EN — LARRY ROMANOFF: World War III is Only Postponed, not Canceled

 

World War III is Only Postponed, not Canceled

By Larry Romanoff

 

 

Contents

Introduction

A Bit of History

The Present Situation

Where Do We Go From Here?

(1) The “Woke Generals Meeting” in Quantico, Virginia

(2) Policy Paper on the US National Security Strategy

(3) The Genesis Mission

Epilogue

 

 

Introduction

 

Readers have surely noticed the huge increase in war-mongering by the Western nations during the past two or three years. It is evident that war clouds are gathering. The signs are everywhere, with media coverage and open talk of war in many countries. The mass media are increasingly offering threatening articles, insane predictions of invasions, attacks, or (alternatively) imperial designs by either Russia or China. Even the social media are increasingly filled with pictures and videos of violence, often military in nature. Russia is attributed with an undocumented desire to attack Western Europe, motivation unspecified. China is attributed with a growing desire to attack Taiwan, with the West doing all possible to provoke precisely such an attack. We have Donald Trump attacking Venezuela and Syria while threatening Canada, Cuba, Colombia, Mexico, Greenland, Iran, the Sudan, and others. We have had the US repeatedly stabbing at China in Hong Kong, with serious attempts to foster a “color revolution” and thus hoping to provoke China into military or police action which can then be denounced as proof of China’s “authoritarian” nature. We have Vietnam and the Philippines repeatedly provoking China in the South China Sea, egged on by (once again) the Americans. Similar with Japan in the East China Sea.

 

NATO is urging its members to reduce excessive bureaucratic procedures that slow down the movement of troops and weapons between European countries. Source

 

The RAND Corporation have for years been preparing military scenarios for World War III, and NATO and the Pentagon are currently doing so. Vast movements of NATO troops and equipment are either in preparation or process to surround Russia.The US is surrounding China with military bases including the world’s largest in Guam. Both China and Russia are surrounded with nearly 400 US biological weapons labs. Iran is entirely vulnerable from the American military build-up in the Middle East. The US has re-christened the Department of Defense (which was always a euphemism) as the (more accurate but more frightening) Department of War.

 

Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’ said that a Chinese military expedition against Taiwan would be a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan, meaning that the Japanese Self Defense Forces (JSDF) may automatically respond.On 6 January 2026, China announced a ban on the export of certain dual-use rare earth elements and other items to Japan. Beijing also openly said that these restrictions are a result of Takaichi’s ‘erroneous’ comments. This is important because Chinese supplies account for 63 per cent of Japan’s total rare earths imports. China has also launched an anti-dumping probe into a chemical compound—dichlorosilane—which is imported from Japan. Source

 

We have Japan’s Prime Minister suddenly (and inexplicably) proclaiming that Taiwan’s independence is crucial to the national security of Japan, and threatening not only to interfere militarily in any attempt at unification, but claiming a need for full militarisation and the development of nuclear weapons. We have most every national government in Europe adopting serious war-mongering postures, being pressured by the US to increase their military spending to an astonishing 5% of GDP. These countries proclaim that war might soon erupt, while ignoring that such a result would be entirely from their own provocations, especially against Russia. And in the meantime, the Jews in Israel continue their unchecked genocide against the Palestinian people, as well as their repeated military attacks on Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, Jordan.

 

Crowds outside the US consulate in Nuuk, Greenland, in January in protest against Trump’s policy towards the territory. Photograph: Evgeniy Maloletka/AP. Source

 

The US has begun seizing oil tankers containing Venezuelan oil, on pretense that they are avoiding Trump’s illegal “sanctions”, and continuing to destroy small fishing boats and killing the occupants on vacant claims of “drug trafficking”. Trump threatens a 100% tariff on all Canadian goods as punishment for forging a trade deal with China. Trump threatens to take Greenland by force, and to levy tariffs on any country that disagrees with his approach. This war-mongering is such a large topic, I will provide more details and a summary in a separate essay.

 

There is no question that we have military flashpoints all over the globe, any one of which could easily escalate into World War III, and the provocations– all by Western nations – have become increasingly outrageous. And dangerous. The war drums are beating faster and louder with each passing year and month. For several years now, it seemed that tensions were sufficiently high that almost any act could have been the spark to detonate a global conflict. There were many days when I opened the morning papers while fearing the worst. Thankfully, the bad news didn’t arrive.

 

There is a reason for that. I will explain.

 

A Bit of History

 

There are two earlier essays I recommend that you read, to fully appreciate the background for the remainder of this essay. The first is titled “The Bankers’ Private Army” [1] and the second “What part will your country play in World War III?” [2] I will quote here a few paragraphs from the first of these two essays.

 

The Jewish Encyclopedia of 1905, states that Sassoon expanded his opium trade into China and Japan. He placed his eight sons in charge of the various major opium exchanges in China. Between 1830-31 they trafficked 18,956 chests of opium earning millions of dollars. Part of the profits went to Queen Victoria and the British government. In the year 1836 the trade increased to over 30,000 chests and drug addiction in coastal cities became endemic.   In 1839, the Manchu Emperor ordered that it be stopped. The Opium Wars began with the British Army fighting as mercenaries of the Sassoons. They attacked cities and blockaded ports. The Chinese Army, decimated by 10 years of rampant opium addiction, proved no match for the British Army. The war ended in 1839 with the signing of “The Treaty of Nanking.” It included territorial sovereignty for the British Crown over several designated offshore islands. Source

 

While Britain was at the peak of its international power, the European Jewish banking families, led by Rothschild, used the British military as their private army to subdue and terrorise the populations of weaker nations to pacify them for plundering and, in the case of India, to partition the country as well. It was the British military, steeped in capitalist ideology and acting as goons and thugs that brutalised India for generations on behalf of private enterprises that included the British East India Company which was created by the Rothschilds and was entirely a Jewish-run organisation. India was never about politics or territory, but about money. It was the same European Jewish banking families, Rothschild, Sassoon, Kadoorie, Hardoon, and more, that used the British military as their private army to protect the Rothschilds while forcing Indians to grow opium, the Russells while transporting it to Hong Kong, and to support the Sassoons while executing their exclusive sales franchise in China. The opium travesty in China is typically attributed to “the British”, but that is wrong. The British were merely the military enforcers for the Jews, literally the bankers’ private army.The entire opium atrocity in China was 100% Jewish.Similarly, the Boer wars fought in South Africa were arranged by the Rothschilds, using the British military to exterminate a population resistant to colonisation, then claim the gold fields and diamond mines which they own to this day.

 

Free PDF — Who Really Starts All The Wars

 

England was used as the bankers’ private army for both world wars, done in the full knowledge that the costs would destroy the UK financially, exterminate the British Empire, and leave Britain an insignificant rump of a country. England was deliberately sacrificed for a war that no one but the Jews wanted, losing 40% of her overseas assets in the first war and the remainder in the second. But by that time, the US military was already much stronger and the bankers already had full effective control of the US government and its politicians and, by extension, its military. That is much more true today. Read: The Power Behind the Throne. [3] Britain was disposable, so the bankers disposed of it and transferred their flag to the US. When Britain was permitted to collapse after its two self-destructive world wars, the bankers transferred their military allegiance to the US and since then it has been the American military doing most of the dirty work to permit their international ravaging.

 

Who is running America? Source

 

It should be noted that we generally attribute much of the financial, political, and military chaos in the world to the actions of the United States, but in at least one sense that is unfair. It is true the US exercises its unbalanced military, political and financial power to wreak havoc in the world that tends inevitably to benefit only the top 1% but, while these actions may have been unilateral at some point in America’s dark history, today this combined power is directed by that same 1%, by what we today call “the deep state”, in other words the Jewish power behind the throne. As with Britain in the past, the US today is being used as a tool, its State Department, its military, the CIA and NSA, the dollar and the increasing weaponisation of finance all being arrows in the quiver of this small group of powerful people.

