上海的月亮: EN — LARRY ROMANOFF: Jews are Plundering the World – Part 3

Right To Life UK spokesperson Catherine Robinson said: “The expansion of the euthanasia and assisted suicide law to those with mental health conditions alone is as sinister as it was predictable. Such a law tells those suffering acutely that there is no hope and they would be better off dead. It tells them that their lives are not worth living. Such legislation is a gross attack on the dignity of individual Canadians”. Source

“It’s not normal to be forced to work three jobs just to barely afford life. It’s not normal for the rise of people having to move into their cars and into the homeless shelters because they’ve been priced out of affordable housing. It’s not normal to be constantly stressing about where your next meal is going to come from. Or to be at your 9 to 5 all day and still not be able to be provided enough to pay your bills. The system that we’re living under, is broken, and it’s absolutely understandable why more people are getting fed up, and why we’re getting angrier and angrier, because it feels like we’re working and sacrificing our entire lives and we still can’t afford to live. We’re sick and tired of the gaslighting. We’re tired of people telling us we’re being irresponsible with our money. We’re tired of people telling us to work harder. It’s like we’re doing the best we possibly can. If you’re in a position where you’re absolutely fed up, and you feel like you can’t live this life any more, you’re not alone. This system is unsustainable, and it’s designed for all of us to fail.” [1]

The above is the transcript from a video posted by a young American woman on YouTube and Douyin, one of many hundreds that have been appearing on the social media during the past year (2025-2026). All are similar, all express a sense of hopelessness and even despair. One video was by a grandmother living in her car with her daughter and granddaughter. Most describe, often in tears, the inability to live a normal life in the US. They tell of unavailable housing, unaffordable rents, extravagant utility bills, exorbitant interest rates on student loans, of the inability to earn enough to live on, and with food and fuel prices constantly increasing. In the video above, the young woman ends by saying that the system is designed for everyone to fail. In other words, to become an asset-less class. These problems exist to a greater or lesser extent in all Western countries, but the US appears to be the worst, and is the most dramatic example.

A strong argument can be made that there exists a definite and systemic class war in the Western world, by a small percentage of those who have, against all those who have not. The evidence is that Western governments and their populations are being systematically plundered by a small group of oligarchs, bankers and industrialists. We can connect dots between ideology, lobbying, arms manufacture, deregulation, privatisation, revolving doors, regulatory capture, the mega banks, AIPAC, The US Congress, the IMF and World Bank, The Jewish bankers in The City of London, their large corporations and hedge funds, and fascist government entities like the US ICE thugs. This framework is far more powerful and insidious than a cartoonish conspiracy. It means the system doesn’t need to be hijacked for governments and societies to be plundered; it operates exactly as designed.

It further seems that those who are plundering, have an agenda beyond the simple desire for more money. Nobody needs another billion dollars, yet the plundering continues and increases even down to the lowest levels of societies. As one example, most people in India are too poor to afford Western hair shampoo. So, Johnson & Johnson package a teaspoon of shampoo in a tiny sachet and sell it for $0.25. They are effectively sucking the last pennies from the poorest people. The marketing of Western artificial baby milk in Africa – especially by Nestlé – is similar, where mothers will spend a full 50% of the family’s monthly income on a product marketed as far superior to mother’s milk while millions of infants are dying from improper use of that same commodity. See: Nestlé – Murdering with Milk. [2]

When we connect all the dots and consider all the evidence of circumstances and conditions, an alarming picture appears. There is an undercurrent here, much more insidious than simple greed and plundering. The plundering is real; there is no question of that. But the thesis that emerges from the behavior of the plunderers is that their real motivation is not obtaining more money, but to bankrupt, to leave entirely destitute, all those not of their group. The frank thesis is that they don’t want anyone but them to have any money or assets at all. Connecting all the apparently disparate conditions into a unified picture, heavily supports the premise that Western populations are being transformed into one large asset-less class, deliberately created.

The evidence is largely factual, only partly circumstantial, and is overwhelming in total. In this essay, we will examine the validity of this premise and the signs of a motivation and intent of “Exclusion” rather than “Accumulation”. To define our terms, “Accumulation” is being used in the sense of greedy plundering, an apparently insatiable desire for more money. “Exclusion” is used in the sense of plundering, but with the intent of stripping all assets from the bottom 99%, leaving the top 1% with everything and the bottom 99% with nothing at all. Accumulation is parasites living off a host; Exclusion is the parasites destroying the host.

And yet, there is something even more sinister that emerges when we connect all the dots: the bottom 99% not only become a destitute, asset-less class, but they become disposable. The picture that is formed is that greed and euthanasia are already locked in a close embrace.

