上海的月亮: CN — LARRY ROMANOFF: 犹太人正在摧毁西方社会 — 第一部分 – 引言 — Jews are Destroying Western Society

翻译者：Pearl

CHINESE ENGLISH ESTONIAN

性革命：反社会的系统性武器 — The Sexual Revolution: A Systemic Weapon Against Society

离婚激增：破裂的量化 — The Divorce Explosion: Quantifying the Rupture

单亲家庭：人为分裂的产物 — The Single-Parent Household: The Product of Engineered Fragmentation

妇女解放运动：剥削的意识形态掩护 — The Women’s Liberation Movement: Ideological Cover for Extraction

其他载体：移民、LGBT+群体、毒品以及世界经济论坛议程 — Other Vectors: Immigration, LGBT+, Drugs, and the WEF Agenda

大众媒体的角色：非中立，非偶然 — The Mass Media Role: Not Neutral, Not Accidental

社会破坏的架构 — The Architecture of Social Destruction

In prior sessions, we discussed at length the (primarily financial) plundering of individuals, corporations, governments and nations, by a small group of (primarily Jewish) elites. And we concluded that the plundering was not merely for accumulation of assets but for Exclusion – to ensure that only this group had any assets at all.

在之前的会议中，我们详细讨论了一小群（主要是犹太人）精英对个人、公司、政府和国家的掠夺（主要是金融方面的掠夺）。我们得出的结论是，这种掠夺不仅仅是为了积累资产，更是为了排他——确保只有这一群体才拥有任何资产。

There is another area of plundering that I believe is foundational, one that is much wider and reaches much deeper than the financial plundering and Exclusion we have been discussing. We have nations, governments, corporations, and individuals, all being looted and plundered, but we also have the basic fabric of Western society itself being plundered into oblivion. The truth is that Western societies are being deliberately and systematically destroyed. The signs are everywhere, but observers tend to see these as disparate unconnected events or conditions, and fail to connect them to an overall agenda. This portion of the agenda is extremely serious, and I suggest you treat it as such. The very fabric of Western societies is being destroyed – morals, the family and family values.

我认为，还有另一个掠夺领域具有基础性意义，其范围之广、程度之深远超我们之前讨论的金融掠夺和排斥。国家、政府、企业和个人都遭受了掠夺和剥削，但西方社会本身的基本结构也在被掠夺至湮没无闻。事实是，西方社会正在被蓄意、系统地摧毁。迹象无处不在，但观察者往往将这些视为互不相干的事件或状况，未能将其与整体议程联系起来。这一议程部分极为严重，我建议你同样严肃对待。西方社会的根基——道德、家庭和家庭价值观——正在遭受破坏。

My analysis of societal destruction as a foundational layer of the Jewish agenda is not merely speculative. When we examine this topic with forensic rigor, the evidence produces a pattern of engineered social entropy – a gradual decline into disorder. And that means a deliberate dismantling of the structures (family, community, shared identity) that once protected individuals from total exposure to Jewish social machinations. I approach this not as a cultural commentator, but as a detective examining a crime scene. The question is not whether these changes occurred – they have – but whether they exhibit the hallmarks of coordinated design rather than spontaneous evolution.

我将社会破坏视为犹太议程的基础层面，这一分析并非仅凭推测。当我们以严谨的法医眼光审视这一话题时，证据呈现出一种人为制造的社会熵模式——即逐渐陷入混乱。这意味着曾经保护个体免受犹太社会阴谋全面影响的结构（家庭、社区、共同身份）被蓄意瓦解。我并非以文化评论员的身份来看待这一问题，而是像侦探调查犯罪现场一样。问题不在于这些变化是否发生——它们确实发生了——而在于它们是否表现出协同设计的特征，而非自发演化的特征。

To begin, in the 1960s and 1970s, we had the so-called “sexual revolution” in the West, augmented by the intense promotion of birth-control pills, this duo causing sexual morals to evaporate. One result was that the divorce rate doubled in Canada and the US, and perhaps in Europe as well. Then in the late 1970s and early 1980s we had the so-called “women’s’ liberation movement”. This was promoted heavily by all the (Jewish-owned) women’s magazines of the time, as well as the mass media, all owned or controlled by Jews. The theory was that women could be hugely successful if they were not carrying the millstone of family and marriage. The result was that the divorce rates doubled again in a very short time. These conditions were not accidental; they were clearly part of a planned agenda to destroy the family. The family is the basis of society and civilisation; if the family is destroyed, society itself will collapse.

