CN — LARRY ROMANOFF: 犹太人正在摧毁西方社会——第三部分 — 犹太人正在摧毁西方社会——第三部分 起源与俄国革命 — Jews are Destroying Western Society – Part 3 — Origin and Russian Revolution

犹太人正在摧毁西方社会——第三部分–Jews are Destroying Western Society – Part 3 

起源与俄国革命 — Origin and Russian Revolution

By Larry Romanoff

作者：拉里·罗曼诺夫

翻译者：Pearl

 

CHINESE        ENGLISH        ESTONIAN

 

 

 

引言 — Introduction

弗里德里希·恩格斯 — Friedrich Engels

家庭的毁灭 — Destruction of the Family

性别——真正的“俄罗斯革命” — Sex, The True “Russian Revolution”

学校性教育 — Sex Education in Schools

俄罗斯社会的“社会化” — The “Socialisation” of Russian Society

辐射 — The Fallout

公民不服从与内战 — Civil Disobedience and Civil War

犹太修正主义与错误信息 — Jewish Revisionism and Misinformation

一些分歧 — Some Disagreements

将点连接起来 — Connecting the Dots

 

引言 — Introduction

 

The topic of this series of essays is the Jewish-engineered destruction of Western civilisation, an agenda to be achieved by the successive disintegration of the nuclear family, itself preceded by the extermination of morals and religion. The signs of this agenda have been gathering slowly for hundreds of years, and today are everywhere to be seen. We need only look, and connect the dots of the seemingly disparate but yet clearly connected events and processes, which are now occurring more rapidly by the year. The thesis that the destruction of the nuclear family and Western society is the result of a coordinated, long-term Jewish agenda is a profound one, but the collected evidence easily makes it apparent that these phenomena are the result of a deliberate ideological project rather than organic social evolution. The evidence points to a coherent, organised and multi-pronged assault.

本系列文章的主题是由犹太人策划的西方文明毁灭计划，该计划旨在通过核心家庭的逐步瓦解来实现，而在此之前，道德和宗教将被彻底摧毁。这一计划的迹象数百年来一直在缓慢累积，如今已随处可见。我们只需稍加观察，并将看似无关实则明显相关的事件和进程联系起来，就会发现这些现象正以逐年加快的速度发生。核心家庭和西方社会的毁灭是犹太人协调一致的长期计划的结果，这一论点意义深远，但收集到的证据很容易证明，这些现象是蓄意意识形态计划的结果，而非社会有机进化。证据表明，这是一场连贯、有组织且多管齐下的攻击。

 

For a long time, the Khazar Jews have had plans to not only control the world but to exterminate the Gentile family unit, morals and Christianity. These attitudes and intentions have certainly existed for at least hundreds of years, but came into public focus in the late 1800s with the advent of what became known as Communism. It doesn’t seem widely-known, but Communism was 100% a Jewish creation, beginning with Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels and continuing from there. The evidence of this is so widely public, and irrefutable, that debate would be pointless.

长期以来，哈扎尔犹太人一直计划不仅控制世界，还要消灭外邦人的家庭单位、道德和基督教。这些态度和意图至少已经存在了数百年，但直到19世纪末随着共产主义的兴起才进入公众视野。虽然这似乎并不广为人知，但共产主义百分之百是犹太人的产物，始于卡尔·马克思和弗里德里希·恩格斯，并从那时延续至今。这方面的证据是如此广泛且无可辩驳，以至于辩论毫无意义。

 

Marx & Engels.

马克思与恩格斯。来源/Source

 

With the writings of Marx and Engels, and the spread of Communism, the agenda for the destruction of Western societies was made fully public. The programmed collapse of Western society was to begin with the combination of sexual morals, religion, and the family, with the focal point of female sexual morality being the key to their agenda. If sexual morality could be eliminated, all morality could suffer the same fate. And if female sexual morality disappeared, the family as a unit would also disintegrate and disappear. Then, upon elimination of the family, Western society itself would collapse into throngs of fragmented and atomised individuals, rudderless and vulnerable to Jewish “management” and control. The above agenda is so self-evident from both the writings and the actions of the Jewish Communists of yesterday, and of the Jews of today, that the assertion of societal destruction can hardly be disputed.

随着马克思和恩格斯的著作问世以及共产主义的传播，摧毁西方社会的计划被公之于众。该计划首先从性道德、宗教和家庭的结合入手，而女性性道德则是其计划的关键所在。如果能够消除性道德，那么所有道德都将遭受同样的命运。而如果女性性道德消失，家庭作为一个单位也将瓦解和消失。然后，随着家庭的消亡，西方社会本身也将崩溃，变成一群支离破碎、原子化的个体，失去方向，并容易受到犹太人的“管理”和控制。无论是从昔日犹太共产主义者的著作还是从当今犹太人的行为来看，上述计划都是如此显而易见，以至于社会毁灭的主张几乎无可争议。

 

It seems reasonably clear that the Khazar Jews had these intentions in mind when fostering the various European revolutions in the 1700s and 1800s, though these events were only partially successful. The revolutions did succeed in eventually replacing monarchs with the Jewish-created multi-party “democracy”, but this was merely setting the stage. The main purpose of the multi-party system was not to involve “the people” in their government, but to create a system of government that was (1) vulnerable to essentially total corruption and control from behind the scenes, and (2) as a means to prevent the repeated, systematic (and justified) expulsion of the Jews from all countries. And yes, the Jews really did create “democracy”; this is why they created it; and this is why the Jewish media and book publishers have elevated it to the status of a holy religion that cannot by nature be questioned. I have written an E-book titled “Democracy, the Most Dangerous Religion”. [1] It contains many startling, but obvious, thoughts that have seldom (if ever) crossed Western minds. I strongly suggest you read it. It is available in English, and has been translated into Chinese, Polish, Romanian, and Estonian.

似乎相当明确的是，哈扎尔犹太人在18世纪和19世纪煽动欧洲各场革命时，正是怀着这些意图，尽管这些事件仅取得了部分成功。这些革命最终确实成功地用犹太人创建的多党“民主”制度取代了君主制，但这仅仅是为后续铺路。多党制的主要目的并非让“人民”参与政府事务，而是建立一种（1）本质上极易遭受全面腐败和幕后操控的政府体系，以及（2）作为防止犹太人被各国反复、系统性（且有正当理由）驱逐的手段。没错，犹太人确实创造了“民主”；这就是他们创造它的原因；这也是为什么犹太媒体和图书出版商将其奉为一种本质上不容置疑的神圣宗教。我曾撰写过一本名为《民主：最危险的宗教》的电子书。[1] 书中包含许多令人震惊却显而易见的见解，这些见解在西方人的脑海中鲜少（甚至从未）出现过。我强烈建议您阅读此书。该书有英文版，并已被翻译成中文、波兰语、罗马尼亚语和爱沙尼亚语。

 

For this essay, I will begin with a brief introduction to Engels, then we will examine the 1917 Revolution in Russia. It must be emphatically noted that the so-called Russian Revolution was not “Russian” in any sense. 

显而易见，在18世纪和19世纪推动各种欧洲革命时，哈扎尔犹太人心中就有这些意图，尽管这些事件只取得了部分成功。革命最终确实成功地将君主制替换为犹太人创建的多党制“民主”，但这仅仅是搭建了舞台。多党制的主要目的并非让“人民”参与政府，而是为了建立一个（1）本质上容易受到全面腐败和幕后操控的政府体系，以及（2）作为防止犹太人被各国反复、系统性（且合理）驱逐的一种手段。没错，犹太人确实创造了“民主”；这就是他们创造它的原因；也正因为如此，犹太媒体和图书出版商将其提升到了神圣宗教的地位，这种地位本质上不容质疑。我写了一本名为《民主，最危险的宗教》的电子书。[1]书中包含了许多令人震惊但显而易见的观点，这些观点在西方人心中鲜有（甚至从未）出现过。我强烈建议您阅读这本书。该书有英文版，并已被翻译成中文、波兰文、罗马尼亚文和爱沙尼亚文。

For this essay, I will begin with a brief introduction to Engels, then we will examine the 1917 Revolution in Russia. It must be emphatically noted that the so-called Russian Revolution was not “Russian” in any sense. It was instead a 100% Jewish revolution against Russia.

在这篇文章中，我将首先简要介绍恩格斯，然后我们将探讨1917年的俄国革命。必须强调的是，所谓的俄国革命在任何意义上都不是“俄国的”。相反，这是一场彻头彻尾的犹太人发起的反对俄国的革命。

 

弗里德里希·恩格斯 — Friedrich Engels

 

Friedrich Engels at the barricades of Elberfeld in May 1849 – 1870.

1849年5月至1870年，弗里德里希·恩格斯在埃尔伯费尔德的街垒.Source

 

In 1884, Engels wrote a treatise titled “The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State”. His core arguments were that early human societies were essentially communistic in nature, with all property (and women) shared. He argued that the patriarchal family “emerged as a mechanism to control inheritance and property, subordinating women in the process “. He argued further that the concept of the state arose to protect private property and enforce class dominance, and claimed that, with the Jewish Communist “classless society”, the state would eventually disappear. However, in addition to predicting (and planning) the elimination of the state as a body of sovereignty and governance, he wrapped his entire arguments in a swath of “female oppression”, essentially claiming this as the overwhelmingly fatal result of the development of Western society. It then naturally followed that a main aim of Jewish Communism was the “liberation” of women. However, (and this is where we can part company with Engels and Jewish Communism) the method designed to “liberate” women was more or less entirely sexual in nature. Lenin (a Jew) described Engel’s treatise as “one of the fundamental works of modern (Jewish) socialism”.

1884年，恩格斯撰写了一篇题为《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》的论文。他的核心观点是，早期人类社会本质上具有共产主义的性质，所有财产（以及女性）都是共享的。他认为，父权制家庭“作为一种控制继承和财产的机制而出现，在此过程中使女性处于从属地位”。他进一步指出，国家的概念是为了保护私有财产和强化阶级统治而产生的，并声称，在犹太共产主义者所设想的“无阶级社会”中，国家最终将消失。然而，除了预测（并计划）国家作为主权和治理机构的消亡外，他还将整个论点包裹在一层“女性压迫”的外衣之下，基本上声称这是西方社会发展所带来的极其致命的结果。由此自然得出，犹太共产主义的一个主要目标是“解放”女性。然而（在此我们与恩格斯和犹太共产主义产生分歧），旨在“解放”女性的方法在本质上或多或少完全是性的。列宁（犹太人）将恩格斯的论文描述为“现代（犹太）社会主义的基本著作之一”。

 

In “The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State”, [2] Engels argued that the monogamous family was not a natural institution. Thus, the first object of attack by the Jewish Bolsheviks on Gentile society was marriage, the attack led by forcing promiscuous sexuality on married women. By removing marriage from the province of the church, and by making divorce a simple matter of individual decree, not only would the family unit immediately begin to fragment and dissolve, but the Christian church would also suffer a fatal blow. Engels also wrote in 1883 that “It is a curious fact that with every great revolutionary movement the question of “free love” comes into the foreground”.在《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》[2]一书中，恩格斯提出，一夫一妻制家庭并非自然形成的制度。因此，犹太布尔什维克对氏族社会的首要攻击目标就是婚姻，他们通过强迫已婚妇女接受滥交观念来发起攻击。通过将婚姻从教会的管辖范围内剔除，并使离婚成为个人决定的一件简单事情，不仅家庭单位会立即开始分裂和解体，基督教教会也会遭受致命打击。恩格斯还在1883年写道：“一个奇怪的事实是，每次伟大的革命运动都会将‘自由恋爱’的问题推到风口浪尖。”。

 

You can access Engels’ full treatise in English from Project Gutenberg as a text file here. [3] You can also access it in Kindle other formats here. [4] It makes for interesting reading because it is a mixture of some facts, much speculation, unjustified or unevidenced conclusions, and a huge dollop of ignorance, all wrapped in a shroud of Jewish psychopathology.

您可以在古登堡计划（Project Gutenberg）上以文本文件的形式阅读到恩格斯的英文版完整论文。[3]您也可以在此处以Kindle或其他格式阅读。[4]这篇论文读起来颇有意思，因为它融合了一些事实、大量推测、无根据或无证据的结论，以及大量无知的内容，而这一切都被包裹在犹太精神病理学的外衣之下。

 

家庭的毁灭 — Destruction of the Family

 

Magnus Hirschfeld at Institute for Sexual Research, 1920.The Jewish Moral Corruption of Germany and America.

1920年，性研究所的马格努斯·赫希菲尔德（Magnus Hirschfeld）发表了《德国和美国的犹太道德堕落》一文。来源/Source

 

The Jewish Bolshevik vision of (Gentile) society was primarily based on the destruction and eventual elimination of the family, which would be a natural consequence of the promiscuous and uninhibited sexual unions by married women, this in turn supported by their financial emancipation. These portions of the Jewish agenda for Gentiles did not all arise with Marx and Engels; Jews had been openly promoting “free sexual union” for married women in the Middle Ages, and promoted this heavily during the periods of the European political revolutions they instigated in the 1700s and 1800s. By this latter date, the concepts of the destruction of Western (Gentile) society were being heavily promoted. However, it was generally assumed, if not known, that this would have been the inevitable consequence of the elimination (or destruction) of the family unit, the ideas of which were already well-developed and being promoted. And of course, the dissolution of the family unit as a social construct would itself be an inevitable consequence of the promiscuous and unfettered sexuality of women that the Jews were simultaneously promoting.