Source

Groups of elites in Western societies have for centuries dealt with this issue in related ways. The British elite (and the Jewish elite in Britain) for several hundred years managed to ship their “surplus poor” to Australia or the New World of North or South America, generally as slaves or so-called “indentured servants”. The intent was simply to eliminate all the “useless eaters” in England. Other European nations were similar, though not as open about their intent. It was a very callous approach to society.

Slavery was part of this process, a mentality that the populations of poor countries – and the poor populations of rich countries – were objectionable, disposable material. The evidence of this is everywhere to be seen, even though the entire topic has been excised from all our history books, from the media, and even from human consciousness. When we think of slavery, we think of persons shipped from black Africa to the Americas, but this was only a very small part of the slave trade. [3] [4] [5]

As one example, are you aware that about 30% of the population of Brazil is of Italian extraction? Millions of Italians were duped into indentured slavery in the 1800s by the Jewish elite in Brazil, to work the coffee plantations. Their plight became so dreadful the Italian government finally passed a law prohibiting all emigration to Brazil. [6] And it wasn’t only Italians. Were you aware that the population of Panama today is more than 10% Chinese? They were all kidnapped by Jewish slave traders and shipped as forced slave labor to build the Panama Canal and railroad. The same was true for building the US and Canadian railroads, and working the Yukon and Klondike gold mines. This is why we have Chinese in every country in the world today. Another example is the savage depopulation of Ireland. [7] Kidnapping for slavery has been a feature of Irish history more than almost any other country in the world. With a population of only 5 million in Ireland, it is estimated there are about 55 million people worldwide who can trace their ancestry back to Ireland. That is more than the black or mixed-black population in the US. That would certainly support the thesis of millions of Irish being abducted as slaves over the years.

To continue with our main premise, it appears indisputable, and of great concern, that Western societies today – led by the Jewish oligarchy in the US – are actively creating a large, asset-less class. In some states in the US, it is against the law to provide food or shelter to the homeless. Canada is not much better. Homeless sites like tent cities in Canada and the US, are attacked by the police who destroy all the tents to force the victims to “go somewhere else”. These homeless also qualify as “surplus poor”, and we are now publicly advocating killing them as a solution. This would be the ultimate “exclusion”, would it not?

Homeless tents of Veterans in Los Angeles. Source

We begin by acknowledging the historical precedent of the Europeans exporting their “surplus poor,” then detail the current criminalisation of homelessness in the US, followed by Canada’s similar practices. Then draw connections to MAID (Medical Assistance In Dying) and the “Exclusion” thesis, link these to deliberate depopulation practices, and conclude by tying it all together. These apparently disparate elements connect with precision two eras of “surplus population” management, and I will outline how the evidence supports this dark continuum. The “surplus poor”, those deemed unproductive, costly, or unsightly, have long been a problem for elites. What has changed is the technology of disposal. The historical record shows three overlapping phases of this exclusion, each more efficient than the last.

Phase I: Expulsion (16th–18th Centuries)

By the time this image was printed (c.1788) transportation of British convicts to the American Colonies had ceased, owing to the War of Independence (1775-83), which necessitated the use of decommissioned ships, or hulks, as temporary floating prisons anchored in the Thames River and at other locations around the British coastline. Source

Beginning with England’s Vagrancy Act of 1597, “persistent rogues” could be banished to the fledgling colonies. Kidnapping, or “spiriting,” was so prevalent that it became widely feared by everyone but the elite class, and this was true of England, Scotland and Ireland. Between the early 1600s and late 1700s, over 50,000 inmates were forcibly transported from English jails, workhouses, brothels, and houses of correction to the Americas. As one author noted, “Given the hideous mortality rates, indentured contracts often amounted to a life sentence at hard labor, many convicts asked to be hanged rather than be sent to Virginia.”

These “undesirable Britons”—including beggars, homeless children, vagabonds – and political non-conformists – were treated savagely, but the trade was profitable because of the high prices for human labor at the port of entry. By the late 1600s, the English government was actively encouraging the transport of paupers, convicts, criminals, and “vagabond” children. This was the exclusion thesis in its primitive form: physically remove the problem from domestic view, monetise the removal, and pass the costs to someone else. Across urban Europe, the pattern was similar: vagrants were banished, put into penal institutions, and drafted into armies. Most European nations engaged in comparable practices, though perhaps with less systematic legislation. The underlying logic was identical: the poor were a problem to be eliminated, not a population to be supported.

Phase II: Internal Policing (19th Century–Present)

For nearly a century, so-called “ugly laws” banned people with visible disabilities and diseases from public spaces, revealing society’s harsh standards of beauty and the impact on those who didn’t meet them. Source

The mass export of the poor to the colonies eventually ended, but the impulse to criminalise poverty did not. It simply turned inward. In 1867, San Francisco pioneered the “Ugly Laws”, [8] which were legislative crackdowns fining poor and disabled people for begging, or simply for existing, on city streets. The contemporary manifestations of these same impulses are visible in the “anti-camping” ordinances, encampment “sweeps” by law enforcement today, and mass towing of RVs that serve as people’s homes. In 2025, the US Supreme Court effectively declared that it was not unconstitutional to criminalise homelessness, even when no shelter was available. The resultant state-level policies are explicit in their punitive intent, with fines up to $750 and jail time for violations of sleeping bans.

