Part 3 – Establishing and Controlling the Narrative
By Larry Romanoff for The Saker Blog, May
21, 2021
The Globe & Mail is a
respectable broadsheet long recognised as Canada’s national newspaper. Some
years ago, the Globe published an article detailing the atrocities then being
committed against the Arabs in Palestine. The article wasn’t inflammatory or
ideological, but simply an accurate chronicle of events the editors believed
should be brought to the attention of the world. The very next morning, the
entire top half of the front page of the Globe carried a huge photo of a Jewish
soldier giving candy to a supposedly Palestinian child, with text to match. You
don’t need an imagination to know what must have happened behind a closed door
somewhere. The date was 1983 and, in the 38 years since then, the Globe hasn’t
published a single article that was critical of either the Jews or of Israel.
Much the opposite, in fact. One of their more celebrated pieces was titled,
“Shmeck the Halls”, a story about how two Jewish songwriters “created
Christmas”. (1)
It
is widely-known that a relatively small handful of people, all Jews, either own
or exercise virtual total control over all Western (and much other) media. This
includes not only newspapers, but radio and TV stations and networks, plus most
recognised magazines, virtually the entire book publishing industry, all of the
social media and related internet platforms like Wikipedia and Google, as well
as 90% of Hollywood which includes both motion pictures and television
programs. The people involved do not like this information stated publicly, but
the facts are not in dispute and indeed Jewish publications boast privately
about the extent of their ownership of the media as well as of their control of
movies and television.
Philip
Weiss wrote an article in Mondoweiss titled, “Do Jews Dominate in American
Media? And So What If We Do?” (2)
In his article, he inserted this observation and quotation: As former CNN
correspondent Linda Scherzer has said, “We, as Jews, must understand that we
come with a certain bias … We believe in the Israeli narrative of history. We
support the values that we as Americans, Westerners, and Jews espouse. Thus,
we see news reporting through our own prism.” (3)
Yes,
and that isn’t necessarily a bad thing, depending of course on the orientation
of the facets of that prism. Much of the reporting through that “Jewish prism”
is harmless, while some of it is helpful. In fact, much of the second and third
tier of the Internet consists of platforms that provide us with our only
alternative sources of publication and information, and are operated mostly but
not entirely by Jews. The Vineyard of the Saker, the Unz Review, Global
Research and many similar. Without these, our world would be one-dimensional.
The problem is that, aside from the ‘helpful prisms’, the vast majority of
these Jewish contributors are low-level conscripts. I don’t mean to denigrate
their abilities or contribution; merely to state that they are nowhere near the
top of the pyramid where the “values” are decided and the narratives
constructed. And it is the top of the pyramid that requires our focus.
In
the comments section of my article Propaganda and the Media – Part 1, one
reader related the following paragraph by Michael Cieply:
By
and large, talented reporters scrambled to match stories with what internally
was often called “the narrative”. We were occasionally asked to map a narrative
for our various beats a year in advance, square the plan with editors, then
generate stories that fit the pre-designated line. The bigger shock came on
being told, at least twice, by Times editors who were describing the paper’s
daily Page One meeting: “We set the agenda for the country in that
room.” (4)
(5)
This
is the real issue: The NYT are not in the business of reporting news but of
creating and then editorialising it with ideology, with ‘viewpoints’, and with
their ‘agenda for the country’. And they aren’t alone. Within these parts of
the Jewish-owned media scaffolding, there exists a commonality, a
synchronicity, a simultaneity, a shared identity,that does not originate within
these scattered pieces of the media herd but comes from somewhere higher in the
pyramid, from a central source quietly operating behind the scenes in Europe.
It cannot be otherwise: When every newspaper in the Western world and much of
the rest can repeatedly report on the same events in the same way with an
astonishing total uniformity, this cannot possibly be random and cannot be
attributed to use of a newswire service. Someone, somewhere, as Bernays was so
fond of saying, is “pulling the wires which control the public mind.” (6)
As
evidence (admittedly circumstantial but obviously also powerful), consider the
hate campaign against China that has been running at full speed for the past at
least 18 months in every Western country, and this gleeful review of the
results which reflects only three countries of the many where similar programs
and polls have been conducted:
Ask
yourself: how could it happen that virtually every editor and TV newsroom
director in the West (and in much of the rest of the world) would, without
external contact or instruction, independently and simultaneously decide to
mount an intense, unremitting, and relentless negative campaign against China
and everything Chinese? How would it happen that similar unanimous and
simultaneous demonising campaigns were mounted against Iraq and Libya prior to
their invasion and colonisation? Against Russia, Cuba and North Korea? Against
Venezuela today? How is it that an enormous swath of these media outlets, not
only newspapers but including (apparently unrelated) television networks and
magazines would have the same story to tell us about ZIKA, all unanimous with
cries for Latin America to relax its abortion restrictions?
