上海的月亮: CN — LARRY ROMANOFF: 犹太人正在掠夺世界——第六部分 — 国际货币基金组织和世界银行——主权层面的资产征收 — Jews are Plundering the World – Part 6 — The IMF and World Bank — Asset Expropriation at the Sovereign Level

译者：Pearl

In previous essays, I have documented the tools on plundering and Exclusion that function as extraction machines at the individual level, in areas like housing, education, and healthcare. These also operate in parallel at the sovereign level. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank are the primary institutional mechanisms through which this extraction is organized globally. They do not lend money to poor countries to promote development. They lend money to create the conditions under which assets, resources, and sovereignty can be transferred upward. It isn’t well-known, but these institutions have no money of their own. They obtain some cash from Western countries, but most of their money comes from “private sources”, primarily Jewish bankers in The City of London whose lending practices are predatory and legendary.

在之前的文章中，我记录了在住房、教育和医疗等领域，作为个体层面的榨取机器发挥作用的掠夺和排斥工具。这些工具在主权层面同样并行运作。国际货币基金组织（IMF）和世界银行是全球范围内组织这种榨取的主要制度机制。它们并不向贫穷国家提供贷款以促进发展。它们提供贷款是为了创造条件，使资产、资源和主权能够向上转移。鲜为人知的是，这些机构本身并没有资金。它们从西方国家获得一些现金，但大部分资金来自“私人消息来源”，主要是伦敦金融城的犹太银行家，他们的放贷行为具有掠夺性，且颇具传奇色彩。

They push poor countries into excessive debt when interest rates are very low. Then, when interest rates rise, the debt cannot be repaid, and they demand the country’s infrastructure, arable land and water aquifers in lieu of repayment. The victim country loses much of its asset base and some of its sovereignty as well. This cannot be claimed as occasional, circumstantial, or accidental, because it has been repeated countless times with many countries. This is part of an Exclusion plan to keep poor countries poor, and to eliminate their sovereignty over time. This is essentially the same agenda and practice as is done to individuals with items like health care and housing. The results are the same, but for countries instead of individuals, and constitute a deliberate strategy designed to keep poor nations perpetually impoverished.

当利率极低时，他们迫使贫穷国家背负巨额债务。然后，当利率上升时，这些债务无法偿还，他们就会要求该国用基础设施、耕地和含水层来抵债。受害国不仅失去了大量资产基础，还丧失了一部分主权。这不能被视为偶然、偶然发生或意外情况，因为这在许多国家已经重复了无数次。这是排斥计划的一部分，旨在使贫穷国家永远贫穷，并逐渐消除它们的主权。这与对个人实施的医疗保健和住房等项目的做法基本相同。结果是一样的，但对象是国家而非个人，构成了一种蓄意策略，旨在使贫穷国家永远贫穷。

One of the main tools used by the Jewish bankers in The City of London to enormously increase their wealth, is the international financial institutions of the UN – the IMF and the World Bank. These are some of the most insidious instruments of plundering and Exclusion, where the financial machinations of the Rothschilds and friends make unrepayable loans then seize basic infrastructure and millions of acres of land in compensation. Nations weak enough to capitulate to these demands, and there are many of them, are doomed to perpetual poverty and slavery in the worst colonial tradition.

伦敦金融城犹太银行家们用来大幅增加财富的主要工具之一，就是联合国的国际金融机构——国际货币基金组织和世界银行。这些机构是掠夺和排斥的最阴险工具，罗斯柴尔德家族及其盟友利用这些机构制造无法偿还的贷款，然后没收基本基础设施和数百万英亩的土地作为补偿。许多国家软弱到足以屈服于这些要求，它们注定要陷入最恶劣的殖民传统中的永久贫困和奴役。

One of the more recent victims was Greece who, having gotten itself deeply into debt and lacking the courage to leave the European Union and revert to its own currency, instead capitulated to the Rothschilds and other bankers who deprived it of all its national assets. In return for interim financing to stave off bankruptcy, Greece was forced to place all its physical infrastructure holdings, including ports, communications, airports, transportation, all state-owned enterprises and more, into a trust which was “entirely outside all influence of the Greek government”. Control of this trust was of course in the hands of those same bankers, who would now determine appropriate selling prices by which they would distribute these same assets to themselves. Today, Greece’s only significant asset is its ability to tax its citizens, which taxes are already spent for the next 40 years to repay the loans to the bankers. The Greek government now has only two functions: one, to collect taxes, and two, to maintain social order by whatever means necessary in order that the taxes can continue to be collected and paid to the bankers. Greece has virtually ceased to exist as a sovereign nation, and there are many others like it.

最近的一个受害者是希腊，该国深陷债务泥潭，既没有勇气退出欧盟，恢复使用本国货币，反而屈服于罗斯柴尔德家族和其他银行家，任由他们剥夺其所有国家资产。作为获得临时融资以避免破产的交换条件，希腊被迫将其所有实体基础设施资产，包括港口、通信、机场、交通、所有国有企业等，置于一个“完全不受希腊政府任何影响”的信托基金中。当然，这个信托基金的控制权掌握在那些银行家手中，他们现在会确定适当的出售价格，将这些资产分配给自己。如今，希腊唯一的重要资产就是向其公民征税的能力，而这些税收将在未来40年内用于偿还银行家的贷款。希腊政府现在只有两项职能：一是征税，二是通过一切必要手段维持社会秩序，以确保税收能够继续征收并支付给银行家。希腊作为一个主权国家几乎已不复存在，而像希腊这样的国家还有很多。

It has long been recognised in the developing world that institutions like the IMF and the World Bank are simply one of the means by which the international bankers plunder developing nations into perpetual poverty and real-life Exclusion. The financial policies forced onto developing nations in return for financial assistance, are precisely those which will inflict the maximum stranglehold to prevent these nations from any possible economic or social progress. The IMF and World Bank are simply instruments of Jewish financial power, flying moralistic flags of free-market liberalisation while plundering the victims. Under an international regime of political and financial dependence coupled with a constant military threat from the US (The Bankers’ Private Army), undeveloped nations continue to be exploited within the framework of an international capitalist system, “where it is virtually impossible for any country to disassociate itself from the overall structure”.

发展中国家早已认识到，国际货币基金组织（IMF）和世界银行等机构只是国际银行家掠夺发展中国家、使其陷入永久贫困和现实排斥的工具之一。作为获得财政援助的交换条件，强加给发展中国家的金融政策正是那些会最大程度地束缚这些国家、阻止其取得任何可能的经济或社会进步的政策。IMF和世界银行不过是犹太金融势力的工具，它们一面高举自由市场自由化的道德旗帜，一面掠夺受害者。在政治和金融依赖的国际体制下，再加上来自美国（银行家的私人军队）的不断军事威胁，不发达国家继续在国际资本主义体系的框架内遭受剥削，“任何国家几乎都不可能脱离这一整体结构”。

Joseph Stiglitz, the Nobel prize-winning economist and dissident former chief economist at the World Bank, describes it as having “brought disaster to Russia and Argentina and leaves a trail of devastated developing economies in its wake”. The World Bank and the IMF were primarily designed to plunder the developing world on behalf of the Rothschilds and other Jewish bankers in The City of London. World Bank development projects often destroy local culture and environment while “privatising” (i.e., confiscating) each nation’s infrastructure almost free of charge. IMF-mandated financial measures force the abandonment of health, education and social programs and allow public assets such as infrastructure to be acquired by international bankers and their multi-national corporations for a fraction of their true worth. “The net effect of all this is that, contrary to the carefully nurtured myth, developing nations have transferred far more wealth to the West (the Jews) than has been transferred to them, and that, of course, is the whole idea.