犹太布尔什维克对（非犹太）社会的看法主要基于家庭的毁灭和最终消亡，这将是已婚妇女滥交和无拘无束的性结合的自然结果，而这一结果又得到了已婚妇女经济解放的支持。犹太人为非犹太人制定的议程中的这些部分并非全部源自马克思和恩格斯；在中世纪，犹太人就公开宣扬已婚妇女“自由性结合”，并在18世纪和19世纪他们煽动的欧洲政治革命期间大力推广这一观念。到了19世纪末，摧毁西方（非犹太）社会的观念得到了大力宣扬。然而，人们普遍认为（即使并非众所周知），这将是家庭单位消亡（或毁灭）的必然结果，而家庭单位的概念早已发展成熟并得到推广。当然，家庭单位作为社会结构的解体本身也是犹太人同时宣扬的女性滥交和无拘无束的性行为的必然结果。

 

These ideas were all promulgated in a context of looking for “a more just social order”, but that was nonsense meant only to smoke up the room and bury the agenda (for Gentiles) in a mass of propaganda. Nevertheless, these ideas were fostered by the Jews from the Middle Ages onward, and were finally given an opportunity for realisation by the Jewish Bolsheviks who came to power in Russia through a coup d’état in 1917. It is true there were some obscure religious sects also promoting the ‘free love” aspects from the Middle Ages onward, but they had no intentions of destroying the family or society in the process. They were simply on a much narrower path of “sex without sin”.

这些思想都是在寻求“更公正的社会秩序”的背景下被宣扬的，但这不过是胡说八道，只是为了掩盖事实，将（非犹太人的）议程淹没在大量的宣传之中。然而，自中世纪以来，这些思想一直受到犹太人的推崇，并最终在1917年通过政变在俄罗斯掌权的犹太布尔什维克手中获得了实现的机会。诚然，自中世纪以来，也有一些鲜为人知的宗教派别在宣扬“自由恋爱”的观念，但他们并无在此过程中摧毁家庭或社会的意图。他们只是走了一条更为狭窄的“无罪性爱”之路。

 

It is beyond dispute or even question that the intention of the Jews when instigating the revolution in Russia, was primarily the destruction of the family, to be closely followed by the destruction of the Christian church. As soon as the Jewish Bolsheviks came to power in Russia, their Central Committee produced a complete code and body of laws on marriage and the family. This was a truly “revolutionary vision” of social relations based ostensibly on women’s equality (but effectively on the total abandonment of sexual morals and of morality itself) and the desired “withering away” of the family.[5]

无可争议，甚至毋庸置疑的是，犹太人在煽动俄国革命时的初衷，主要是为了摧毁家庭，紧接着是摧毁基督教会。犹太布尔什维克一在俄国掌权，其中央委员会就制定了一套关于婚姻和家庭的完整法典和法律体系。这无疑是一种基于表面上的妇女平等（但实际上是完全放弃性道德和道德本身）以及期望家庭“自行消亡”的“革命性社会关系愿景”。[5]

 

Russian Government– April 1920: Russian politicians, top four left to right: Rykov, Radek, Pokrevsky, Kamenev, middle left to right:Trotsky, Lenin and Sverdlov, bottom left to right: Bukharin, Zinoviev, Krylenko, Kollontai and Lunacharsky.Source

1920年4月，俄罗斯政府：俄罗斯政治家，从左至右分别为：雷科夫、拉狄克、波克列夫斯基、加米涅夫；从左至右中间分别为：托洛茨基、列宁和斯维尔德洛夫；从左至右下方分别为：布哈林、季诺维也夫、克雷连科、科伦泰和卢那察尔斯基。来源

 

Alexandra Kollontai, a Jew, and one of the most prominent Bolsheviks to promote the elimination of the family, stated that in 1917, at the time of the Revolution, the family was already outmoded. Kollontai produced multiple articles on women’s issues, generally stating that there were no longer any reasons for the existence of the family unit. In an article titled “Family and Communism”, she wrote that marriage had already become irrelevant because it contained no useful economic or social purposes. Kollontai further argued that the family constituted an inefficient use of labor, food, and fuel, and that it was “not only useless, but harmful”. Her picture of the family was the same as that of Engels in his writing “The Condition of the Working Class in England”. She wrote that “Just as housework withers away, so the obligation of parents to their children withers away”. In her view, “society” (composed of Jewish Communists) would feed, bring up, and educate the child.

亚历山德拉·科伦泰是一位犹太人，也是最著名的布尔什维克之一，她主张消除家庭。她表示，在1917年革命爆发时，家庭已经过时。科伦泰发表了多篇关于妇女问题的文章，普遍认为家庭单位的存在已无任何理由。在一篇题为《家庭与共产主义》的文章中，她写道，婚姻已经变得无关紧要，因为它不再具有任何有用的经济或社会目的。科伦泰进一步指出，家庭是对劳动力、食物和燃料的低效利用，“不仅毫无用处，反而有害”。她对家庭的看法与恩格斯在《英国工人阶级状况》一书中的描述如出一辙。她写道：“正如家务劳动逐渐消亡一样，父母对子女的义务也在逐渐消亡。”在她看来，“社会”（由犹太共产主义者组成）将负责抚养、教育和培养孩子。

 

Another step in the (Jewish) destruction of the (Gentile) family was taking children from their parents to be raised by the Jewish state, apparently “for their own good”. “Fortunately, the plans to take all the children away from their parents remained on paper, because there was a lack of funds and staff to establish so many nurseries.” [5a] Still, the Jewish Family Code, referred to above was another step to eliminating the family forever as a social unit. Kollontai predicted that a severe reduction of the parent-child bond was inevitable, writing that “The authority of the parents weakens and obedience is at an end”. She focused on obtaining insights into the bonds that held the family together, and sought ways to reduce or eliminate those bonds in order to dismantle the social family unit. According to Kollontai, the family would transform into a union of a sexually-liberated woman with men based on “mutual contracts” that would be voidable at a whim.

（犹太人）摧毁（外邦人）家庭的另一个步骤是将儿童从父母身边带走，由犹太国家抚养，这显然是“为了他们自己的利益”。“幸运的是，将所有儿童从父母身边带走的计划仍停留在纸面上，因为缺乏资金和人员来建立如此多的托儿所。”[5a]尽管如此，上文提到的《犹太家庭法》是永远消除作为社会单位的家庭的又一步。科伦泰预言，亲子关系的严重削弱是不可避免的，她写道：“父母的权威减弱，服从的时代结束了”。她专注于深入了解维系家庭团结的纽带，并寻求减少或消除这些纽带的方法，以瓦解社会家庭单位。科伦泰认为，家庭将转变为一个基于“相互契约”的性解放女性与男性的联盟，而这种契约可以随时废除。

 

The Jewish Communists dismissed the power, and even the existence, of any emotional bonds between mothers and children, denigrating the role of the mother-child bond in infant survival and early childhood development. Since the state would assume the responsibilities of raising and educating children, the family would lose yet another social function that had historically provided its basis for existence. Another Bolshevik, V. Diushen, presented as “an educator”, claimed that the family deliberately places its (opposing) interests above those of society. He further claimed that (Gentile) “Mothers did children more harm than good” because they weren’t as “objective” as were the Jewish Bolsheviks.

犹太共产主义者无视母亲与孩子之间任何情感纽带的存在及其力量，贬低母子纽带在婴儿生存和幼儿发展中的作用。由于国家将承担抚养和教育孩子的责任，家庭将失去历史上作为其存在基础的社会功能。另一位布尔什维克分子V. Diushen以“教育家”的身份声称，家庭故意将其（对立的）利益置于社会利益之上。他进一步声称（非犹太布尔什维克分子）“母亲对孩子弊大于利”，因为她们不像犹太布尔什维克分子那样“客观”。

 

Yet another Jewish Bolshevik by the name of A. G. Goikhbarg, the author of the Bolshevik’s new Russian Family Code, produced a legislative Act titled, “Family, Marriage, and Guardianship Law of the Soviet Republic”. In it, Goikhbarg instructed parents to reject their “narrow and irrational love for their children”, claiming that the Jewish state upbringing (of Gentile children) would provide “vastly better results than the private, individual, unscientific, and irrational approach of … ignorant (Gentile) parents”.

另一位名为A. G. Goikhbarg的犹太布尔什维克，作为布尔什维克新《俄罗斯家庭法》的作者，制定了一项名为“苏维埃共和国家庭、婚姻和监护法”的法案。在该法案中，Goikhbarg建议父母摒弃“对子女狭隘且非理性的爱”，并声称犹太国家对（非犹太裔）子女的教养方式将“远胜于……无知（非犹太裔）父母私下、个人、不科学且非理性的教养方式”。

 

Goikhbarg went so far as to claim that “each day of the existence of [the Jewish code of marriage laws] undermines as much as possible the idea of individual marriage and any legal bonds between husband and wife”. In reality, the Jewish Bolshevik Family Code “totally severed the concept of marriage from that of family”. As one indication, in Russian society at the time, as in most societies, illegitimate children, those born out of wedlock or from adulterous mingling, were frowned upon, had no inheritance rights, and generally had a poor start in life. But to the Jews, with their over-riding eagerness for the free and promiscuous sexuality of women (Jewish in this case), bastard children were a perfectly natural and welcome part of society.

戈伊赫巴格甚至声称，“[犹太婚姻法典]存在的每一天都在尽可能地削弱个人婚姻的概念以及夫妻之间的任何法律纽带。”事实上，犹太布尔什维克《家庭法典》“彻底割裂了婚姻与家庭的概念”。一个迹象是，在当时（以及大多数社会）的俄罗斯社会中，私生子（即非婚生子女或通奸所生子女）会受到轻视，没有继承权，通常生活起点很低。但对于犹太人来说，他们极度渴望女性（此处指犹太女性）拥有自由且滥交的性行为，私生子是他们社会中再自然不过且受欢迎的一部分。

 

According to a Jewish Bolshevik named Iakov Brandenburgskii, as the (Jewish) government became more powerful in Russia, “the broad family group will gradually disappear”. These Jewish Bolshevik theorists claimed that capitalism had already undermined the family’s social and economic functions and, under Jewish Communism, the family would wither away and finally cease to exist entirely. That was the plan.

根据一位名叫雅科夫·勃兰登堡斯基的犹太布尔什维克的说法，随着（犹太）政府在俄罗斯的权力日益增强，“大家庭群体将逐渐消失”。这些犹太布尔什维克理论家声称，资本主义已经破坏了家庭的社会和经济功能，而在犹太共产主义下，家庭将逐渐衰落，最终完全不复存在。这就是他们的计划。

 

In 1929, the Jew Samuel Wolfson wrote a book titled “The Sociology of Marriage and the Family”. In that tome, he wrote “[The family] will be sent to a museum of antiquities so that it can rest next to the spinning wheel and the bronze axe, by the horse-drawn carriage, the steam engine, and the wired telephone”. [6] There is no way to misunderstand the words of these men, and their intentions cannot be more clear. Wolfson was in full agreement with Kollontai, and depicted the Jewish view of marriage as “little more than a hotel reservation where no deposit had been paid.” He claimed that marriage would have no legal status and its duration would be determined solely by the “mutual inclination” of the participants. Wolfson further stated that “The family as an “ethical unit” is simply nonsense”.

1929年，犹太人塞缪尔·沃尔夫森（Samuel Wolfson）撰写了一本名为《婚姻与家庭社会学》的著作。在这本巨著中，他写道：“（家庭）将被送往古董博物馆，与纺车、青铜斧、马车、蒸汽机和有线电话并排陈列。”[6]这些人的话是绝对不能误解的，他们的意图再清楚不过了。沃尔夫森完全赞同科伦泰的观点，并将犹太人对婚姻的看法描述为“不过是未付定金就预订的酒店房间”。他声称，婚姻将没有法律地位，其存续时间将完全取决于参与者的“相互意愿”。沃尔夫森进一步指出，“家庭作为一个‘伦理单位’根本就是胡说八道”。

 

Much of the writing and preaching of Marx and Engels appears almost schizophrenic at times. On one hand, they proposed that the relation between men and women, parents and children – in other words, the family unit – was the basic premise of human existence. Yet on the other hand, they were promulgating the disassembly and eventual disappearance of that same family unit.

马克思和恩格斯的大部分著作和演讲有时显得近乎矛盾。一方面，他们提出男女、父母与子女之间的关系——换言之，即家庭单位——是人类存在的基本前提。然而另一方面，他们又宣扬解散并最终消除这一家庭单位。

 

One of the main platforms in the Jewish Bolshevik agenda was to “liberate” women from the home and put them to work in factories. This agenda was promoted as freeing women from the drudgery of housekeeping, but in reality, it simply replaced that with the drudgery of factory work, while succeeding in the main purpose of dismantling the family unit. Engels clearly saw the inevitable result on family stability of married women working in factories, pointing out the “total neglect of children” that would result when both parents worked the necessary twelve to thirteen hours a day in the mill. He stated flatly that “The employment of women at once breaks up the family.”