There are many reports from both Canada and the US of police entering a homeless tent camp with box cutters, and ripping to shreds every single tent, destroying the only shelter those people have. This is done in terms of “safety” for society. Here are three articles on “Criminalizing the Samaritan”, or why it is illegal to feed the homeless in the US. [9] [10] [11] Here are two articles describing how Canadian Federal Opposition Leader, Pierre Poilievre, said police should criminally charge the homeless, because “We want to give people a way out”!! [12] [13] And here are two articles where Canadian police boast about the “tremendous job” they did in beating the homeless and destroying all their tents and meager property. [14] [15]

A woman is treated after being pepper sprayed. Source

Donald Trump said, “Our once-great cities have become unlivable, unsanitary nightmares”, but his solution is to gut taxpayer-subsidized housing, and instead mandate fines and potentially jail time on homeless people. [16] [17] This has produced pressure on the police to incarcerate, or drive out, unhoused and disabled people as a new constant in American life. [18] Scott Turner, who heads Trump’s Department of Housing and Urban Development, crowed that his agency will now “play a critical role to identify and eliminate waste, fraud and abuse and ultimately better serve the American people” – by imprisoning and euthanising the poor. Many new anti-homeless measures have been created in most US states. The violent sweeps of homeless camps have become increasingly violent and abusive.

Donald Trump says the US government can’t afford to fund daycare, Medicare, or Medicaid, because war comes first. [19] [20] In fact, the US has passed new laws to eliminate much health care and other social services. With the rising prices due to the Iran war, many Americans are actually suffering terribly, definitely in the asset-less class. And with the cost of health care in the US being so high, huge numbers of people will become destitute and ill. They will be perfect candidates for the MAID program, and this will undoubtedly accelerate. Moreover, the destitute are being blamed for their own problems as a “moral failing”, and thus deserving to be eliminated. The trashing of tent cities for the homeless and the laws against feeding the poor, seem like preparation for this.

Phase III: Depopulation (21st Century)

Canada is closing in on 100,000 deaths through its government-assisted suicide program, a threshold no modern nation has reached.Canada also plans to extend MAID to individuals whose sole condition is mental illness beginning March 2027, CBN News reported. The expansion has already been postponed twice. Source

In Canada, the logic of elimination has become chillingly literal. Canada’s MAID program (Medical Assistance in Dying) – thanks to the mental depravity and inhumanity of Justin Trudeau – has surpassed 100,000 cumulative deaths. [21] It is so bad that euthanasia (being killed by your own doctor) is now one of the leading causes of deaths in Canada. The program began for only those with terminal illnesses but quickly expanded to cover those whose natural death is not “reasonably foreseeable”, and includes virtually anyone for any reason. [22] [23] In Canada, euthanasia is now a category that explicitly includes the homeless, the impoverished, the desperate, and the mentally ill. Today, the Canadian government euthanises citizens in cases of depression, hearing loss, autism, poverty and homelessness.

The explicit link between economic uselessness and elimination was very clearly (and coldly) articulated in the 2025 study “Government Economics of Expanding Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying to Vulnerable Populations“, which bluntly models the cost savings of expanding MAID to groups that “cost the government more than they contribute in taxes”. [24] The original government paper is sufficiently embarrassing that it has apparently been taken offline.

Another academic paper discusses “the unexamined benefits” of expanding legalised euthanasia. [25] Canada’s CBC boasts that euthanasia could realise nearly $150 million in annual saving on medical costs. The study projects up to $275 billion in savings by 2047, from 2.6 million “voluntary” deaths. [26] “What began as an option for the terminally ill is now being used to eliminate those who have become a burden on the national public health system.” [27] Armstrong Economics tells us (seemingly happily) that Canada has a new special euthanasia program for children and teens. [28] It specifies that a “mature minor” under 18 years of age is deemed competent to make informed decisions about their own “healthcare”. There is no set age for which a minor is “mature”. Moreover, parents must accept their child’s autonomy to deny treatment and choose euthanasia. To add to the outrage, the government is even pushing to expand euthanasia laws to include children and infants as young as one year, while the Quebec College of Physicians and Surgeons “demands” assisted suicide for babies. [29] It is interesting that Canada’s euthanasia program specifically includes those individuals suffering from “COVID vaccination syndrome”, a tacit admission that the mRNA injections were not really vaccines and that contained the potential for permanent harm to the victims. [30]

Source:

Canada’s MAID is slowly becoming a form of sanctioned euthanasia for the homeless, the disabled, the asset-less, those in despair and without economic hope. [31] [32] This is not an exaggeration, and the qualifications for government-approved euthanasia have long escaped any moral bounds. As one example, in April of 2022, a 51-year-old woman who was “chemically-sensitive”, and unable to find housing free of the smell of cigarette smoke, was euthanized by a Canadian doctor who gave her a lethal injection. She filmed a video several days before her death, saying, “The government sees me as expendable trash, a complainer, useless and a pain in the a**”.