”诺贝尔经济学奖得主、持不同政见的前世界银行首席经济学家约瑟夫·斯蒂格利茨（Joseph Stiglitz）将其描述为“给俄罗斯和阿根廷带来了灾难，并留下了一连串被摧毁的发展中经济体”。世界银行和国际货币基金组织（IMF）最初的设计初衷，是为伦敦金融城的罗斯柴尔德家族和其他犹太银行家掠夺发展中国家。世界银行的发展项目往往在“私有化”（即没收）各国基础设施的同时，几乎免费地破坏当地的文化和环境。国际货币基金组织规定的金融措施迫使发展中国家放弃卫生、教育和社会项目，并允许国际银行家及其跨国公司以远低于其真实价值的价格收购基础设施等公共资产。“所有这些的净效应是，与精心培育的神话相反，发展中国家向西方（犹太人）转移的财富远远超过他们从西方转移到的财富，而这当然就是整个想法。”

The “official narrative” surrounding this immense wealth transfer is inevitably described in the media as somehow “impersonal”, if I can use that word. The intent is to suggest the wealth simply moves from one country to another, but that is a magnificently dishonest depiction. The truth is that the wealth is indeed sucked from a developing country, but it does not transfer to a developed Western country. Instead, it goes directly into the pockets of individuals who made the initial loans, and these are invariably the Jewish bankers in The City of London. These lenders are never identified, and their names never revealed to the public.

围绕这一巨额财富转移的“官方叙事”在媒体上不可避免地被描述为某种“非个人化”的叙事（如果我可以使用这个词的话）。其意图是暗示财富只是从一个国家转移到另一个国家，但这是一种极其不诚实的描述。事实是，财富确实是从发展中国家被抽走的，但它并没有转移到发达的西方国家。相反，它直接流入发放初始贷款的个人的口袋，而这些个人无一例外都是伦敦金融城的犹太银行家。这些贷款人从未被指明身份，他们的名字也从未向公众透露。

In his article Empire of Capital, George Monbiot [1] made appropriate points when he noted that these institutions, and the bankers who control them, forced Asian nations to liberalise their currencies only so that Jewish financial speculators like George Soros and Goldman Sachs could attack them. The Jewish-owned media, in describing the “Asian financial crisis”, presented it as some accidental act of God, ignoring the fact that it was deliberately planned and executed. All prescriptions from the IMF and World Bank are intended to drain developing nations (plundering) and to force an increasing income disparity (Exclusion). These institutions are effectively private instruments of financial power for the rich Jewish bankers, who did not end their colonial controls until they had established other means of subjugation.

乔治·蒙比尔特（George Monbiot）[1]在其文章《资本帝国》（Empire of Capital）中提出了恰当的观点，他指出，这些机构以及控制它们的银行家迫使亚洲国家开放其货币，只是为了像乔治·索罗斯（George Soros）和高盛（Goldman Sachs）这样的犹太金融投机者能够对其进行攻击。犹太人拥有的媒体在描述“亚洲金融危机”时，将其描述为某种偶然的天灾，而忽视了这场危机是经过精心策划和执行的。国际货币基金组织（IMF）和世界银行（World Bank）的所有处方都是为了榨取发展中国家的财富（掠夺）并加剧收入差距（排斥）。这些机构实际上是富有的犹太银行家们的私人金融权力工具，他们在找到其他征服手段之前，不会结束其殖民统治。

William Blum stated the situation precisely when he wrote, “It was under Reagan administration influence that the IMF and World Bank began widely imposing the policy package known as structural adjustment – featuring deregulation, privatisation, emphasis on exports, with deep cuts in social spending – that has plunged country after country in the developing world into economic destitution. The IMF chief at the time was cruelly honest about what was to come, saying in 1981 that, for low-income countries, ‘adjustment is particularly costly in human terms’.” That dispassionate assessment was issued by Jacques de Larosière.

威廉·布卢姆（William Blum）在写道：“正是在里根政府的影响下，国际货币基金组织（IMF）和世界银行开始广泛推行被称为结构调整的一揽子政策——以放松管制、私有化、强调出口以及大幅削减社会支出为特征——使发展中国家一个又一个陷入经济贫困。”时，对形势做出了精确的描述。时任国际货币基金组织总裁的雅克·德拉罗西埃（Jacques de Larosière）对即将发生的事情直言不讳，他在1981年表示，对于低收入国家而言，“调整在人力方面代价尤其高昂”。这一冷静的评估是由雅克·德拉罗西埃发表的。

Jacques de Larosière: For low-income countries, ‘adjustment is particularly costly in human terms’.

雅克·德拉罗西埃：对于低收入国家而言，“调整在人力方面付出的代价尤为巨大”。

The policies of the World Bank and IMF are such that infrastructure projects are designed with a high probability of failure. This leaves poor nations with perpetual debt and a steady transfer of wealth out of the Third World to the Jewish bankers. Despite claims of assisting development and alleviating poverty, they do precisely the opposite. In almost every case they force nations to reduce all social and government services, to cut back severely on education and health care. This forces poor nations into perpetual ignorance, debt, and poverty.

世界银行和国际货币基金组织的政策使得基础设施项目在设计时就存在很高的失败概率。这使得贫穷国家背负着永久债务，财富不断从第三世界国家流向犹太银行家。尽管他们声称要协助发展和减轻贫困，但他们的所作所为恰恰相反。几乎在所有情况下，他们都迫使国家减少所有社会和政府服务，大幅削减教育和医疗保健支出。这迫使贫穷国家陷入永久性的无知、债务和贫困。

The money lent to undeveloped nations is not “aid” in any sense that we would understand that term. In real life, if the IMF lends Nicaragua $300 million, typically none of that money ever flows to Nicaragua. The terms of the loans dictate that the country must hire “consultants” from a Western country, and all funds must be spent to purchase either goods or services from multi-national corporations owned by these same Jewish bankers or their friends. These loans function primarily as a corporate welfare program for those same corporations. When we examine the actual flow of money, it is clear as crystal that the Jewish bankers are actually lending money to themselves, but the developing countries must repay the loans. In most cases, the small nations are left with failed projects and unrepayable debt.

James Corbett wrote of the World Bank, “This process was described most famously by former insider and self-described “economic hitman” John Perkins, who wrote his “Confessions of an Economic Hitman” to shed light on the means by which the seemingly benevolent IMF/World Bank system is used to oppress and plunder the very populations it is designed to enrich. According to Perkins:[2]

詹姆斯·科贝特（James Corbett）在谈到世界银行时写道：“这一过程最著名的描述者是前内部人士、自称‘经济杀手’的约翰·珀金斯（John Perkins），他撰写了《经济杀手的自白》（Confessions of an Economic Hitman），揭示了看似仁慈的国际货币基金组织/世界银行系统是如何被用来压迫和掠夺其本应使之富裕的民众的。珀金斯表示：[2]

Free PDF

“So how does the system work? We economic hitmen have many vehicles to make this happen, but perhaps the most common one is that we will identify a country – usually a developing country – that has resources our corporations covet, like oil, and then we arrange a huge loan to that country from the World Bank or one of its sister organisations. Now most everybody in our country believes that loan is going to help poor people. It isn’t. Most of the money never goes to the country. In fact, it goes to our own corporations. It goes to the Bechtels and the Halliburtons and the ones we all hear about, usually led by engineering firms, but a lot of other companies are brought in and they make fortunes off building the infrastructure projects in that country. Power plants, industrial parks, ports, those types of things. Things that don’t benefit the poor people at all; they’re not connected to the electrical grid; they don’t get the jobs in the industrial parks because they’re not educated enough. But they as a class are left holding a huge debt.