首先，在20世纪60年代和70年代，西方发生了所谓的“性革命”，加之避孕药的大力推广，这两大因素导致性道德观念逐渐消解。其后果之一是，加拿大和美国的离婚率翻倍，或许欧洲也是如此。接着，在20世纪70年代末和80年代初，我们迎来了所谓的“妇女解放运动”。这一运动得到了当时所有（犹太人拥有的）女性杂志以及大众媒体的鼎力支持，而这些媒体均由犹太人拥有或控制。其理论依据是，如果女性摆脱了家庭和婚姻的束缚，她们可以取得巨大的成功。结果，离婚率在很短的时间内再次翻倍。这些情况并非偶然；它们显然是摧毁家庭这一计划议程的一部分。家庭是社会和文明的基础；如果家庭被摧毁，社会本身也将崩溃。

The sexual revolution and women’s liberation destroyed much of the moral framework of society, and initiated the ruin of the family and related values. We in the West seem to have totally lost our sense of shame, because of this.

性革命和妇女解放运动摧毁了社会的大部分道德框架，并引发了家庭及相关价值观的崩溃。正因如此，我们西方人似乎完全丧失了羞耻感。

Another area is the enforced immigration, especially in Europe but also in Canada and the US. It is proven that if the percentage of “others” – foreigners unlike us – exceeds about 30% of the population, a society loses its cohesion and becomes aimless and drifting. If we have 100 persons who all share the same culture and values, and who object to a government policy, we will mostly be unanimous in our agenda for reform. But if 30% or more of this group are “others” with a totally different culture and values, and with very different things being important to them, we will not be able to reach a critical mass of social dissent, and we will become helpless. Many countries in Europe today have more than the 30% of very different foreigners.

另一个领域是强制移民，尤其是在欧洲，但加麻大和美国也存在这一问题。事实证明，如果一个社会中“其他人”——与我们不同的外国人——的比例超过人口的30%，这个社会就会失去凝聚力，变得漫无目的、随波逐流。如果我们有100个人，他们都拥有相同的文化和价值观，并且都反对政府的某项政策，那么我们大多会在改革议程上达成一致。但如果这个群体中有30%或更多的人是“其他人”，他们有着完全不同的文化和价值观，看重的事物也大相径庭，那么我们就无法形成足够的社会异议群体，从而变得无助。如今，欧洲许多国家的“其他人”比例都超过了30%，他们与本土居民有着极大的差异。

There is more to this immigration story. Another, and very serious, inescapable outcome is that immigration will, over the medium to long term, effectively eliminate races and ethnic groups. Whatever the intentions of the intense immigration push in Europe especially, this will be the ultimate result. Germany will soon no longer be “German”; Italy no longer “Italian”, and France no longer “French”. The US and Canada will very soon no longer be white countries. This is in keeping with Klaus Schwab’s WEF promoting the agenda that “national sovereignty” is an outdated concept. This is not a joke, but a momentous agenda that is already occurring. The elimination of national sovereignty was the main intent of the stillborn TPP – the “Trans-Pacific Partnership”. [1] Canada’s former Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, boasted that Canada was the world’s first “post-nation-state”; i.e., post-sovereign nation.[2]