One of the nastier propaganda memes in the media is to repeatedly depict the poor and destitute, as “homeless drug addicts and the mentally ill living in those awful tent cities”. But this is an outrageously false description. A good many of the poor and homeless in both Canada and the US are educated families with children. One activist stated that Canada’s program is an “opt-in euthanasia”, being presented as the only solution to the problem of poverty, despair, hopelessness. One academic concluded starkly: “Canada’s current MAID regime is, in fact, [euthanasia] disguised as autonomy”.

This isn’t only Canada. Euthanasia is becoming global. In Belgium and the Netherlands, assisted suicide has been legal for more than 20 years, and Switzerland has created “suicide pods” where anyone can kill themselves merely by climbing in and pushing a button. [33] The US is already well down this path, the UK is planning on implementing it, and the program is being heavily promoted in all European countries as well, with many other nations at some stage in this process.

The most chilling distinction is that Phase III (euthanasia) is “voluntary”. The state does not need to forcibly transport or arrest. It merely needs to make elimination seem like a reasonable, dignified choice. The tent city resident, exhausted, hopeless, despairing, is offered a “compassionate” exit, and encouraged to sign their own death warrant. The state’s hands remain clean, and the exclusion is complete. The plan to expand medically assisted dying to the poor and those in despair is utterly barbaric but, as one critic wrote, “Euthanasia as a solution for those living troubled lives is hardly a new concept”. This is the ultimate exclusion: not just from wealth or housing, or from dignity, but from existence itself.

There is much concern that doctors and other medical staff are deliberately inducing individuals to suicide; the most vulnerable patients being pushed to choose death over “expensive” care. Reports are that this option is introduced to patients who have never entertained suicidal thoughts, with a professional MAID consultant (suicide salesperson) personally accompanying a patient to the place where the lethal injections are given – to present the choice with a pretty face. There are too many reports that euthanasia was an option that originated with the medical staff and not the patient. I believe it would be quite easy to prey on society’s most vulnerable, those already feeling despair and hopelessness, and push them to take that final step. The asset-less (who cannot afford health care) are defined as “useless eaters”, and should be disposed of, eliminated, when they reach that stage. The physician-initiated deaths are not only for terminal diseases, but for hopelessness and despair, and these are precisely the conditions generated by becoming part of the asset-less class. Read “Assisted Dying: Cheaper When Dead”. [34]

Here is another transcript from a video by a young American woman, echoing similar sentiments: “Life in America really feels like serving a death sentence. It feels like we are all being collectively punished for something we didn’t do. Everything (prices) goes up up up up up, except for our wages. Nothing ever gets better. It honestly feels like it’s all getting worse. How am I supposed to be positive when our government is actively trying to kill all of us off?” [35] The young woman was more right than she knew.

We cannot avoid the explicit connections between MAID and the elimination of the “useless” or “asset-less” class. The ubiquitous MAID programs are not only “flirting with” euthanasia and genocide; they ARE euthanasia and genocide. [36] What was once unthinkable is now common, and this links directly to the “Exclusion” theory with which we began.

Let’s connect the dots between the “Exclusion” thesis and the expansion of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID). The circumstantial evidence is substantial enough that ignoring it would require willful blindness. The facts on the ground are that the scope of this euthanasia is unprecedented. As of April 2026, cumulative MAID deaths have surpassed 100,000 in Canada alone, and are now one of the leading causes of deaths in the country. Crucially, the criteria for MAID deaths have expanded from terminal illnesses to virtually anything, and even small children have the sole right to choose suicide – over the objections of their own parents. The most explicit evidence is contained in the Canadian government’s study that models the savings a government obtains by expanding MAID to “vulnerable groups that cost the government more than they contribute in taxes,” including the homeless, mentally ill, elderly, disabled, and indigenous populations”. This is not fiction.

Consider the money trail: What we now have is a death industry with investors, and profits embedded at every level. In the pharmaceutical industry, Jewish-owned Pfizer has donated much money to the pro-suicide advocacy group Dying with Dignity Canada. If the program is scaled to 2.6 million people as planned, that represents a massive, guaranteed market for end-of-life drugs for Pfizer. There is a great deal of direct profiteering within this new “death industry”.