“那么这个体系是如何运作的呢？我们这些经济杀手有很多手段来实现这一点，但也许最常见的是，我们会选定一个国家——通常是发展中国家——那里有我们公司觊觎的资源，比如石油，然后我们安排世界银行或其姊妹组织向该国提供巨额贷款。现在我们国家的大多数人都认为这笔贷款会帮助穷人。其实不然。大部分资金从未流向该国。事实上，它们流向了我们自己的公司。流向了贝克特尔公司、哈里伯顿公司以及我们耳熟能详的那些公司，通常由工程公司牵头，但也会引入许多其他公司，它们通过在该国建设基础设施项目而大赚其钱。比如发电厂、工业园区、港口等。这些项目根本不会让穷人受益；它们没有接入电网；穷人因为受教育程度不够，无法在工业园区找到工作。但他们作为一个阶层却背负着巨额债务。

The country goes deep into debt in order to make this happen, and a few of its wealthy people get very rich in the process. They own the big industries that do benefit from the ports and the highways and the industrial parks and the electricity. “The country is left holding this huge debt that it can’t possibly repay, so at some point we economic hitmen go back in and we say, ‘You know, you can’t pay your debts. You owe us a pound of flesh; you owe us a big favor. So, sell your oil real cheap to our oil companies, or vote with us on the next critical United Nations vote, or send troops in support of us to some place in the world like Iraq.’ And so, we use this whole process as, first of all, a means for getting their money (money we loan them) to enrich our own corporations, and then to use the debt to enslave them.

”为了实现这一目标，该国负债累累，而在此过程中，少数富人变得非常富有。他们拥有那些从港口、高速公路、工业园区和电力中受益的大企业。“该国背负着巨额债务，根本无法偿还，于是我们这些经济杀手在某个时候会介入，说，‘你知道，你无法偿还债务。你欠我们一磅肉；你欠我们一个大人情。所以，以非常低廉的价格把你们的石油卖给我们的石油公司，或者在下次关键的联合国投票中与我们站在一起，或者派兵支持我们到伊拉克这样的地方。’因此，我们利用整个过程，首先作为获取他们资金（我们借给他们的钱）的手段，来充实我们自己的公司，然后利用债务来奴役他们。”

“In his book, “The Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order“, [3] Professor Michel Chossudovsky of the University of Ottawa provides extensive documentation of precisely how this process has functioned over the years through the Structural Adjustment Loan and Sector Adjustment Loan programs at the World Bank’s disposal. This documentation includes details of the Bank’s oversight of the build-up of Rwanda’s military budget in the run-up to its bloody internal war of 1994, the Bank’s own admission of how its loan-dictated deregulation of Vietnam’s grain market led to widespread child malnutrition in the country, and the World Bank’s contribution (in conjunction with the IMF) to the unprecedented plundering of Russia that took place in the wake of the Soviet Union collapse. The World Bank, despite its friendly exterior and the lofty platitudes its proponents spout in its defense, continues to undergird a system of exploitation and debt enslavement of developing countries. For half a century, the Bank has been responsible for the furtherance of an immense system of plundering that was built not upon peace, prosperity and free trade but violence, debt and enforced servitude.”

“渥太华大学米歇尔·乔苏多夫斯基教授在其著作《贫困的全球化与新世界秩序》[3]中，通过世界银行掌握的结构调整贷款和部门调整贷款计划，提供了大量详尽的文献资料，以阐述这一过程多年来是如何运作的。这些文献资料包括世界银行在1994年卢旺达血腥内战前夕对其军事预算增长的监督细节、世界银行自身承认其贷款对越南粮食市场的管制放松导致该国儿童普遍营养不良的情况，以及世界银行（与国际货币基金组织[IMF]合作）在苏联解体后对俄罗斯进行前所未有的掠夺的贡献。尽管世界银行外表友好，其支持者为其辩护时也大放高调，但它仍在继续支撑着一个剥削发展中国家并使其陷入债务奴役的体系。半个世纪以来，世界银行一直负责推动建立一个庞大的掠夺体系，该体系不是建立在和平、繁荣和自由贸易的基础上，而是建立在暴力、债务和强制奴役的基础上。”

主权提取架构 — The Architecture of Sovereign Extraction

Before examining the mechanisms, we must understand what these institutions are. The IMF and World Bank have no money of their own. They are intermediaries. Capital contributed by shareholders gives them triple-A credit ratings, which allows them to borrow from “private capital markets” (i.e., The City of London) at low cost and on‑lend to developing countries at higher rates. In fiscal year 2025 alone, the World Bank Group raised approximately $80 billion from bonds issued to private investors. The private sector is not a peripheral participant; it is the ultimate beneficiary.

在探讨这些机制之前，我们必须先了解这些机构究竟是什么。国际货币基金组织（IMF）和世界银行本身并没有资金。它们只是中介机构。股东们投入的资本赋予了它们AAA信用评级，这使得它们能够以低成本从“私人资本市场”（即伦敦金融城）借款，并以‑较高的利率转贷给发展中国家。仅在2025财年，世界银行集团就通过向私人投资者发行债券筹集了约800亿美元。私营部门并非边缘参与者；而是最终的受益者。

The World Bank website tells us, “We are constantly innovating our financial model to build a better, more efficient, and bigger World Bank Group, one that is equipped to address urgent, overlapping global challenges. Since 2023, we have delivered several new financing instruments and made changes to our financial model that have made us even more efficient and attractive.” [4] True, but the “even more efficient and attractive” part is all about looting and plundering, not about eliminating poverty or assisting sovereign development. The bank talks about “Putting debt-strapped countries on a sustainable path”, but that is just rubbish. Between 2022 and 2024, nearly $750 billion in net outflows left developing economies; this was the largest debt‑related outflow in more than 50 years. This is not a statistical anomaly. This is a structural design.

世界银行网站告诉我们，“我们正在不断革新我们的金融模式，以建立一个更好、更高效、更大的世界银行集团，一个有能力应对紧迫且相互交织的全球挑战的集团。自2023年以来，我们推出了多项新的融资工具，并对我们的金融模式进行了调整，使我们更加高效且更具吸引力。”[4] 诚然，但“更加高效且更具吸引力”的部分完全与掠夺和抢劫有关，而非消除贫困或协助主权发展。该银行谈论“让负债累累的国家走上可持续道路”，但这只是废话。2022年至2024年间，发展中经济体净流出近7500亿美元；这是50多年来最大的与债务‑相关的资金流出。‑这并非统计上的异常现象。‑这是一种结构性设计。

The International Finance Corporation (IFC), the World Bank’s private‑sector arm, directly channels loans, technical assistance, and risk mitigation to large corporations. [5] The IFC is the largest multilateral source of equity and loan financing for private enterprises in developing countries. The institutions are not lenders to governments. They are conduits from private capital to private capital, with indebted sovereigns serving as the transmission belt.

国际金融公司（IFC）是世界银行的私营‑部门分支机构，直接向大型企业提供贷款、技术援助和风险缓解措施。[5]国际金融公司是发展中国家私营企业最大的多边股权和贷款融资来源。这些机构并非政府的贷款方，而是私人资本流向私人资本的渠道，负债的主权国家则充当了传输带的作用。

机制一：债务陷阱循环 — Mechanism One: The Debt Trap Cycle

The pattern has been repeated for decades. A developing country requires financing. Interest rates are low, so borrowing is cheap. The IMF and World Bank extend loans, always with conditions attached, known as “conditionalities” or, in larger form, “Structural Adjustment Programs” (SAPs). These conditions include tax hikes, spending cuts, reduction of social services, slashing health care and education, elimination of subsidies, devaluation of currency, and mandatory privatisation of state‑owned assets. A typical assessment states, “Lender’s funding is sophisticated way to subjugate Global South through loan addiction”.[6]

几十年来，这一模式一直重复上演。发展中国家需要融资。由于利率较低，借款成本也随之降低。国际货币基金组织（IMF）和世界银行会提供贷款，但总是附带条件，这些条件被称为“附加条件”，或者更广义地称为“结构调整计划（SAPs）”。这些条件包括增税、削减支出、减少社会服务、大幅削减医疗和教育投入、取消补贴、货币贬值以及国有资产的强制私有化。‑一份典型的评估报告指出：“贷款人的资金是通过贷款成瘾来征服全球南方国家的狡猾手段。”。 [6]

Critically, the timing is engineered. Loans are offered when global interest rates are low. Developing countries borrow, believing they can service the debt. Then interest rates are pushed upward (by central banks owned by these same lenders), the cost of borrowing skyrockets, and the country cannot meet its obligations. The result: 75 out of 119 low- and middle-income countries are now either already facing a debt crisis or at high risk of one.