 

To see the truth of this, we need only think. Most of the actions during the past decades taken (and still being taken today) by the US FED, the policies of the State Department, the incessant wars, revolutions and national destabilisations, were in no way beneficial to either the US as a nation or to the American people. In fact, quite the contrary, since the US bore all the expense and the battlefield casualties while receiving none of the benefits. But they were very beneficial indeed to those few behind the scenes who vacuumed up astonishing amounts of wealth from each event, which would include the many US depressions, the invasions of countries like Iraq [4] and Libya [5], the destruction of the Ukraine, and so much more. No ordinary American benefitted in any way from these atrocities, but a small handful of people, the same Jewish kleptocrats in every case, profited in the trillions of dollars.

 

America was never built to last, and in fact, Jew Sir Francis Bacon documents this fact in his book The New Atlantis, which in summary documents the creation of America for the sole purpose of worldwide destruction of other nations, via regime change and WARS.After of which America will be destroyed itself, consequently the point we are currently entering into. America has been at war destroying nation all across the globe since its inception under the guise that “they hate us for our freedoms” as documented in this Wiki War List.Source 

An understanding of this background is necessary, because another shift is gradually taking place. Today, much of this work of conquering the world for the Jewish bankers is being transferred to NATO, at least in the European theater. The European so-called “government” is essentially a proto-fascist dictatorship with the actual control and decision-making power residing in dark rooms several levels above both national and European elected representatives, in fact and deed accountable to nobody but themselves. NATO is being co-opted as their private military, one reason aspirants to European membership must first surrender their militaries to NATO which is, in real life, like the European rulers themselves, a supra-national criminal body accountable to nobody (except them).

 

A bit more background before we examine the current situation:

 

Source

 

The true origins of the first two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither war was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of European Zionist Jews with (1) the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany and (2) the lust for Palestine as a homeland for the Jews. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]

 

That history is being repeated today in a mass grooming of the Western world’s people (especially Americans) in preparation for World War III – which I believe is now imminent. There exists today a definite intent and determined desire for a Third World War, one which unquestionably emanates from the Khazar Jewish bankers in The City of London. The momentum being built for this third global conflagration is not subsiding, and it is a certainty these people will not stop until they have what they want.

 

Source

 

Through their control of the mass media, the Jews have been unrelenting, and successful, for at least the past several years filling the pages and airwaves with false atrocity tales against China, Russia, and Iran, barrages of these lies occurring almost daily. These follow the same template used by the same people against Germany to stoke hatred and prepare the populations for World Wars I and II. I urge readers in all earnestness to read the following article to fully understand the determination of these Jews to incite wars and their unparalleled expertise in war propaganda: “Bernays and Propaganda — The Marketing of War“. [18] It is the same – and based on the same kinds of lies – as those used to prepare for the invasions of Iraq, Libya and Syria.These people are utilising every manner of provocation against Russia and China, including increasingly outrageous and reckless military challenges in the South China Sea and near Taiwan. The entire world is being taught to hate China, Russia, and Iran. Attempts to convert India to China’s enemy are becoming increasingly desperate.

 

World War III will consist of the combined forces of the US, NATO and Israel (who considers itself a world military power) provoking a conflict aimed at the final destruction of China, Russia, and Iran, the three countries that must be destroyed to satisfy the dream of building Satan’s Third Temple in Jerusalem and initiating our New World Order where the Jews rule supreme. That is the plan. Your belief in it is not material to its execution.

 

Moving to the Present

 

Through literally hundreds of individual economic sanctions, the intent was to destroy the Russian economy, to effect another “regime change” and to partition the country. Source of the image

 

The provocations to incite a global conflict have been intense. Russia was provoked to an existential limit by the expansion of NATO and the threat of Western nuclear missiles literally on its borders. When Russia finally reacted, it was subjected to the most intense (and patently illegal) series of so-called “sanctions” ever levied against any nation. Russia was cut off from the SWIFT banking system, several hundred billions of Russian central bank’s gold were confiscated by the West.The Nordstream pipeline was destroyed. Countries purchasing Russian oil and gas were dealt crippling sanctions. Multiple tariffs and trade embargoes were introduced. Through literally hundreds of individual economic sanctions, the intent was to destroy the Russian economy, to effect another “regime change” and to partition the country.

 

Joshua Wong during a protest in Hong Kong’s financial district. T Photograph: Anthony Kwan/Getty Images. Source

 

China was subjected to two years-long bouts of terrorism and violence in Hong Kong, entirely instigated and supported by the Jews in London, and executed by the US. You may recall Joshua Wong, the little golden-haired boy who was prominent in the violence in Hong Kong in the illegal “Occupy Central” movement in 2014 and the social unrest of 2019. I have video of Wong (and many other young boys) at about 14 years of age, in a small auditorium in England being lectured on the means of causing political chaos in Hong Kong. The US have maneuvered their aircraft carriers into the South China Sea on pretense of “freedom of navigation”, but really just a bullying projection of power. The US has incited Vietnam and the Philippines to occupy and claim Chinese islands in the South China Sea. It has done something similar with Japan and the Diaoyu Islands in the East China Sea. The US has imposed many kinds of trade restrictions, tariffs and “sanctions” in attempts to slow China’s rise and prevent its further economic development. The hate campaign against China in the Jewish-controlled Western media has never seen an equal since the similar campaign against Germany by the Jews, in preparation for the first two world wars. Read “The Anger Campaign Against China”. [19]

 

 

Iran has been attacked, bombed, terrorised, demonised, sanctioned, hit with trade embargoes, suffered Jewish terrorism that included exploding phones, subjected to constant Israeli espionage tactics to sow unrest and attempt a regime change. Countries purchasing Iranian oil have been sanctioned. Everything possible has been done to destroy Iran’s economy and bring down the government, in preparation for an invasion and takeover of the nation and its petroleum reserves.

 

Unfortunately for the Jews, all the above efforts appear to have been largely wasted. Russia has not only survived, but has improved its position, and the Russian economy today is arguably stronger than before. The West is dumbfounded. Recent reports state that there is “nothing else” the West can do in its attempts to damage Russia, and will have to accept a defeat, at least temporarily. Moreover, the Russian military machine is unquestionably superior to that of the US, especially in regard to hypersonic missiles which the US admits cannot be intercepted or defended against.

 

If Russia’s survival was a surprise, China’s was staggering. The Chinese government was strategically well prepared for the Western moves and is today much stronger than when the Western attacks began. The Chinese have so far proven to be unstoppable. The US desperately tried to crush Huawei with astonishingly vicious, illegal and very dirty, measures, but Huawei is much larger and stronger today than yesterday. This same situation exists with China’s economy, which has not been materially harmed, in spite of the combined efforts of the Jewish bankers and the US State Department. But perhaps the biggest surprise was China’s success in technological areas, from AI (DeepSeek) to humanoid robots (IRON), Huawei’s computer chips, and the country’s immense success in EVs, solar and wind energy, and its specialisation in the rare earth metals. Part of this huge surprise was China’s military progress, which appeared to totally blindside the Americans (and the Jews).

 

It has produced 5th and even 6th generation military aircraft. It leads the world in drones of every description, including those with military application. China’s shipbuilding capacity is 250 times that of the US. In terms of economic sanctions, China completed currency swaps with dozens of trading partners, and has formulated a new international banking system that bypasses the dollar altogether and immunises nations from US financial threats. With the increasing success of BRICS and the New Silk Road, China has managed to avoid an American strangulation of the sea routes for Chinese trade. The list is very long.

