些信息主要来自FlightRadar和美国联邦航空局（FAA）的飞机登记册。据报道，在柯克遭枪击后不久，一架私人飞机从距离柯克被枪击校园非常近的一个机场起飞。这架飞机是一架2013年出厂的庞巴迪挑战者300型飞机，美国联邦航空局识别号为N888KG，注册于犹他州莱希的N888KG有限责任公司。该飞机由德里克·马克斯菲尔德（Derek Maxfield）所有，他是一名犹太人，也是犹他州恰巴德·卢巴维奇（Chabad Lubavitch）的富有的捐赠者。报告指出，这架飞机没有提交飞行计划，且其应答机处于关闭状态。这是严重违法的行为，只有军方或情报机构才能做到这一点，或者由有影响力的个人在情报机构的合作和批准下才能做到。

哈扎尔犹太人消灭了查理·柯克吗？ — Did the Khazar Jews Eliminate Charlie Kirk?

We are now fully into speculation, and perhaps a conspiracy environment as well, but a few facts bear listing and deserve pondering. Foremost among these is that Charlie Kirk was well-known to influential Jews and Jewish groups in the US, as well as by Benjamin Netanyahu, and there is evidence Kirk was being groomed as a potential US (Jewish) presidential candidate, but one who was suddenly (and resentfully) going astray.

我们现在完全陷入了猜测，或许还处于一种阴谋论的氛围之中，但有几个事实值得列出并深思。其中最重要的是，查理·柯克（Charlie Kirk）在美国颇具影响力的犹太人和犹太团体中，以及在本雅明·内塔尼亚胡（Benjamin Netanyahu）眼中都很有名气，有证据表明，柯克曾被培养为潜在的美国（犹太人）总统候选人，但他却突然（且愤愤不平地）走上了歧途。

I will summarise as best I can. Charlie Kirk was the leader of an organisation named Turning Point USA, which was America’s largest conservative youth association. This organisation was heavily supported and funded by Jews, with Kirk being considered a celebrity among them. In the early days of this organisation, Kirk was instrumental in promoting many of the programs or attitudes the Jews wanted propagated in the US. And he was gaining a very high public profile, with his name already being promoted (by Jews) as a presidential candidate in the next US election. And indeed, many observers have noted that Kirk’s public appearances seemed a duplicate of Donald Trump’s campaign rallies. All was going well until Kirk appeared to have a change of heart and became increasingly critical of both the Jews and Israel.

我将尽我所能进行总结。查理·柯克（Charlie Kirk）是一个名为“美国转折点”（Turning Point USA）的组织的领导者，该组织是美国最大的保守派青年协会。该组织得到了犹太人的大力支持和资助，柯克在犹太人中颇有名气。在该组织成立初期，柯克在推动犹太人希望在美国传播的许多项目或态度方面发挥了重要作用。他的公众形象日益提升，他的名字（被犹太人）宣传为下一届美国大选的总统候选人。事实上，许多观察人士注意到，柯克的公开露面似乎与唐纳德·特朗普的竞选集会如出一辙。一切进展顺利，直到柯克似乎改变了心意，对犹太人和以色列的批评日益增多。

Max Blumenthal and Chris Hedges covered this background on Kirk, and on his political development, in an article I strongly urge you to read. [15] Also, Max Blumenthal did an excellent work in an article published in The Grayzone titled, “Charlie Kirk refused Netanyahu funding offer, was ‘frightened’ by pro-Israel forces before death”. I strongly urge you to read this one as well. [16]Briefly, Benjamin Netanyahu was very familiar with Kirk and was willing to pay Kirk as much as $150 million for him to return to his “Jewish” roots and back off his criticism of Israel. This article contains much useful information, to help you place things in context. I strongly recommend you read it. [16a] Kirk apparently dismissed Netanyahu’s offer with some contempt, and his reversion on Israeli influence “provoked a private backlash from Netanyahu’s allies that left him angry and afraid”. Reports were that Kirk was genuinely afraid for not only his own well-being but also for his life.