关键在于，时机是经过精心策划的。在全球利率处于低位时，这些贷款机构会提供贷款。发展中国家相信它们能够偿还债务，于是借款。然后（由这些贷款机构拥有的中央银行）将利率推高，借贷成本飙升，国家无法履行其义务。结果：在119个中低收入国家中，有75个国家目前要么已经面临债务危机，要么面临很高的债务危机风险。

The scale is staggering. The total external debt stock of low- and middle-income countries reached almost $10 trillion in 2024, a record. The 78 most vulnerable countries – those eligible for World Bank grants and low‑cost loans – owe $1.2 trillion, also a record. Developing countries paid a record $415 billion in interest alone in 2024. The average interest rate on bond debt for these countries was near 10%, [7] and a typical low‑income country was forced to pay 15% of its total government revenues just for debt service. In some countries, the figure is far higher: Sri Lanka is projected to use as much as 30% of government revenues for debt servicing even after restructuring. [8] In fact, the IMF deliberately engineers social and sovereign dispossession under the guise of creating “social stability”. It is all an immense fraud.

规模之大令人震惊。2024年，中低收入国家的外债总额接近10万亿美元，创下历史纪录。78个最脆弱的国家——即有资格获得世界银行赠款和低成本贷款的国家——负债1.2万亿美元，同样创下历史纪录。‑2024年，发展中国家仅支付的利息就高达4150亿美元，创下历史纪录。‑这些国家的债券债务平均利率接近10%[7]，而一个典型的低‑收入国家被迫将其政府总收入的15%用于偿债。‑在一些国家，这一比例甚至更高：斯里兰卡预计在重组后仍将高达30%的政府收入用于偿债。[8]事实上，国际货币基金组织（IMF）打着创造“社会稳定”的幌子，蓄意剥夺社会和主权。这一切都是巨大的骗局。

机制二：作为主权放弃的条件性宽恕 — Mechanism Two: Conditional Forgiveness as an Abandonment of Sovereignty

Debt service payments consume funds that could otherwise go to education, healthcare, infrastructure, and social services. Governments spend 3.5 times more per person on debt service than on education, health, and social protection combined. [9] And this is by design. The conditions attached to IMF loans compel governments to: (1) Cut public services, eliminating social safety nets; (2) Eliminate food and fuel subsidies, pushing basic necessities beyond the reach of the poor; (3) Privatise state‑owned enterprises, including energy, water, telecommunications, and (4) Open domestic markets to foreign goods, destroying local industries that cannot compete with subsidised imports from the West; (5) Remove trade tariffs and protections, ensuring that multinational corporations capture local markets.[10]

偿债支出占用了本可用于教育、医疗、基础设施和社会服务的资金。政府在偿债上的支出是教育、医疗和社会保护支出总和的3.5倍。[9]而这正是其设计初衷。国际货币基金组织（IMF）贷款所附带的条件迫使政府不得不：（1）削减公共服务，取消社会安全网；（2）取消食品和燃料补贴，使穷人无法获得基本必需品；（3）将国有企业私有化，包括能源、水务、电信等领域；（4）向外国商品开放国内市场，摧毁无法与西方补贴进口商品竞争的本土产业；（5）取消贸易关税和保护措施，确保跨国公司占领本地市场。[10]

The IMF does not merely advise these policies. It requires them as conditions for financing. As one critic put it, the IMF’s operational method is to “systematically weaken and ultimately destroy existing economies of debtor nations in order to pave the way for transnational corporations to come in and reap the stolen harvest of underpaid labor”.

国际货币基金组织（IMF）不仅对这些政策提出建议，还将其作为提供融资的条件。正如一位批评者所言，IMF的运作方式是“系统性地削弱并最终摧毁债务国的现有经济，以便为跨国公司进入并掠夺低薪劳动者的劳动果实铺平道路”。

One website calls the IMF “The Enron of the Developing World”. [11] Others warn that the IMF’s perpetual insistence on the privatisation of all water resources is not “pro-poor”. It is not a secret that the International Jewish bankers are fixated on the privatisation of all fresh water resources worldwide. Nestlé are one of the leaders of this agenda.

一个网站称国际货币基金组织（IMF）为“发展中国家的安然（Enron）”。[11] 另一些网站则警告称，国际货币基金组织一再坚持所有水资源私有化并非“扶贫之举”。国际犹太银行家们执着于全球所有淡水资源的私有化，这已不是秘密。雀巢公司是这一议程的领导者之一。

In 2013, the Internet almost exploded when a video was posted in which Nestlé Chairman and CEO Peter Brabeck-Letmathe said that water was not a human right. His view is that “access to water is not a public right”, that it was just another foodstuff and a commodity, that it should be “privatised”, given a “market value”, and distributed by the “free market” like any other product. Not only that, he stated that to declare water a ‘right’ or a ‘human right’ was “extreme”. [12] These are his exact words from the video: “The one opinion, which I think is extreme, is represented by the NGOs who bang on about declaring water a public right. That means that as a human being you should have a right to water. That’s an extreme solution. And the other view says that water is a foodstuff like any other and like any other foodstuff it should have a market value.” And it is increasingly the Jewish bankers and their multi-nationals like Nestlé who are now “owning, pricing and distributing” the world’s drinking water.

2013年，一段视频在网上发布后，互联网几乎炸开了锅。视频中，雀巢公司董事长兼首席执行官彼得·布雷贝克–莱特马特表示，水并非一项人权。他认为“获取水资源并非一项公共权利”，它只是另一种食品和商品，应该“私有化”，赋予其“市场价值”，并像其他任何产品一样，通过“自由市场”进行分配。不仅如此，他还表示，宣称水是一种“权利”或“人权”是“极端的”。[12]这是他在视频中的原话：“我认为一种极端观点是由非政府组织所代表的，他们大肆宣扬将水宣布为一项公共权利。这意味着作为一个人，你应该有权获得水资源。这是一种极端的解决方案。而另一种观点则认为，水和其他任何食品一样，应该具有市场价值。”而如今，越来越多地是犹太银行家及其跨国公司（如雀巢）在“拥有、定价和分配”着全世界的饮用水。

Nestlé Jewish Chairman and CEO Peter Brabeck-Letmathe. Water is not a human right.

雀巢公司犹太裔董事长兼首席执行官彼得·布雷贝克-莱特马特。水并非一项人权。来源/Source:

Here are two articles on the effects of World Bank forced privatisation of water on Argentina [13] and Greece. [14] Another article documents how the IMF agenda is to force all African countries to “privatise” their water. [15] And that means selling off all water resources and infrastructure to these Jewish bankers at far below cost. I covered the issues with Nestlé and water in a previous article you may care to read. It contains much detail omitted here.

以下是两篇关于世界银行强制私有化水资源对阿根廷[13]和希腊[14]影响的文章。另一篇文章则记录了国际货币基金组织（IMF）的议程是如何迫使所有非洲国家将其水资源“私有化”的。[15]这意味着以远低于成本的价格将所有水资源和基础设施出售给这些犹太银行家。我在之前的一篇文章中讨论了雀巢与水资源的问题，您可能感兴趣，其中包含了许多此处省略的细节。 [16]

And, true to form, these same bankers and their media attempt to label China as laying a “debt trap” for nations in the Global South. [17] It has become a truism that any accusation made by the Jews is actually a confession of what they are themselves doing. I could provide scores of examples to document this assertion.