As
I stated in Part 1 of this series, the important point is that these ‘media
floods’ as I call them do not and cannot happen by accident. These
circumstances are planned meticulously, and implemented with strategies
carefully chosen according to Freud’s theories to create public discomfort and
emotional pressure for acceptance of ‘the agenda’, to manipulate public
attitudes on political, social, and commercial issues – in fact “pulling the
wires which control the public mind.”
Sometimes
the agenda is for the benefit of their countless hundreds of huge
multinationals, many more than you might imagine, many controlled in ways you
might not imagine. As one example the Jewish Wallenberg family has been
reliably fixed as controlling more than 40% of the stocks listed on Sweden’s
exchange, as well as about 40% of the GDP of the nation. One detailed and
extensively-documented study concluded that fewer than 150 corporations
controlled at least 40% of everything on the world’s listed stock markets. (7)
(8)
The first link gives an excellent summary, with links to important sources.
Most
of the multi-nationals you know so well, and a great many you may not know, are
in this incestuous grouping, controlled mostly by privately-owned banks,
related hedge funds and similar. But the statistic omits the essential point
and the reality of this condition, because it is not the 150 companies who
control virtually everything and who set the international corporate ‘agenda’,
but the ultimate beneficial owners of those companies – real people with names.
As an example, if Berkshire-Hathaway buys Coca-Cola, it is not
“Berkshire-Hathaway” that sets the agenda for Coca-Cola to liquidate union
organisers in Latin America; it is Warren Buffett who does that.
As
another example, much effort has been made to tally the assets of the
Rothschild banking family. A creditable result obtained some years back with an
estimate of between 6 trillion and 7 trillion US dollars, with many of the
European Jewish banking families being similar. Since that time, I have
obtained a graphic that displays the vast holdings of the Rothschilds. It
appears similar to a corporate organisation chart, with small boxes and lines
indicating the holdings and the directions of control. To print this graphic in
the smallest readable type, would require a sheet of paper 1/2 a square meter
in size. It was recently reported that Rothschild established a new bank simply
to hold his accumulation of arable land that has been acquired in so many
nations.
In
a brief abstract taken from a database of Chinese scientific and technological
journals; The Age of Innovation 2013 Issue 6; 95-97 pp. 3 of 1003, the text
says: Rothschild was “sitting on a $6 billon fortune in the 1850s, and was
known (in China) as “the enemy”. It even accurately addresses the deep Jewish
influence on the US government at the time: “The Democratic Party belongs to
the Morgan family, and the Republican Party belongs to the Rockefeller family.”
Rockefeller and Morgan, however, belonged to Rothschild.”
This
is admittedly speculative because hard facts are seldom available and because
of the intense secrecy and use of so many tax havens, but my updated estimate
of the accumulated wealth of the Rothschilds is between 20 trillion and 30
trillion US dollars. You can imagine the power associated with wealth of this
magnitude, including political power which has existed and grown for centuries.
Much
has been written, and many tallies presented, of “The Richest Man in the
World”, an honor alternating for years between Bill Gates, Warren Buffett,
Carlos Slim and, more recently, Jeff Bezos. This has all been false propaganda
emanating from the same source as every item on the ‘agenda’, Rothschild and
the Jewish banking families of Sassoon, Warburg, Montefiori, and many others
disappearing entirely from view and apparently non-existent. We have many
Jewish websites ‘debunking’ the fiction of Jewish banking families being
wealthy, and Wikipedia tells us that the Rothschilds were once rich but they so
freely distributed their wealth among their many children and are now merely
middle-class Europeans. This silence, and the associated fiction, is one part
of the ‘agenda’ emanating from the central core.
As
one quick example, Canada, through its cleverly Jewish-controlled central bank,
has paid these European bankers more than one trillion US dollars in interest
during the past 30 or 40 years. And this is only one of dozens of central banks
they control. The real truth about the ‘richest man’ that no medium anywhere has
had the courage to state openly, is that compared to these European Jewish
bankers, Bill Gates is pocket change. The interest alone that these people
earn each year from these central banks is far more than
Gates’ entire wealth, and this isn’t accounting for the revenue deriving from
their hundreds of huge multi-national corporations.
Rothschild’s
Sanofi-Aventis-Connaught is perhaps the largest manufacturer of vaccines in the
world. If a few members of this elite group stand to benefit from the sale of
COVID-19 (or other) vaccines, their close media partners will cooperate to
heavily promote vaccinations, while elected officials will legislate them as
compulsory, with their controlled governments scheming ‘vaccination passports’
to ensure sales (one of the ‘benefits’ of democracy), while relieving the
vaccine makers of all liability. They will heavily pressure poor governments
into the purchases and will utilise every portion of the UN, including the
World Bank and IMF as well as the WHO, to tie loans and other assistance to
these purchases – while stipulating the avoidance of such vaccines not
manufactured by their group, such as those from China and Russia, the media
helpfully denigrating these as ‘untested’ and ‘ineffective’, with the UN and
various Western governments helpfully withholding approvals. It’s a very small
club.