马克斯·布卢门撒尔（Max Blumenthal）和克里斯·赫奇斯（Chris Hedges）在一篇文章中介绍了柯克（Kirk）的背景及其政治发展，我强烈建议您阅读这篇文章。[15]此外，马克斯·布卢门撒尔在《灰色地带》（The Grayzone）上发表的一篇题为《查理·柯克拒绝内塔尼亚胡的资金提议，临终前被亲以色列势力“吓倒”》的文章中，也做了出色的工作。我强烈建议您也阅读这篇文章。[16]简而言之，本雅明·内塔尼亚胡（Benjamin Netanyahu）非常熟悉柯克，并愿意支付高达1.5亿美元，让柯克回归其“犹太”根源，并收回对以色列的批评。这篇文章包含了许多有用的信息，有助于您了解事情的来龙去脉。我强烈建议您阅读。[16a]柯克显然对内塔尼亚胡的提议不屑一顾，他对以色列影响力的回归“引发了内塔尼亚胡盟友的私下反弹，让他既愤怒又害怕”。据报道，柯克不仅为自己的安危，也为自己的生命感到真正的恐惧。

From Blumenthal’s article: “In the weeks leading up to his September 10 assassination, Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader, regarding him as a “bully,” the source said. Kirk was disgusted by what he witnessed inside the Trump administration, where Netanyahu sought to personally dictate the president’s personnel decisions. Trump was terrified of [Netanyahu] … Kirk had become the target of a sustained private campaign of intimidation and free-floating fury by wealthy and powerful allies of Netanyahu – figures he described in an interview as Jewish “leaders” and “stakeholders”. Kirk was bombarded with infuriated text messages and phone calls from Netanyahu’s wealthy allies in the US, including many who had funded TPUSA. According to his longtime friend, the Zionist donors treated Kirk with outright contempt, essentially ordering him to fall back into line. Harrison Smith, a personality at the pro-Trump Infowars network, stated on August 13 – almost a month before Kirk’s assassination – that he was told by “someone close to Charlie Kirk that Kirk thinks Israel will kill him if he turns against Israel.”

“The frenzied speculation set off shockwaves in Tel Aviv, where Netanyahu was compelled to explicitly deny that his government killed Kirk.” But the mere fact that Netanyahu denied guilt, functions more as proof than exoneration. And of course, the Times of Israel chimed in to support Netanyahu and tell us that any accusations of any kind against Jews or Israel is just more “anti-Semitism”. [17] From their article: “Netanyahu asserted that the young conservative pundit “loved Israel” and “loved the Jewish people.” Quoting from a letter he said Kirk had sent him a few months prior to his killing, Netanyahu said that advocating for Israel was one of Kirk’s “greatest joys as a Christian”.

“疯狂的猜测在特拉维夫引发了轩然大波，内塔尼亚胡不得不明确否认其政府杀害了柯克。”然而，内塔尼亚胡否认有罪这一事实本身，与其说是洗脱了罪名，不如说是提供了更多证据。当然，《以色列时报》也加入进来支持内塔尼亚胡，并告诉我们，任何针对犹太人或以色列的指控都不过是“反犹太主义”的表现。[17]该报文章称：“内塔尼亚胡断言，这位年轻的保守派评论员‘热爱以色列’和‘热爱犹太人民’。”内塔尼亚胡引用柯克在被杀前几个月寄给他的一封信中的话，称倡导以色列是柯克“作为基督徒最大的乐趣”之一。

Netanyahu’s words are clearly false, evidenced by his own vicious attacks on Kirk, as well as those by countless influential Jews in the US. Clearly, it was not one of Kirk’s “greatest joys as a Christian” to contemplate those same loving Jews killing him for speaking out against them.

内塔尼亚胡的言论显然是虚假的，他本人对柯克的恶毒攻击，以及美国无数有影响力的犹太人的攻击，就是明证。显然，柯克“作为基督徒最大的乐趣”之一，并不是想象那些同样充满爱心的犹太人会因为他的公开反对而杀害他。

And the letter that Kirk supposedly sent to Netanyahu shortly before his death, where he disclosed his “great love for Israel”? I am reminded of the Jew who produced a “letter from Fidel Castro”, in which Castro proclaimed his undying love for Jews and Israel. The letter was produced only after Castro’s death and provenance could thus never be determined. The letter was widely believed to be a Jewish forgery, its statements very much at odds with Castro’s known public position on Jews. I doubt very much Netanyahu possesses any letter from Kirk that is favorable and, if it does exist, it is certain to be a forgery.