 

Israeli soldiers search through the rubble of residential buildings destroyed by an Iranian missile strike in Bat Yam, central Israel, on Sunday, June 15, 2025. Baz Ratner—AP. Source

 

Iran was a bit of an eye-opener as well. When the Israeli Jews launched military attacks against Iran, the expectation was that Iran might disintegrate. Instead, it was the Jews who collapsed from shock. The Western world was well-informed by the Jewish media when Israel launched the military strikes against Iran, but the media oddly went perfectly silent when those attacks ended abruptly without explanation. The explanation is simple: the West badly underestimated Iran’s ability to retaliate. The thinking in Israel was that its very expensive (and American produced) “Iron Dome” would protect it from attack, but that proved to be a delusion. Iran did indeed retaliate against Israel, with blows that were devastating, destroying a good amount of Israel’s military establishment while ironically destroying much of Israel’s Iron Dome installations in the process, and doing very considerable harm to cities like Tel Aviv. Netanyahu was clearly in shock at the result, with Israel having been so badly damaged by Iran’s retaliation that he had no choice but to cease hostilities and hope Iran would reciprocate. Little of this news leaked out of Israel because the government declared it a felony crime, or even treasonous, to reveal the details of the damage that Iran inflicted. Even the media within Israel were forbidden to display knowledge or evidence of the damage, so that Israel’s own citizens had no clear idea of the scale of destruction. There were times when this was both comical and absurd. I watched one Israeli news program where the reporter was facing a TV camera while standing in front of a demolished building. The structure appeared to be an office/apartment complex of perhaps 20 stories, and was totally in ruins. With one glance, it was obvious that anyone unlucky enough to have been in the building at the time, could not possibly have survived. But the Jewish reporter was hinting that this might have been the only building in Israel that suffered any damage. She ended her censored reporting by telling viewers that in the destruction of this building, “two persons were injured and, sadly, one person died”. I couldn’t prevent myself from laughing out loud when I heard that.

 

Where Do We Go From Here?

 

Well, we recalibrate. I stated earlier that World War III would be led by the US with NATO support, and Israel providing a genocidal rump. But this was calculated (and imagined) on an assumption that the US would be able to defeat the combination of Russia, China, and Iran. The actual expectation was that a world war would be a brutal affair, unquestionably nuclear by the end, and that Russia, China, and Iran would be destroyed. Of course, the expectation was that the US would also be destroyed, much as Britain was after the first two Jewish World Wars.It is worth specifically noting that the Jews are not only using the US military as their private army to conquer the world; they are willing to fight to the last American to achieve their aim.

 

 

But, as I mentioned above, this is irrelevant; the reason the Jews are transferring their flag to NATO. There might not be very much of a NATO remaining after World War III, but it would likely be the only extant military of any consequence, and it could be quickly rebuilt. Certainly, the bankers would have no shortage of funds for such an endeavor and, with the expected destruction of all other major forces, this would leave them as the only remaining superpower – the “last man standing”. At least, that was the plan.

 

I wrote earlier above that for some time I honestly expected the morning news to inform that a world war had actually begun, but that, thankfully, the bad news didn’t arrive. And I said “There is a reason for that”. The reason is that the Americans and the Jews realised they had been deluding themselves about the strength of the US military and the weaknesses of their “enemies”. The conclusion was that the result of a war they initiated was by no means certain, and that their own defeat was the most likely outcome.

 

The US Department of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff have held internal, high-level war games with the key reported outcome being that they admitted to repeated, lopsided defeats. A 2021 statement noted US forces “get their asses handed to them”. [20][21][22] A statement from the RAND Corporation said that the US military is often beaten to death in any military conflict with China.[23] In a security conference, RAND analyst David Ochmanek said, “We lose a lot of people; we lose a lot of equipment; we usually fail to achieve our objective. In our games, when we fight Russia and China, [the US] gets its ass handed to it.” [24]

 

Air Force General John Haydon, vice chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that in the “war game” to test US military capabilities, the US lost to China and “lost badly”. One reason is that the US military knows only how to fight what is termed “low-level adversaries” and non-state actors. In other words, shepherds with spears and the Houthis in Yemen – and they even lost against the Houthis. Hayden also said that America’s chances of success in a confrontation with a real adversary “are rapidly diminishing.”

 

This is where things become interesting, and why I wrote that World War III has been postponed. It really has been put on hold. It will almost certainly still occur, but not yet. The West must not only recalibrate, but must somehow regroup into some form that has a fighting chance.

 

There were three main projects that resulted from this Jewish-American epiphany. All are interesting. I will discuss them in turn.

 

(1) The “Woke Generals Meeting” in Quantico, Virginia

 

This was a classified gathering of US Generals and Admirals, described as unprecedented and mysterious, with no agenda disclosed beforehand. The meeting was held on September 30, 2025, at the Marine Corps Base in Quantico, Virginia. The attendees were somewhere between 800 and 1,000 senior flag officers recalled from posts worldwide. Both Pete Hegseth, the US Defense Secretary, and Donald Trump gave speeches at this meeting.

 

Pete Hegseth:

US Secretary of Defense Hegseth delivers a speech to the US military generals, with rich expressions and gestures. (Associated Press) Source:

 

The most notable feature of Hegseth’s speech was not the content but the tone – astonishingly pugnacious and belligerent, brutal and almost savage in its war-mongering rhetoric. In viewing the video, Hegseth is so unquestionably aggressive, almost like a rabid dog foaming at the mouth, that I found it frightening. Here below are some direct quotes from Hegseth’s speech. You can read the entire transcript here. [25]

 

“Welcome to the War Department, because the era of the Department of Defense is over. From this moment forward, the only mission of the newly restored Department of War is warfighting, preparing for war … [This is] not because we want war …but because we love peace. The only people who deserve peace are those who are willing to wage war.”

 

“We are preparing every day … for war, not for defense. We’re training warriors, not defenders. We [will] unleash overwhelming and punishing violence on the enemy. We also don’t fight with stupid rules of engagement. We untie the hands of our warfighters to intimidate, demoralize, hunt, and kill the enemies of our country. No more politically correct and overbearing rules of engagement, just … maximum lethality. You kill people and break things for a living. You are not politically correct and don’t … belong … in polite society. You feel comfortable inside the violence so that our citizens can live peacefully. Lethality is our calling card.”

 

“Either we’re ready to win or we are not. This urgent moment … requires more troops, more munitions, more drones, more patriots, more submarines, more B-21 bombers. It requires more innovation, more AI in everything … more cyber effects, more counter-UAS, more space, more speed … we need to get stronger, and quickly. The time is now, and the cause is urgent. The free world requires allies with real hard power, real military leadership, and real military capabilities.”

 

“Foolish and reckless political leaders set the wrong compass heading, and we lost our way. We became the woke department, but not anymore. [We will be] fixing decades of decay, clearing out the debris, removing the distractions. We cannot go another day without directly addressing … the problems in our own commands and in our own formations. Real toxic leadership is endangering subordinates with low standards. Real toxic leadership is promoting people based on immutable characteristics or quotas, instead of based on merit. Real toxic leadership is promoting destructive ideologies that are an anathema to the Constitution and the laws of nature and … of God.”

 

“We are done with that shit. I’ve made it my mission to uproot the obvious distractions that made us less capable and less lethal. Underneath the woke garbage is a deeper problem and a more important problem that we are fixing and fixing fast. Frankly, it’s tiring to look out at combat formations … and see fat troops. Likewise, it’s completely unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals in the halls of the Pentagon.” Hegseth then told the Generals that anyone dissatisfied with this new direction should “resign” or “do the honorable thing and quit”.[26]

 

Donald Trump:

 

 

 

US President Donald Trump also addressed the meeting of Generals and Admirals. The most notable feature of his hour-long babble was its incoherence. In this speech, Trump seems to be totally mentally unhinged. He babbles incoherently, jumps wildly from one topic to another with little to no transition, mixes constant self-praise with serious military content, and almost everything he said was irrelevant to the circumstance. The speech was just a stream-of-consciousness with no logical flow. Plus, he lied about everything of substance. Trump even told reporters if there were any Generals he didn’t like, he would fire them “on the spot”. [27][28][29] I won’t deal further here with the content of Trump’s speech because it is unrelated to the topic of this essay. But if you want startling proof of Trump’s mental derangement, just read this transcript. [30]

 

One very unsettling part of the speeches of both these men was that the new paradigm includes turning the military onto American civilians, most especially those protesting against the brutal (and lethal) ICE raids. Trump said the protestors were spitting on the ICE agents, and that “I say, if they spit, we hit.” He further said, “You get [them] out of that car and you can do whatever the hell you want to do”. This encouragement of unhindered and random violence against civilians by the President, is not comforting.