Certainly,
members of this media herd can determine an agenda on local matters, though
they would be working in concert, but not so for international and serious
geo-political affairs – which would be above their level. In simple terms,
neither the NYT nor the Huffington Post would decide on their own that Libya
should be invaded and colonised, and all its gold and oil seized by a few
European bankers and industrialists. If they were to attempt such a maneuver,
they would be alone, and likely held to ridicule. But when the entire list of
international media sources suddenly and simultaneously espouses this agenda,
we know it originated in a central source with ‘the agenda’ delivered to media
lieutenants for execution.
Much
of the agenda, as you already know, is geo-political, and has existed in its
present form for nearly 100 years. It began with Lippman and Bernays in
marketing both world wars (9),
and continued most notably when on June 5, 1989, every one of these media
sources unanimously carried the same story about China’s student demonstration
in Tiananmen Square – a story that has been proven totally false even by the US
Embassy itself (10).
The
uniform agenda was fully evident during the media floods preparing the world
for the invasion and total confiscation of the assets of Iraq and Libya, and it
is much in evidence today in their current Anger Campaign against China (11).
We have COVID-19 “escaping” from a Chinese lab, the “genocide” occurring in
Xinjiang, the travesties in Tibet, the “democracy” protests in Hong Kong, the
threatened invasion of Taiwan, China’s “military threatening” of all South-East
Asia, China’s “militarisation” of the South China Seas. We have Huawei, Tik-Tok
and WeChat (12);
we have accusations of cyber-spying. We have “questionable Chinese economic
data” (13)
prepared by “authoritarian dictators” desperate to cling to their “tenuous grip
on power”.
The
Jewish columnist Jonathan Kay of Canada’s Jewish-owned National Post tells us
“China’s ruthless foreign policy is changing the world in dangerous ways”, that
“unlike the US”, “China doesn’t even pretend to operate on any other principle
except naked self-interest.” (14)
We have Roderic Broadhurst in the SCMP telling us that “Corruption is a
byproduct of Chinese party-state’s defective genes” (15). Jewish
historical websites (16)
and the NYT (17)
are today telling us the Bubonic Plague that killed 30% of the population of
Europe actually originated in China, as did the Rockefeller Medical Institute’s
1918 “influenza” pandemic that killed as many as 100 million people. Today,
China is “stealing our secrets” while “enslaving the world”, has no “rule of
law” and is “choking on its own success” in cities that are “barely livable”
and inhabited by only children who have no future.
The
established ‘agenda’ includes at its core an upheaval of the world’s
educational, social, sexual, religious, and family values. In an earlier essay
titled “Connecting the Dots” (18),
I stated the following: It often happens that events we view as isolated
occurrences are connected as integral parts of a much larger picture, often as
part of a wide-ranging plan, and frequently with important social, economic,
and/or political implications which become evident only when seen in
total.” We must today make a sincere effort to connect related events
and see them as portions of the overall plan that they are.
As
one example of the determined indoctrination efforts to re-vamp our social and
sexual values, Canada is passing new legislation (the country’s only new
legislation of consequence) to lower (and then eliminate) the age of consent
for anal sex while adopting striking new measures for “assisted dying” of
family members, especially those who either cost money or have money to
distribute. Canada’s British Columbia government officially endorses sexual
“Glory Holes” (19)
(20),
releasing a detailed 16-page brochure with tips on how to best use, and offers
new tips for masturbation & orgies. The new tip sheet was inspired by a
document released earlier by the health authority of New York City (21),
and sharing “some invaluable insights on how to stage orgies . . . amid the
pandemic”. Pornhub, the world’s largest pornographic website, located in
Montreal, Canada, (22)
(23)
has become mainstream media with the apparent silent approval of Canada’s Prime
Minister Justin Trudeau. Certainly, he’s had nothing negative to offer, in
spite of the outrage that website has caused for egregious violations.
In
its ‘Entertainment’ section, the Huffington Post helpfully advises on the best
places for women to find pornography online (24),
along with another article advising that “Swinging is back” and how to assess
“if it’s right for you” (25). In other parts, pedophilia, incest and sex
parties are being promoted. ABC discusses young girls repaying their student
loans by being a “sugar baby” (26),
working to separate sex and morality by encouraging young girls to prostitute
themselves. Such a discussion in the mainstream media serves not only to
legitimise but to “approve” of these attitudes.