这个移民故事还有更多内容。另一个非常严重且不可避免的后果是，从中长期来看，移民将有效地消除种族和民族群体。无论欧洲大力推动移民的意图是什么，这将是最终结果。德国很快将不再是“德国”；意大利不再是“意大利”，法国也不再是“法国”。美国和加麻大很快将不再是白人国家。这与克劳斯·施瓦布在世界经济论坛上宣扬的议程相一致，即“国家主权”是一个过时的概念。这不是笑话，而是一个正在发生的重大议程。消除国家主权是胎死腹中的跨太平洋伙伴关系（Trans-Pacific Partnership，简称TPP）的主要意图。加拿大前总理贾斯汀·特鲁多（Justin Trudeau）曾夸口说，加拿大是世界上第一个“后民族国家”，即后主权国家。[2]

On 24 June 2022, the US Supreme Court overturned the constitutional protection of the right to abortion, which had been upheld by a landmark 1973 ruling known as Roe v. Wade.

2022年6月24日，美国最高法院推翻了1973年具有里程碑意义的“罗诉韦德案”裁决所确立的堕胎权宪法保护。来源/Source

Most of us have forgotten the incessant frontal assault on women, on the family, on morals and conscience, and on society, by the intensely-pressured propaganda campaign for free abortions, a campaign that has now progressed for more than a century and is still underway. Planned Parenthood has been intensely promoted for all these years as a campaign for “reproductive health” and “personal liberties”, but it was no such thing. Abortion is widely recognised as a“Jewish value”, and the push for it was entirely Jewish. ZIKA was one huge contribution to this effort.[3]

我们大多数人已经忘记了，为免费堕胎而展开的强大宣传攻势对女性、家庭、道德和良知以及社会进行了持续不断的正面攻击，这场运动已经持续了一个多世纪，至今仍在继续。多年来，计划生育联合会一直被大力宣传为一场“生殖健康”和“个人自由”的运动，但事实并非如此。堕胎被广泛认为是“犹太价值观”，而推动堕胎的完全是犹太人。寨卡病毒对此起到了巨大的推波助澜的作用。[3]

Other areas are the heavy promotion of homosexuality and the LGBT+, where every manner of sexual perversion is now just a“preference”. Morality is dead. Another area is the heavy push for the legalisation of “recreational drugs” like marijuana and cocaine. Religion is another area being pushed into the scrap bin, which is also working to destroy society. We have yet another new push – heavily promoted by Klaus Schwab at the WEF – for people to live in “tiny homes” of perhaps 15 or 20 square meters. “You will have nothing, and you will be happy”. There is also the powerful new push for “insect protein”, for humans (Gentiles only) eating maggots for nutrition. All of these things, and many more, are connected and must be seen as such. None of these are natural evolutions or accidents, evidenced by the immense media propaganda campaigns supporting them. They are all part of a plan. It is of great importance to realise that most of these changes are occurring simultaneously and that all are fed by persistent and intense media promotion.

其他领域包括大力推广同性恋和LGBT+群体，如今，各种性变态行为都仅仅被视为一种“偏好”。道德已死。另一个领域是大力推动大麻和可卡因等“娱乐性毒品”的合法化。宗教是另一个被推向废品堆的领域，而宗教也在努力摧毁社会。我们还有另一个新动向——由世界经济论坛的克劳斯·施瓦布大力推广——即人们住在大约15或20平方米的“小房子”里。“你将一无所有，但你会很快乐”。还有一个强大的新动向是“昆虫蛋白”，即人类（仅限非犹太人）食用蛆虫以获取营养。所有这些事情，以及更多的事情，都是相互关联的，必须这样看待。这些都不是自然演变或偶然事件，支持它们的庞大媒体宣传活动就是明证。它们都是一个计划的一部分。至关重要的是要意识到，这些变化大多同时发生，并且都受到媒体持续而激烈的宣传推动。

性革命：反社会的系统性武器 — The Sexual Revolution: A Systemic Weapon Against Society

On May 9, 1960, the FDA approved the first oral contraceptive in the United States. 1960年5月9日，美国食品药品监督管理局（FDA）批准了美国首个口服避孕药。来源/Source

The timing of this was critical. The introduction of the oral contraceptive pill in 1960 was not a neutral technological advance. It was, as demographers have documented, a structural shock that fundamentally altered the relationships between men and women. It also severely altered concepts of morality, and changed forever the social values relating to marriage and family.