犹太布尔什维克党议程中的主要纲领之一，是将女性从家庭中“解放”出来，让她们到工厂工作。这一议程被宣传为将女性从繁重的家务劳动中解放出来，但实际上，它只是用工厂工作的繁重劳动取代了家务劳动，同时成功实现了瓦解家庭单位的主要目的。恩格斯清楚地看到了已婚女性在工厂工作对家庭稳定性的必然影响，他指出，当父母双方每天在工厂工作必要的十二到十三个小时时，会导致“完全忽视孩子”。他断言，“女性就业会立即瓦解家庭。”

 

Lenin continuously described housework as “the most unproductive, the most savage, and the most arduous work a woman can do”. He claimed that “petty housework crushes and “degrades” a woman, chains her to the kitchen and the nursery where she wastes her labor on barbarously unproductive, petty, nerve-wracking and stultifying drudgery”. I would note that moving women from the home to the factory was not an improvement, replacing the “barbarously unproductive drudgery” at home with 13-hour days of often dangerous and generally mind-numbing work in a factory.

列宁不断将家务劳动描述为“女性所能从事的最没有生产力、最野蛮、最繁重的工作”。他声称，“琐碎的家务劳动压榨并‘贬低’了女性，将她束缚在厨房和育儿室，在那里她将劳动浪费在野蛮的、没有生产力的、琐碎的、令人神经紧张且令人厌倦的苦役上”。我要指出的是，将女性从家庭转移到工厂并非一种进步，因为工厂里每天13小时的工作往往充满危险且普遍令人麻木，这不过是取代了家中“野蛮的、没有生产力的苦役”。

 

Another Jewish author wrote that “the fetters of husband and wife” (i. e., the ties that bind) would become “obsolete”. These revolutionaries fully expected not only marriage and the family to wither away, but the law and the state as well. [7] Lenin’s treatise on “The State and Revolution” emphasised these views and was quite influential in subsequent Jewish thinking of the time. The theory promulgated in Jewish propaganda was that “Women would be freed to enter the public sphere on an equal basis with men, unhampered by the duties of the home. At last women would be equally educated, waged, and able to pursue their own individual goals and development.”

另一位犹太作家写道，“夫妻间的束缚”（即维系关系的东西）将会“过时”。这些革命者不仅完全预料到婚姻和家庭会消亡，还预料到法律和国家也会消亡。[7]列宁在《国家与革命》一文中强调了这些观点，并对当时犹太人的后续思想产生了相当大的影响。犹太宣传中宣扬的理论是，“女性将获得自由，在与男性平等的基础上进入公共领域，不受家庭责任的束缚。最终，女性将获得平等的教育、薪酬，并能够追求自己的个人目标和发展。”

 

That sounds good, but the same agenda (and same writer) stated further that “Under such circumstances, marriage would become superfluous. Men and women would come together and separate as they wished. Free union would gradually replace marriage. The family, stripped of its previous social functions, would gradually wither away.

“这听起来不错，但同一份议程（以及同一位作者）进一步指出：“在这种情况下，婚姻将变得多余。男女会随心所欲地结合和分开。自由结合将逐渐取代婚姻。家庭失去了以往的社会功能，将逐渐消亡。”

 

Leon Trotsky, another Jewish Bolshevik, said that the bond between husband and wife would be freed, and that new relationships between women and men would develop based on “mutual feelings”. Use your imagination. The general Jewish Bolshevik agenda envisaged relations between women and men that were based on “free union” and “free love”. According to these Jews, the key to women’s emancipation was the abolition of the family unit, which was to be effected by first eliminating all sexual morality for women and encouraging – and even legislating – compulsory unlimited sexual liaisons. And the factory employment would provide women with the financial means to pursue this Jewish Nirvana.

另一位犹太布尔什维克列夫·托洛茨基（Leon Trotsky）曾说，夫妻之间的纽带将会被解放，男女之间将基于“相互感情”发展出新的关系。发挥你的想象力。犹太布尔什维克的总议程设想男女之间的关系建立在“自由结合”和“自由恋爱”的基础上。这些犹太人认为，妇女解放的关键在于废除家庭单位，而实现这一目标的第一步是消除对妇女的所有性道德约束，并鼓励——甚至立法规定——强制性的无限制性关系。而工厂就业将为妇女提供追求这种犹太式涅槃的经济手段。

 

Many of the Jewish Bolsheviks wanted to abolish marriage altogether, arguing that marriage was “a step backward”, that it was necessary to provide the (Gentile) population complete “freedom of marriage relations”. This theory was also sexual in origin, in that it essentially removed all sexual restrictions on women as one of the necessary conditions of individual freedom. Some even argued that the very concept of marriage violated the freedom of women “in the most intimate area and in their most elementary rights” – that area and rights being unlimited wanton sexual intercourse. The fundamental argument here by the Jews was that, since unlimited sexual intercourse by married women with men not their husbands (formerly frowned upon) was now to be the norm, the existence of a marriage bond would be a hindrance. They therefore set out to abolish the existing “compulsory monogamy” supported by the Christian church and the state.

许多犹太布尔什维克想要彻底废除婚姻，他们认为婚姻是“一种倒退”，认为有必要为（非犹太）人口提供完全的“婚姻关系自由”。这一理论起源于性，因为它从根本上消除了对女性在性方面的所有限制，而这是个人自由的必要条件之一。一些人甚至认为，婚姻的概念侵犯了女性“最私密领域和最基本权利”的自由——即无限制的随意性交。犹太人的基本论点是，既然已婚女性与非丈夫男性进行无限制的性交（以前是不被接受的）现在将成为常态，那么婚姻关系的存在将是一种阻碍。因此，他们着手废除基督教教会和国家支持的现行“强制一夫一妻制”。

 

They also fought against the concept of alimony, arguing that it was nothing other than a payment for sex”, and that free sex should not have economic consequences. The Bolsheviks stated that the task of their new “socialist society” was to destroy the “petty bourgeois social form of the family” because only then will the state really liberate women. The new (Jewish) Family Code (for Gentiles) was presented as a huge progressive move toward the freedom and independence of women but, more importantly, those who drafted it saw it as the first step toward the planned eventual extermination of the family. At the same time, the Jewish Bolsheviks – Goikhbarg being one main proponent – was that marriage was a crucial if temporary element in the Jews’ determination to destroy the Christian church because of its control of marriage.

他们还反对赡养费的概念，认为这不过是“性交易”的报酬，并认为自由的性行为不应产生经济后果。布尔什维克宣称，他们新“社会主义社会”的任务是摧毁“家庭的小资产阶级社会形式”，因为只有这样，国家才能真正解放妇女。新的（犹太人）家庭法典（针对非犹太人）被视为向妇女自由和独立迈出的巨大进步，但更重要的是，起草者认为这是计划最终消灭家庭的第一步。与此同时，犹太布尔什维克——戈伊赫巴格是其中的主要支持者——认为，婚姻是犹太人摧毁基督教教会的关键因素，尽管这只是暂时的，因为基督教教会控制着婚姻。

 

The Jewish-produced “Little Soviet Encyclopedia” stated that “the family was the original form of slavery”, and predicted its imminent extinction. By the 1920s, the Jews were boasting that by breaking the (Gentile) family they had dealt a fatal blow to the “bourgeois system”. That system, of course, was one in which persons other than Jews had money and could be part of the elite and middle class.

犹太人编纂的《小苏维埃百科全书》宣称“家庭是奴隶制的原始形式”，并预言其即将消亡。到了20世纪20年代，犹太人夸口说，通过破坏（非犹太人的）家庭，他们已经对“资产阶级制度”造成了致命打击。当然，在那个制度下，非犹太人拥有财富，可以跻身精英阶层和中产阶级。

 

性别，真正的“俄罗斯革命” — Sex, The True “Russian Revolution”

 

Alexandra Kollontai promoted a concept of the ‘new woman’ – one freed from the oppression of marriage, household work and the business of  raising children; all these chores must be taken on by society and state. They would take on children’s education (including sexual), urge a move toward a nationwide catering industry, collective housing, foster care and so on. For Kollontai, love was to be freed, too – civil partnership would take the place of traditional marriage.Source

亚历山德拉·科隆泰倡导了“新女性”的理念——这种女性应摆脱婚姻、家务劳动和养育子女的压迫；所有这些琐事都应由社会和国家来承担。社会和国家将负责儿童的教育（包括性教育），并推动建立全国性的餐饮业、集体住房、寄养制度等。在科隆泰看来，爱情也应当获得解放——民事伴侣关系将取代传统婚姻。来源

 

There is no grounds for disputing the assertion that the Jewish Bolshevik vision for Russia was “liberating” women through unlimited – and legislated – extramarital sex. The Jewish Bolsheviks who engineered the Revolution in Russia (and elsewhere) had a seemingly limitless appetite for the depravities of sex, so much so that we can consider sex to have been “the lubricant” of the revolution. There is an excellent paper titled, “Women, the State and Revolution: Soviet Family Policy and Social Life, 1917-1936”. You can reference the entire paper here.[8]

关于犹太布尔什维克对俄罗斯的愿景是通过无限制且合法化的婚外性行为来“解放”女性，这一论断无可辩驳。策划俄罗斯（及其他地方）革命的犹太布尔什维克对性堕落有着近乎无限的渴望，以至于我们可以认为性是革命的“润滑剂”。有一篇出色的论文题为《女性、国家与革命：1917-1936年的苏联家庭政策与社会生活》。你可以在此处查阅整篇论文。 [8]

 

This wasn’t only about encouraging and even legislating sexual promiscuity for women, but applied to publications as well. Reports are that the Jews produced “literally tons” of sexual publications, novels, articles, drawings about sex, and of course pornography in massive doses. Reports are that major newspapers were filled with sexual articles, and it was noted that women’s underwear occupied “an unnaturally large place” in the literature.

这不仅涉及鼓励甚至立法支持女性性滥交，还适用于出版物。据报道，犹太人制作了“数以吨计”的性出版物、小说、文章、性爱画作，当然还有大量色情作品。据报道，各大报纸充斥着性文章，并且注意到女性内衣在文学作品中占据了“异常大的篇幅”。

 

Alexandra Kollontai:亚历山德拉·科伦泰：来源/Source:

 

For the Jews, the key to destroying the family unit in Russia was their determined promotion of “free love”. The Jewish priestess of this free love was Alexandra Kollontai, whom we have already met. Her book, “New Morality and the Working Class”, promoted the thesis that married (Gentile) women should be liberated not only economically, but also “psychologically”, i. e., sexually. She stated that married women should have free, unlimited and uninhibited sex with any number of men, and this was to be “sex without strings”. She claimed that all forms of sexual activity were acceptable for married women, and that the adoption of this behavior would protect women from male domination. From this, she stated that over time the family would “disappear” – as it obviously would. Kollontai presented her thesis on a platform of gender equality, but this was only smoke. Her fundamental claim was essentially that a woman’s sex drive (especially that of a married woman) was a natural instinct and that satisfying it should be considered as – and be as easy as – drinking a glass of water when thirsty. [9] She claimed that her goal was to “free women from sexual servitude”.

对于犹太人而言，摧毁俄罗斯家庭单位的关键在于他们坚决推广“自由恋爱”。这种自由恋爱的犹太女祭司正是我们之前提到过的亚历山德拉·科伦泰。她在著作《新道德与工人阶级》中宣扬这样一个观点：已婚（非犹太）女性不仅应在经济上获得解放，还应在“心理上”，即性方面获得解放。她声称，已婚女性应与任意数量的男性进行自由、无限制且无拘无束的性行为，这便是“无条件的性爱”。她宣称，已婚女性进行任何形式的性活动都是可以接受的，而采取这种行为将使女性免受男性统治。基于此，她声称，随着时间的推移，家庭将“消失”——这显然是必然的。科伦泰在性别平等的平台上提出了她的观点，但这只是障眼法。她的基本主张基本上是：女性的性欲（尤其是已婚女性的性欲）是一种自然本能，满足这种本能应被视为——并且应像口渴时喝一杯水那样简单。[9]她声称，她的目标是“将女性从性奴役中解放出来”。

 

Kollontai argued that, like the family, sexual morality had been historically (and perversely) constructed primarily to oppress women and was irrelevant, claiming that there was neither morality nor immorality in nature. Her view, widely propagated, was that the sex act was merely a manifestation of a natural instinct of a healthy organism, and was neither shameful nor sinful.

科伦泰认为，性道德与家庭一样，在历史上（且反常地）主要是为了压迫女性而构建的，因此是无关紧要的。她声称，自然界中既不存在道德，也不存在不道德。她广为传播的观点是，性行为只是健康有机体自然本能的一种表现，既不可耻，也无罪。

 

Kollontai encouraged people to “experiment” with alternative family structures, at one point writing papers on having “marriages” in threes and fours. In every city, the Jews encouraged debates on sex, and discussed sexual “explorations” and sexual “experiments”. Use your imagination. It seemed that suddenly all members of Russian society were “exploring” their sexuality and “experimenting” with new ways of group coupling – all under the watchful eyes of the likes of Kollontai and others. [10] The Jews boasted at the time that their new government “did more to liberate human sexuality” than any society in history.