The advocacy groups are not neutral charities. Dying with Dignity Canada has over $9.2 million in assets, with $7.3 million in long-term investments, and spends over $800,000 annually on advertising. Their growth is tied directly to the number of deaths and the expansion of eligibility. And most of this is what we term “dark money”, funding coming from opaque offshore trusts, hidden from public scrutiny. A significant portion of the UK’s Dignity in Dying’s £1.2 million in funding came from such opaque sources. Virtually all of the promotion of euthanasia that I have been able to identify, is done by Jews, particularly the funding of the promotion. It seems that abortion is not the only Jewish “value”.

This ideology has much historical precedent. The paper framing this as a means to manage the “economically unproductive” is a direct descendant of eugenics, which sought to improve the human race by eliminating the “unfit”. Darwin’s theories were warped into “Social Darwinism” to rationalise neglect – and elimination – of the poor and disabled. The modern connection is explicit: the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities warned that Canada’s program was “sliding back toward eugenic thinking”.

This all forms a unified theory, with the pieces forming a coherent picture on a global scale. The IMF/World Bank model impoverishes nations and dismantles public healthcare, creating a large, vulnerable population with no social safety net. Researchers and think tanks calculate, in plain financial terms, the trillions of dollars in savings from eliminating these “costly” populations, turning depopulation into a fiscal policy. A multi-million dollar “death lobby” (Dying with Dignity, etc.) stages a PR campaign to rebrand state-sponsored death as “dignity” and “choice”. They hide dark money donors and normalise the concept of euthanasia through relentless advertising. When a state awards multi-million-dollar contracts to service a system that prioritizes a cheap, “dignified” death over providing basic housing or mental health care, the “Exclusion” thesis ceases to be a speculation. It becomes a business model. And those perpetuating it are not just indifferent. They are incentivised to let the asset-less die. They have found a way to profit from the natural endpoint of their system: eliminating the “human waste” they created.

The explicit link between economic uselessness and elimination is articulated in the 2025 government study. The safety net designed to keep our most vulnerable protected has been abandoned, and replaced with a program of state-sanctioned murder by physician, fed to the population as “the only solution to the problem”. What connects these phases is not a conspiracy but a consistent logic: the poor are a problem. The problem must be solved. The solution is to make them choose death over survival and frame it as dignity. This is inhuman. We are being led to eliminate the economic drain of the impoverished and despairing portion of humanity, the most vulnerable, by simply ending their lives and disposing of them.

In both Canada and the US, the connection of these disparate events: (a) the public pronouncements by Trump and Poilievre, (b) the gutting of Medicaid, (c) the criminalisation of homelessness, and (d) the aggressive expansion of MAID, are not merely speculative. When examined through a forensic lens, a clear, logical, and deeply disturbing continuum emerges. It is a mechanism designed not just to manage poverty, but to systematically eliminate the impoverished. The foundation in all Western countries is the dismantling of the social safety net. Trump’s stance was unambiguous: the government could not afford daycare, Medicare, or Medicaid because “we have to take care of one thing: military protection”.

Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill enacted the largest cut to social services in US history, totaling nearly $1 trillion. According to the Congressional Budget Office, this legislation is projected to leave 16 million more people without medical insurance. This is a combination of debtor’s prison and penal colony, in that it criminalises basic existence. This is the ideological heart of the exclusion thesis. The safety net is not being taken away; it is being replaced by a penal system. Since the Supreme Court’s 2024 Grants Pass decision, over 150 cities across the United States have passed laws criminalising homelessness. Being without a home is now a crime in much of America. In some states, laws explicitly prohibit the act of feeding the homeless, enforcing a state-sanctioned assault on the most basic forms of community and survival.

It’s a crime being Homeless in America. Source

Today, homeless individuals in Canada, the US, and other Western nations, are systematically “rounded up”, their tents destroyed, their few possessions confiscated, and they are “saddled with criminal records, court dates and fines that only make it even harder to secure housing”. The criminalisation of poverty is not an unfortunate byproduct; it is the primary mechanism. Those who are not productive in the eyes of the state are stripped of their dignity and their freedom, preparing them for the final solution. And that “final solution” is the MAID Death Machine. In this context, Canada’s MAID program is the logical endpoint. The evidence is overwhelming. This is a complete, integrated system to “let the asset-less die”.

My Exclusion thesis is not a theory. It is a description of an observable reality. The pieces of a horrifying machine are in operation. First, the economic boot (OBBB, Trump’s statements) crushes people into destitution. Second, the legal cudgel (anti-homeless laws) criminalises their resulting existence. Finally, the state syringe (MAID) offers a “dignified” exit when the crushing and punishment become unbearable. The wealthy Jewish oligarchs, the architects of the system, are insulated from its consequences. They do not see the faces of the people whose survival they have systematically denied. They see only balance sheets, profit streams, tax savings, and the restored “order” of clean streets. For them, the poor are not a problem to be solved, but a surplus to be eliminated. And, of course, it isn’t Jews who are being recruited as victims to be eliminated.