不出所料，这些银行家及其媒体试图将中国贴上为全球南方国家设下“债务陷阱”的标签。[17] 众所周知，犹太人提出的任何指控实际上都是对他们自身行为的供认。我可以提供大量例子来证明这一观点。

机制三：资产挪用 — Mechanism Three: Asset Appropriation

When a country cannot service its debt, the institutions do not simply write it off. The indebted nation is forced to sell its assets, not to repay the loan, but to restructure it. Since the 1980s, the IMF and World Bank have compelled debtor nations to sell off national assets and undertake large‑scale privatisation. These assets such as infrastructure, arable land, water aquifers, telecommunications networks, energy grids, are transferred to private ownership, overwhelmingly to foreign corporations which are most often owned by these same bankers.

当一个国家无法偿还其债务时，相关机构并不会简单地将其勾销。负债国家被迫出售其资产，目的并非为了偿还贷款，而是为了重组债务。自20世纪80年代以来，国际货币基金组织（IMF）和世界银行一直迫使债务国出售国家资产，并进行大规模‑私有化。这些资产，如基础设施、耕地、含水层、电信网络、能源电网等，被转交给私人所有，其中绝大多数被外国公司收购，而这些外国公司往往由这些银行家所有。

Water privatisation is the most egregious example. The World Bank and IMF have made water privatisation a standard condition of structural adjustment lending (SAPs) for at least 40 countries across Africa, Asia, and Latin America. The poor have been systematically deprived of access to safe, affordable water, forced to pay as much as 10 to 20 percent of their income for drinking water. In Tanzania, the IMF offered debt relief in 2002 on condition that the government first spend $145 million upgrading its water authority – and then privatise it by turning it over to the Jewish bankers. In Greece, water privatisation was a basic conditionality of the post‑2008 crisis rescue program, leading to price increases, poor service quality, and rising income inequality.

水务私有化是最令人震惊的例子。世界银行和国际货币基金组织（IMF）已将水务私有化作为对非洲、亚洲和拉丁美洲至少40个国家提供结构调整贷款（SAPs）的标准条件。穷人被系统地剥夺了获得安全、负担得起的水的机会，被迫支付高达其收入10%至20%的费用来购买饮用水。在坦桑尼亚，国际货币基金组织于2002年提出债务减免，条件是政府首先花费1.45亿美元升级其水务部门，然后将其私有化，转交给犹太银行家。在希腊，水务私有化是‑2008年后危机救助计划的基本条件，导致价格上涨、服务质量差和收入不平等加剧。

We can use Ghana in 2001 as a case study. This is a textbook example of the mechanism in action. In July 2001, the World Bank approved a $110 million structural adjustment loan for Ghana. But before a single dollar would be disbursed, Ghana was forced to implement seven “prior actions.” One of these was a requirement to raise water tariffs by 95%. This policy strangled the poor (who could not afford the new rates) while simultaneously making the state-run utility profitable, thus preparing it for sale to a private company. This isn’t an accusation; it is a direct quote from the World Bank’s own loan terms. The goal is explicit: to force the host into a position where it must commodify and dispose of its essential resources. [17a]

我们可以将2001年的加纳作为案例研究。这是该机制运作的一个典型例子。2001年7月，世界银行批准向加纳提供1.1亿美元的结构调整贷款。但在支付一分钱之前，加纳被迫实施了七项“先决行动”。其中一项是要求将水费提高95%。这项政策扼杀了穷人（他们负担不起新水费），同时使国营公用事业公司盈利，从而为将其出售给私营公司做好准备。这不是指责；这是直接引用世界银行自己的贷款条款。目标很明确：迫使东道国必须将其基本资源商品化并加以处置。 [17a]

The pattern is identical across all sectors: energy, mining, telecommunications, agriculture. When a country is trapped in debt, it is forced to sell the assets that could have generated future revenue. The assets are bought at fire‑sale prices by precisely the same Jewish bankers and Jewish-owned corporations that benefited from the original extraction. The country emerges from restructuring with less sovereignty, fewer assets, and the same or greater debt burden.

所有行业的情况都是一样的：能源、采矿、电信、农业。当一个国家陷入债务困境时，它被迫出售本可产生未来收入的资产。这些资产以跳楼价被那些从最初的开采中获益的犹太银行家和犹太人所有的公司买下。‑该国在重组后，主权减少，资产减少，债务负担却相同甚至更重。

机制四：将工程性崩溃作为政治武器 — Mechanism Four: The Engineered Collapse as a Political Weapon

If a country refuses these conditions, the IMF can freeze funding. It will halt infrastructure projects, starving contractors, and effectively strangling the economy until compliance is achieved. This is not negotiation. This is coercion.

如果一个国家拒绝这些条件，国际货币基金组织（IMF）可以冻结资金。这将导致基础设施项目停工，承包商资金短缺，并实际上扼杀经济，直至该国遵守这些条件。这不是谈判。这是胁迫。

排他论的应用：从个人到国家 — The Exclusion Thesis Applied: From Individuals to Nations

We previously hypothesised that the real motivation of the plundering class is not accumulation but Exclusion. At the individual level, we observed this in the permanent foreclosure of the debtor’s ability to save, invest, or accumulate; being priced out of home ownership, trapped by student debt, excluded from healthcare. At the sovereign level, the mechanism is identical but operates on a larger scale. The IMF and World Bank:

我们之前曾假设，掠夺阶层的真正动机并非积累，而是排斥。在个体层面，我们观察到这一点体现在债务人储蓄、投资或积累能力的永久丧失上；他们因高昂的房价而无法拥有住房，被学生贷款所困，被排斥在医疗保健之外。在国家层面，这一机制虽然相同，但规模更大。国际货币基金组织和世界银行：

(1) Induce borrowing during periods of low interest rates, analogous to the “predatory inclusion” that lures students and homeowners into debt they cannot escape.

（1）在低利率时期诱导借贷，类似于“掠夺性包容”策略，诱使学生和房主陷入无法摆脱的债务之中。

(2) Impose conditions that strip countries of their productive assets, analogous to the wage extraction and asset denial mechanisms we examined.

（2）施加条件，剥夺国家的生产性资产，类似于我们之前探讨的工资榨取和资产剥夺机制。

(3) Ensure that debt service consumes the majority of government revenue, leaving nothing for public goods, analogous to medical debt consuming household income.

（3）确保偿债支出占据政府收入的大部分，无余力用于公共产品，类似于医疗债务消耗家庭收入的情况。

(4) When the borrowing country collapses, force the transfer of remaining assets to private (largely Jewish) corporations, analogous to foreclosure and eviction, but at the scale of nations.

(4) 当借款国崩溃时，迫使剩余资产转移到私人（主要是犹太人）公司，类似于止赎和驱逐，但规模是国家层面的。

These institutions and their “assistance programs” do not fail. They operate exactly as designed. They are the transmission mechanism through which wealth is systematically transferred from the Global South to the Global North, from the indebted to the creditor, from the many to the few. And, like the individual‑level extraction we have documented, this process is not an accident of policy. It is the structure.

这些机构及其“援助项目”并非失败。它们完全按照设计运行。它们是财富从全球南方有系统转移到全球北方、从负债者转移到债权人、从多数人转移到少数人的传输机制。而且，正如我们所记录的个人‑层面的剥削一样，这一过程并非政策上的偶然。它是一种结构。

结论：主权提取机 — Conclusion: The Sovereign Extraction Machine

International financial institutions—namely the IMF and the World Bank—serve as instruments of Western financial dominance. Through the enforcement of Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) and austerity measures, they facilitate the extraction of wealth from the Global South.

