FR — LARRY ROMANOFF — La tentative de coup d’État fasciste juif de 1933 en Amérique

La tentative de coup d'État fasciste juif de 1933 en Amérique

Par Larry Romanoff• 5 février 2023

 

 ENGLISH   FRENCH

 

RO — LARRY ROMANOFF — Evreii erau foarte ocupati in anii 1930

 

Evreii erau foarte ocupati in anii 1930

De Larry Romanoff, February 04, 2023

Traducerea: CD

ENGLISH   PORTUGUESE   ROMANIAN

Acest eseu este un exercițiu de conectare a punctelor de reunire a evenimentelor aparent disparate, care sunt de fapt conectate într-un mod semnificativ, realizat în încercarea de a oferi cititorilor posibilitatea de a plasa evenimentele lumii în context și de a obține o imagine coerentă întreagă din elementele aparent separate. Conținutul acestui eseu este următorul:

PT — LARRY ROMANOFF — Os Judeus Estavam Ocupados na Década de 1930

 

Os Judeus Estavam Ocupados na Década de 1930

Por Larry Romanoff, February 04, 2023

 

ENGLISH   PORTUGUESE

 

Este ensaio é um exercício de ligação de pontos, de reunião de acontecimentos aparentemente distintos, que, de facto, estão relacionados de alguma forma significativa, feito numa tentativa de dar aos leitores uma oportunidade de colocar as conjunturas mundiais num contexto e ter toda uma imagem coerente que se manifesta daqueles elementos supostamente separados. Os conteúdos deste ensaio são os seguintes:

EN — LARRY ROMANOFF — The Attempted 1933 Jewish Fascist Coup in America

 

The Attempted 1933 Jewish Fascist Coup in America

By Larry Romanoff, February 04, 2023

 

 

EN — LARRY ROMANOFF — God Save the Queen. Or, Maybe not — January 14, 2022

God Save the Queen. Or, Maybe not

 

By Larry Romanoff for PRAVDA, January 14, 2022

Westerners seem to hold a fondness for monarchies; pleasant remembrances of times past, the pleasures of the "court", colloquial recollections of quaint beheadings and the capriciousness of rulings, and envious mention of the 'King's prerogative' on a wedding night. Altogether a generally uncritical recollection.

We tend to think of the British monarchy today, or possibly the smaller incarnations existing in Monaco, the Netherlands or Belgium, rulers who tend now to be not only civilised but also marginalised. But monarchies were not always thus, and rather too many disappeared in the smoke of revolutions because entire populations revolted against the frequent and unpredictable brutality of the rulers, the callous and cynical lack of concern for the populace, and general bad management.

Monarchies and Dictatorships

 

Monarchies and dictatorships are functionally very similar, differing primarily in the method of succession planning, both being a form of government where one person holds absolute power, the exercise of which was not always predictable. Both Monarchies and dictatorships tended to pass power to the next relative in line. The primary difference between the two is that monarchies often claimed a 'divine right' to rule, having been conveniently selected by God, whereas a dictator, sadly but still unashamedly, passed power onto his son. But the only real difference, certainly in the public imagination, is that dictators just didn't have the class of monarchs. There truly is something special about these hard-to-get divine appointments.

 

But our recollections are little more than us having what we might call a convenient and selective memory. We recall what we choose. For downright brutal inhumanity, monarchies have never had much to be proud of. King Leopold of Belgium killed 10-15 million people without hesitation. A Transylvanian prince, eager to explain something to his subjects in a way they could understand, had his soldiers gather 20,000 subjects and chop one arm and one leg off each one. Monarchies were equally as inhuman as were the worst of dictators, and the British were arguably the worst of the lot.

 

The British Royal Family