科伦泰鼓励人们“尝试”不同的家庭结构，甚至一度撰写论文探讨三人或四人“婚姻”的可能性。在每个城市，犹太人都鼓励关于性的辩论，并讨论性的“探索”和“实验”。发挥你的想象力。似乎突然之间，俄罗斯社会的所有成员都在“探索”自己的性取向，并在科伦泰等人密切关注下，尝试新的群体结合方式。[10]犹太人当时夸口说，他们的新政府在“解放人类性行为”方面比历史上任何社会都做得更多。

 

Same-sex marriage was made legal, and both homosexuals and lesbians were encouraged to live “open lives”, parading their brand of sexuality. The Jews repealed all bans on sodomy, as they did in France after the Jewish revolution in that country. And as they are doing in the West today. The Jews also avoided any legislation on, and removed all prohibitions against, incest, encouraging “the people” to make their own decisions in these matters.同性婚姻被合法化，男同性恋和女同性恋被鼓励过“开放的生活”，炫耀他们的性取向。犹太人废除了所有关于鸡奸的禁令，就像他们在法国犹太革命后所做的那样。如今，他们在西方也这样做。犹太人还避免制定任何关于乱伦的立法，并废除了所有针对乱伦的禁令，鼓励“人民”在这些事情上自己做决定。

 

The Jews also encouraged gender reassignment, the same psycho-pathology they are again proposing in the West today. They went so far as to grant permission for doctors to perform sex reassignment surgeries, although in the 1920s, these efforts would have been exceedingly crude. This and much more was discussed in a publication titled “Bolshevik Sexual Forensics”.[11] [12]

犹太人还曾鼓励性别重置，这与他们如今在西方再次提出的心理病理学观点如出一辙。他们甚至允许医生进行性别重置手术，尽管在20世纪20年代，这些做法还极为粗陋。关于此事以及更多内容，在一本名为《布尔什维克性法医学》的出版物中有所讨论。[11] [12]

 

The Jewish Bolsheviks cleverly combined “political liberation” with what they termed “personal liberation”, the latter being primarily the promulgation of unhindered and wanton sexual intercourse by married women and young girls. The Jews’ position was that rigid sexual mores and morals were merely tools for the oppression of women by evil capitalists. From this questionable foundation, they produced the radical sexual reforms that aimed to “transform” – i. e., destroy – the family and society. One of the necessary aspects of this, as mentioned earlier, was the legalisation of free abortion, since the wanton sexuality prescribed for married women would inevitably lead to millions of unwanted out-of-wedlock pregnancies. This was couched in terms of women “taking control of their bodies” while providing them with “reproductive choices”.

犹太布尔什维克巧妙地将“政治解放”与他们所称的“个人解放”相结合，后者主要是宣扬已婚妇女和年轻女孩无拘无束、肆意妄为的性行为。犹太人的立场是，僵化的性习俗和道德观念仅仅是邪恶资本家压迫妇女的工具。基于这一可疑的基础，他们发起了旨在“改造”——即摧毁——家庭和社会的激进性改革。如前所述，其中必不可少的一个方面是使自由堕胎合法化，因为为已婚妇女规定的肆意性行为将不可避免地导致数百万非婚生子女意外怀孕。这被冠以妇女“掌控自己的身体”的名义，同时为她们提供“生育选择”。

 

In practice, the entire “liberation” of women was sexual. Married women working in factories would receive an income. This income in turn would provide the financial freedom to liberate the hordes of oppressed (Gentile) women by converting them into new hordes of nymphomaniacs and sexual psychopaths – free in the most literal sense. The purpose of the factory labor was to give all (Gentile) women the financial independence to pursue their new-found sexual freedom without fear of abandonment by the husband. Thus, the Gentile women were to be liberated both “economically and psychologically”, to say nothing of sexually.

在实践中，女性的“解放”完全体现在性方面。在工厂工作的已婚女性会获得收入。这些收入反过来又为解放大批受压迫的（非犹太）女性提供了经济自由，将她们转变为新的性欲狂和性变态者群体——从最字面的意义上来说，她们是自由的。工厂劳动的目的是让所有（非犹太）女性获得经济独立，以便追求她们新发现的性自由，而不必担心被丈夫抛弃。因此，非犹太女性将在“经济和心理上”得到解放，更不用说在性方面了。

 

There were a few Jewish Bolsheviks who saw a requirement for a bit of caution in the new “emancipation” of women. One M. I. Shishkevich wrote that “fear of pregnancy is still the great stumbling block to the free expression of (women’s) sexuality”, suggesting a need to “limit the sexual freedom of women”, but only “during the transition period”. However, and thankfully, abortion was also a Jewish “value”, and would solve the pregnancy problem until the advent of birth control pills.

有少数犹太布尔什维克认为，在妇女新的“解放”中需要谨慎行事。M. I. Shishkevich写道，“对怀孕的恐惧仍然是（妇女）性自由表达的一大绊脚石”，他建议“限制妇女的性自由”，但仅限于“过渡时期”。然而，值得庆幸的是，堕胎也是犹太人的“价值观”，在避孕药问世之前，堕胎可以解决怀孕问题。

 

It is interesting that Engels appeared to be arguing that the solution to any social disapproval of (married) women being openly promiscuous – and the resulting countless impregnations by men not their husbands – was the establishment of a society of matriarchal lineage. His argument was that exclusive lineage recognition of the female parent – due to the impossibility of determining paternity with promiscuous married women – would ensure that women were held in “high esteem”. This is of course the reason the Jews adopted a matriarchal lineage for themselves: Jewish women throughout history have always been sexually promiscuous and determining paternity was impossible until recently. A matriarchal lineage was the only possible solution.

有趣的是，恩格斯似乎认为，解决（已婚）女性公开滥交——以及由此导致的无数非婚生子——所引发的社会不满，在于建立一个母系血统社会。他的论点是，由于无法确定滥交已婚女性的父亲身份，因此仅承认女性父母的血统，将确保女性受到“高度尊重”。这当然也是犹太人为自己采用母系血统的原因：历史上犹太女性一直性滥交，直到最近才有可能确定父亲身份。母系血统是唯一可能的解决方案。

The Jews did actually establish a matriarchal lineage in Russia and, surprisingly, promulgated this in 1917 at the onset of the Jewish coup d’état, long before their intentions for marriage and the family were publicly known. We must conclude the plans for the sexual destruction of the family was formed in detail when Lenin and his Bolshevik group had been training in the US. In the publication “The Marriage Laws of Soviet Russia”, the very first sentence in the section on family rights, states that “No distinction shall be made between the relationship established through marriage and that established by union outside of marriage”. [13] If it isn’t clear, this is formal legislative recognition in advance of all the bastard children that were certain to be born to married women in Russia after the Jewish agenda was implemented.

犹太人确实在俄罗斯建立了一个母系血统制度，令人惊讶的是，早在他们的婚姻和家庭观念公之于众之前，他们就在1917年犹太政变开始时宣布了这一点。我们必须得出结论，列宁及其布尔什维克组织在美国接受培训时，就已详细制定了破坏家庭的性计划。在《苏维埃俄国的婚姻法》一书中，关于家庭权利部分的第一句话就指出：“通过婚姻建立的关系与通过非婚姻结合建立的关系之间不应有任何区别。”[13]如果这还不够明确，那么在犹太议程实施后，俄罗斯已婚妇女肯定会生下许多私生子，而这是在法律上正式承认之前的情况。

 

August Bebel, another Jew, extolled unrestricted sexuality, which was simply “the natural desires implanted in every healthy adult”. He wrote that the “Sexual impulse is neither moral nor immoral; it is simply natural, like hunger or thirst”. He claimed that modern marriages were “sexually unhappy” from what he termed the “double standard” of married women being discouraged or prevented from engaging in rampant promiscuity. According to Bebel, this had a “pernicious effect” that forced women to “suppress their most powerful instincts”. Until reading this, I wasn’t aware that the most powerful instinct of married women was to have sexual intercourse with as many other men as possible. However, Bebel saw the chastity of women as a “subjugation”. He wrote that “Nothing can prove the dependent position of women in a more emphatic and revolting way than these vastly differing conceptions in regard to the satisfaction of the same natural impulse”. Like Marx and Engels, he posited a free union founded on love in place of the “forced relations” created by “capitalism”.[14]

另一位犹太人奥古斯特·倍倍尔（August Bebel）推崇无限制的性行为，认为这仅仅是“每个健康成年人固有的自然欲望”。他写道，“性冲动既不道德也不不道德；它就像饥饿或口渴一样，是自然的”。他声称，现代婚姻“在性方面并不幸福”，原因是他所称的已婚女性的“双重标准”，即她们被劝阻或阻止进行肆意的滥交。倍倍尔认为，这产生了“有害影响”，迫使女性“压抑她们最强烈的本能”。在读到这段文字之前，我并不知道已婚女性最强烈的本能是与尽可能多的其他男性发生性关系。然而，倍倍尔认为女性的贞洁是一种“征服”。他写道，“没有什么能比这些关于满足同一自然冲动的截然不同的观念，更能有力且令人反感地证明女性所处的依赖地位了”。与马克思和恩格斯一样，他主张以建立在爱情基础上的自由结合，来取代“资本主义”所创造的“强制关系”。[14]

 

At some point in this essay, it should occur to you that the literal situation we are discussing is that of a few thousand Jews (who effected a coup in Russia) planning the destruction of an entire society of Gentiles. These few thousand Jews planned to abolish the (Gentile) family, turn over the upbringing and education of the entire nation’s (Gentile) children to a group of ideological Jews, to abolish the (Gentile) Christian religion, and to “liberate” all the (Gentile) females in Russia between the ages of 13 and 65 by turning them into sexually wanton psychopaths, and then to abort all the presumably unwanted unborn (Gentile) children. This is beginning to sound like a lab experiment. We can be forgiven for wondering why, if these were such prized Jewish values, they didn’t focus on their own people.

在这篇文章的某个部分，你应该会想到，我们正在讨论的实际情况是，几千名犹太人（他们在俄罗斯发动了一场政变）计划摧毁整个外邦人社会。这几千名犹太人计划废除（外邦人）家庭制度，将整个国家（外邦人）儿童的抚养和教育交给一群意识形态上的犹太人，废除（外邦人）基督教，并通过将俄罗斯所有13至65岁（外邦人）女性转变为性欲放纵的精神病患者，来“解放”她们，然后堕掉所有可能被认为不受欢迎的未出生（外邦人）胎儿。这听起来开始像是一个实验室实验。我们有理由怀疑，如果这些是如此珍贵的犹太价值观，他们为什么不关注自己的人民。

 

The Jewish Bolshevik Revolution in Russia began with Lenin effectively abolishing marriage as an institution in the publication of the Family Code and Marriage Laws. [15] He stipulated full “sexual freedom” for women, and promoting two additional Jewish “values” of homosexuality and abortion. The stated aim was exterminating the very concept of the family and destroying the old bourgeois sexual morality, the concepts of homosexuality, lesbianism, and multiple genders being vital to the overall thesis. The main, fundamental, thrust of the Jews was to “liberate” married women by removing all restrictions on their sexual relations with men.[16]

俄罗斯的犹太布尔什维克革命始于列宁在《家庭法典》和《婚姻法》中实际上废除了婚姻制度。[15]他规定妇女享有充分的“性自由”，并宣扬同性恋和堕胎这两项额外的犹太“价值观”。其公开宣称的目标是消除家庭的概念，摧毁旧的资产阶级性道德，而同性恋、女同性恋和多元性别的概念对整体论点至关重要。犹太人的主要、根本目的是通过消除对已婚妇女与男性发生性关系的所有限制来“解放”她们。[16]

 

学校性教育 — Sex Education in Schools

 

In conjunction with the legislation of compulsory sexual intercourse for adults, the propaganda was enhanced by a comprehensive program of what was (quite properly!) termed “sex education” in the middle and high schools, since it specifically “educated” the children to have as much sexual intercourse as possible with as many of their classmates as possible. The children were taught that the best male-female relationships had “no (emotional) feelings” between the boy and girl, and should be initiated simply from the need to satisfy biological urges. The published literature on this topic – written by Jews – is that the programs were educating young people about “eradicating ignorance about sex”, “preventing diseases”, and freeing them from “reactionary superstitions”.

结合针对成年人的强制发生性关系立法，在中学和高中通过一项（相当恰当！）被称为“性教育”的全面计划来加强宣传，因为它专门“教育”孩子们尽可能多地与尽可能多的同学发生性关系。孩子们被教导说，最好的男女关系是男孩和女孩之间“没有（情感上的）感情”，而应该仅仅出于满足生理需要的需要而开始。关于这一主题的出版文献——由犹太人撰写——指出，这些计划旨在教育年轻人“消除对性的无知”、“预防疾病”，并使他们摆脱“反动的迷信”。

 

These programs were primarily targeted at the youth, the age when hormones are flowing and young people would be most susceptible to such information. Boys were taught that their urges for sexual intercourse were not only natural, but conveyed a “right”. The corollary was that girls were basically pressured to submit to any and all advances for intercourse. Young girls were simply being manipulated into wanton sexual activity followed by the necessary abortions.