那么，柯克（Kirk）据称在他去世前不久写给内塔尼亚胡（Netanyahu）的信，信中他表达了对“以色列的热爱”呢？这让我想起了那个犹太人，他出示了一封“菲德尔·卡斯特罗的来信”，信中卡斯特罗宣称他对犹太人和以色列有着永恒的爱。这封信是在卡斯特罗去世后才出示的，因此其来源无从查证。人们普遍认为这封信是犹太人伪造的，其内容与卡斯特罗在犹太人问题上的公开立场大相径庭。我非常怀疑内塔尼亚胡是否真的拥有柯克写给他的任何一封有利的信件，即使真的有，那也肯定是伪造的。

And, just so it doesn’t remain unsaid, it is disconcerting to learn that US Jews (through Bill Ackman) apparently offered $1 million to the family of the young alleged shooter – turn him in to the authorities. There is something here that really stinks. (See ref. 16a)

而且，为了避免有话未说，令人不安的是，据悉美国犹太人（通过比尔·阿克曼）似乎向这名年轻的枪击嫌疑人家庭提供了100万美元，要求他们向当局举报嫌疑人。这件事真的很可疑。（见参考文献16a）

This brings us back to The Strange Airplane mentioned above. It is not in dispute that influential Jews in the US could obtain the necessary permission and cooperation from the intelligence services to transport an assassin from the scene of the crime, in much (illegal) secrecy.

这让我们回到了上文提到的《奇怪的飞机》一书。无可争议的是，美国有影响力的犹太人能够从情报机构获得必要的许可和合作，在（非法）高度保密的情况下，将刺客从犯罪现场转移。

尾声 — Epilogue

I do not know what happened with Charlie Kirk, but I can tell you that the official story promulgated by the White House and the US media is a lie in its entirety – 100%. There is no part of the story that is even plausible, much less likely. Again, I do not know what happened, but the only theory that fits all the known facts is that Charlie Kirk was killed by a small-caliber weapon from very close range. A political assassination to remind everyone that you don’t cross the Jews. And done with the full knowledge and cooperation of the various agencies of the US government – including the White House. You will have to examine the evidence and form your own conclusion.

我不知道查理·柯克（Charlie Kirk）发生了什么事，但我可以告诉你，白宫和美国媒体宣扬的官方说法完全是谎言——百分之百是谎言。这个说法没有任何可信之处，更别提可能性了。再说一遍，我不知道发生了什么，但唯一符合所有已知事实的理论是，查理·柯克是被近距离使用的小口径武器杀害的。这是一次政治暗杀，目的是提醒所有人不要得罪犹太人。而且，美国政府各部门——包括白宫——对此都完全知情并给予了配合。你必须审查证据，得出自己的结论。

Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).

罗曼诺夫先生的作品已被翻译成34种语言，他的文章被发布在30多个国家的150多个外文新闻和政治网站上，以及100多个英文平台上。拉里·罗曼诺夫是一位退休的管理顾问和商人。他曾在国际咨询公司担任高级管理职务，并拥有一家国际进出口企业。他曾担任上海复旦大学的客座教授，为高级EMBA课程讲授国际事务案例研究。罗曼诺夫先生现居上海，目前正在撰写一系列共十本书，总体上涉及中国与西方。他是辛西娅·麦金尼新选集《当中国打喷嚏》（第2章——与恶魔打交道）的特约作者之一。

His full archive can be seen at

他的全部档案可以在以下网址查看：

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/

He can be contacted at:

他的全部档案可以在以下网址查看：

2186604556@qq.com

NOTES – Charlie Kirk

注释 – 查理·柯克

[1] False Flags and Conspiracy Theories
[1] 虚假旗帜与阴谋论
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/14028/

[2] A college campus, a fiery speaker — and then a single gunshot
[2] 大学校园，慷慨激昂的演讲者——然后是一声枪响
https://apnews.com/article/charlie-kirk-assassination-turning-point-utah-c8192d8eda83312aabf4cf0a3cd6e5f1