Add
these to the continuous flood of the alphabet soup of “sexual preferences”
being promoted today, and try to see this as one enormous propaganda campaign
being flogged worldwide as one portion of the “agenda” determined and
promulgated by these same people. With the power of the mass media, they are in
fact dictating the new attitudes and points of view to be accepted, while
censoring and condemning contrary opinions.
I
stated earlier that the US media function as the microphone of the US State
Department, full partners in scripting propaganda campaigns to achieve foreign
policy objectives. But it is crucial to understand that the Americans are not
leading these international geo-political, social, and moral assaults. They are
merely functioning as the Bankers’ Private Army to accomplish the objectives of
a group of European-UK elites who are always in the shadows and led by one who,
like Voldemort, is “he who must not be named”.
The
marketing control of this agenda is near total. We have not only the
newspapers, magazines, radio and television stations and book publishers, but
the social media have been 100% conscripted into this agenda. Scores of
websites, including some very prominent ones, have been ‘de-platformed’ by
Google, to the extent their contents almost never appear in searches. Facebook
and Twitter have become quite aggressive in censoring and silencing all
dissenting voices to the extent that even mentioning an author’s name or
listing the URL of an article is now flagged as “false news” and either
prohibited or deleted. The so-called “fact-checkers” are doing their part to
trash anyone escaping the censorship net.
Again,
pause for a moment to think of all the persons who must be involved to
accomplish such results. How many individuals in which places must be involved
to ensure either an unremitting flood of propaganda or a complete blanket of
silence, and ask yourself what is the source of their power to do this.
The
connection you need to make is that all of these agenda categories, and many
more, emanate from the same source. It is not ‘the media’ who want to invade
Iran and confiscate the country’s oil. It is not the NYT journalists who want
to destroy China and Russia or the WSJ editors who are determined to initiate
World War III. It is not Arianna Huffington who wants you to become sexual
perverts and abandon your moral, social, religious, and family values. These
media people are tools for distributing the propaganda and manipulating public
opinion according to the various items currently on ‘the agenda’. Media editors
and columnists are lieutenants; they receive instructions and act on them. It
happens because the relative handful of real, live people who set the agenda
have unshakeable ethnic and philosophical bonds with the media owners and
editors to ensure cooperation in their mutual view of the world. They all
belong to the same small club and share the same ‘interests’ and ‘values’. This
is all part of one thing, emanating from a small group of real people with
names.
In
an earlier article titled “Humanity at the Crossroads” (27),
I began with this statement:
“Humankind
is at a cusp, a point of transition between two different states of governance
and existence. The world today is like a sack being slowly filled while the
string around the opening is pulled increasingly tighter to prevent the
contents from escaping confinement. The shadows of this future are everywhere
to be seen but even the keenest of observers tend to view the portents not as
the warnings they are, but instead regard all these pieces of one despairing
puzzle as disconnected and unrelated events. In this essay, we will take a look
at where our world is going, how it is going there, and why it is going there.”
*
Mr. Romanoff’s writing
has been translated into more than 30 languages and his articles posted on
more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30
countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff
is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior
executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an
international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at
Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs
to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing
a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the
contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China
Sneezes’, Chapt. 2 "Dealing with
Demons".
His
full archive can be seen at https://www.moonofshanghai.com/
and http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/
He
can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com
*
Notes
(2) https://mondoweiss.net/2008/02/do-jews-dominat/
(3) http://www.ujc.org/page.html?ArticleID=78802
(5)https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/stunned-trump-york-times-finds-205904328.html
(6) Bernays and Propaganda – Part 1 of 5
http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/1562/
(8) https://www.forbes.com/sites/bruceupbin/2011/10/22/the-147-companies-that-control-everything/
(9) http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/1582/
(10) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/04/tiananmen-square-failure-of-american.html
(11) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/08/blog-post_49.html
(12) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/08/huawei-tik-tok-and-wechat-august-8-2020.html
(15) SCMP.com; 12 December, 2013
(16) http://www.jewishhistory.org.il/history.php?startyear=1340&endyear=1349
(17) http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/01/health/01plague.html
(18) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/06/connecting-dots-june-24-2020.html
(19) https://www.rt.com/news/495509-canada-covid-glory-hole/
(20) pic.twitter.com/sS7vmFuCDa
(21) https://www.rt.com/usa/491458-new-york-covid-sex-tips/
(22) https://www.ibtimes.com/sexual-abuse-victims-urge-canada-investigate-pornhub-3156530
(24) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/best-porn-for-women-online_564f71f9e4b0258edb316a5a
(25) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sandra-lamorgese-phd/swinging_b_8884220.htm
(26) https://abcnews.go.com/US/paying-student-loans-sugar-baby/story?id=72175621
(27) http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/2331/ Humanity
at the Crossroads
The original source of this article is The Saker Blog
Copyright © Larry
Romanoff, Moon of Shanghai, Blue Moon of
Shanghai, 2021