这一事件发生的时机至关重要。1960年口服避孕药的问世并非一项中性的技术进步。正如人口学家所记录的，这是一次结构性冲击，从根本上改变了男女之间的关系。它还严重改变了道德观念，并永久地改变了与婚姻和家庭相关的社会价值观。

It was a Jew named Carl Djerassi who developed the modern contraceptive pill for Syntex Laboratories in 1951. [4] The birth control pill was approved by the USFDA shortly after, and went into common use under widespread promotion by the mass media and the womens’ magazines of the time. The “official narrative” tells us that the birth control pill “has transformed women’s health” by offering reliable contraception and “additional health benefits”. [5] I am unaware of any additional health benefits, but the main point is that the pill transformed much more than womens’ health. The main transformation was in female morality, again strongly encouraged by a concerted propaganda campaign that stressed the independence of womanhood while now “taking control of your body”, and having “choice”. The “choice” of course was the encouragement of free, promiscuous, and uninhibited sex, targeted at females as young as girls entering puberty. These were essentially the same arguments used by the Jews to promote free abortions.

1951年，一位名叫卡尔·杰拉西（Carl Djerassi）的犹太人为Syntex Laboratories研发了现代避孕药。[4]不久后，美国食品药品监督管理局（USFDA）批准了这种避孕药，并在当时大众媒体和女性杂志的广泛推广下，避孕药开始普遍使用。根据“官方叙事”，避孕药通过提供可靠的避孕措施和“额外的健康益处”，“改变了女性的健康状况”。[5]我并不知晓任何额外的健康益处，但避孕药所改变的远不止女性的健康。避孕药所改变的主要方面是女性道德观念，而这一观念同样受到了一场协同宣传运动的强烈鼓励，该运动强调女性独立，同时鼓励女性“掌控自己的身体”并拥有“选择权”。当然，“选择权”是指鼓励自由、滥交和无拘无束的性行为，其目标群体是进入青春期的女孩等年轻女性。这些论点与犹太人当初为推广免费堕胎所使用的论点基本相同。

According to the “second demographic transition” framework developed by demographer R. Lesthaeghe, [6][7] the period between 1955 and 1970 witnessed three simultaneous societal ruptures: a dramatic acceleration of divorce, the end of the baby boom, and a sharp decline in marriage rates. This was not a slow evolution. It was a cascade. This “trilogy of ruptures” includes: (a) the origins and patterns of this global sexual revolution, (b) the resultant sub-replacement fertility, and (c) the rise of unmarried cohabitation and the “ethics revolution”.

根据人口学家R. Lesthaeghe提出的“第二次人口转型”框架[6][7]，1955年至1970年间，社会同时经历了三次断裂：离婚率急剧上升、婴儿潮结束以及结婚率大幅下降。这并非缓慢演变，而是一场连锁反应。这一“断裂三部曲”包括：（a）这场全球性性革命的起源和模式，（b）由此产生的低于更替水平的生育率，以及（c）未婚同居的兴起和“伦理革命”。

The technical term used by demographers is significant: they speak of the “second contraceptive revolution” based on “efficient methods” that allowed the separation of sex from reproduction “more decisively than ever before”. This technological shock did not merely enable individual choice; it restructured the entire calculus not only of marriage but of the content and quality of relationships and relations between men and women. It also dramatically restructured the concept of morality, opening floodgates that could never be closed. What makes this relevant to our thesis is the coordinated nature of the ideological accompaniment. The pill arrived simultaneously with an aggressive media campaign for promiscuous sexual activity by women and girls, again tagged as “having choice” and “freedom” and “taking control of your body”. It was intensely discussed and recommended in women’s magazines, in television, in film, and almost always accompanied by a narrative that reframed traditional marriage as oppression. As one analysis notes: “New ethics replaced the family with the self; dignity no longer derived from fulfilling obligations, but from self-fulfillment”. This is not organic cultural change. This is engineering at scale of social norms.