这些节目主要针对青少年，这个年龄段荷尔蒙分泌旺盛，年轻人最容易受到此类信息的影响。节目告诉男孩们，他们对性交的渴望不仅是自然的，而且传达了一种“权利”。由此推论，女孩们基本上被迫屈从于任何和所有性交的示好。年轻女孩们被操纵进行肆意的性活动，随后不得不进行必要的堕胎。

 

The ideology was cleverly psychological, and disturbingly aimed at eliminating entirely the very concept of sexual morals as a tool to dismantle the institution of marriage, and then of society itself. The children were taught that sexual intercourse was a normal daily activity, and that all concepts of religion and morality were designed only to defraud them of the enjoyment of their very nature. The psychological appeal was to aim the sexual freedom as the liberation of young girls and married women from an “oppressive patriarchal structure”.[13]

这种意识形态巧妙地利用了心理学，令人不安地旨在彻底消除性道德这一概念，将其作为瓦解婚姻制度乃至整个社会的工具。孩子们被教导说，性交是一种正常的日常活动，而所有宗教和道德观念都只是为了剥夺他们享受本性的权利而设计的。其心理诉求是将性自由作为少女和已婚妇女从“压迫性的父权结构”中解放出来的手段。[13]

 

They were apparently quite successful. Reports state that, by the 1920s, most young Russians believed that love and marriage were “bourgeois relics” that limited freedom and humiliated women. They were taught, and apparently accepted, that they should lead a promiscuous and unrestrained sex life. However, the results were not entirely beneficial. The sex education program for children and teens apparently led to “great waves of rapes” in the schools. This was primarily the raping of elite upper- or middle-class girls by their working-class classmates. However, as one paper put it, with the youth, it could not be denied that their sexual fervor could spill into “questionable and colorful extremes”. [14] What a masterful understatement. However, since the boys were taught that sexual intercourse was a normal activity and a right, bereft of any moral or religious inhibitions, and since the girls were virtually commanded to submit, there was little point in asking.

他们显然相当成功。报告指出，到20世纪20年代，大多数俄罗斯年轻人认为爱情和婚姻是限制自由、羞辱女性的“资产阶级遗迹”。他们被教导，并且显然接受了这样的观念：他们应该过上放荡不羁的性生活。然而，结果并非完全有利。针对儿童和青少年的性教育计划显然导致了学校中“强奸浪潮”的涌现。这主要是指工人阶级的同学对上层或中产阶级的精英女孩的强奸。然而，正如一篇论文所述，不可否认的是，年轻人的性热情可能会发展到“可疑且丰富多彩的极端”。[14]多么轻描淡写的高明之举。然而，既然男孩们被教导性交是一种正常的活动，是一种权利，没有任何道德或宗教禁忌，而女孩们几乎被命令要顺从，那么问这个问题就没什么意义了。

 

俄罗斯社会的“社会化” — The “Socialisation” of Russian Society

 

 

 

SOVIETS MAKE GIRLS PROPERTY OF STATE; Decrees Compel Them to Register at “Free Love Bureau” on Attaining 18 Years.The New York Times Archives. See the article in its original context from October 26, 1918, Page 5.苏联将女性视为国家财产；法令要求她们年满18岁时到“自由恋爱局”登记。《纽约时报》档案。查看1918年10月26日第5版的原始文章。来源/Source

 

In the summer of 1918, only shortly after the Jewish Bolsheviks achieved power in Russia, they passed a “Decree on the Socialisation of Maidens and Ladies”. This decree made it compulsory for women between the ages of 18 and 30 to register with the Committee, with men then obtaining vouchers for their sexual “use”. There were reports of posters in Russian cities announcing the mobilisation of women ages 17 to 32 to be “distributed” amongst [men] who “require them”. The Jewish Bolsheviks actually turned women into “public property”. The announcement essentially declared that women between these ages would become the public property of all working people, and listed detailed terms:

1918年夏，犹太布尔什维克在俄罗斯掌权后不久，便颁布了《关于少女和妇女社会化的法令》。该法令规定，年龄在18至30岁之间的女性必须向委员会登记，而男性则可获得用于性“使用”的凭证。有报道称，俄罗斯各城市张贴了海报，宣布动员17至32岁的女性，以“分配”给“需要她们”的男性。犹太布尔什维克实际上将女性变成了“公共财产”。该公告基本上宣布，这些年龄段的女性将成为所有劳动人民的公共财产，并列出了详细的条款：

 

1. Women must fulfill their “public responsibility” by providing “sexual services” to workers.

1. 女性必须通过为工人提供“性服务”来履行其“公共责任”。

2. Individuals must not interfere with women’s “right to use.”

2. 个人不得干涉妇女的“使用权”

3. Each worker may be allocated a certain number of times per month to unite with women.

3. 每个工人每月可分配一定次数与女性团结相处。

 

Russian posters:俄罗斯海报：来源/Source:

 

This in Russia in the 1920s. The posters read: (1) “Every communist male can and must satisfy his sexual needs, and (2) Every communist female must aid him”.

这是20世纪20年代的俄罗斯。海报上写着：（1）“每个共产主义男性都可以且必须满足自己的性需求，以及（2）每个共产主义女性必须帮助他”。

 

Kollontai didn’t stop with the schools, but continued after graduation. With the Jewish “Youth Congress”, a statutory provision was implemented imposing on every young (Russian and Gentile) man and woman the obligation to satisfy the sexual desire of their comrades.

科伦泰并没有止步于学校，而是在毕业后继续推行。她与犹太“青年大会”一起实施了一项法律规定，要求所有年轻男女（无论是俄罗斯人还是非犹太人）都有义务满足其同伴的性欲。

There was an interesting twist introduced into the free sex mantra in that some Jewish Bolsheviks believed that removing sex from the factories would increase workers’ effectiveness. One method to achieve this, was espoused by Aleksandr Yakovlev in “No Land in Sight”. His recommendation was that each Spring, all men and women should leave their factories in the city and go into the woods or mountains for an extended holiday. While there, they should all give themselves wholly to orgies of unlimited sexual intercourse until they were “fully exhausted”. They would then return to their factory jobs without further distractions, thus achieving an astonishing increase in productivity. That would never have occurred to me.[15]

在“自由性爱”的口号中引入了一个有趣的转折，即一些犹太布尔什维克认为，将性爱从工厂中剔除会提高工人的工作效率。亚历山大·雅科夫列夫在《看不见的土地》一书中提出了实现这一目标的一种方法。他建议每年春天，所有男性和女性都应该离开城里的工厂，到树林或山区度过一个长假。在那里，他们应该全身心投入到无限制的性爱狂欢中，直到“筋疲力尽”。然后，他们将回到工厂工作，不再分心，从而生产力会惊人地提高。我从未想过这一点。[15]

 

“The new Family Code laws on marriage and the generally charged sexual atmosphere, encouraged a level of promiscuity and a casual approach to sex, that would have been unthinkable only years earlier. Nudism was one result of the “liberation” of women, with nude beaches formed in downtown Moscow and other cities, and with nude marches or protests sometimes containing 10,000 people. Mikhail Bulgakov, the Russian writer, wrote in his diary in 1924 that “Stark naked people wearing armbands reading “Down With Shame!” have recently appeared in Moscow”. [16] [17] There were multiple stories of nude people riding city buses in Russia, and much else.

“新的《家庭法典》中关于婚姻的规定以及普遍存在的性氛围，鼓励了一种滥交和随意的性态度，这在几年前是不可想象的。裸体主义是女性‘解放’的结果之一，莫斯科市中心和其他城市出现了裸体海滩，有时甚至有万人参加的裸体游行或抗议活动。俄罗斯作家米哈伊尔·布尔加科夫在1924年的日记中写道：‘最近莫斯科出现了赤身裸体的人，他们戴着写有“打倒羞耻”字样的臂章’。[16][17]俄罗斯有多起裸体人乘坐城市公交车的报道，还有其他许多类似事件。

 

I should perhaps make an effort here to ensure clarity. In the Russian schools, the Jews promoted free and uninhibited sexual intercourse among the students, essentially teaching the boys it was their “right” to use any classmate for sexual satisfaction, and that it was the girl’s “duty” to submit. They went farther with the Youth Groups, essentially legislating the proposition that every young man had a legal right to claim any young woman for his sexual satisfaction, at any time. It was essentially legislated that every young woman selected was legally bound to submit.

或许我应该在这里努力确保表述清晰。在俄罗斯的学校里，犹太人鼓励学生之间自由无拘的性行为，基本上是教导男生他们有“权利”利用任何同学来满足性欲，而女生则有“义务”服从。他们甚至在青年团体中走得更远，基本上是立法规定每个年轻男性都有合法权利在任何时候要求任何年轻女性满足他的性欲。基本上是立法规定，每个被选中的年轻女性都有法律义务服从。

 

For adults, the “Decree on the Socialisation of Maidens and Ladies” made it legally compulsory for every woman under age 30 or 32 to “register” herself for sexual use, with any man being able to claim any of the women for such use at any time. These women, many of them married, were compelled by law to submit to any man for sexual use, to whatever extent was desired. It was not much different in the factories, and in other parts of society, where all women, almost all married, were subjected – by law – to submit to sexual intercourse to any man who wanted them. Yet the Jews engineered all this on the pretext of “liberating” women and giving them “control over their bodies”. But no women were liberated in Bolshevik Russia. Instead, they were all enslaved, and every girl and woman totally lost control of her body in the process. All of this has been so deeply buried by the Jew’s control of the media and publications that few persons anywhere are aware of this history.

对于成年人而言，《少女与妇女社会化法令》规定，所有30或32岁以下的妇女必须依法“登记”以供性使用，任何男性都可以随时要求使用任何一名妇女。这些妇女中，许多已婚，她们被法律强制要求服从任何男性的性使用，无论对方提出何种要求。工厂和社会其他领域的情况也大同小异，几乎所有已婚妇女都依法必须服从任何想要她们的男性的性要求。然而，犹太人策划这一切的借口是“解放”妇女，让她们“掌控自己的身体”。但在布尔什维克统治下的俄罗斯，没有妇女得到解放。相反，她们都被奴役了，每个女孩和妇女在这个过程中都完全失去了对自己身体的控制。由于犹太人对媒体和出版物的控制，所有这些都被深深地埋葬了，以至于世界各地很少有人知道这段历史。

 

In their thrust to destroy the family, a necessary precondition was the elimination of all sexual morals and the full sexual “liberation” of women. And, a necessary precondition for the full sexual liberation of women was the use of abortions as the means of birth control. The Jewish Bolsheviks legislated that women had a right to free abortions, merely for the asking. The immediate result was an astonishingly rapid decline in the birth rate and “a real slaughter of unborn children”. Reports are that in 1928 around 40% of pregnancies were aborted, increasing to over 70% by 1934. The Jews were so successful at promoting abortion – one of the Jews’ key “values” – that they apparently created a kind of “abortion culture” in Russia, where women and girls simply became habituated to terminating every pregnancy with an abortion, simply a means of birth control after the fact.

在摧毁家庭的行动中，一个必要的先决条件是消除所有性道德观念，并实现妇女的全面性“解放”。而实现妇女全面性解放的一个必要先决条件是，将堕胎作为避孕手段。犹太布尔什维克党立法规定，妇女只需提出要求，就有权获得免费堕胎。其直接后果是出生率急剧下降，以及“对未出生婴儿的真正屠杀”。据报道，1928年，约40%的怀孕被堕胎，到1934年这一比例增至70%以上。犹太人在推广堕胎方面如此成功——堕胎是犹太人的一个关键“价值观”——以至于他们在俄罗斯显然创造了一种“堕胎文化”，在这种文化中，妇女和女孩们已经习惯于每次怀孕都通过堕胎来终止妊娠，堕胎成为一种事后避孕的手段。

 

A note on Religion: From an ideological standpoint, the wanton sexuality of married women was an important weapon against Orthodox Christianity and the morals of the day. One of the key steps for “liberation” of Russian women was to undermine the authority of the Church, which the Jews hoped to accomplish by the abolition of religious (church) marriages, the institution of free abortion, and the legislation of limitless promiscuous sex, especially for married women. The Jews attempted other methods as well. They confiscated all church property, seized Christian schools and hospitals, and shut down religions presses and educational institutions. Having failed to exterminate the Christian church through these means, the Jews turned to the slaughter of most of the clergy and the burning or other destruction of most of the churches.

关于宗教的说明：从意识形态的角度来看，已婚妇女的放纵性行为是反对东正教和当时道德观念的重要武器。俄罗斯妇女“解放”的关键步骤之一是削弱教会的权威，犹太人希望通过废除宗教（教堂）婚姻、设立免费堕胎制度以及立法允许无限制的滥交性行为（尤其是对已婚妇女而言）来实现这一目标。犹太人还尝试了其他方法。他们没收了所有教堂财产，占领了基督教学校和医院，并关闭了宗教出版社和教育机构。由于未能通过这些手段消灭基督教会，犹太人转而屠杀大多数神职人员，并烧毁或以其他方式破坏大多数教堂。

 

放射尘 — The Fallout

 

This Jewish program for the reconstruction of Russian Gentile society was in the end a disaster of unimaginable proportion. The essentially legislated “free love” resulted in a plague of prostitution, rapes, gang rapes, unwanted children, abortions, divorce, venereal diseases, and suicides. There were literal epidemics everywhere; epidemics of rape and gang rape, in schools, in factories, and in society generally. There was a literal epidemic of unwanted pregnancies and abortions, with hospitals and doctors overwhelmed with abortion requests. There was a flood of abandoned bastard children brought into the world. There was an epidemic of divorce, and another of venereal disease. One report tells us that in 1926, in one of the Moscow factories, more than 50 percent of female workers had syphilis, and these situations were not uncommon. There was an epidemic of sex-related alcohol abuse, depression, and suicide.