Depopulation as Agenda

We have progressed from ships to courts, to needles, but the target remains the same.

Euthanasia is merely one arrow in the quiver of depopulation. The criminalisation of poverty, Canada’s MAID program, abortions, and so much else, are all parts of the same picture, all programs with the identical overall purpose and all part of a world-wide agenda. The three phases I listed above, of expulsion, policing and active depopulation, are closely integrated. In each era, the state has acted as the agent of the propertied class. The instruments have varied. We have progressed from ships to courts, to needles, but the target remains the same. In 17th-century England, the Vagrancy Act cleared the streets of “undesirables” bound for Virginia. In 21st-century Canada, the Criminal Code cleared the way for euthanising the homeless, the poor, and the mentally ill. The language of the former as “rogues,” “vagabonds,” “undesirables”, has been refined, but the function is identical: to dispose of a population that capital has rendered obsolete.

Certainly, it was true in the early part of the last century, as is still true today, that the elite had no love whatever for humans or humanity. They nearly all behaved and acted as if 95% of humans were infesting vermin who were tolerable only to the extent they could add to one’s wealth, those frustrating this ambition generally receiving contempt and bullets in more or less equal amount. It was these elite who were smitten heart and soul with the new ‘science’ of eugenics, and in fact with euthanasia as well. Carnegie recommended locally-operated gas chambers to exterminate the lower classes. It was truly a monstrous philosophy that became exceedingly dangerous when put into action by men of enormous wealth and influence, because almost no one had the power to contradict or obstruct them. The immediate result was that within a few years, in the first decade of the last century, hundreds of thousands of legislated forcible sterilisations were performed, and not the few thousand listed in the history books.

The topic of depopulation is easily dismissed in the media as just another conspiracy theory, but it is no such thing. The evidence of a determination to depopulate the non-Jewish world is voluminous, ubiquitous, and irrefutable. One of the most glaring examples is the sterilization campaign carried out by the WHO. You won’t be aware of this because the entire topic was deeply buried, but the WHO sterilised more than 150 million females in non-Western countries without their knowledge or consent. There is a female hormone known as hCG, which is necessary in pregnancy. Without the existence of this hormone, a pregnancy cannot be carried to term and the fetus will inevitably be aborted. The WHO created a vaccine containing this hormone combined with tetanus toxoid, and set out on a world-wide sterilisation program disguised as a tetanus vaccination protocol.

Tetanus is a disease we commonly associate with stepping on a rusty nail or some such event, and it is clear that males are rather more susceptible to this than females. But the WHO specified that only females between the ages of 15 and 40 (obviously child-bearing age) were eligible for these “tetanus” vaccinations. Further, a single tetanus vaccination is declared medically sufficient and with protection lasting at least ten years. But for these “tetanus” vaccinations, the WHO specified at least three to five separate injections within a short time. The result was as you would imagine. When a vaccinated woman became pregnant and her body released the vital hCG hormone, her body’s immune system identified it as a foreign substance and destroyed it. Each woman who received the WHO tetanus inoculation was vaccinated not only against tetanus but also against pregnancy. There were of course immediate reports of millions of spontaneous abortions, and tests identified the cause. The WHO attempted to deny their duplicity, but the evidence was overwhelming and the WHO finally went silent. The worldwide media were deadly silent as well, and there might not be one person in a million who has any knowledge of this.

Lest you consider dismissing this as just another “conspiracy theory”, damning evidence is hiding in plain sight on the WHO’s own website. It documents how the WHO spent 20 years and more than $400 million to develop what it termed an “anti-fertility vaccine” specifically using the hCG hormone combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier. The Lancet medical journal also confirmed this. I covered this inhuman travesty in detail in an earlier article “A Cautionary Tale About the WHO” that I strongly recommend you read. [37] I also covered it with additional detail in another article titled “The WHO – Depopulation is Reality“. [38]

I have to emphasise that this WHO sterilisation program was entirely a Jewish construct; it was the Rothschild-owned Sanofi that produced the vaccines. As I’ve often mentioned elsewhere, the Western (Jewish) media are excessively fond of demonising Hitler, but Hitler didn’t sterilise 150 million Jewish women without their knowledge or consent. Yet Rothschild (a Jew) produced the vaccine to sterilise 150 million non-Jewish women without their knowledge, so where is the moral outrage against the Jews?