人口学家使用的技术术语意义重大：他们谈到了“第二次避孕革命”，这场革命基于“有效方法”，使得性行为与生殖的分离“比以往任何时候都更加果断”。这一技术冲击不仅使个人选择成为可能；它还彻底改变了整个计算方法，不仅改变了婚姻，还改变了男女关系的内容和质量。它还极大地重构了道德观念，打开了永远无法关闭的闸门。这与我们的论点相关的是意识形态伴随的协同性。避孕药问世的同时，媒体发起了一场声势浩大的运动，宣扬妇女和女孩的滥交行为，再次将其贴上“有选择”、“自由”和“掌控自己的身体”的标签。女性杂志、电视、电影对此进行了激烈的讨论和推荐，几乎总是伴随着一种叙事，将传统婚姻重新定义为压迫。正如一项分析所指出的：“新的伦理以自我取代了家庭；尊严不再来源于履行义务，而是来源于自我实现”。这不是有机的文化变革。这是对社会规范的大规模工程。

离婚激增：破裂的量化 — The Divorce Explosion: Quantifying the Rupture

In the period 1965-1975, the so-called “sexual revolution” combined with the early adoption of the birth-control pill, resulted in the divorce rate at least doubling in Canada and the US, and even tripling in some Western countries. In that same period, the contributing concept of “no-fault” divorce laws was adopted in Canada and across most US states. Following this, the divorce rate surged so dramatically that by 1975, half of marriages faced potential dissolution. The introduction of no-fault divorce legislation is particularly significant, because it had the effect of transforming marriage from a binding social contract into an easily terminable arrangement. In the period 1975-1985 came the “Women’s Liberation” movement, immediately causing yet another massive surge in the divorce rates, which plateaued at historically unprecedented levels.

在1965年至1975年期间，所谓的“性革命”加之避孕药的早期普及，导致加麻大和美国的离婚率至少翻了一番，在某些西方国家甚至翻了三番。在同一时期，加麻大和美国大多数州都采纳了“无过错”离婚法这一概念。此后，离婚率急剧上升，到1975年，半数婚姻面临解体的可能。无过错离婚法的引入尤为重要，因为它将婚姻从具有约束力的社会契约转变为一种可轻易终止的安排。1975年至1985年期间，“妇女解放”运动兴起，立即引发了离婚率的又一次大幅上升，并稳定在历史前所未有的水平。

From the Exclusion perspective, the destruction of marriage as a durable institution serves a clear function: atomisation. A married couple with children represents a unit of resistance; shared resources, mutual support, collective bargaining against employers, landlords, and the state. A divorced individual, particularly a single mother, is vulnerable. She is more likely to need state assistance, more likely to accept exploitative wages, more likely to fall into debt, and more likely to be excluded from asset accumulation.

从排斥理论的角度来看，婚姻作为一种持久制度的解体具有一个明确的功能：原子化。有孩子的已婚夫妇构成了一个抵抗单位；他们共享资源，相互支持，共同与雇主、房东和国家进行谈判。而离婚的个人，尤其是单身母亲，则处于弱势地位。她们更可能需要国家援助，更可能接受剥削性的工资，更可能陷入债务，也更可能被排除在资产积累之外。

The data on this final point is stark. A US study found that in states that adopted no-fault divorce, divorced women and their children suffered an immediate 73% drop in their standard of living. This was not an accident of the system. This was the system redistributing wealth from women and children – from the vulnerable to the protected.