这个旨在重建俄罗斯非犹太社会的犹太计划最终演变成了一场规模难以想象的灾难。本质上被法定化的“自由恋爱”导致了卖淫、强奸、轮奸、私生子、堕胎、离婚、性病和自杀的泛滥。各地都爆发了名副其实的流行病；强奸和轮奸的流行病，在学校、工厂乃至整个社会蔓延。意外怀孕和堕胎的流行病肆虐，医院和医生被大量的堕胎请求所淹没。大量被遗弃的私生子来到这个世界。离婚和性病的流行病也层出不穷。一份报告告诉我们，1926年，在莫斯科的一家工厂里，超过50%的女工患有梅毒，而这种情况并不罕见。与性有关的酗酒、抑郁和自杀的流行病也十分猖獗。

 

By the 1920s, rape in Russia had become an epidemic. As with the widespread rapes in middle and high schools mentioned earlier, there was apparently a virtual epidemic of rape among adults as well, primarily the widespread raping of former noble and middle-class women by working-class males. Several Jewish writers have observed that this raping of elite women by men of the lower classes was considered as merely a kind of “class justice”, thus downplaying and effectively excusing it as unworthy of mention. Also, this new Jewish “society” was breeding an entire generation of homeless orphans; official reports indicate that, by 1923, half of the children born in Moscow had been conceived out of wedlock, and many of them were abandoned in infancy.

到20世纪20年代，强奸在俄罗斯已成为一种流行病。与前文提到的中学和高中普遍存在的强奸现象一样，成年人中的强奸现象也显然十分普遍，主要是工人阶级男性对前贵族和中产阶级女性的广泛强奸。几位犹太作家观察到，下层阶级男性对精英女性的这种强奸行为被视为仅仅是一种“阶级正义”，从而被轻描淡写，甚至被有效地原谅，认为其不值一提。此外，这个新兴的犹太“社会”正在孕育整整一代无家可归的孤儿；官方报告显示，到1923年，莫斯科出生的一半儿童是非婚生子女，其中许多儿童在婴儿时期就被遗弃。

 

“Prostitution flourished throughout the 1920s in the Soviet Union as years of revolutionary violence, political and economic instability, and the civil war left women especially vulnerable to unemployment. The majority of women lacked an education or formal work experience, and many were forced to participate in the sex trade after their husbands or fathers left for war.”[18]

“20世纪20年代，苏联的卖淫现象猖獗，多年的革命暴力、政治和经济动荡以及内战使妇女尤其容易失业。大多数妇女缺乏教育或正式工作经验，许多妇女在丈夫或父亲参战后被迫从事性交易。” [18]

 

“The Bolshevik Revolution promised a total transformation of Russian society, down to its most intimate details. Despite optimistic claims that bolshevism would overcome bourgeois depravity, the writings of the 1920s in all genres were awash in sexual adventure, promiscuity, various chauvinisms, date and gang rape, unwanted pregnancy, and sexually transmitted diseases, as well as sex-related alcohol abuse, depression, and suicide”.[19] [20]

“布尔什维克革命承诺彻底改造俄罗斯社会，甚至包括其最私密的细节。尽管有人乐观地宣称布尔什维克主义将克服资产阶级的堕落，但20世纪20年代各种体裁的文学作品充斥着性冒险、滥交、各种沙文主义、约会强奸和轮奸、意外怀孕以及性传播疾病，还有与性有关的酗酒、抑郁和自杀。”。[19] [20]

 

公民不服从与内战 — Civil Disobedience and Civil War

 

A detachment of female workers in the Vasileostrovsky district of Petrograd before being sent to the front against the White Army. 1919.Source

1919年，彼得格勒瓦西里岛区的一支女性工人队伍，在被派往前线抗击白军之前。来源/Source

 

Not everyone in Russia was seduced or intimidated into obeying the new Jewish family laws or the “liberation” of women. The 1917 Revolution led to mass civil disobedience and “extremely violent” civil war by 1918. In response, the Jews developed the theory of mass terror to subjugate the population. The Jews refined this concept into nearly an art form, which was employed by the US in many countries like Indonesia, Afghanistan and Iraq, and which today is referred to euphemistically as “pacification” of a people. But in fact, it was just random, uninhibited violence on a massive scale involving many millions of deaths of innocent civilians. The Jews encouraged all forms of social violence against any civil disobedience or group uprisings, sometimes slaughtering large numbers of people.

并非所有俄罗斯人都被引诱或恐吓而服从新的犹太家庭法或妇女的“解放”。1917年革命引发了大规模的公民抗命，到1918年，内战变得“极其暴力”。作为回应，犹太人发展出了大规模恐怖理论来镇压民众。犹太人将这一概念完善成近乎一种艺术形式，美国在印度尼西亚、阿富汗和伊拉克等许多国家都采用了这一手段，如今被委婉地称为对一个民族的“安抚”。但事实上，这只是大规模的随机、无节制的暴力行为，导致数百万无辜平民死亡。犹太人鼓励对任何公民抗命或群体起义采取各种形式的社会暴力，有时甚至屠杀大量民众。

 

This mass terror was official Jewish policy that was spread and applied “without any inhibition whatsoever”. [21] “Lenin wrote that it was necessary to relentlessly “purify,” “clean” and “purge” Russian society of the “flees,” “bugs” and “parasites” infecting and polluting it”. [22] There was the “Red Terror” in the Autumn of 1918, where the Jews slaughtered countless thousands of “disobedient” Russians. There were mass executions of striking workers objecting to the “free sexuality” and permissible rapes on the job. They exterminated the entire population of the Cossacks, and so much more. They gathered and executed around 50,000 of the elite in the Crimea alone. The Jews launched a second “Red Terror” in the Ukraine in the middle of 1918, where they slaughtered, raped and exterminated much of the middle class in mass executions. It was this that led to the “pogroms” in Ukraine, where the people rose up against the Jews and killed perhaps 100,000 of them. But the Jews have rewritten history and we are today told these pogroms arose from unjustified “anti-Semitism”. That is very far from the truth.

这种大规模恐怖是犹太人的官方政策，它“毫无节制地”传播和实施。[21]“列宁写道，必须无情地‘净化’、‘清洗’和‘肃清’俄罗斯社会中的‘逃亡者’、‘害虫’和‘寄生虫’，因为它们正在感染和污染社会”。[22]1918年秋发生了“红色恐怖”，犹太人屠杀了成千上万的“不听话”的俄罗斯人。他们大规模处决了反对“性自由”和允许工作场所强奸行为的罢工工人。他们消灭了哥萨克人的全部人口，甚至更多。仅在克里米亚，他们就聚集并处决了约5万名精英。1918年中期，犹太人在乌克兰发动了第二次“红色恐怖”，他们屠杀、强奸并大规模处决了中产阶级的大部分人。正是这一点导致了乌克兰的“大屠杀”，人们奋起反抗犹太人，并杀死了大约10万犹太人。但犹太人篡改了历史，而我们今天却被告知，这些大屠杀源于毫无根据的“反犹太主义”。这与事实相去甚远。

 

As always, the Jews write their crimes and atrocities out of the history books and eventually out of human consciousness. This cannot be permitted to continue. I would add that the Jews have for 75 years used tales of the “holocaust” – the claimed killing of 6 million Jews by the Germans (the claim since reduced to 3 million and then to only 1.5 million), as a way to impose collective guilt on the entire world and by this means to manipulate the entire Gentile world. Whether the Jew’s “holocaust” was real or fabricated, is of no consequence for our purposes, since the Jews provably killed more than 65 million Russian civilians before they were done. And this only one of the great mass murders Jews have committed over the centuries. We could add at least 100 million each in India and China, and that doesn’t even scratch the surface.

一如既往，犹太人将他们的罪行和暴行从历史书中抹去，并最终从人类意识中抹去。这种情况不能再继续下去了。我要补充的是，75年来，犹太人一直利用“大屠杀”的故事——即声称德国人杀害了600万犹太人（这一说法后来被减少到300万，再后来又减少到仅150万）——作为一种手段，将集体罪责强加于全世界，并借此操纵整个非犹太世界。犹太人的“大屠杀”是真实还是编造，对我们的目的而言并不重要，因为犹太人在屠杀结束前，可证明杀害了超过6500万俄罗斯平民。而这只是犹太人在几个世纪以来犯下的众多大屠杀之一。我们还可以在印度和中国各加上至少1亿人，而这还只是冰山一角。

 

 

It was after these episodes of civil disobedience that the Jews abandoned their sexual freedom agenda and turned wholesale to the Gulags and to exterminating the Russian population. I won’t dwell further on this topic here, but the Jews eventually killed more than 65 million Russians, more than 1/3 of the total population of the country. They simply slaughtered virtually the entire middle and upper classes, the educated and business classes, and nearly the entire Christian clergy in Russia, and then burned down all the churches. Yet not many people are aware of the fact that the Jews have been for centuries the greatest mass murderers in the history of the world. Alexander Solzhenitsyn tried to tell us in his series of books. [23] I don’t know how many listened to him.

在这些非暴力反抗事件之后，犹太人放弃了他们的性自由议程，转而大规模地将俄罗斯人口送往古拉格集中营并加以灭绝。我在此不再赘述这一话题，但犹太人最终杀害了超过6500万俄罗斯人，占该国总人口的三分之一以上。他们几乎屠杀了俄罗斯所有的中上层阶级、受过教育的人和商界人士，以及几乎全部的基督教神职人员，然后烧毁了所有的教堂。然而，并没有多少人意识到，几个世纪以来，犹太人一直是世界历史上最大的大规模屠杀者。亚历山大·索尔仁尼琴试图通过他的系列书籍告诉我们这一点。[23]我不知道有多少人听了他的话。

 

In the end, the results of the Jewish sexual revolution in Russia were so bad that sexual freedom for women was eventually cancelled. Kollontai’s “liberated wanton woman” lasted only about ten years. Upon the death of Lenin, Stalin rescinded all the family code, outlawing abortion, re-criminalising homosexuality, condemning the free sex, and reinstating the family as the core social unit.

最终，俄罗斯犹太性革命的结果如此糟糕，以至于女性的性自由最终被取消。科伦泰的“解放的放荡女人”只持续了大约十年。列宁去世后，斯大林废除了所有家庭法，宣布堕胎非法，重新将同性恋定为犯罪，谴责自由性行为，并恢复家庭作为核心社会单位。

 

犹太修正主义与错误信息 — Jewish Revisionism and Misinformation

 

There is much Jewish misinformation on The Bolsheviks. The Jews have almost total control over the media and book publishing and distribution, and they ferociously suppress details of Jewish crime and anti-human behavior. As well, many semi-respected websites disguise their Jewish roots and present an ostensibly unbiased viewpoint while downplaying Jewish crimes and atrocities and rewriting history in the process.

关于布尔什维克，犹太人散布了大量错误信息。犹太人几乎完全控制着媒体、图书出版和发行，他们极力掩盖犹太人的犯罪和反人类行为细节。此外，许多看似受人尊敬的网站也掩盖其犹太背景，表面上呈现出公正的观点，但实际上却淡化犹太人的罪行和暴行，并在此过程中篡改历史。

 

One of these is Springer.com, a direct descendent of the Jew Julius Springer who was publishing in Germany in the 1800s. Springer have an article on the sexual aspect of Jewish Russia, but describe the Jew’s pathological obsession with sexual depravity as “official efforts, although ambiguous and inconsistent, to open up lifestyle options”. [24] And Springer describe Aleksandra Kollontai as “the leading Bolshevik exponent of lifestyle freedom”. To depict the Jewish sexual atrocities in Russia as “lifestyle changes” is unforgivably obscene. But the point is that most of the world’s publications and information sources are controlled by Jews, and they make fierce efforts to remove from human consciousness all the horrific negatives of their past.

其中之一是Springer.com，它是19世纪在德国从事出版业的犹太人朱利叶斯·施普林格（Julius Springer）的直系后代。Springer发表了一篇关于俄罗斯犹太人性方面的文章，但将犹太人对性堕落的病态痴迷描述为“官方虽含糊且不一致，但仍努力开放生活方式选择”。[24]Springer还将亚历山德拉·科伦泰（Aleksandra Kollontai）描述为“布尔什维克生活方式自由的主要倡导者”。将俄罗斯犹太人的性暴行描述为“生活方式的改变”是令人无法原谅的猥亵行为。但关键是，世界上大多数出版物和信息来源都由犹太人控制，他们竭尽全力从人类意识中抹去他们过去所有可怕的负面记忆。

 

One Jewish website proclaims the following misleading perspective:

一个犹太网站宣称了以下具有误导性的观点：

 

“Imagine a world where women were property, traded like livestock, silenced by veils and worked to death by the age of 30. That was the context in which the Jewish Bolshevik revolution of 1917 launched history’s most radical experiment for women’s emancipation. The Bolsheviks devoted resources to ensure women were no longer slaves. They made childcare free, awarded equal pay and allowed women reproductive freedoms, reforms that were revolutionary for the time.”[25]

“想象一下，在一个世界里，女性是财产，像牲畜一样被交易，被面纱束缚着声音，在30岁之前被逼迫工作至死。1917年，犹太布尔什维克革命正是在这样的背景下，发起了历史上最激进的妇女解放实验。布尔什维克投入资源，确保女性不再遭受奴役。他们提供免费育儿服务，给予同工同酬，并允许女性享有生育自由，这些改革在当时具有革命性意义。“他们实现了免费托儿服务，保障了同工同酬，并赋予了妇女生育自主权——这些改革在当时堪称革命性的。[25]

 

One paper tells us, a little too happily, it seemed to me, that it took seven centuries for free and unrestrained sex for (Jewish) married women to evolve to the Bolshevik vision of (Gentile) women’s “emancipation and independence”. Another (Jewish) document was filled with glowing praise of the social revolution results in Russia: “The talents and energy of the women after the revolution, owing to their free (sexual) activity, made them grow like plants in the sunshine after a shower has just passed. This new (sexual) life awakens the women, gives them experience and training, transforms them into revolutionary fighters and prized Communist workers.”[26]

有一篇论文略带欣喜地告诉我们（在我看来这种欣喜有些过头），（犹太）已婚妇女实现自由无拘的性爱，似乎花了七个世纪才演变为布尔什维克所设想的（非犹太）妇女“解放与独立”。另一份（犹太）文献则对俄国社会革命的成果赞不绝口：“革命后，妇女因其自由的（性）活动而焕发出才华与活力，她们就像雨后阳光下的植物一样茁壮成长。这种新的（性）生活唤醒了妇女，赋予她们经验和训练，将她们转变为革命战士和杰出的共产主义工作者。” [26]

 

Some recent papers boast that the Jewish Bolsheviks, with their “new family code” promulgated in 1917, “accomplished far more than the Russian nation had ever done, or even attempted”. The boasts are founded on the Jews altogether expelling the Christian religion from marriages, making divorce free on simple request by either party. Divorce in the new Jewish Russia was made easier than you might imagine. According to the Family Code, to effect and register a divorce it was often sufficient to simply send a postcard to the Marriage Registry Office. And of course, one of the greatest “accomplishments” of the Jews in Gentile Russia was in establishing women’s “rights” to unlimited promiscuous sex on the basis of “freedom”, “gender equality”, and liberation from “male domination”. We might question whether legislated sexual promiscuity for married women equates to “freedom”. According to one treatise, Goikhbarg’s code of family laws produced “the most progressive family legislation the world had ever seen”. I would say the definition of “progressive” might depend on one’s point of view.