 

(2) Policy Paper on the US National Security Strategy

 

Source

 

In November of 2025, the US government issued the above policy paper. You can read the original document at the White House website here [31], an executive summary here [32], a brief commentary by the US Naval Institute here [33], and some international reaction statements here. [34] Several patterns emerge in this document. The strategy represents a fundamental shift from American global military primacy, to selective engagement, but with deliberate geographic priorities. This can have far-reaching implications, at least one scenario that would not be intuitively obvious.

 

“The 2025 NSS constitutes a fundamental break with the consistent assessment of previous US administrations during the post-1945 period that permanent US global dominance was in the best US national interest. Instead, the 2025 NSS seeks to align the perceived past US overreach to a narrower definition of US national interest, and to eliminate ‘global burdens’ that it claims have no connection to the US national interest and have been a drain on US resources. However, the strategic refocus does not appear to be … isolationism but rather … to allow the US to maintain its preeminent economic and military role in the world, and to proceed to unilateral economic or military action.”[35]

 

The paper significantly alters the rank of geographic areas of interest, with the Americas first, China second, Europe third, the Middle East fourth, and Africa last. This constitutes a dramatic US foreign policy shift to the “Western Hemisphere”, a reincarnation of the Monroe Doctrine. It sets out the US intention “to deny external competitors both the ability to deploy forces in the region and to own or control strategically vital assets”. Venezuela was the first victim of this new pivot, and other nations are likely to follow.

 

The policy still includes a strategic competition with China and Russia in technological, military, and economic terms, and it still assumes American economic and technological sovereignty, including domestic production of semiconductors and critical industries. However, US global leadership is stated as conditional, where any US support for allies hinges on America’s new “strategic interests”. This obtuse shift might prove to be of vital importance.

 

In considering this document, we should remain aware of what I might term “pretextual justifications”. The public emphasis on issues like drugs and migration clearly serves as operational cover for more traditional (and much nastier) geopolitical objectives. The Venezuela situation shows how “anti-drug operations” serve as cover for regime pressure and regional dominance. The naval deployments on Venezuela’s border, under the pretext of migration control, are actually to secure strategic control of the sea lanes. This latter – control of sea lanes –is also one of the motivations for US control of Greenland. As it was in the South China Sea until China developed hypersonic missiles that rendered the US carrier fleet into large floating objects with targets painted on them.

 

The new “National Security” strategy marks a significant doctrinal shift, with its main pillars as follows:

 

The original America First Committee began as an anti-war movement devoted to keeping the U.S. out of World War II. But it quickly evolved into something far more ugly.During one infamous 1941 rally in Iowa, Lindbergh said, “The British and the Jewish races, for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war… Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government.”  Source

 

“America First” as Guiding Principle: The strategy explicitly rejects the post-Cold War goal of “permanent global dominance” as undesirable and unsustainable, framing it as harmful to the American middle class. Security policy is now defined by a strict prioritisation of limited “core national interests”. The strategy establishes a clear hierarchy of concerns:

 

Priority 1: Ensuring US primacy in the Western Hemisphere. Defense of the homeland is included in this priority but, since the US is not now and is highly unlikely to be, under attack from any direction, this claim is useful only to smoke up the room. US border security is declared a “primary element of national security,” and includes combating “transnational criminal organisations”; more smoke in the same room.

 

Priority 2: Managing Peer Competition: The posture toward China is recalibrated. While long-term strategic competition continues, the public rhetoric is softened. China is not explicitly labeled a “strategic competitor,” and competition is framed more around trade and “rebalancing” within the Indo-Pacific chapter.

 

Europe definitely has been de-prioritised. The paper is sharply critical of Europe, and demands allies assume greater defense burdens and costs, ending what it calls “free-riding”. It claims a desire to “end the perception of NATO as a permanently expanding alliance”. In simple military terms, the document emphasises modernising nuclear deterrence, building next-generation missile defense (“Golden Dome”), and significantly increasing the basic defense (i.e. aggressive war-production) industries.

 

An intelligent assessment of these American documents must look beyond the declared policy to the patterns of action and their strategic effect. The evidence suggests a calculated strategy of regional hegemony under a banner of domestic security. If we compare the official narrative with observable actions, a clear pattern emerges where publicly stated objectives for military deployments (drugs, migration) provide operational cover for achieving traditional geopolitical goals like regime change and control of strategic maritime geography.

 

 

 Pictures of the ships and aircraft sent on”Operation Southern Spear” clickHere

 

For example, Trump boasted of “controlling drug trafficking” in his attacks on Venezuela, but the scale of force included the deployment of a naval task force of 8 ships including destroyers, cruisers, a nuclear attack submarine, amphibious ships with ~2200 Marines, F-35 fighter jets, and more than 1,200 missiles. This was vastly disproportionate to an interdiction mission involving a few small fishing boats. It constituted a classic “gunboat diplomacy” deployment aimed at destabilising the Venezuelan government through extreme intimidation, with the ancillary benefit of signaling to Cuba and Nicaragua.

 

Similarly, the White House made noises about securing the country’s borders and halting illegal immigration, but deploying destroyers to patrol waters off the southern US border, tells a different story. Destroyers are ill-suited for intercepting migrant vessels. Their deployment establishes a persistent naval presence in key Gulf and Caribbean transit zones, securing sea lines of communication for broader hemispheric power projection.

 

The primary objective of the NSS doctrine is to re-establish uncontested US economic and military primacy in the Western Hemisphere. This is the non-negotiable core of the “America First” security vision. The US means to neutralise any regional challengers by using maximum pressure of covert action, economic sanctions and naval blockades, to cripple or overthrow leftist, anti-US governments like Venezuela’s. The drug war provides a legally and politically flexible pretext for intervention. The US clearly intends to use all instruments of power to control key sea lanes, energy resources, critical minerals, and all foreign investment, in Latin America.

 

The Asia strategy is interesting because it attempts to impose heavy costs on China by focusing on technology (chips) and economics (tariffs and sanctions) while outsourcing military containment to Japan, South Korea, and other Asian “allies”. This is why Japan’s new Prime Minister made the absurd statement that Taiwan’s independence was integral to Japan’s national security and that Japan would intervene militarily in a conflict. This threat coincides with Japan’s newly-expressed desire to obtain nuclear weapons. This means that the NSS’s softer tone on China is tactical, not strategic. The document’s increased adversarial tone regarding Taiwan, suggests Taiwan remains a primary lever for provoking China. The US is merely building a more distributed military architecture in Asia while preparing for potential coercive actions or crises over Taiwan.

 

This strategy offers the US the freedom to concentrate its coercive resources (diplomatic, financial and military) on the Americas, but it also accelerates global multi-polarity as estranged allies (primarily in Europe) seek greater autonomy and other powers fill voids left by US retrenchment. The explicit message to NATO allies to “do far more for Europe’s defense”, accelerates the de-coupling of (fictional) US security guarantees. This will force rapid, and likely unstable, European military consolidation. The real intent is to consolidate a US-centric Western Hemisphere, manage China indirectly through proxies, and force allies to shoulder burdens, thereby preserving US power for decades to come. I wrote above that the US “security defense” of Europe was fictional, and that is true. For at least the past 50 years, Europe has been under no threat of military action by anyone. As an aside, this is also true for Canada: the only country that poses a military threat to Canada, is the US.