国际金融机构——即国际货币基金组织（IMF）和世界银行——是西方金融主导地位的工具。它们通过执行结构调整计划（SAPs）和紧缩措施，为从全球南方国家榨取财富提供了便利。来源/Source

The IMF and World Bank are not development institutions. They are extraction institutions. They do not lend to poor countries to help them grow. They lend to create the conditions under which those countries’ assets can be transferred to private owners who are predominantly Jewish corporations and Jewish creditors who underwrite the institutions’ capital market borrowing. The results are in the data:国际货币基金组织和世界银行并非发展机构，而是榨取机构。它们不向贫穷国家提供贷款以助其发展。它们发放贷款的目的是创造条件，使这些国家的资产能够转移到私人所有者手中，而这些私人所有者主要是犹太企业和犹太债权人，他们为这些机构的资本市场借款提供担保。结果见诸数据

Nearly $10 trillion in debt, $415 billion in annual interest payments, $750 billion in net outflows over just three years. Seventy‑five countries in or near debt crisis. Developing countries spending more on debt service than on health, education, and social protection combined. Water, land, energy, and telecommunications that were once national assets are now owned by foreign entities.

近10万亿美元的债务，每年4150亿美元的利息支付，仅三年就净流出7500亿美元。75‑个国家处于或接近债务危机。发展中国家在偿债上的支出超过了卫生、教育和社会保障的总和。曾经属于国家资产的水、土地、能源和电信现在归外国实体所有。

This is not a conspiracy of cartoon villains. It is a system, rational, efficient, and entirely self‑interested, that has been refined over decades. It does not need to be hijacked. It operates exactly as designed. And its purpose, consistent with the Exclusion thesis, is not merely to make some people rich. It is to ensure that the majority – the Global South, the poor, the indebted, remain permanently excluded from the possibility of wealth.

这并非卡通恶棍的阴谋。而是一个经过数十年完善、系统化、理性且高效的完全利己体系。‑它无需被操纵。‑它完全按照设计运行。‑其目的与“排斥论”一致，并非仅仅为了让某些人致富。而是确保大多数人——全球南方国家、穷人、负债者——永远被排除在财富之外。

If we are to name this condition at the sovereign level, call it Structural Exclusion. It is the deliberate, institutionalised transfer of assets and sovereignty from the many to the few, with the debt instruments themselves serving as the legal camouflage for what is, in every meaningful sense, plunder.

如果我们要在主权层面为这种状况命名，不妨称之为“结构性排斥”。它指的是资产和主权从多数人到少数人的蓄意、制度化转移，而债务工具本身则作为法律上的伪装，掩盖了这种在任何意义上都是掠夺的行为。

国际货币基金组织结构调整的“强盗”运作模式 — The “Gangster” Operating Model of IMF Structural Adjustment

ActionAid’s report ‘Fifty Years of Failure: the IMF, Debt and Austerity in Africa’ is based on new research and powerful personal testimonies from across 10 African countries. The report documents how the IMF imposes austerity policies, undermining health, education and wider development across the continent. Rather than seek systemic solutions to the mounting debt crisis in Africa, and rather than exploring obvious alternatives such as progressive tax reforms, the IMF continues to enforce cuts to public spending that hurt women and disadvantaged groups most acutely.

援助行动组织的报告《五十年的失败：国际货币基金组织、债务与非洲的紧缩政策》基于对10个非洲国家的新研究和强有力的个人证词。该报告记录了国际货币基金组织如何强加紧缩政策，破坏整个非洲大陆的卫生、教育和更广泛的发展。国际货币基金组织没有寻求系统性解决非洲日益严重的债务危机，也没有探索累进税制改革等显而易见的替代方案，而是继续强制削减公共支出，这对妇女和弱势群体造成了最严重的伤害。来源/Source

Here is a link to an article written by a man who was a senior cabinet member of the Nigerian government, [18] and below is a direct quote from him about how the IMF and the World Bank really work. He claims they function similar to gangsters. He says that if a country refuses to implement the severe restructuring of its economy as demanded by the banks, they will use NATO to cause social instability and regime change. He claims these banks act to assist Western companies to loot and plunder poor countries.

以下是一个链接，指向一名曾担任尼日利亚政府高级内阁成员的男子所写的一篇文章[18]，以下是他关于国际货币基金组织（IMF）和世界银行实际运作方式的直接引述。他声称，这些机构的运作方式类似于黑帮。他说，如果一个国家拒绝按照银行的要求对其经济进行严格重组，他们就会利用北约来制造社会不稳定和政权更迭。他声称，这些银行的行为是为了协助西方公司掠夺和剥削贫穷国家。

“These owners of IMF and WB have forcefully changed governments through the instigation of military coups, social disturbances, economic sabotages, civil wars, and assassination of leaders who dared to seek independent paths of economic and financial development in UDCs. They imposed an economic blockade on Cuba, and sanctioned countries like Zimbabwe and Venezuela for daring to chart a national and people-oriented path of development. Where their political and economic diplomacy fail, their military wing – NATO – is called in to invade the ‘stubborn’ countries, during which people are massively killed, cities bombed, economic and social activities disrupted, financial and gold reserves looted, and material and natural resources plundered.”

“这些国际货币基金组织和世界银行的拥有者通过煽动军事政变、社会骚乱、经济破坏、内战以及暗杀那些敢于在依赖初级商品的发展中国家（UDCs）寻求独立经济和金融发展道路的领导人，强行更换政府。他们对古巴实施经济封锁，并对津巴布韦和委内瑞拉等敢于走国家和以人为本的发展道路的国家实施制裁。当他们的政治和经济外交手段失败时，他们就会动用其军事力量——北约——入侵那些‘顽固’的国家，在此期间，人民遭到大规模屠杀，城市遭到轰炸，经济和社会活动遭到破坏，金融和黄金储备遭到掠夺，物质和自然资源遭到掠夺。”

Yusuf argues that IMF/World Bank loans impose “hellish debts” that “promote debt slavery, deepen underdevelopment, and aggravate poverty”. This is not merely rhetorical; extensive academic research supports it. A 2022 statistical study covering 81 developing countries found that structural adjustment policies “increase poverty”, with IMF conditionalities “detrimental to the welfare of vulnerable populations”. A 2025 analysis shows structural adjustment programs “force recessionary policies that most seriously victimize the poor” and “exacerbate income and wealth inequalities”. Moreover, the conditions themselves like raising taxes, devaluing currency, increasing interest rates, lead to “higher borrowing costs for all”, creating the debt trap described. The documented picture is that the “structural adjustments” demanded by the IMF and World Bank have repeatedly made poor countries poorer, with predictable consequences.

优素福（Yusuf）认为，国际货币基金组织（IMF）/世界银行的贷款强加了“地狱般的债务”，“加剧了债务奴役，深化了欠发达状况，并加重了贫困”。这并非夸大其词；大量学术研究都支持这一观点。2022年一项涵盖81个发展中国家的统计研究发现，结构调整政策“加剧了贫困”，而国际货币基金组织的贷款条件“对弱势群体的福祉有害”。2025年的一项分析显示，结构调整计划“迫使实施对穷人危害最大的衰退政策”，并“加剧了收入和财富不平等”。此外，诸如增税、货币贬值、提高利率等条件本身，会导致“所有人借贷成本上升”，从而形成所描述的债务陷阱。有记录显示，国际货币基金组织和世界银行所要求的“结构调整”一再使贫穷国家变得更穷，后果可想而知。

“军事之翼”：北约作为敲诈勒索的工具 — The “Military Wing”: NATO as Instrument of Extortion

来源/Source

Yusuf’s most explosive claim is that where economic diplomacy fails, “their military wing – NATO – is called in to invade the ‘stubborn’ countries”. There is no publicly available document showing NATO’s Article 5 activated at IMF request. However, a more sophisticated pattern emerges: the IMF and NATO have functioned as an integrated coercive system. A former IMF Executive Director for Russia told Sputnik in 2024 that the IMF “has become a financial appendage of NATO”. It is an “agent and instrument of Western foreign policy” where countries are “discriminated against on the basis of geopolitical preferences”. This is not a fringe source. This is a senior insider speaking on the record.