Henry Kissinger

The WHO’s sterilisation agenda was part of Henry Kissinger’s National Security Study Memorandum (NSSM-200), [39] where he famously stated “Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy toward the third world”. Kissinger is a Jew, and he wasn’t recommending the depopulation of Jews. The full text of Kissinger’s memorandum is available on archive.org, [40] and the Schiller Institute prepared an archive of this memorandum under the title of “Kissinger’s 1974 Genocide Plan“. [41] It should be noted that Kissinger’s proposal for depopulation included not only “birth control” – i.e., sterilisation, but also implicitly the combined use of war and famine to cull the world’s surplus Gentile (non-Jewish) populations. I wrote an earlier article titled “The Pleasures of Depopulating the Earth“. [42] It provides much of the background for this entire topic, and reveals much more than merely the WHO and Henry Kissinger. Among the topics is Planned Parenthood, another Jewish construct to spread the gospel of a principal Jewish value – abortion.

We also have the pandemics of ZIKA and COVID, which exhibit all the signs of being part of this same agenda. ZIKA in particular appeared to have no other cause or purpose than to reduce or eliminate the abortion restrictions in all of South and Central America. I researched ZIKA in exhaustive detail and prepared a report you may care to read. [43] COVID is more complicated, but there is much distressing evidence that the vaccine for this virus also will function primarily for depopulation through various means. One of the most damning pieces of evidence is that the remnants of the mRNA vaccine do not remain in the musculature of injection as was initially claimed, but rapidly migrated through the body and settled primarily in the reproductive organs of both men and women. The result on reduced fertility would be dramatic, but it would be only after many years that a couple would realise they were infertile, and no effective way to go back in time and relate present infertility with a past vaccine. If this is true, it would be a perfect crime.

The above commentary describes only the beginning of an enormous worldwide program of culling the world’s surplus poor, in fact depopulating the earth, a real and frightening genocide on a global scale that is in silent execution today, an unrecognised but integral part of globalisation. It led not only to the vast program of eugenics taught in American universities, the WHO’s inhuman travesty of deceit, but many other programs of forcible sterilisations, including those carried out in India by USAID. It led directly to Henry Kissinger’s US National Security Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200), a viciously aggressive plan to prevent, at apparently almost any cost, the populations of non-Western countries from having children. [44] [45] [46]

It led to Reimert Ravenholt and USAID forcibly sterilising at least 100 million women, and many other unwitting victims, killing millions in the process. It led to hundreds of thousands of American women being rendered permanently sterile and millions of sterilities and deaths in undeveloped countries from the Dalkon Shield. It led to Robert McNamara’s Project 100,000, where about 500,000 low-IQ individuals were conscripted into the US army and sent to Vietnam, few returning. [47]

To complete the linkage between current events and the Exclusion thesis, the next essay in this series will present some case studies on housing, education, healthcare and more, and describe how their activities and structure provide supporting evidence for the thesis.

Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).

His full archive can be seen at

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/

He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com

Notes – Part 3

[1] The US is broken
https://v.douyin.com/y2U3oGgitP4/

[2] Nestlé – Murdering With Milk
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/6004/

[3] Slavery and the British transatlantic slave trade
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/british-transatlantic-slave-trade-records/

[4] We the people: Author details shipment of laborers to colonies
https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news/2008/06/26/we-the-people-author-details-shipment-of-laborers-to-colonies/61575427007/

[5] White cargo : the forgotten history of Britain’s white slaves in America
https://archive.org/details/whitecargoforgot0000jord

[6] The Prinetti Decree
https://ko.ichacha.net/m.aspx?q=prinetti&p=3&l=zj#bilingual

[7] America’s Buried History of White Slavery
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/10166/

[8] Illegal to be ’ugly’? The history behind one of America‘s cruelest laws
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/history-of-ugly-laws-america-disability

[9] Criminalizing the Samaritan: Why cities across the US are making it illegal to feed the homeless
https://www.salon.com/2023/08/07/criminalizing-the-samaritan-why-cities-across-the-us-are-making-it-illegal-to-feed-the-homeless/

[10] Is Feeding the Homeless Illegal?
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/is-feeding-the-homeless-illegal/

[11] The Law That Criminalizes Feeding The Homeless
https://lawshun.com/article/can-t-feed-the-homeless-law

[12] Police should get power under Criminal Code to dismantle tent cities
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/police-power-under-criminal-code-195500916.html

[13] Conservative plan to tackle tent cities looks like ‘political theatre,’ experts say
https://www.ctvnews.ca/federal-election-2025/article/poilievre-says-he-would-give-police-more-power-to-dismantle-tent-cities/

[14] Toronto Cops Say They Did ‘Tremendous Job’ After Beating People, Destroying Homeless Camp
https://www.vice.com/en/article/toronto-cops-say-they-did-tremendous-job-after-beating-people-destroying-homeless-camp/

[15] Toronto officials, police under fire for tactics used to clear homeless encampments
https://globalnews.ca/news/8052972/lamport-stadium-park-encampment-toronto-police/

[16] Trump turns homelessness response away from housing, toward forced treatment
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-homelessness-response-forced-treatment/

[17] Trump signs an executive order to make it easier to remove homeless people from streets
https://www.npr.org/2025/07/24/nx-s1-5479139/trump-homelessness-executive-order-civil-commitment-camping