 

There is also a related document named the US National Defense Strategy[36], and another titled Global Force Posture Review. The latter deals with the deployment of US forces internationally, and lists those foreign bases which will be depleted, with the soldiers reassigned or returning home. For example, the US plans to withdraw up to 35,000 troops from Germany while redeploying some to Eastern Europe. The intent contained in these documents will compel European self-sufficiency, freeing US resources for the Americas, and reducing Washington’s day-to-day “leadership burden. The US is also considering reduction of forces in Korea and Okinawa, shifting some assets to the “Second Island Chain”, while pushing Japan and South Korea to assume primary “defense” roles – i.e. aggression and provocation against China.It is clear that the US aims to let regional allies bear the initial brunt of a potential conflict while preserving its own high-end power projection capabilities (navy, air force, missiles) from safer distances.

 

All three of the above documents deal with military resource concentration, moving manpower and materiel out of Europe and forward bases in Asia to husband strength and focus on a potential future conflict with China.The US uses the threat of troop withdrawals and conditional security guarantees as leverage in trade, diplomatic, and burden-sharing negotiations with its European and Asian allies. These are ultimatums, not negotiations. For Europe, it forces a crisis of autonomy. Since the US security guarantee is no longer unconditional, this will accelerate European defense integration but also deepen divisions and cause chaos. Japanand South Korea will face immense pressure to increase military spending and capabilities dramatically.

 

The real intent is to dismantle the architecture of America’s “enduring” forward military presence. It is replaced by Trump’s “America First” strategy which concentrates military power on hemispheric control, and offloads foreign defense costs onto allies. The purpose is to preserve US strength for a potential high-end conflict with China.

 

An important point in these documents is that they collectively align in three ways. One is the new military and colonial emphasis on the Americas. The second is the dramatic burden-shifting to former allies. The US demands that NATO allies meet an “historic” commitment to spend 5% of GDP on defense, framing it as essential for the alliance’s future. This essentially abandons the former US commitment to “protect” its allies, and sets them on their own. It is important to note that it isn’t really “defense” that is being passed to the allies; it is the responsibility for provoking Russia and China that are transferred to them. The third, following from the first two, is the breathing space this gives the US to regroup militarily, to transition from a “woke loser” to a majestic world military power.

 

World War Three has been postponed because the US and its puppet-masters realised they would lose. The above documents comprise the strategic reset necessary to buy time while continue to provoke unrest, until the US believes it is ready for war and able to win.

 

(3) The Genesis Mission

 

Source: White House

 

This is the third link in the chain. The Genesis Mission is an enormous undertaking that reveals (1) the extent of desperation the US feels at being the underdog, and (2) the astonishing measures it plans to take, to alleviate this condition. It is of enormous surprise to me that the revelation of this new agenda and any public discussion of it have been so muted as to qualify as censorship. Yet this “Mission” is of overwhelming geopolitical importance, but the mass media have focused all their attention on minor items that serve only to distract.

 

The Official Story

 

Authorised by an executive order from President Trump on November 24, 2025, the US launched a significant federal initiative called the “Genesis Mission.”[37][38] It is a hugely ambitious government-led program under the direction and control of the Department of War (through the Department of Energy), designed to use artificial intelligence to dramatically accelerate “scientific discovery and technological development”. One stated goal is to double the productivity and impact of American research and innovation within a decade. The official narrative surrounding the Genesis Mission states its purpose as “a dedicated, coordinated national effort to unleash a new age of AI‑accelerated innovation and discovery that can solve the most challenging problems of this century.”

 

The stated goals are not only to increase research productivity but, specifically “leveraging the world’s largest collection of federally curated scientific datasets to train AI models and create AI agents that can automate research workflows and even test new hypotheses.” The mission’s leaders explicitly state goals such as using AI to “accelerate scientific discovery, strengthen national security, secure energy dominance… and thereby further America’s technological dominance”. The Mission is framed as an historic national effort, with its ambition and urgency unfortunately and frighteningly compared to the World War II-era Manhattan Project – the development of the atomic bomb. The Genesis Mission represents a major shift, with the US government building a state-backed AI research infrastructure.

 

Collaborators and Resources

 

This Genesis Mission is unquestionably the most massive nation-wide mobilisation of such vast resources since WWII, and is definitely a “public-private partnership”. It demands extensive collaboration with over 50 companies, including AI pioneers like OpenAI, Google, and NVIDIA, as well as chip manufacturers and biotech firms. These partners are expected to act as suppliers and co-developers. [39][40][41]Michael Krazios, Assistant to the President and Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, said, “The 24 new research collaborations announced today are just the beginning, and we are implementing President Trump’s directive to include the entire scientific community, including businesses, universities, nonprofits, and federal agencies, into the Genesis Program”.[42]

 

Companies collaborating in the Genesis Mission. Source:

 

AI Model & Cloud Giants: Amazon (AWS), Google, Microsoft, IBM, Oracle

Core AI Hardware & Semiconductor: NVIDIA, AMD, Intel, TSMC, Cerebras Systems

Leading AI Research Labs: OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI

Specialized AI & Infrastructure: Accenture, CoreWeave, Dell, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), Palantir, Radical AI

 

This list confirms that the Genesis Mission is mobilising the most significant players across the American AI and semiconductor industries. The participation of these companies underscores a key feature of the Genesis Mission. It is a full-stack mobilisation designed to control the entire technological chain—from the foundational chips and hardware to the AI models and cloud platforms that run on them. Nvidia and Oracle are to build the Department of Energy’s (DOE) largest-ever AI supercomputers. The “Solstice” and “Equinox” systems, to be hosted at the military’s Argonne National Laboratory, will be equipped with over 100,000 next-generation NVIDIA Blackwell GPUs.[43][44][45]

 

Four factors emerge as being of crucial significance:

 

(1) The US government is assembling a “working partnership” between the US Government, the US military, all military research laboratories, many academic research institutions, and 50 or more of the most advanced companies in scientific and technological fields.

(2) The Mission will be using all of America’s most powerful supercomputers from the Department of Energy’s 17 national (military) laboratories. It will obviously also use the massive compute centers built by Google, Microsoft, Meta, OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI and others.

(3) The US Government possesses vast scientific and military datasets, containing federally curated data from decades of research in fields like nuclear physics, materials science, biomedicine, biological warfare, weapons design.

(4) The Mission will be using all American AI systems, computer centers, and laboratories to form a “closed-loop” where AI can generate hypotheses, design experiments, and analyze results at an unprecedented pace.

 

From Civilian to Military

 

The line between civilian scientific advancement and national security is intentionally blurry. Technologies like advanced materials, quantum computing, and biotechnology have clear dual-use potential, applicable in both military and civilian systems. It seems also of critical importance that the Mission defines its foundation – the national infrastructure integrating supercomputers, datasets, AI tools, and people – as the “American Science and Security Platform“. The “security” reference is entirely military, and is there for a reason. The Genesis Mission is explicitly framed as a crucial initiative for national security, and the technologies it aims to advance have clear and significant military applications. While its stated goals include “scientific discovery”, the creation of new weapons of mass destruction qualify under that definition, and achieving military dominance is an undeniable and central part of its purpose. I believe it is quite apparent that, in spite of the peaceful and civilian “official narrative” about the purpose of this mission, its real purpose is military dominance, especially concerning China.Moreover, the Mission is entirely under the direction and control of the Department of Energy, which is itself a part of the US military.

 

 

The program “brings together America’s brightest minds, the most powerful computers, and vast amounts of scientific data into a collaborative research system.” That is probably true. My concern is that the “vast amounts of scientific data” will be primarily of military nature and use. And if the US actually combines the brightest minds with the most powerful computers and all the data, and feeds this into an AI, they might invent a true doomsday machine. That intense concentration of those specific resources, in the hands of an inveterate war-monger, is not reassuring. Consider Pete Hegseth’s words: “[This is] not because we want war … but because we love peace. The only people who deserve peace are those who are willing to wage war. We … demoralize, hunt, and kill [our] enemies. [We] kill people and break things for a living. Lethality is our calling card.” In the real world, and given Hegseth’s main directive, the Genesis Mission really could create a “doomsday machine” – at least potentially – by combining powerful AI with military data and objectives. At the very least, is seems the US wants to use AI to convert its military from a “woke loser” into a formidable and unbeatable power.