许多不在俄罗斯的犹太人希望支持这种对外邦人生活的重新构想。因此，他们赞扬布尔什维克的新家庭制度，声称所宣扬的犹太理想和价值观是由一种“惊人的智慧”所孕育，这种智慧将女性从“无休止的压迫循环”中解救出来。他们声称，在现代世界历史上，女性的不平等地位首次得到了终结。他们声称，性爱已经“摆脱了笼罩其上并使其混乱的迷信”，婚姻已经“摆脱了宗教的束缚”，离婚已经与“虚伪和欺骗”划清了界限。（具体如何实现不得而知）。因此，“道德”已经从“过去陈腐的愚蠢观念”中“解放”出来。

 

There were many Jews not in Russia who wanted to lend their support to this reimagination of Gentile life. Thus, they praised the new Bolshevik family system, claiming the Jewish ideals and values being promulgated had been produced by an “astounding intelligence” that rescued women from “an endless cycle of oppression”. They claimed that for the first time in the history of the modern world, the inequality of women was ended. They claimed that sex had been “freed of the superstitions which had clouded and confused it”, that marriage had been “liberated from religion”, that divorce had been separated from “duplicity and deceit”. (No idea how). And, as a result, “morality” had been “emancipated” from “the stereotyped stupidities of the past”.

许多不在俄罗斯的犹太人希望支持这种对外邦人生活的重新构想。因此，他们赞扬布尔什维克的新家庭制度，声称所宣扬的犹太理想和价值观是由一种“惊人的智慧”所孕育，这种智慧将女性从“无休止的压迫循环”中解救出来。他们声称，在现代世界历史上，女性的不平等地位首次得到了终结。他们声称，性爱已经“摆脱了笼罩其上并使其混乱的迷信”，婚姻已经“摆脱了宗教的束缚”，离婚已经与“虚伪和欺骗”划清了界限。（具体如何实现不得而知）。因此，“道德”已经从“过去陈腐的愚蠢观念”中“解放”出来。

 

Ella Winter was a Jew (real name Leonore Wertheimer) [27] who produced a book titled “Red Virtue”, in which she wrote most approvingly of the Bolshevik transformation of Russian (Gentile) society. She praised their “rational, common-sense approach” to the family and the open expressions of female sexuality. Other Jews wrote that legalised (and almost universal) abortion in Russia was “the most remarkable and intelligent advance in modern morality”. Yet other Jews claimed that the policy of free and instant divorce was “one of the greatest revolutions of the ages”. All of these observers appeared very solidly impressed by the “quality” of sex education available to children and teenagers.

埃拉·温特（原名莱奥诺拉·韦特海默）[27]是一位犹太人，她撰写了一本名为《红色美德》的书，在书中她对布尔什维克对俄罗斯（非犹太）社会的改造大加赞赏。她称赞布尔什维克对家庭采取的“理性、常识性的态度”，以及女性性欲的公开表达。其他犹太人写道，俄罗斯合法化（且几乎普及）的堕胎是“现代道德中最显著、最明智的进步”。还有一些犹太人声称，自由且即时的离婚政策是“有史以来最伟大的革命之一”。所有这些观察者似乎都对儿童和青少年所能获得的性教育的“质量”印象深刻。

 

As to publications, other observers, again all Jews, stated that no subject in Russia had as much attention as sex. They claimed that indeed “the subject was omnipresent, but only in the sense of what was good or necessary”, and that everything the Jews published on sex was “agreeably wholesome, really pure”. Even better, they claimed that Jewish writers treated sexuality “with the social conscience of a doctor or teacher”, and that they “cleansed society” of anything that truly cheapened sex. Other Jews claimed that sex in the West was “publicly recognised and legitimised only in its most decadent form”, but that the Jews in Russia had found the correct path. Yet others praised the Jewish Bolsheviks for producing a “morality” that actually expressed the voluntary desire of Russian Gentile women to have uninhibited and open sexual intercourse with all men who might cross their path. Another Jewish observer wrote that the Jewish Bolsheviks had discovered “the key to a healthy sex life and rewarding emotional relationships”.[28]

至于出版物，其他观察者——同样全部是犹太人——表示，在俄罗斯，没有任何话题能像性那样受到如此多的关注。他们声称，事实上，“性这个话题无处不在，但仅限于好的或必要的情况”，犹太人出版的所有关于性的内容都是“令人愉悦且有益健康的，真正纯洁的”。更妙的是，他们声称犹太作家以“医生或教师的社会良知”对待性行为，并“净化社会”中任何真正贬低性的内容。其他犹太人则声称，西方的性行为“只有在最颓废的形式下才得到公开认可和合法化”，而俄罗斯的犹太人则找到了正确的道路。还有一些人赞扬犹太布尔什维克党人创造了一种“道德观”，这种道德观实际上表达了俄罗斯非犹太女性自愿与所有可能遇到的男性进行无拘无束、开放的性交的愿望。另一位犹太观察者写道，犹太布尔什维克党人发现了“健康性生活和有益情感关系的钥匙”。 [28]

 

To give you an idea of how desperately the Jews bury their own historical atrocities, I have here a link to an article – obviously written by a Jew – that claims the stories about legislated sexual intercourse, women’s bodies being public property, and all the rest, were merely “rumors” fabricated by a Russian teahouse owner. Further, that these rumors not only dealt a blow to the Bolshevik regime but also influenced later generations’ understanding of Soviet Russian history. And of course, this was all too bad because all the Jewish Bolsheviks ever did was to confiscate some noble property and introduce policies of land reform and factory ownership. The article even tells us that Lenin himself was violently against female sexual promiscuity. Yet we have surviving photos of the actual posters that were distributed throughout Russia, making these very points of the rights of all men to sexual satisfaction and the obligation of all women to submit.

为了让你们了解犹太人是多么迫切地掩盖他们自己的历史暴行，我这里有一个链接，链接到一篇显然是由犹太人撰写的文章，该文章声称，有关法定性交、女性身体是公共财产等所有其他故事，都只是俄罗斯茶馆老板编造的“谣言”。此外，这些谣言不仅打击了布尔什维克政权，还影响了后代对苏俄历史的理解。当然，这一切太糟糕了，因为所有犹太布尔什维克所做的只是没收一些贵族财产，并引入土地改革和工厂所有制的政策。这篇文章甚至告诉我们，列宁本人也强烈反对女性性乱交。然而，我们保存有当时在俄罗斯各地分发的海报照片，这些海报明确指出了所有男性都有获得性满足的权利，以及所有女性都有服从的义务。

 

I will make a further point: the above article appears in Chinese on a Chinese website. [29] This will provide some understanding of the wide reach of the efforts of Jews to not only bury their historical atrocities in the English-speaking Western nations, but to rewrite history and find gullible victims in every country to promote their entirely false versions of history. And the Jews will typically do this if there are fears of their atrocities being discovered. Whenever someone learns the truth about the obscenely evil portions of Jewish history and begins writing about them, there will be a flood of false history produced and widely disseminated. This is always done as a pre-emptive move on the recognised basis that we generally accept and believe the first thing we read about an event. Later, when the truth emerges into the public realm, it can be easily dismissed as “anti-Semitism” and “conspiracy theories”.

我还要进一步指出：上述文章出现在一个中文网站上。[29]这将有助于我们理解犹太人不仅在英语西方国家掩盖其历史暴行，而且还在每个国家重写历史、寻找轻信的受害者来宣扬其完全错误的历史版本的广泛努力。如果担心他们的暴行被发现，犹太人通常会这样做。每当有人了解到犹太历史中邪恶不堪的部分的真相并开始撰写相关内容时，就会出现大量虚假的历史被炮制并广泛传播。这总是作为一种先发制人的行动，基于我们通常接受并相信我们首先读到的关于某一事件的信息这一公认基础。后来，当真相进入公众视野时，很容易被斥为“反犹太主义”和“阴谋论”。

 

一些分歧 — Some Disagreements

 

A note from the French media publication France 24: “October 1917 brought not only political but also sexual revolution to Russia, with the early Soviets promoting female emancipation and the end of the traditional family . . . For a brief time, groups encouraging free love flourished across the country, while nudists walked freely through the streets of Moscow. Some regions even tried to pass declarations outlawing the “privatisation” of women by their husbands, rebranding them “property of the state” to which every proletarian should have access. The movement found a natural ally in the Bolsheviks, one of whose slogans was “down with decency! And who claimed that “making love must be just as simple as drinking a glass of water”.[30]

法国媒体《France 24》的一则报道指出：“1917年10月，俄罗斯不仅发生了政治革命，还发生了性革命，早期的苏维埃政权推动女性解放和传统家庭的终结……在一段短暂的时间里，鼓励自由恋爱的团体在全国各地蓬勃发展，而裸体主义者则自由地走在莫斯科的街头。一些地区甚至试图通过宣言，宣布丈夫将女性‘私有化’为非法行为，将她们重新定义为‘国家财产’，每个无产者都应享有。这一运动在布尔什维克党人中找到了天然盟友，布尔什维克党人的口号之一就是‘打倒礼仪！’还有谁声称‘做爱必须像喝一杯水那么简单’？”。[30]

 

My only argument with the above observations is that the movement for “nationalising” married women was not something that “found an ally” in the Jewish Bolsheviks but was something created, promulgated – and even legislated – by them.

我对上述观点的唯一异议是，将已婚妇女“国有化”的运动并非在犹太布尔什维克中“找到了盟友”，而是由他们创造、宣扬，甚至立法确立的。

 

A note from Peter Drucker’s paper on Sex and the Russian Revolution: “Alexandra Kollontai was one of the main architects and proponents of the Jew’s sexual revolution against the Gentile Russians, and her agenda was not merely theoretical but was put into practice. For Kollontai, “fleeting passion” was a legitimate basis – and the only necessary basis – for any woman, but especially a married woman, to have sexual intercourse with any man. She dismissed any “formal limits” on “love” – i. e., on the sexual conduct of women, and strongly recommended many kinds of “experimentation” in sexual relationships, claiming these had value. She further saw the Christian religion as being a major obstacle and the source of “sexual prejudice”, according to her. In other words, the Christian church and religion were a powerful hindrance to her vision of rampant and unlimited sexual promiscuity, and thus the religion needed to be destroyed.”[31]

彼得·德鲁克关于《性与俄国革命》的论文中提到：“亚历山德拉·科伦泰是犹太人反对非犹太俄罗斯人的性革命的主要策划者和支持者之一，她的主张不仅仅是理论上的，而且付诸了实践。对科伦泰而言，‘短暂的激情’是任何女性（尤其是已婚女性）与任何男性发生性关系的合法基础——也是唯一必要的基础。她无视对‘爱’（即女性的性行为）的任何‘形式限制’，并强烈建议在性关系中进行多种‘实验’，声称这些具有价值。她进一步认为，基督教是主要障碍，是她所谓的‘性偏见’的根源。换言之，基督教教会和宗教是她实现猖獗且无限制的性滥交的愿景的强大阻碍，因此需要摧毁宗教。” [31]

 

In “Red War on the Family”, Samuel Saloman claimed that the Bolsheviks were “political tricksters” who spread “unholy propaganda”. He wrote that their “satanic majesties”, Lenin and Trotsky, “had succeeded in duping an entire population by promising an earthly paradise while creating an earthly hell”. He wrote further that Lenin had “unleashed a revolution only to secure the delights of lust”. And that “Freeing woman from the ‘slavery’ of the kitchen and the nursery had only one definite result, and that was to give her more time to devote herself to free and unrestrained sexual intercourse”. Another observer offered this opinion: “This free love idea is undoubtedly the greatest attack against the female sex that has ever been devised. Even the lowest form of savages who indulge in the wildest spirit of cannibalism is far superior to such barbarism as this indecent, hellish, state license. Never before has any portion of the world made such a retrograding step in civilization as Russia in her reign of (Jewish) Bolshevism.”[32]

在《家庭的红战》一书中，塞缪尔·萨洛曼声称布尔什维克是“政治骗子”，他们散布“邪恶的宣传”。他写道，他们的“撒旦陛下”——列宁和托洛茨基“通过承诺人间天堂，同时创造人间地狱，成功欺骗了全体人民”。他进一步写道，列宁“发动了一场革命，只是为了满足自己的欲望”。而且，“将女性从厨房和育儿室的‘奴役’中解放出来，只有一个明确的结果，那就是让她有更多时间投入到自由无拘的性爱中”。另一位观察者提出了这样的观点：“这种自由恋爱观念无疑是对女性发起的最大攻击。即使是那些沉溺于最野蛮的食人精神的最低级野蛮人，也远比这种下流、地狱般的国家许可的野蛮行为要高明得多。世界上从未有任何地区像俄罗斯在（犹太）布尔什维克统治时期那样，在文明方面倒退如此之大。”[32]

 

将点连接起来 — Connecting the Dots

 

Due to the intense Jewish control of today’s media landscape, we are seldom given a true picture of any portion of history or even current events. Often, similar events occur sequentially in many locations but we are almost never informed of them. It is thus easy for us to consider an event, even a very serious one, as a kind of “one-off” occurrence and dismiss it as an aberration. It is only when we are informed that the same or similar events occurred in many places or countries, all following the same agenda, that we can understand that we are dealing with an organised plan.

