Jews are Destroying Western Society
The Sexual Revolution: A Systemic Weapon Against Society
The Divorce Explosion: Quantifying the Rupture
The Single-Parent Household: The Product of Engineered Fragmentation
The Women’s Liberation Movement: Ideological Cover for Extraction
Other Vectors: Immigration, LGBT+, Drugs, and the WEF Agenda
The Mass Media Role: Not Neutral, Not Accidental
The Architecture of Social Destruction
In prior sessions, we discussed at length the (primarily financial) plundering of individuals, corporations, governments and nations, by a small group of (primarily Jewish) elites. And we concluded that the plundering was not merely for accumulation of assets but for Exclusion – to ensure that only this group had any assets at all.
There is another area of plundering that I believe is foundational, one that is much wider and reaches much deeper than the financial plundering and Exclusion we have been discussing. We have nations, governments, corporations, and individuals, all being looted and plundered, but we also have the basic fabric of Western society itself being plundered into oblivion. The truth is that Western societies are being deliberately and systematically destroyed. The signs are everywhere, but observers tend to see these as disparate unconnected events or conditions, and fail to connect them to an overall agenda. This portion of the agenda is extremely serious, and I suggest you treat it as such. The very fabric of Western societies is being destroyed – morals, the family and family values.
My analysis of societal destruction as a foundational layer of the Jewish agenda is not merely speculative. When we examine this topic with forensic rigor, the evidence produces a pattern of engineered social entropy – a gradual decline into disorder. And that means a deliberate dismantling of the structures (family, community, shared identity) that once protected individuals from total exposure to Jewish social machinations. I approach this not as a cultural commentator, but as a detective examining a crime scene. The question is not whether these changes occurred – they have – but whether they exhibit the hallmarks of coordinated design rather than spontaneous evolution.
To begin, in the 1960s and 1970s, we had the so-called “sexual revolution” in the West, augmented by the intense promotion of birth-control pills, this duo causing sexual morals to evaporate. One result was that the divorce rate doubled in Canada and the US, and perhaps in Europe as well. Then in the late 1970s and early 1980s we had the so-called “women’s’ liberation movement”. This was promoted heavily by all the (Jewish-owned) women’s magazines of the time, as well as the mass media, all owned or controlled by Jews. The theory was that women could be hugely successful if they were not carrying the millstone of family and marriage. The result was that the divorce rates doubled again in a very short time. These conditions were not accidental; they were clearly part of a planned agenda to destroy the family. The family is the basis of society and civilisation; if the family is destroyed, society itself will collapse.
The sexual revolution and women’s liberation destroyed much of the moral framework of society, and initiated the ruin of the family and related values. We in the West seem to have totally lost our sense of shame, because of this.
Another area is the enforced immigration, especially in Europe but also in Canada and the US. It is proven that if the percentage of “others” – foreigners unlike us – exceeds about 30% of the population, a society loses its cohesion and becomes aimless and drifting. If we have 100 persons who all share the same culture and values, and who object to a government policy, we will mostly be unanimous in our agenda for reform. But if 30% or more of this group are “others” with a totally different culture and values, and with very different things being important to them, we will not be able to reach a critical mass of social dissent, and we will become helpless. Many countries in Europe today have more than the 30% of very different foreigners.