关于这最后一点的数据十分触目惊心。美国的一项研究发现，在实行无过错离婚的州，离婚妇女及其子女的生活水平立即下降了73%。这并非制度的偶然结果。这是制度在重新分配财富，从妇女和儿童——从弱势群体到受保护群体。

单亲家庭：人为分裂的产物 — The Single-Parent Household: Engineered Fragmentation

The most recent US data (2026) shows that approximately one-third of children live with a single parent, the highest rate in the OECD. Among African-American households, the figure exceeds 60%. But the trendline is unmistakable. Between 1960 and 2000, unmarried-couple households multiplied almost tenfold; the proportion of births to unmarried mothers rose from 5% to almost 35%; the percentage of adults who declined to marry at all rose from 15% to nearly 20%. The academic literature refers to this as the “retreat from marriage.” The language is neutral, but the consequences are not. As one feminist critic noted, “The vaunted independence of the liberated and divorced often turned out to mean loneliness and penury”.

美国最新数据（2026年）显示，约三分之一的儿童与单亲家庭生活，这一比例在经合组织国家中最高。在非裔美国家庭中，这一比例超过60%。但趋势线是显而易见的。1960年至2000年间，未婚夫妇家庭数量几乎翻了十倍；未婚母亲生育的比例从5%上升到近35%；完全拒绝结婚的成年人比例从15%上升到近20%。学术文献将此称为“婚姻退潮”。这一表述是中性的，但其后果却并非如此。正如一位女权主义批评家所指出的那样，“被解放和离婚的人所吹嘘的独立性，往往意味着孤独和贫困”。

The family is a unit of resistance. The family is the factory that produces resilient, non-extractable humans. Destroy the family, and you destroy the capacity for resistance. A stable two-parent household with shared resources, intergenerational obligations, and community ties is difficult to exploit. It can weather economic shocks. It can save. It can refuse exploitative wages. It can pass assets to children.

家庭是抵抗的单位。家庭是生产有韧性、不可剥削的人的工厂。摧毁家庭，就摧毁了抵抗的能力。一个稳定的双亲家庭，拥有共享的资源、代际义务和社区纽带，很难被剥削。它能经受住经济冲击。它能存钱。它能拒绝接受剥削性的工资。它能将资产传给子女。

The atomised individual is extractable. The divorced single mother, the isolated elderly person, the young adult without family support, the student deeply in debt, are the targets of predatory lending, exploitative labor practices, and the debt traps I documented earlier. The destruction of marriage creates new markets, each broken family becoming a new revenue stream. Divorce generates legal fees, new housing purchases, dual household expenses, and increased consumption of everything from furniture to therapy. The individuals resulting from this destruction are not citizens. They are raw material.

被原子化的个体是可以被剥削的。离异的单身母亲、孤立的老年人、没有家庭支持的年轻人、负债累累的学生，都是我之前所记录的掠夺性贷款、剥削性劳动行为和债务陷阱的目标。婚姻的破坏催生了新的市场，每个破碎的家庭都成为新的收入来源。离婚会产生法律费用、新住房购买、双家庭支出，以及从家具到心理治疗等所有消费的增加。这种破坏所导致的个体不是公民，而是原材料。

妇女解放运动：剥削的意识形态掩护 — The Women’s Liberation Movement: Ideological Cover for Social Destruction

The women’s movement was a parallel vector of societal destruction, at least in North America. The stated goals of equal pay, reproductive rights, access to education, were probably legitimate responses to genuine oppression. However, the actual effects of the movement, as promoted by the Jewish-owned mass media, diverged sharply from its stated aims. The movement’s message, much amplified by women’s magazines and television, was not merely “equal pay for equal work.” It was, in its most radical formulation: “not to be a wife, not to be a mother” and “to smash the family”. This was not a call for equality; it was a call for institutional destruction.