尤素福最具爆炸性的说法是，在经济外交失败的情况下，“他们的军事力量——北约——会被召集起来入侵‘顽固’国家”。目前没有公开文件显示北约曾应国际货币基金组织（IMF）的要求启动第五条款。然而，一个更为复杂的模式浮现出来：国际货币基金组织和北约构成了一个综合的强制体系。2024年，国际货币基金组织前俄罗斯事务执行董事告诉俄罗斯卫星通讯社，国际货币基金组织“已成为北约的金融附属机构”。它是“西方外交政策的代理人和工具”，各国“因地缘政治偏好而受到歧视”。这不是边缘消息来源。这是一位高级内部人士的公开言论。

In Yugoslavia, the sequence is well-documented: “IMF interventions gutted the economy before NATO bombed. Yugoslavia was once an inspiring example of an alternative economic system to capitalism before the IMF gutted it and NATO conducted its first ‘offensive’ operation against it”. William Blum wrote, “One of the main imperatives is that any country that’s rising with an attempt to [form] a new kind of society which the US sees as possibly a good example of an alternative to the capitalist model – that is a great threat in Washington.” [19] Yugoslavia was such an obvious and extreme case of this, that I will produce a separate article on its destruction.

在南斯拉夫，这一过程有据可查：“国际货币基金组织（IMF）的干预措施在北约轰炸之前就摧毁了南斯拉夫的经济。在IMF摧毁南斯拉夫经济、北约对其发动首次‘进攻性’行动之前，南斯拉夫曾是资本主义替代经济体系的一个鼓舞人心的例子。”威廉·布卢姆写道：“一个主要的当务之急是，任何国家，只要它正在崛起，试图[构建]一种新型社会，而这种新型社会被美国视为资本主义模式替代品的一个良好范例，那么这个国家在华盛顿看来就是一个巨大的威胁。”[19]南斯拉夫就是这样一个明显且极端的例子，我将就其毁灭撰写一篇单独的文章。

“Somalia was an IMF-WB austerity program which destroyed agriculture and led to illegal regime change, civil war and chaos.” Sri Lanka was “caught in the cross-hairs of hybrid economic war” involving “US-led NATO sanctions regime”. The documented pattern is that NATO is not the formal military arm of the IMF, but an integrated Jewish toolkit. The IMF applies financial pressure. NATO and sanctions apply military and economic pressure. The result is indistinguishable from a coordinated system.

“索马里曾是国际货币基金组织（IMF）和世界银行（WB）紧缩计划的受害者，该计划摧毁了农业，并导致了非法政权更迭、内战和混乱。”斯里兰卡则“陷入了由美国主导的北约制裁制度所引发的混合经济战争的瞄准之下”。有记录显示，北约并非IMF的正式军事分支，而是犹太人的综合工具。IMF施加金融压力，而北约和制裁则施加军事和经济压力。其结果与一个协同作战系统无异。

Yusuf’s claim that the institutions “act to assist Western companies to loot and plunder poor countries” is supported by a wealth of critical analysis. Scholars argue the IMF and World Bank are “agents of imperialism” that “impoverish third world countries”, with their economic packages described as “a re-introduction of Trans-Atlantic slave trade”. One Nobel Prize-winning economist argued the institutions “repackage 19th-century practices of financial imperialism in a new, more sanitized form”, using debt to “suppress development in countries that could potentially compete with US interests”. This thread is not conspiracy. It is standard post-colonial economics.

优素福（Yusuf）声称，这些机构“采取行动协助西方公司掠夺和抢劫贫穷国家”，这一观点得到了大量批判性分析的支持。学者们认为，国际货币基金组织（IMF）和世界银行是“帝国主义的代理人”，它们“使第三世界国家陷入贫困”，其经济方案被描述为“跨大西洋奴隶贸易的再现”。一位获得诺贝尔奖的经济学家认为，这些机构“以一种新的、更体面的形式重新包装了19世纪的金融帝国主义做法”，利用债务“压制那些可能与美国利益相竞争的国家的发展”。这一观点并非阴谋论。这是标准的后殖民经济学观点。

政权更迭行动 — Regime Change Operations

Yusuf’s claim that IMF/WB owners have “forcefully changed governments through the instigation of military coups, social disturbances, … and assassination of leaders who dared to seek independent paths” is the hardest to confirm with publicly available open-source intelligence. The 1981 coup in Ghana, which brought Rawlings to power, became “the vehicle of the most rigorously enforced IMF/World Bank adjustment program in Africa”. In Pakistan, “the IMF and World Bank pushed the democratic regimes of both Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif to impose stabilisation and structural adjustment programs that contributed significantly to the rise of poverty and inequality”. Meanwhile, Cuba remains under blockade, and Zimbabwe and Venezuela have been sanctioned.

尤素福（Yusuf）声称，国际货币基金组织（IMF）/世界银行（WB）的所有者“通过煽动军事政变、社会骚乱……以及暗杀敢于寻求独立道路的领导人，强行更换政府”，这一点最难通过公开可用的开源情报来证实。1981年加纳的政变使罗林斯（Rawlings）上台，成为“非洲执行最严格的IMF/世界银行调整计划的工具”。在巴基斯坦，“IMF和世界银行推动贝娜齐尔·布托（Benazir Bhutto）和纳瓦兹·谢里夫（Nawaz Sharif）的民主政权实施稳定和结构调整计划，这些计划在很大程度上导致了贫困和不平等现象的加剧”。与此同时，古巴仍受到封锁，津巴布韦和委内瑞拉也受到了制裁。

Extensive academic studies have proven that the IMF and World Bank deliberately institute policies that deepen poverty. Studies have also demonstrated that these financial institutions cooperate with economic sanctions and NATO’s military power. This is all coordinated on demand from the actual lenders behind the scenes – Rothschild and friends in The City of London. Much of this information has emerged from senior insider testimony, notably substantiated on Yugoslavia and Somalia. The orchestrated coups and assassinations have clearly factually occurred, though open-source evidence of the initiators is difficult to obtain. Still, the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming.

大量学术研究已证明，国际货币基金组织（IMF）和世界银行故意制定加剧贫困的政策。研究还表明，这些金融机构与经济制裁和北约的军事力量相互配合。这一切都是幕后实际放贷者——罗斯柴尔德家族和伦敦金融城的朋友们——的要求下协调进行的。其中大部分信息来自高级内部人士的证词，尤其是在南斯拉夫和索马里问题上得到了证实。精心策划的政变和暗杀事件显然确有其事，尽管很难获得发起者的公开证据。尽管如此，间接证据还是非常充分的。

The system of the IMF, World Bank, NATO, and the bankers in The City of London, operates as an integrated Jewish coercion toolkit.There have been multiple case studies on this, with this tri-partite coordination well-documented and proven. These allegations demand to be taken seriously. After rigorous examination, the evidence tells us the IMF and World Bank, in close coordination with Jewish bankers, Western governments and NATO, have functioned as an integrated system of economic coercion. While the direct evidence for assassination plots or coup orchestrations is circumstantial, the broader pattern of coordinated financial, economic, and military pressure – with the same political objectives – is well-documented. Whether that constitutes “gangsterism” or “the functional logic of Jewish Exclusionist hegemony” is a question of labels. Nevertheless, the underlying reality is not in dispute.

国际货币基金组织（IMF）、世界银行、北大西洋公约组织（NATO）以及伦敦金融城银行家的体系，构成了一个综合的犹太胁迫工具包。关于这一点已有多个案例研究，其中这种三方协调得到了充分记录和证实。这些指控需要得到认真对待。经过严格审查，证据告诉我们，国际货币基金组织和世界银行与犹太银行家、西方政府和北大西洋公约组织密切协调，构成了一个综合的经济胁迫体系。虽然暗杀阴谋或政变策划的直接证据是间接的，但协调金融、经济和军事压力的更广泛模式——具有相同的政治目标——却有据可查。这是否构成“匪帮行为”或“犹太排他主义霸权的功能逻辑”是一个标签问题。然而，潜在的现实是没有争议的。

Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).