 

Concern about the potential risks of concentrating vast data, computing power, and AI expertise is very valid. While the Genesis Mission is officially presented as a scientific initiative, an assessment of the broader landscape suggests that the line between civilian and military AI advancement is increasingly – and deliberately – blurred, and the potential for destabilising military applications is a topic of serious expert discussion. The Genesis Mission concentrates the essential ingredients—data, computing, and talent—that can fuel a leap in military AI capabilities. Importantly, the Mission is explicitly framed as a “Manhattan Project” for AI, a comparison that inherently carries offensive military implications. Analysis from Shanghai’s Fudan University notes that the US is actively building an “AI military-industrial complex”, with companies like PalantirandAndurildeveloping and deploying AI-driven systems for target recognition, autonomous drones, and command-and-control networks.[46]

 

Much of the official public narrative focuses on AI, and leads readers and viewers to assume this Mission is a government-led race to ensure US supremacy in the field of AI. But that is wrong. The government has clearly stated the Mission was a response to the “race for global technology dominance,” aiming to “unleash a new age of AI-accelerated innovation and discovery that can solve the most challenging problems of this century.” This clearly says that AI is not the issue, but is a tool. Further, they said the purpose is to solve “the century’s most challenging problems”. But this is nonsense. The century’s most challenging problems are peace, poverty, education, health care, climate. They won’t be addressing these issues, and they certainly won’t be looking for a cure for diabetes or how to alleviate homelessness. They are not looking to solve humanitarian problems, but to solve America’s loss of domination. To add more smoke to the room, the White House stated that the number of new drug approvals was declining and that more researchers were needed to increase pharmaceutical output. We can be quite certain that the thrust of the Genesis Mission is not pharmaceutical, at least not in the usual meaning of this word.

 

The Genesis Mission is clearly a dual-use initiative, meaning its core components are foundational to both civilian and military advancement.Its “official narrative” of accelerating science for public benefit may be partially genuine, but its foundation is unequivocally strategic and military. It is a direct response to a perceived technological competition, particularly with China,which is why the line between civilian and military advancement is deliberately blurred.

 

The executive order itself leaves no doubt about the security dimensions of the program. It is explicitly framed as an effort “comparable in urgency and ambition to the Manhattan Project” and is designed to “strengthen national security” and “further America’s technological dominance and global strategic leadership” In fact, the platform it will build is even named the “American Science and Security Platform”, directly linking science to military security and dominance.

 

Further, the mission will focus on specific technology domains that are critical for modern warfare: The stated key focus areas are Nuclear Fission & Fusion Energy (Power for naval vessels, advanced propulsion systems), Biotechnology (Bio-surveillance, biological weapons, enhanced human performance), Semiconductors and Microelectronics (AI chips for drones, missile guidance systems), Critical Materials (Lightweight armor, advanced missile components), Quantum Information Science (Secure military communications, advanced sensors), Advanced Manufacturing (Rapid prototyping of weapons, resilient supply chains), AI Models & Data (Analyzing military intelligence, designing weapons systems), High-Performance Computing (Running battlefield simulations, cryptanalysis), Private Sector Partnership (Integrating commercial AI (from firms like Palantir, Anduril) directly into weapons and command systems). [47] Speculation that the US is actively pursuing AI for military dominance is not just theoretical; it is already happening. There is already an existing AI “Arms Race”.

 

From “What?” to “Why?”

 

This is NOT about beating China at AI. It is about using AI as a tool to solve a threat perceived as existential. The official narrative is that China may soon catch up and even surpass the US in AI, in robotics, in military weapons, in battlefield technology, in materials science, in computer chips, quantum computing, nuclear fusion, building a moon base, even in the militarisation of space … Sure, but these items are hardly a surprise. They have been known for a long time and have been openly discussed in the media, debated in multiple public fora, been the topic of many position papers from various think tanks, and the subject of “war games” for many years. There is indeed concern about China in all these areas, but this does not in itself account for the sudden massive mobilisation. China may be related to this endeavor, but only obliquely. There is something else happening here, of much wider scope.

 

From “Why?” to “Why Now?”

 

This is related to the urgency of the Genesis Mission. What spooked the US into such a sudden and massive nation-wide mobilisation with such a vast collection of resources and with such extreme urgency?This could be explained if the US somehow discovered that the Martians planned to launch an attack on Earth within 24 months. That would justify a “Manhattan Project” response with the massive national mobilisation of all possible resources, and the impossibly urgent time-frame. But our trigger was terrestrial, not Martian, so we must look elsewhere. What was the trigger causing this“Critical Urgency”?

 

The only thought that comes to my mind is that the puppet-masters in The City of London have communicated in dire terms the necessity of having – and winning – a Third World War. And from this, have exerted extreme pressure on the US to get itself into a position to not only incite such a conflagration but to have a clear chance of winning it. I have no evidence of such communication. I mention it onlybecause it would fit all the known facts and answer all the questions about the Genesis Mission.

 

It is alarming in itself to realise that something very similar was done for the creation of the atomic bomb in Nevada, and that the process is being replicated today in Silicon Valley. According to Department of Energy Chief of Staff Carl Coe, the current administration has directly benchmarked the strategic height of [this project] against the “Manhattan Project”or“the US-Soviet space race.”[48] This not only emphasises the exaggerated urgency of this program, but it creates genuine worrying links to the Manhattan Project and its overtones of nation-wide mobilisation without concern for expense, solely to create a horrible new weapon of mass destruction.

 

To appreciate the extreme urgency attached to the Mission, here are some of the major activities to be accomplished, and their extremely-compressed dictated timelines:

 

(1) Prepare a definitive list of key science and technology challenges for the Mission to address (e.g., fusion energy, semiconductors, space domination). The permitted time is only 60 days.

(2) Prepare a complete inventory of federal computing, storage, and networking resources available. The time permitted is only 90 days.

(3) Identify all the initial scientific and military data assets in the hands of the US government and military, but also formulate a plan to incorporate similar useful datasets from academia (all universities and research institutions) as well as from the private sector. The time permitted to achieve this immense cataloguing of all data is only 120 days.

(4) Perform a complete review of the capabilities for AI-directed robotic laboratories and AI-automated manufacturing. The time scheduled for this is only 240 days, but no indication is given of precisely WHAT will be designed in these AI-controlled labs, nor WHAT will be manufactured in the AI-controlled factories.

(5) Perform live (and successful) demonstrations of the platform’s initial operating capability on at least one national challenge. In other words, be prepared to demonstrate a meaningful success of this Mission in one of the designated critical areas. The scheduled time permitted to produce this success is only 270 days.

 

The executive order made no secret of the scale and urgency of the program. Michael Krazios, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, said this is “the largest mobilisation of federal scientific research resources since the Apollo program.”

 

There is another factor of considerable concern. In January 2025 Trump signed Executive Order 14179, repealing most of the Biden administration’s policies on AI safety regulation and announcing that he would “remove all obstacles to US AI leadership.” In July 2025, the White House released a 25-page “U.S. AI Action Plan” with nearly 100 recommendations for federal action, with the core idea of “deregulation”. This will have the effect of removing all rails, firewalls and legal protection from the path to be treaded by this new AI venture. There is another, and much more serious event, one totally ignored by the media. In November of 2025, the White House issued a new executive order calling for the creation of a dedicated “AI litigation task force” to launch legal challenges to state AI regulatory laws and even threaten to withhold federal funds.Try to understand what this means.

 

I would like to know what “spooked” the US into launching this Genesis project. When the US government decides to combine such a vast array of resources with a label of national security, and to do it with such astonishing urgency, that did not happen in a vacuum. They must have either learned something, or discovered something, or perhaps concluded something of such grave importance that it nearly gave all of them heart attacks.The abruptness of the appearance of this project, and its intense time pressure, had to be caused by something external. There is no public evidence of this, and yet while no single “heart attack”-inducing event has been disclosed, the abruptness and urgency cannot be explained otherwise.