女性运动是社会破坏的平行向量，至少在北美是这样。其宣称的目标，如同工同酬、生殖权利、受教育机会，可能是对真正压迫的合理回应。然而，由犹太人拥有的大众媒体所宣扬的这场运动的实际效果，与其宣称的目标大相径庭。女性运动的信息，在女性杂志和电视的大力宣传下，不仅仅是“同工同酬”。其最激进的表述是：“不做妻子，不做母亲”和“摧毁家庭”。这并非呼吁平等；而是呼吁制度破坏。

The consequences were measurable: Divorce rates doubled again in the decade following the height of the women’s movement. Labor force participation of mothers with young children rose from one-quarter in 1960 to more than half by 1986. The contradiction is the point. The woman who is divorced, working two jobs, exhausted, and financially precarious is not liberated. She is extractable. She will accept lower wages, longer hours, and worse conditions because she has no fallback. She will take out predatory loans, accept substandard housing, and delay retirement indefinitely. She is, in this framework, the perfect asset-less subject.

后果是显而易见的：在妇女运动达到顶峰后的十年里，离婚率再次翻了一番。有年幼子女的母亲的劳动力参与率从1960年的四分之一上升到1986年的一半以上。矛盾之处就在于此。离了婚、打两份工、精疲力尽且经济状况不稳定的女性并没有获得解放。她们是可以被榨取的。她们会接受更低的工资、更长的工作时间和更差的条件，因为她们别无选择。她们会申请掠夺性贷款，接受不合格的住房，并无限期推迟退休。在这个框架下，她们是完美的无资产主体。

其他载体：移民、LGBT+群体、毒品以及世界经济论坛议程 — Other Vectors: Immigration, LGBT+, Drugs, and the WEF Agenda

The additional vectors I listed above, of enforced immigration, LGBT+ normalisation, drug legalisation, the WEF’s abandonment of national sovereignty, its “tiny homes” and “insect protein” agendas, deserve acknowledgment in this context because each follows the same logic. Mass immigration destroys social cohesion, prevents critical mass of dissent, and creates a compliant labor force competing for lower wages. The normalisation of both LGBT+ and same-sex “marriages” further destabilise traditional family structures, and normalise non-reproductive relationships which cannot produce new generations. Drug legalisation pacifies, incapacitates, and extracts revenue from the asset-less class. Klaus Schwab’s “You will own nothing” is an explicit admission of the Exclusion agenda; where there are no assets, there is no resistance. The new (Gentile) food of “insect protein” signals the planned reduction of living standards for the Gentile majority while the Jewish billionaire elites retain luxury lives.

我之前列出的其他因素，如强制移民、LGBT+群体正常化、毒品合法化、世界经济论坛（WEF）放弃国家主权、其“微型住宅”和“昆虫蛋白”议程，在此背景下都值得关注，因为它们都遵循相同的逻辑。大规模移民破坏了社会凝聚力，阻止了足够数量的异见者出现，并催生了一群甘于顺从、为更低工资而竞争的劳动力。LGBT+群体和同性“婚姻”的正常化进一步动摇了传统家庭结构，并使无法繁衍后代的非生殖关系正常化。毒品合法化安抚了无产阶级，剥夺了他们的反抗能力，并从他们身上榨取收入。克劳斯·施瓦布的“你们将一无所有”是对排斥议程的明确承认；没有资产，就没有反抗。新的（非犹太人）食物“昆虫蛋白”预示着计划降低非犹太人多数群体的生活水平，而犹太亿万富翁精英则继续过着奢侈的生活。

大众媒体的角色：非中立，非偶然 — The Mass Media Role: Not Neutral, Not Accidental

My observation that the mass media, notably magazines, television, film, were (and still are) owned by a concentrated group of Jews who promoted these changes aggressively, is supported by the historical record. The same media outlets that promoted the sexual revolution and women’s liberation also normalised divorce and sexual promiscuity, celebrated single motherhood, and pathologised traditional marriage. The mechanism is not conspiracy in the crude sense. It is ideological capture.When the same corporate interests own both the news outlets and the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture birth control pills, when the same advertising agencies profit from selling both “liberation” and the products that fill the resulting void, the alignment of incentives is clear.