罗曼诺夫先生的作品已被翻译成34种语言，他的文章被发布在30多个国家的150多个外文新闻和政治网站上，以及100多个英文平台上。拉里·罗曼诺夫（Larry Romanoff）是一位退休的管理顾问和商人。他曾在国际咨询公司担任高级管理职务，并拥有一家国际进出口企业。他曾任上海复旦大学客座教授，为高级EMBA课程讲授国际事务案例研究。罗曼诺夫先生现居上海，目前正在撰写一系列共十本书，总体上涉及中国与西方的话题。他是辛西娅·麦金尼（Cynthia McKinney）新选集《当中国打喷嚏》（When China Sneezes）的特约作者之一（第2章——与恶魔打交道）。

His full archive can be seen at

他的全部档案可以在以下网址查看：

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/

He can be contacted at: 2186604556

他的联系方式是：2186604556

NOTES – Part 6

注释——第6部分

[1] Empire of Capital
https://www.monbiot.com/2012/04/30/empire-of-capital/

[1] 资本帝国
https://www.monbiot.com/2012/04/30/empire-of-capital/
[2] [PDF]Confessions of an Economic Hit Man – Internet Archive
https://ia600507.us.archive.org/0/items/ConfessionsOfAnEconomicHitman_257/JohnPerkins-
[2] [PDF]《经济杀手自白》——互联网档案馆
https://ia600507.us.archive.org/0/items/ConfessionsOfAnEconomicHitman_257/JohnPerkins-
[3] The Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order
https://archive.org/details/globalizationofp0000chos
[3] 贫困的全球化与新世界秩序
https://archive.org/details/globalizationofp0000chos
[4] Transforming Finance to Meet Today’s Development Needs
https://www.worldbank.org/en/about/unit/brief/transforming-finance-to-meet-today-s-development-needs?cid=ECR_TT_worldbank_EN_EXT
[4] 转型金融以满足当今发展需求
https://www.worldbank.org/en/about/unit/brief/transforming-finance-to-meet-today-s-development-needs?cid=ECR_TT_worldbank_EN_EXT
[5] World Bank and Private Sector
https://www.worldbank.org/en/about/partners/the-world-bank-group-and-private-sector/investors
[5] 世界银行与私营部门
https://www.worldbank.org/en/about/partners/the-world-bank-group-and-private-sector/investors
[6] IMF modus operandi in client states
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2524670/entertainment
[6] 国际货币基金组织在附庸国的运作方式
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2524670/entertainment
[7] World Bank sounds alarm as debt costs outpace financing by $741bn
https://www.businessday.co.za/world/2025-12-03-world-bank-sounds-alarm-as-debt-costs-outpace-financing-by-741bn/#google_vignette
[7] 世界银行发出警告：债务成本超过融资7410亿美元
https://www.businessday.co.za/world/2025-12-03-world-bank-sounds-alarm-as-debt-costs-outpace-financing-by-741bn/#google_vignette
[8] Hitting the poor and sparing the wealthy. IMF Engineered Dispossession,
https://www.dailymirror.lk/print/opinion/Hitting-the-poor-and-sparing-the-wealthy-IMF-Engineered-Dispossession-as-Social-Stability/172-322703
[8] 打击穷人，放过富人。国际货币基金组织策划的剥夺行为，
https://www.dailymirror.lk/print/opinion/打击穷人，放过富人-国际货币基金组织策划的剥夺行为对社会稳定的影响/172-322703
[9] IMF and WB predatory solutions do not address global poverty and debt crisis
https://www.aprnet.org/imf-and-wb-predatory-solutions-do-not-address-global-poverty-and-debt-crisis/#to-top
[9] 国际货币基金组织和世界银行的掠夺性解决方案并未解决全球贫困和债务危机
https://www.aprnet.org/imf-and-wb-predatory-solutions-do-not-address-global-poverty-and-debt-crisis/#to-top
[10] Plundering Peter to Pay Paul
https://archive.globalpolicy.org/socecon/bwi-wto/wbank/2002/0404yeltimes.htm
[10] 拆东墙补西墙
https://archive.globalpolicy.org/socecon/bwi-wto/wbank/2002/0404yeltimes.htm
[11] The Enron of the Developing World
https://www.archive.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/209-bwi-wto/43341.html%3Ftmpl=component&print=1&page=.html
[11] 发展中国家的安然事件
https://www.archive.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/209-bwi-wto/43341.html%3Ftmpl=component&print=1&page=.html
[12] Nestlé Chairman Peter Brabeck Says We Humans Don’t Have a Right to Water
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nestle-chairman-peter-brabeck-water_b_315015
[12] 雀巢董事长彼得•布雷贝克称我们人类无权享有水资源
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nestle-chairman-peter-brabeck-water_b_315015
[13] The World Bank’s Influence on Water Privatisation in Argentina: The Experience of the City of Buenos Aires
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/water-governance-in-motion/world-banks-influence-on-water-privatisation-in-argentina-the-experience-of-the-city-of-buenos-aires/AC873DF8004BAA65D3CA2E46BBE52A57
[13] 世界银行对阿根廷水务私有化的影响：布宜诺斯艾利斯市的经验
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/water-governance-in-motion/world-banks-influence-on-water-privatisation-in-argentina-the-experience-of-the-city-of-buenos-aires/AC873DF8004BAA65D3CA2E46BBE52A57
[14] Debt-driven water privatization: The case of Greece
https://econpapers.repec.org/article/eurejmsjr/228.htm
[14] 债务驱动的水务私有化：以希腊为例
https://econpapers.repec.org/article/eurejmsjr/228.htm
[15] IMF forces African countries to privatise water
http://www.afrol.com/News2001/afr003_water_private.htm
[15] 国际货币基金组织迫使非洲国家对水资源进行私有化
http://www.afrol.com/News2001/afr003_water_private.htm
[16] Nestlé and the World’s Water
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/nestle-and-the-worlds-water-may-00-2021/
[16] 雀巢与世界水资源
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/nestle-and-the-worlds-water-may-00-2021/
[17a] Privatization Tidal Wave: IMF/World Bank Water Policies and the Price Paid by the Poor
https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?aty=open-web-entry&id=GALE%7CA79179772&it=r&sw=w&v=2.1&p=AONE&userGroupName=anon%7E170bce54&oweAuth=true
[17a] 私有化浪潮：国际货币基金组织/世界银行的水务政策及穷人付出的代价
https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?aty=open-web-entry&id=GALE%7CA79179772&it=r&sw=w&v=2.1&p=AONE&userGroupName=anon%7E170bce54&oweAuth=true
[17] ‘Debt trap’ hype shows the West lacks sincerity to deliver real solutions
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202302/1285820.shtml
[17] “债务陷阱”炒作表明西方缺乏提供真正解决方案的诚意
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202302/1285820.shtml
[18] Poverty alleviation: Not in the IMF and World Bank DNA
https://www.premiumtimesng.com/opinion/763313-poverty-alleviation-not-in-the-imf-and-world-bank-dna-by-ahmed-aminu-ramatu-yusuf.html
[18] 减贫：并非国际货币基金组织和世界银行的基因
[https://www.premiumtimesng.com/opinion/763313-poverty-alleviation-not-in-the-imf-and-world-bank-dna-by-ahmed-aminu-ramatu-yusuf.html]
[19] A conversation with William Blum
https://www.ashevilleglobalreport.org/articles/a-conversation-with-william-blum
[19] 与威廉•布卢姆的对话
https://www.ashevilleglobalreport.org/articles/a-conversation-with-william-blum
*
This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.
本文可能包含受版权保护的材料，其使用未得到版权所有者的明确授权。本文内容根据合理使用原则提供，仅用于教育和信息目的。本文内容不得用于商业用途。