There is more to this immigration story. Another, and very serious, inescapable outcome is that immigration will, over the medium to long term, effectively eliminate races and ethnic groups. Whatever the intentions of the intense immigration push in Europe especially, this will be the ultimate result. Germany will soon no longer be “German”; Italy no longer “Italian”, and France no longer “French”. The US and Canada will very soon no longer be white countries. This is in keeping with Klaus Schwab’s WEF promoting the agenda that “national sovereignty” is an outdated concept. This is not a joke, but a momentous agenda that is already occurring. The elimination of national sovereignty was the main intent of the stillborn TPP – the “Trans-Pacific Partnership”. [1] Canada’s former Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, boasted that Canada was the world’s first “post-nation-state”; i.e., post-sovereign nation. [2]
On 24 June 2022, the US Supreme Court overturned the constitutional protection of the right to abortion, which had been upheld by a landmark 1973 ruling known as Roe v. Wade. Source
Most of us have forgotten the incessant frontal assault on women, on the family, on morals and conscience, and on society, by the intensely-pressured propaganda campaign for free abortions, a campaign that has now progressed for more than a century and is still underway. Planned Parenthood has been intensely promoted for all these years as a campaign for “reproductive health” and “personal liberties”, but it was no such thing. Abortion is widely recognised as a “Jewish value”, and the push for it was entirely Jewish. ZIKA was one huge contribution to this effort. [3]
Other areas are the heavy promotion of homosexuality and the LGBT+, where every manner of sexual perversion is now just a “preference”. Morality is dead. Another area is the heavy push for the legalisation of “recreational drugs” like marijuana and cocaine. Religion is another area being pushed into the scrap bin, which is also working to destroy society. We have yet another new push – heavily promoted by Klaus Schwab at the WEF – for people to live in “tiny homes” of perhaps 15 or 20 square meters. “You will have nothing, and you will be happy”. There is also the powerful new push for “insect protein”, for humans (Gentiles only) eating maggots for nutrition. All of these things, and many more, are connected and must be seen as such. None of these are natural evolutions or accidents, evidenced by the immense media propaganda campaigns supporting them. They are all part of a plan. It is of great importance to realise that most of these changes are occurring simultaneously and that all are fed by persistent and intense media promotion.
The Sexual Revolution: A Systemic Weapon Against Society
On May 9, 1960, the FDA approved the first oral contraceptive in the United States. Source
The timing of this was critical. The introduction of the oral contraceptive pill in 1960 was not a neutral technological advance. It was, as demographers have documented, a structural shock that fundamentally altered the relationships between men and women. It also severely altered concepts of morality, and changed forever the social values relating to marriage and family.
It was a Jew named Carl Djerassi who developed the modern contraceptive pill for Syntex Laboratories in 1951. [4] The birth control pill was approved by the USFDA shortly after, and went into common use under widespread promotion by the mass media and the womens’ magazines of the time. The “official narrative” tells us that the birth control pill “has transformed women’s health” by offering reliable contraception and “additional health benefits”. [5] I am unaware of any additional health benefits, but the main point is that the pill transformed much more than womens’ health. The main transformation was in female morality, again strongly encouraged by a concerted propaganda campaign that stressed the independence of womanhood while now “taking control of your body”, and having “choice”. The “choice” of course was the encouragement of free, promiscuous, and uninhibited sex, targeted at females as young as girls entering puberty. These were essentially the same arguments used by the Jews to promote free abortions.
According to the “second demographic transition” framework developed by demographer R. Lesthaeghe, [6] [7] the period between 1955 and 1970 witnessed three simultaneous societal ruptures: a dramatic acceleration of divorce, the end of the baby boom, and a sharp decline in marriage rates. This was not a slow evolution. It was a cascade. This “trilogy of ruptures” includes: (a) the origins and patterns of this global sexual revolution, (b) the resultant sub-replacement fertility, and (c) the rise of unmarried cohabitation and the “ethics revolution”.
The technical term used by demographers is significant: they speak of the “second contraceptive revolution” based on “efficient methods” that allowed the separation of sex from reproduction “more decisively than ever before”. This technological shock did not merely enable individual choice; it restructured the entire calculus not only of marriage but of the content and quality of relationships and relations between men and women. It also dramatically restructured the concept of morality, opening floodgates that could never be closed. What makes this relevant to our thesis is the coordinated nature of the ideological accompaniment. The pill arrived simultaneously with an aggressive media campaign for promiscuous sexual activity by women and girls, again tagged as “having choice” and “freedom” and “taking control of your body”. It was intensely discussed and recommended in women’s magazines, in television, in film, and almost always accompanied by a narrative that reframed traditional marriage as oppression. As one analysis notes: “New ethics replaced the family with the self; dignity no longer derived from fulfilling obligations, but from self-fulfillment”. This is not organic cultural change. This is engineering at scale of social norms.