[18] Ugly laws: The blueprint for Trump’s anti-homeless crusade
https://lemmy.world/post/35035092

[19] Trump says US ‘cant take care of’ basic need amid war — and the backlash is intense
https://www.nj.com/politics/2026/04/trump-says-us-cant-take-care-of-basic-need-amid-war-and-the-backlash-is-intense.html

[20] Trump Sparks Outrage by Claiming Federal Government Can’t Fund Daycare, Medicare, or Medicaid, Saying War Comes First
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/trump-sparks-outrage-claiming-federal-government-cant-fund-daycare-medicare-medicaid-saying-1789853

[21] Canada Reportedly Set To Surpass 100,000 Assisted Suicides
https://cbnc.com/canada-reportedly-set-to-surpass-100000-assisted-suicides/

[22] Canada’s “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAID) Programme
https://www.globalresearch.ca/canadian-medical-assistance-dying-programme/5906543

[23] Canada Moves to Begin Euthanizing Citizens with ‘Pre-Approval’
https://www.globalresearch.ca/canada-moves-begin-euthanizing-citizens-pre-approval/5917587

[24] Government Economics of Expanding Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40021127/

[25] The Unexamined Benefits of the Expansive Legalization of Medical Assistance-in-Dying
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Government-Economics-of-Expanding-Canada’s-Medical-Jamil-Pearce/cbf2373425fe167c59978d0e75f42de93cff4072

[26] Medically assisted deaths could save millions in health care
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/medically-assisted-death-could-save-millions-1.3947481

[27] Canada begins euthanasia for citizens with ‘Covid vaccination syndrome’
https://comedonchisciotte.org/il-canada-inizia-a-praticare-leutanasia-ai-cittadini-con-la-sindrome-da-vaccinazione-covid/

[28] MAID for Children and Teens – Canada Expands Eugenics Program
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/canada/maid-for-children-and-teens-canada-expands-eugenics-program/

[29] Assisted Suicide for Babies Demanded by Quebec College of Physicians
https://www.globalresearch.ca/assisted-suicide-babies-demanded-quebec-college-physicians/5837504

[30] Canada begins euthanasia for citizens with ‘Covid vaccination syndrome’
https://comedonchisciotte.org/il-canada-inizia-a-praticare-leutanasia-ai-cittadini-con-la-sindrome-da-vaccinazione-covid/

[31] Colby Cosh: Assisted suicide — Canada’s latest solution to loneliness
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/colby-cosh-assisted-suicide-canadas-latest-solution-to-loneliness

[32] ‘It’s being abused:’ Group that led campaign for MAID is now calling for safeguards
https://nationalpost.com/news/group-that-led-campaign-for-maid-now-calling-for-safeguards

[33] Switzerland Launches ‘Assisted Suicide Pods’ to Euthanize Citizens with the ‘Push of a Button’
https://slaynews.com/switzerland-launches-assisted-suicide-pods-euthanize-citizens-push-button/

[34] Assisted Dying: Cheaper When Dead
https://www.donotpanic.news/p/assisted-dying-cheaper-when-dead

[35] Life in America is a Death Sentence
https://v.douyin.com/ZQIG4v_1u4k/

[36] Canada’s euthanasia program is flirting with eugenics – National Right to Life
https://nrlc.org/nrlnewstoday/2023/10/canadas-euthanasia-program-is-flirting-with-eugenics/

[37] A Cautionary Tale About the WHO
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/4879/

[38] Biological Warfare in Action — Chapter 5 — The WHO – Depopulation is Reality
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/14721/

[39] National Security Study Memorandum – NSSM-200
https://www.nssm200.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/NSSM-200.pdf

[40] Full text of “NSSM 200 by Henry A. Kissinger Report 1974
https://archive.org/stream/NSSMHenryA.KissingerReport200435/National%20Security%20Study%20Memorandum%20200-3_djvu.txt

[41] Schiller Institute- Kissinger’s 1974 Genocide Plan- NSSM 200 …
https://archive.schillerinstitute.com/food_for_peace/kiss_nssm_jb_1995.html

[42] The Pleasures of Depopulating the Earth
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/5760/

[43] ZIKA
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/5811/

[44] USAID
https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PCAAB500.pdf

[45] Henry Kissinger Report NSSM-200
https://archive.org/stream/NSSMHenryA.KissingerReport200435/National%20Security%20Study%20Memorandum%20200-3_djvu.txt

[46] NSSM-200
https://www.pop.org/nssm-200-understanding-national-security-study-memorandum-200/

[47] Robert McNamara’s Infamous “Project 100,000”
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/robert-mcnamaras-infamous-project-100000-and-the-vietnam-war-a-premeditated-crime-against-humanity-october-30-2019/

This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.

Other Works by this Author