 

Consider again the sudden creation of this Genesis Mission. If it were only China’s taking the lead in AI, or the possibility of China succeeding with nuclear fission or quantum computing, the US might well have created such a “mission” to deal with it. But this would have been planned and reasoned, and done slowly. There would have been public discussion, policy papers, but never such a massive nation-wide mobilization with such extreme urgency. “China’s rise” is hardly a sudden surprise justifying panic. The urgency of the Genesis Mission isn’t about winning a race; it’s about preventing a checkmate.

 

The US creation of the Genesis Mission was not merely a response, but a panic response. Consider that they did this so suddenly, with such intense time pressure, with such unreasonable time lines, with a critical seriousness comparison to the Manhattan Project, and with such an extreme urgency and making it an “all population” effort to marshal the entire country’s resources. They allowed only 90 days for a complete inventory of all federal computing, storage, and networking resources available,and an extensive collaboration with over 50 companies to support the Mission. Something specific happened to scare the hell out of the US, for them to jump into this project. The conventional “China AI competition” narrative is insufficient to explain any part of this. The character of the response—the panic, the wartime urgency references, the unreasonable deadlines—does not match the character of a chronic, known problem. It matches the character of a sudden, catastrophic realisation, suggesting a specific, shocking catalyst. The Genesis Mission is the sound of a superpower pressing the panic button.

 

An Hypothesis

 

Consider this as a hypothetical case, but one that might easily be rooted in reality. The position proposed is this: Let’s assume that there exist elite parties who want to provoke a third world war. Their motivation would be financial gain and immense political power in the aftermath.

 

The common expectation is that such a war would be fought by the US, NATO and Israel on one side, and primarily Russia, China and Iran on the other. But the US has now realised that it could not beat China in such a war, with all simulations and war games concluding that the US would suffer a massive defeat. Given this realisation, the US has issued its new National Security Strategy which dictates that the US retrench and focus only on controlling the Americas, a reincarnation of the Monroe Doctrine. This new strategy essentially abandons the Europeans, while insisting they increase their military expenditures to 5% of GDP. But the provocations against Russia are not decelerating, but accelerating, though they are now coming primarily from Europe rather than from the US. If this continues, there could very easily be a war between Russia and Western Europe.

 

If we examine history, all the wars the US has instigated, have always been on the soil of other nations. Many countries have been devastated, but the US homeland has never suffered a military attack. If the US continued its prior policies, this situation might have changed in the future, because a war between the US and Russia would undoubtedly mean that the US homeland would suffer extensive damage. And since China might be involved in such a war, and has hypersonic nuclear missiles that the US cannot defend against, the risk is extreme.

 

Now consider that the new US National Security Strategy is primarily a means to deal with this real threat. By temporarily retreating to the Western hemisphere, and by forcing the European nations to massively increase their defense spending while still provoking Russia, the US would be left in a preferred military position. If such a war were to break out between Europe and Russia, and perhaps involving China, those parties might inflict severe damage on each other, leaving them in poor condition.

 

But in the meantime, the US is aggressively expanding its military, partly funded by the Europeans purchasing enormous quantities of weapons and war materiel from the US. Given this, if there were a war with Russia, and perhaps China, with these parties weakened by a protracted war, the US could then come in at the end with a revitalised military, and perhaps win over these weakened adversaries.

 

The point is that the US entrenchment into the Americas and the simultaneous abandonment of a new and massively-armed Europe might in reality be a strategic preparation for the US to provoke a European and Asian war, and then come in at the end to “clean up”. Since the US could not win a war in the current circumstances, this new approach could be a massive strategic victory, giving the US time to become far more powerful militarily while promoting the “let’s you and him fight” scenario in Europe and Asia. If true, this would logically explain everything the US is doing in military and foreign affairs today.

 

The scenario presents an internally logical strategic calculus. It posits that US policymakers, confronted with the unpalatable reality of defeat in a direct peer war, have chosen a path of strategic disengagement and indirect confrontation using minor allies as the cannon fodder. The core pillars of this logic—retreat to a defensible fortress, offloading primary combat burdens to allies, and seeking to benefit from the mutual exhaustion of rivals—are established concepts in realist geopolitical theory, pushed to their most cynical conclusion. Keep in mind that Trump has promised to raise US “defense” spending from its current level of more than $1 trillion – already more than the rest of the world combined – to more than $1.5 trillion in 2027.

 

The hypothesis effectively connects disparate policy dots: (1) The NSS/NDS shift to “Homeland & Hemisphere First”; (2) The Global Posture Review’s implied troop drawdowns from Europe and Korea; (3) The hardline 5% GDP demand on NATO, coupled with continued (delegated) provocation of Russia; (4) The massive domestic military expansion funded partly by allied arms purchases. (5) The Genesis Mission. This narrative provides a singular, if Machiavellian, explanation for these concurrent actions.

 

The strategic consistency of this thesis is actually quite high. The described actions align perfectly with a “Fortress America”doctrine. The renaming to the “War Department,” the purge of “woke” policies in favor of “lethality,” and the focus on industrial mobilisation are all consistent with preparing for total war from a defensive posture. The US has a long history of entering conflicts late (WWI, WWII) after others have borne the initial brunt.

 

Epilogue

 

Let’s recap. The Khazar Jews definitely want a third World War. You can attribute this insane desire to anyone else you prefer, but the end result is the same. There are parties who want another world war; the provocations are everywhere, the media floods are constant, and tensions are increasing almost daily. Most analysts say we are only minutes or even seconds from a world-wide nuclear war. The information in this article, from the historical record to current events, is sufficient to justify and support this conclusion and to understand the agenda being executed.

 

I would add only two observations to the content of this essay. The first is to emphasise that virtually every past war has been proven to have been a “bankers’ war”, initiated by the banker’s private army of the day. Wars have almost never resulted from territorial or other disputes, but almost entirely from persons skilled in the art of “Let’s you and him fight”.

 

My second observation is to restate that, for nearly 80 years now, the US (as the banker’s private army) has waged countless wars and killed tens of millions of people, all of those wars on someone else’s soil. To this point, the US homeland has never suffered a military attack, nor have the bankers suffered any reprisals for their instigation of all those wars. In the past world (or other) wars, no one (other than the Japanese, briefly) had the ability to attack or retaliate against either the US homeland or the headquarters of the Khazar Jews.To date, the guilty have entirely gone free. That situation may be at an end.

 

When (not “if”) World War III arrives, it would be delusional to believe that either Russia or China would permit the US (or NATO) to destroy their countries from a distance and act only defensively to reduce or mitigate the damage to their country and the loss of life to their people. World War III will be different. The attackers, the US and NATO countries in Europe – and quite possibly Japan and Israel, will suffer at least equal devastation to that of Russia or China. As one geopolitical analyst said so clearly: “China will not fire the first shot. But China will not permit you to fire the second shot”.

 

 

The Americans put on a brave face about “acceptable losses”, as if a world war were a chess game. But losses are acceptable only in theory, or when they happen to someone else.This time, it will be US President Donald Trump and the Rothschilds who will be stumbling through the rubble in the streets of Washington DC and London, picking up the body parts of their dead children and grandchildren.

 

 

*

Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).