[3] Charlie Kirk shooting: A visual timeline of how it unfolded
[3] 查理•柯克枪击案：事件发展过程的视觉时间线
https://abcnews.go.com/US/visual-timeline-charlie-kirk-shooting-unfolded/story?id=125478526

[4] Washington Post; Kirk shooter chat
[4] 《华盛顿邮报》；与柯克枪手的对话
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2025/09/15/charlie-kirk-shooter-suspect-discord-chat/

[5] Charlie Kirk murder suspect appeared to confess to killing on Discord, company says
[5] 该公司表示，查理•柯克谋杀案嫌疑人似乎在Discord上承认了杀人行为
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/charlie-kirk-suspect-discord-messages/

[6] Charlie Kirk assassin confession
[6] 查理•柯克刺杀案嫌疑人供述
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/charlie-kirk-assassin-confession-tyler-robinson-b2827019.html

[7] Propaganda and the Media – Part 7 — Fact-Checking
[7] 宣传与媒体 – 第7部分 — 事实核查

[8] False Flags and Conspiracy Theories — Chapter 4 – The 9-11 Attacks
[8] 伪旗行动与阴谋论——第四章——9•11袭击事件
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/14103/

[8a] Security Agency Failure or Hoax?
[8a] 安全机构失误还是骗局？
https://news-pravda.com/world/2025/09/27/1724519.html

[9] Alleged Charlie Kirk assassin apparently confessed in Discord chat group: Report
[9] 据报道，被指控刺杀查理•柯克的凶手在Discord聊天群中公开认罪
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5505318-charlie-kirk-alleged-shooter-discord-confession/

[10] GOP threatens clampdown on social media after Charlie Kirk suspect allegedly confessed on Discord
[10] 查理•柯克嫌疑人据称在Discord上认罪后，共和党威胁要打压社交媒体
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2025-09-18/charlie-kirk-shooting-turns-spotlight-on-discord

[11] ‘I have bad news’: Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin confessed on Discord: Report
[11]“我有坏消息”：据称刺杀查理•柯克的凶手在Discord上供认：报道

[12] Washington Post; Kirk shooter chat
[12] 《华盛顿邮报》；柯克枪手访谈
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2025/09/15/charlie-kirk-shooter-suspect-discord-chat/

[13] Charlie Kirk murder suspect appeared to confess to killing on Discord, company says
[13] 公司称，查理•柯克谋杀案嫌疑人似乎在Discord上承认杀人
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/charlie-kirk-suspect-discord-messages/

[14] Charlie Kirk assassin confession
[14] 查理•柯克刺客自白
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/charlie-kirk-assassin-confession-tyler-robinson-b2827019.html

[15] Israel, Charlie Kirk, and the Weaponization of Murder (w/ Max Blumenthal)
[15] 以色列、查理•柯克与谋杀的武器化（与马克斯•布卢门撒尔合著）
https://www.unz.com/article/israel-charlie-kirk-and-the-weaponization-of-murder-w-max-blumenthal/

[16] Charlie Kirk refused Netanyahu funding offer, was ‘frightened’ by pro-Israel forces before death
[16] 查理•柯克拒绝了内塔尼亚胡的资助提议，死前被亲以色列势力“吓到”

[16a] Netanyahu tried to bribe Charlie Kirk with $150m, shooter’s family offered $1m by Ackman
[16a] 内塔尼亚胡试图用1.5亿美元贿赂查理•柯克，枪手家属则通过阿克曼提出100万美元的贿赂

https://cairnsnews.org/2025/09/30/内塔尼亚胡试图用1.5亿英镑贿赂查理•柯克——枪手家族提供100万英镑/

[17] Rejecting far-right conspiracy theory, Netanyahu reiterates Israel didn’t kill Charlie Kirk
[17] 内塔尼亚胡驳斥了极右翼的阴谋论，重申以色列没有杀害查理•柯克
https://www.timesofisrael.com/rejecting-far-right-conspiracy-theory-netanyahu-reiterates-israel-didnt-kill-charlie-kirk/
https://www.timesofisrael.com/拒绝极右翼阴谋论：内塔尼亚胡重申以色列没有杀害查理•柯克/

This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.

本作者的其他作品