The Divorce Explosion: Quantifying the Rupture
In the period 1965-1975, the so-called “sexual revolution” combined with the early adoption of the birth-control pill, resulted in the divorce rate at least doubling in Canada and the US, and even tripling in some Western countries. In that same period, the contributing concept of “no-fault” divorce laws was adopted in Canada and across most US states. Following this, the divorce rate surged so dramatically that by 1975, half of marriages faced potential dissolution. The introduction of no-fault divorce legislation is particularly significant, because it had the effect of transforming marriage from a binding social contract into an easily terminable arrangement. In the period 1975-1985 came the “Women’s Liberation” movement, immediately causing yet another massive surge in the divorce rates, which plateaued at historically unprecedented levels.
From the Exclusion perspective, the destruction of marriage as a durable institution serves a clear function: atomisation. A married couple with children represents a unit of resistance; shared resources, mutual support, collective bargaining against employers, landlords, and the state. A divorced individual, particularly a single mother, is vulnerable. She is more likely to need state assistance, more likely to accept exploitative wages, more likely to fall into debt, and more likely to be excluded from asset accumulation.
The data on this final point is stark. A US study found that in states that adopted no-fault divorce, divorced women and their children suffered an immediate 73% drop in their standard of living. This was not an accident of the system. This was the system redistributing wealth from women and children – from the vulnerable to the protected.
The Single-Parent Household: Engineered Fragmentation
The most recent US data (2026) shows that approximately one-third of children live with a single parent, the highest rate in the OECD. Among African-American households, the figure exceeds 60%. But the trendline is unmistakable. Between 1960 and 2000, unmarried-couple households multiplied almost tenfold; the proportion of births to unmarried mothers rose from 5% to almost 35%; the percentage of adults who declined to marry at all rose from 15% to nearly 20%. The academic literature refers to this as the “retreat from marriage.” The language is neutral, but the consequences are not. As one feminist critic noted, “The vaunted independence of the liberated and divorced often turned out to mean loneliness and penury”.
The family is a unit of resistance. The family is the factory that produces resilient, non-extractable humans. Destroy the family, and you destroy the capacity for resistance. A stable two-parent household with shared resources, intergenerational obligations, and community ties is difficult to exploit. It can weather economic shocks. It can save. It can refuse exploitative wages. It can pass assets to children.
The atomised individual is extractable. The divorced single mother, the isolated elderly person, the young adult without family support, the student deeply in debt, are the targets of predatory lending, exploitative labor practices, and the debt traps I documented earlier. The destruction of marriage creates new markets, each broken family becoming a new revenue stream. Divorce generates legal fees, new housing purchases, dual household expenses, and increased consumption of everything from furniture to therapy. The individuals resulting from this destruction are not citizens. They are raw material.
The Women’s Liberation Movement: Ideological Cover for Social Destruction
The women’s movement was a parallel vector of societal destruction, at least in North America. The stated goals of equal pay, reproductive rights, access to education, were probably legitimate responses to genuine oppression. However, the actual effects of the movement, as promoted by the Jewish-owned mass media, diverged sharply from its stated aims. The movement’s message, much amplified by women’s magazines and television, was not merely “equal pay for equal work.” It was, in its most radical formulation: “not to be a wife, not to be a mother” and “to smash the family”. This was not a call for equality; it was a call for institutional destruction.
The consequences were measurable: Divorce rates doubled again in the decade following the height of the women’s movement. Labor force participation of mothers with young children rose from one-quarter in 1960 to more than half by 1986. The contradiction is the point. The woman who is divorced, working two jobs, exhausted, and financially precarious is not liberated. She is extractable. She will accept lower wages, longer hours, and worse conditions because she has no fallback. She will take out predatory loans, accept substandard housing, and delay retirement indefinitely. She is, in this framework, the perfect asset-less subject.