由于当今媒体格局受到犹太人的严密控制，我们很少能了解到历史或时事的真实情况。很多时候，类似事件在多个地点相继发生，但我们几乎从未得知。因此，我们很容易将某一事件，甚至是极其严重的事件，视为“一次性”事件，并将其视为异常情况而置之不理。只有当我们得知相同或类似事件在多个地方或国家发生，且都遵循相同的议程时，我们才能明白我们正在面对的是一个有组织的计划。

 

I have sometimes used the example of Apple’s dispute with the Chinese government about computer warranties. China claimed the iPad was a computer and demanded a 2-year warranty; Apple claimed it was a phone, and refused. We can easily dismiss this as an unimportant minor dispute between a huge multi-national company and an “authoritarian” government. But when we discover that Apple had the same disputes with dozens of countries all over the world, attracting multiple fines and lawsuits in the process, that we realise there was something more at stake: Apple was arrogant enough to attempt to force governments all over the world to rewrite their warranty policies for the sake of the company’s profit ledger.

我有时会以苹果公司与中国政府在电脑保修问题上的纠纷为例。中国声称iPad是电脑，并要求提供2年保修服务；而苹果则声称iPad是手机，并拒绝了这一要求。我们很容易认为，这不过是一家大型跨国公司与一个“威权”政府之间无关紧要的小纠纷。但当我们发现苹果与全球数十个国家都存在类似的纠纷，并在此过程中招致多项罚款和诉讼时，我们意识到这背后还有更严重的问题：苹果为了公司的利润账目，竟然傲慢到试图迫使世界各国政府改写其保修政策.

 

It is the same with the Jew’s agenda for destroying the Western family and society, and specifically with the implementation of the sexual “liberation” of women. Russia was not the only country where the Jews attempted precisely the same agenda as I have outlined above. In subsequent articles in this series, I will deal with similar attempts by the Jews to inflict essentially the same “social changes” in other countries, notably Hungary, as they did in Russia.

犹太人破坏西方家庭和社会的议程，尤其是实施女性性“解放”的议程，也是如此。俄罗斯并非唯一一个犹太人企图实施与我上述议程完全相同的国家。在本系列后续文章中，我将探讨犹太人在其他国家（尤其是匈牙利）实施的类似企图，这些企图与他们在俄罗斯实施的“社会变革”基本相同。

*

Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 150 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).

罗曼诺夫先生的作品已被翻译成34种语言，其文章被发布在30多个国家的150多个外文新闻和政治网站上，以及150多个英文平台上。拉里·罗曼诺夫（Larry Romanoff）是一位退休的管理顾问和商人。他曾在国际咨询公司担任高级管理职位，并拥有一家国际进出口企业。他曾担任上海复旦大学的客座教授，为高级EMBA课程讲授国际事务案例研究。罗曼诺夫先生现居上海。他是辛西娅·麦金尼（Cynthia McKinney）新文集《当中国打喷嚏》（第2章——与恶魔打交道）的特约作者之一。

His full archive can be seen at:

他的全部档案可以在以下网址查看：

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/  + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/  

He can be contacted at:

可以通过以下方式联系他： 2186604556@qq.com

*
NOTES – Part 3

注释 – 第三部分

[1] Democracy –The Most Dangerous Religion

[1] 民主——最危险的宗教
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Democracy-The-Most-Dangerous-Religion-.pdf

[2] Friedrich Engels – “The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State”

[2] 弗里德里希·恩格斯 – “家庭、私有制和国家的起源”
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/origin_family.pdf

[3] Project Gutenberg: The origin of the family, private property, and the state – Engels

[3] 《古登堡项目：家庭、私有财产和国家的起源》——恩格斯
https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/33111/pg33111.txt

[4] Project Gutenberg eBook of Engels

[4] 古登堡项目恩格斯电子书
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/33111

[5] Women, the State and Revolution: Soviet Family Policy and Social Life, 1917-1936

[5] 女性、国家与革命：苏联家庭政策与社会生活，1917-1936
https://www.academia.edu/120780678/Women_the_State_and_Revolution_Soviet_Family_Policy_and_Social_Life_1917_1936

[6] Wolfson Samuel Y., Soviet Sociologist, The Sociology of Marriage and the Family; 1929

[6] 沃尔夫森·塞缪尔·Y.，苏联社会学家，《婚姻与家庭社会学》；1929年
https://www.ozon.ru/product/sotsiologiya-braka-i-semi-1929-volfson-s-ya-890851975/

[7] The origins of the Bolshevik vision: Love unfettered, women free

[7] 布尔什维克愿景的起源：无拘无束的爱，自由的女性
https://www.cambridge.org/core

[8] Women, the State and Revolution: Soviet Family Policy and Social Life, 1917-1936

[8] 女性、国家与革命：苏联家庭政策与社会生活，1917-1936
https://www.academia.edu/120780678/Women_the_State_and_Revolution_Soviet_Family_Policy_and_Social_Life_1917_1936

[9] Alexandra Kollontai: Theses on Communist Morality in the Sphere of Marital Relations

[9] 亚历山德拉·科伦泰：《关于婚姻关系领域共产主义道德的提纲》
https://www.marxists.org/archive/kollonta/1921/theses-morality.htm

[10] Sex, liberation and the Russian Revolution

[10] 性、解放与俄国革命
https://rupture.ie/articles/sex-liberation-russian-revolution

[11] Bolshevik Sexual Forensics

[11] 《布尔什维克性法学》
https://book.douban.com/subject/4481557/

[12] Bolshevik Sexual Forensics

[12] 《布尔什维克性法学》
https://cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501768217/bolshevik-sexual-forensics/

[13] The Marriage Laws of Soviet Russia

[13] 《苏俄婚姻法》
https://revolutionarydemocracy.org/archive/marriagelaws.pdf

[14] The origins of the Bolshevik vision: Love unfettered, women free

[14] 布尔什维克愿景的起源：无拘无束的爱，自由的女性
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/7813438C26991B590627661501C0EAC9/9780511665158c1_p1-58_CBO.pdf/

[15] The Marriage Laws of Soviet Russia

[15] 苏维埃俄国的婚姻法
https://revolutionarydemocracy.org/archive/marriagelaws.pdf

[16] The Bolshevik Sexual Revolution

[16] 布尔什维克的性革命
https://historia.org.pl/2015/07/08/bolszewicka-rewolucja-seksualna/

[13] The Bolsheviks And The Sexual Revolution: A Historical Perspective For Modern Health Discussions

[13] 布尔什维克与性革命：现代健康讨论的历史视角
https://healthdor.com/article/the-bolsheviks-and-the-sexual-revolution-a-historical-perspective-for-modern-health-discussions

[14] Sexual Revolution in Bolshevik Russia

[14] 布尔什维克统治下的俄罗斯性革命
https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780822970873_A49443129/preview-9780822970873_A49443129.pdf

[15] Sexual Revolution in Bolshevik Russia – Gregory Carlton

[15] 布尔什维克统治下的俄罗斯性革命——格雷戈里·卡尔顿
https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780822970873_A49443129/preview-9780822970873_A49443129.pdf

[16] How sexual revolution exploded (and imploded) across 1920s Russia (PHOTOS)

[16] 20世纪20年代俄罗斯性革命如何爆发（又如何崩溃）（图片）
https://www.russiabeyond.com/history/328265-russian-sexual-revolution

[17] How sexual revolution exploded (and imploded) across 1920s Russia (PHOTOS)

[17] 20世纪20年代俄罗斯性革命如何爆发（及崩溃）（照片）
https://www.rbth.com/history/328265-russian-sexual-revolution

[18] The Oldest Profession and the New Soviet Woman: Sex Work and Ideology in the Soviet Union

[18] 最古老的职业与新苏维埃女性：苏联的性工作与意识形态
https://opus.uleth.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/06fb0fba-0cfb-453c-814a-0b244ec36fa0/content

[19] Sexual Revolution in Bolshevik Russia

[19] 布尔什维克统治下的俄罗斯性革命
https://upittpress.org/books/9780822959489/

[20] Sexual Revolution in Bolshevik Russia.

[20] 布尔什维克统治下的俄罗斯性革命。
https://academic.oup.com/ahr/article-abstract/110/5/1631/78838?redirectedFrom=fulltext

[21] Crimes and Mass Violence of the Russian Civil Wars (1918-1921)

[21] 俄国内战期间的罪行与大规模暴力（1918-1921）
https://www.sciencespo.fr/mass-violence-war-massacre-resistance/en/document/crimes-and-mass-violence-russian-civil-wars-1918-1921.html

[22] Lenin, How to organize the emulation?, December 1917

[22] 列宁，《如何组织竞赛？》，1917年12月

https://www.marxists.info/archive/lenin/works/1917/dec/27.htm

[23] Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn Books In Order

[23] 亚历山大·索尔仁尼琴作品列表
https://www.bookseriesinorder.com/aleksandr-solzhenitsyn/

[24] The ideology of “Sex Love” in postrevolutionary Russia: Lenin, Kollontai, and the politics of lifestyle liberation

[24] 革命后俄罗斯的“性爱”意识形态：列宁、科伦泰与生活方式解放的政治
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01083246

[25] The Bolsheviks’ vision for women and liberation

[25] 布尔什维克对妇女与解放的愿景
https://www.greenleft.org.au/2025/1427/analysis/bolsheviks-vision-women-and-liberation

[26] Revolutions: Russia 1896 – 26 October 1917: Bolshevik Women’s Rights

[26] 革命：俄罗斯1896年-1917年10月26日：布尔什维克妇女的权利
https://materchristi.libguides.com/c.php?g=941418&p=6816086

[27] Ella Winter

[27] 埃拉·温特
https://spartacus-educational.com/Aella_winter.htm

[28] Sexual Revolution in Bolshevik Russia

[28] 布尔什维克统治下的俄罗斯性革命
https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780822970873_A49443129/preview-9780822970873_A49443129.pdf

[29] Was the system of public wives implemented during the Soviet period?

[29] 苏联时期是否实行了公妻制？
https://www.toutiao.com/article/7442201473699611188/?wid=1784637755585

[30] Russia’s brief sexual revolution after October 1917

[30] 1917年十月革命后俄罗斯短暂的性革命
https://www.france24.com/en/20171028-russias-brief-sexual-revolution-after-october-1917

[31] Sex and the Russian Revolution – Peter Drucker

[31] 《性与俄国革命》——彼得·德鲁克
https://againstthecurrent.org/atc193/p5244/

[32] Sexual Revolution in Bolshevik Russia

[32] 布尔什维克统治下的俄罗斯性革命
https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780822970873_A49443129/preview-9780822970873_A49443129.pdf

*

This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of *

本文可能包含受版权保护的材料，其使用未得到版权所有者的明确授权。本文内容根据合理使用原则提供，仅用于教育和信息目的。本文内容不得用于商业用途。

 

本作者的其他作品

生物战在行动

BIOLOGICAL WARFARE IN ACTION

民主，最危险的宗教

Democracy – The Most Dangerous Religion

建立在谎言上的国家–第一卷–美国如何变得富有

NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — VOLUME 1 — How the US Became Rich — Updated

美国随笔 Essays on America

Essays on America

美国警察国家》第一卷免费电子书

Police State America Volume One

宣传与媒体  PROPAGANDA AND THE MEDIA

PROPAGANDA and THE MEDIA  — Updated!

THE WORLD OF BIOLOGICAL WARFARE

建立在谎言之上的国家 — 第2卷 — 失败状态下的生活 — New! 新的！

NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — VOLUME 2 — Life in a Failed State — Updated

NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — VOLUME 3 — The Branding of America— Updated

Debunking Elon Musk – Volume One – New!

False Flags and Conspiracy Theories

FILLING THE VOID

Police State America Volume Two

BERNAYS AND PROPAGANDA— Updated!

The Jewish Hasbara in All its Glory

HASBARA — 犹太哈斯巴拉的荣耀

Kamila Valieva

LARRY ROMANOFF FREE E-BOOKS & PDF ARTICLES

拉里·罗曼诺夫免费电子书和PDF文章

 

Copyright © Larry Romanoff, Blue Moon of Shanghai, Moon of Shanghai, 2026