我观察到，大众媒体，尤其是杂志、电视、电影，过去（现在也仍然）由一群犹太人集中拥有，他们积极推动这些变革，这一观察得到了历史记录的支持。推动性革命和妇女解放的同一批媒体机构，也使离婚和性滥交正常化，颂扬单身母亲，并将传统婚姻视为病态。其机制并非粗浅意义上的阴谋。而是意识形态的俘虏。当同一家企业既拥有新闻媒体又拥有生产避孕药的制药公司时，当同一家广告公司既从销售“解放”产品中获利，又从填补由此产生的空白的产品中获利时，利益的一致性就显而易见了。

社会破坏的架构 — The Architecture of Social Destruction

These elements are not isolated phenomena. They are coordinated vectors of a single strategy: the complete destruction of all mediating structures between the individual in society and the ruling Jewish elite. This social destruction connects to my central argument about the exclusion of the Goyim (the non-Jews) because the link is structural, not incidental.

这些元素并非孤立的现象。它们是同一策略的协同载体：彻底摧毁社会中个体与统治犹太精英之间的所有中介结构。这种社会破坏与我的核心论点——非犹太人（Goyim）的排斥——息息相关，因为这种联系是结构性的，而非偶然的。

The evidence available suggests that the sexual revolution, women’s liberation, and the resulting destruction of the nuclear family exhibit all the characteristics of engineered social transformation rather than spontaneous cultural evolution. The timing coincides with technological shocks (the pill), and the implementation was amplified by the concentrated media ownership. The consequences of atomisation, vulnerability, extractability, serve the interests of the (Jewish masters-to-be) of our New World Order-to-come. This identifies a crucial layer of my thesis that extends beyond economic plundering to social destruction. And the evidence suggests it was not an accident.

现有证据表明，性革命、妇女解放以及随之而来的核心家庭解体，都表现出人为设计的社会转型特征，而非自发的文化演变。这一进程恰逢技术冲击（避孕药的发明），而媒体集中所有权则加剧了其影响。原子化、脆弱性、可提取性等后果，符合我们即将到来的新世界秩序（犹太主宰者）的利益。这正是我论文中一个关键层面的体现，即不仅限于经济掠夺，还涉及社会破坏。证据表明，这绝非偶然。

The erosion of shame enables normalisation. What was once unthinkable:divorce, free sex without responsibility, sexual perversions, cohabitation, single motherhood, abortion; is now routine. And what is routine cannot be resisted. The system does not need to coerce when it has manufactured consent.

羞耻感的消蚀使一切变得正常化。曾经不可想象的事情：离婚、无责任的随意性行为、性变态、同居、单身母亲、堕胎；如今都成了常态。而常态是无法抗拒的。当体制已经制造出认同感时，它就不再需要强制。

In the subsequent essays in this series, I will deal with the many aspects of this destruction, expanding on the topics introduced here while introducing many others, and providing specific evidence on a case-by-case basis.

在本系列后续的文章中，我将探讨这一破坏现象的诸多方面，不仅对本文所介绍的话题进行拓展，还会引入许多其他相关话题，并逐一提供具体证据。

Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 150 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).

His full archive can be seen at

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/

He can be contacted at:2186604556@qq.com

NOTES – Destruction of Society – Part 1

[1] The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)

[1] 《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》（TPP）
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/11545/

[2] THE GODLESS COUNTRY

[2] 无神之国
https://www.actforcanada.ca/p/the-godless-country

[3] ZIKA

[3] 寨卡病毒
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/5811/

[4] First oral contraceptive

[4] 首个口服避孕药
https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/first-oral-contraceptive

[5] A Brief History of the Birth Control Pill

[5] 避孕药简史
https://www.verywellhealth.com/a-brief-history-on-the-birth-control-pill-3522634

[6] The Second Demographic Transition in Western Countries: An Interpretation

[6] 西方国家的第二次人口转变：一种解读
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257928736_The_Second_Demographic_Transition_in_Western_Countries_An_Interpretation

[7] Second Demographic Transition – A Trilogy

[7] 第二次人口结构转型——三部曲
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353412854_Second_Demographic_Transition_-_A_Trilogy

This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.

本作者的其他作品