Other Vectors: Immigration, LGBT+, Drugs, and the WEF Agenda
The additional vectors I listed above, of enforced immigration, LGBT+ normalisation, drug legalisation, the WEF’s abandonment of national sovereignty, its “tiny homes” and “insect protein” agendas, deserve acknowledgment in this context because each follows the same logic. Mass immigration destroys social cohesion, prevents critical mass of dissent, and creates a compliant labor force competing for lower wages. The normalisation of both LGBT+ and same-sex “marriages” further destabilise traditional family structures, and normalise non-reproductive relationships which cannot produce new generations. Drug legalisation pacifies, incapacitates, and extracts revenue from the asset-less class. Klaus Schwab’s “You will own nothing” is an explicit admission of the Exclusion agenda; where there are no assets, there is no resistance. The new (Gentile) food of “insect protein” signals the planned reduction of living standards for the Gentile majority while the Jewish billionaire elites retain luxury lives.
The Mass Media Role: Not Neutral, Not Accidental
My observation that the mass media, notably magazines, television, film, were (and still are) owned by a concentrated group of Jews who promoted these changes aggressively, is supported by the historical record. The same media outlets that promoted the sexual revolution and women’s liberation also normalised divorce and sexual promiscuity, celebrated single motherhood, and pathologised traditional marriage. The mechanism is not conspiracy in the crude sense. It is ideological capture. When the same corporate interests own both the news outlets and the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture birth control pills, when the same advertising agencies profit from selling both “liberation” and the products that fill the resulting void, the alignment of incentives is clear.
The Architecture of Social Destruction
These elements are not isolated phenomena. They are coordinated vectors of a single strategy: the complete destruction of all mediating structures between the individual in society and the ruling Jewish elite. This social destruction connects to my central argument about the exclusion of the Goyim (the non-Jews) because the link is structural, not incidental.
The evidence available suggests that the sexual revolution, women’s liberation, and the resulting destruction of the nuclear family exhibit all the characteristics of engineered social transformation rather than spontaneous cultural evolution. The timing coincides with technological shocks (the pill), and the implementation was amplified by the concentrated media ownership. The consequences of atomisation, vulnerability, extractability, serve the interests of the (Jewish masters-to-be) of our New World Order-to-come. This identifies a crucial layer of my thesis that extends beyond economic plundering to social destruction. And the evidence suggests it was not an accident.
The erosion of shame enables normalisation. What was once unthinkable: divorce, free sex without responsibility, sexual perversions, cohabitation, single motherhood, abortion; is now routine. And what is routine cannot be resisted. The system does not need to coerce when it has manufactured consent.
In the subsequent essays in this series, I will deal with the many aspects of this destruction, expanding on the topics introduced here while introducing many others, and providing specific evidence on a case-by-case basis.
*
Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 150 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).
His full archive can be seen at
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/
He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com
*
NOTES – Destruction of Society – Part 1
[1] The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/11545/
[2] THE GODLESS COUNTRY
https://www.actforcanada.ca/p/the-godless-country
[3] ZIKA
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/5811/
[4] First oral contraceptive
https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/first-oral-contraceptive
[5] A Brief History of the Birth Control Pill
https://www.verywellhealth.com/a-brief-history-on-the-birth-control-pill-3522634
[6] The Second Demographic Transition in Western Countries: An Interpretation
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257928736_The_Second_Demographic_Transition_in_Western_Countries_An_Interpretation
[7] Second Demographic Transition – A Trilogy
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353412854_Second_Demographic_Transition_-_A_Trilogy
*
This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.
Jews are Plundering the World — New!
Who Starts All The Wars?Jews are Plundering the World — New!
What we Are Not Told :German POWs in America – What Happened to Them?
The Jewish Hasbara in All its Glory
Democracy – The Most Dangerous Religion
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 1 — How the US Became Rich
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 2 — Life in a Failed State
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 3 — The Branding of America
Police State America Volume One
Police State America Volume Two
THE WORLD OF BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
False Flags and Conspiracy Theories
Kamila Valieva
LARRY ROMANOFF FREE E-BOOKS & PDF ARTICLES
Copyright © Larry Romanoff, Blue Moon of Shanghai, Moon of Shanghai, 2026