His full archive can be seen at

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/

He can be contacted at:

2186604556@qq.com

*

NOTES

[1] The Bankers’ Private Army
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/the-bankers-private-army/

[2] What part will your country play in World War III?
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/19242/

[3] The Power Behind the Throne
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/16422/

[4] Humanity at the Crossroads
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/2331/

[5] The Tragedy of Libya
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/10648/

[6] Jewish Responsibility for Both World Wars: A Speech by Benjamin Freedman
https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/10/jewish-responsibility-for-both-world.html

[7] ZIONISM — THE HIDDEN TIRANNY by Benjamin H. Freedman
https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/10/zionism-hidden-tiranny-by-benjamin-h.html

[8] The Jewish Declaration Of War On Germany
https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/10/the-jewish-declaration-of-war-on.html

[9] The Jewish Betrayal of Germany and the Cause of World War II – Benjamin Freedman
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/5840/

[10] Hitler’s War (2001) by David Irving
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Hitlers-War-2001.pdf

[11] Churchill’s War – David Irving
https://archive.org/download/nsliterature/David%20Irving%20Archive/ChurchillsWar-VolumeOne-ByDavidIrving-728.pdf

[12] Germany’s War by John Wear
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Germanys-War-by-John-Wear-2014.pdf

[13] The War Criminal Churchill – Alfred Rosenberg
https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/schul05.htm

[14] “Germany is getting too strong. We’ve got to smash her.” – Winston Churchill speaking during a private lunch in 1936. Reminiscenses in 1961 of General Robert E. Wood. World War II. By Carl J. Schneider, Dorothy Schneider. Page 15.
Free Download of this book: https://pt1lib.org/book/728795/c85219?id=728795&secret=c85219

[15] “We will force this war upon Hitler, if he wants it or not.” – Winston Churchill (1936 broadcast). “This war is an English war and its goal is the destruction of Germany.” – Winston Churchill (Autumn 1939 broadcast)
https://www.coursehero.com/file/p1da79e/Following-the-Treaty-of-Versailles-Germany-was-ordered-to-pay-the-war-costs-of/

[16] “You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism, but against the strength of the German people, which is to be smashed once and for all, regardless of whether it is in the hands of Hitler of a Jesuit priest.” – Winston Churchill [1940]; Emrys Hughes, Winston Churchill, His Career in War and Peace p. 45); This book was published in Great Britain in 1950 under the title “Winston Churchill in war and peace.” The American version titled “Winston Churchill: British bulldog”
https://www.amazon.com/Winston-Churchill-British-bulldog-career/dp/B0006ATSO8

[17] THE BAD WAR – The Truth NEVER Taught About World War II
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/The-Bad-War-The-Truth-NEVER-Taught-About-World-War-II.pdf

[18] Bernays and Propaganda — Part 2 of 5 — The Marketing of War
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/1582/

[19] The Anger Campaign Against China
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/3238/

[20] US has been getting ‘its ass handed to it’ in war games simulating fights against Russia and China
https://www.sott.net/article/408943-US-has-been-getting-its-ass-handed-to-it-in-war-games-simulating-fights-against-Russia-and-China

[21] The US military ‘gets its ass handed to it’ in World War 3 simulation – researchers
https://www.rt.com/usa/453550-us-loses-world-war-three/

[22] US gets its ass handed to it
https://breakingdefense.com/2019/03/us-gets-its-ass-handed-to-it-in-wargames-heres-a-24-billion-fix/

[23] The US admiral admitted that he had suffered a fiasco in the simulated war, but had ulterior motives behind it
https://static.nfapp.southcn.com/content/202107/30/c5582275.html

[24] The US military ‘gets its ass handed to it’ in World War 3 simulation – researchers
https://www.rt.com/usa/453550-us-loses-world-war-three/

[25] Hegseth’s Speech to Generals and Admirals
https://www.airandspaceforces.com/read-hegseth-speech-generals-admirals/

[26] The U.S. Secretary of Defense severely criticized the generals for being “obese and ugly” and lacking professionalism: resign if they are unhappy
https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20250930004869-260408?ctrack=pc_main_headl_p07&chdtv

[27] Trump says he’ll fire generals “on the spot” if he dislikes them
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/trump-threatens-to-fire-top-military-leaders-on-the-spot-if-he-doesn-t-like-them/ar-AA1Oav24

[28] Hegseth rebuked the “fat troops” and announced the end of the “awakening” militaryOctober 1, 2025
https://amazonweb1.ejfq.com/%e4%bf%a1%e5%a0%b1-%e5%8d%b3%e6%99%82%e8%b2%a1%e8%a8%8a.htm?method=detail&cat_id=999&title_id=4210538

[29] Trump firing generals
https://www.axios.com/2025/09/30/trump-firing-generals-hegseth-quantico

[30] Donald Trump Addresses Military Leadership in Quantico, Virginia – September 30, 2025
https://rollcall.com/factbase/trump/transcript/donald-trump-speech-department-of-defense-leaders-quantico-september-30-2025/

[31] National Security Strategy of the United States of America, November 2025
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf

[32] 2025 National Security Strategy – Executive Summary
https://behorizon.org/2025-national-security-strategy/

[33] 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy – US Naval Institute
https://news.usni.org/2025/12/05/2025-u-s-national-security-strategy

[34] U.S. National Security Strategy 2025 Sparks Global Reaction as Policy Shifts Emerge
https://securitybriefing.com/news/u.s.-national-security-strategy-2025-sparks-global-reaction-as-policy-shifts-emerge

[35] The 2025 US National Security Strategy – At a Glance
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2025/779261/EPRS_ATA(2025)779261_EN.pdf

[36] China debate delayed Trump security strategy
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/12/03/china-debate-delayed-trump-security-strategy-00676095

[37] LAUNCHING THE GENESIS MISSION
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/11/launching-the-genesis-mission/

[38] “Project Genesis”: A national gamble to reshape science with AI
https://cloud.kepuchina.cn/newSearch/imgText?id=7393388448464592896

[39] Trump pressed the “Genesis” button: a national gamble to reshape science with AI
https://www.thepaper.cn/newsdetail_forward_32053818

[40] Trump is in a hurry and launches a new “Manhattan Project”: the whole country is working on AGI!
https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_32016006

[41] 24 tech giants join the U.S. “Genesis Project” to promote AI to accelerate scientific discovery
https://wap.seccw.com/Document/detail/id/39660.html

[42] The “Genesis Plan” of American AI has been finalized! 24 giants such as Google and Nvidia were shortlisted
https://news.qq.com/rain/a/20251219A049WN00?

[43] OpenAI, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft and 19 other companies join Trump’s Genesis Mission
https://www.cryptopolitan.com/tech-giants-join-trumps-ai-genesis-mission/

[44] The “Genesis Plan” of American AI has been finalized! 24 giants such as Google and Nvidia were shortlisted
https://news.qq.com/rain/a/20251219A049WN00?suid=&media_id=

[45] White House: 24 giants including Microsoft and Nvidia join the AI “Genesis Project”
https://www.seccw.com/Document/detail/id/39720.html

[46] U.S. Watch|Artificial intelligence military security risk challenges and their management under the U.S. AI Action Plan
https://fddi.fudan.edu.cn/5a/ba/c21253a744122/page.htm

[47] Artificial intelligence military security risk challenges and their management under the U.S. AI Action Plan
https://fddi.fudan.edu.cn/5a/ba/c21253a744122/page.htm

[48] Trump is in a hurry and launches a new “Manhattan Project”: the whole country is working on AGI!
https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_32016006

*

This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.

 

Other Works by this Author

 

ESSAYS ON CHINA  Volume One

ESSAYS ON CHINA Volume 2

ESSAYS ON CHINA Volume Three 

Who Starts All The Wars? — New!

What we Are Not Told :  German POWs in America – What Happened to Them?

The Richest Man in the World

Debunking Elon Musk – Volume One  — New!

The Power Behind the Throne

The Jewish Hasbara in All its Glory

PROPAGANDA and THE MEDIA 

BERNAYS AND PROPAGANDA 

Democracy – The Most Dangerous Religion

NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 1 — How the US Became Rich 

NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 2 — Life in a Failed State

NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 3 — The Branding of America

Police State America Volume One

Police State America Volume Two

Essays on America

FILLING THE VOID

BIOLOGICAL WARFARE IN ACTION

THE WORLD OF BIOLOGICAL WARFARE

False Flags and Conspiracy Theories

Kamila Valieva

 

 

LARRY ROMANOFF FREE E-BOOKS & PDF ARTICLES

 

 Copyright © Larry Romanoff, Blue Moon of Shanghai, Moon of Shanghai, 2026